Displaying reports 63121-63140 of 85662.Go to page Start 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 3160 3161 End
Reports until 00:39, Friday 06 November 2015
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:39, Friday 06 November 2015 (23151)
Ops Owl Beginning Shift Summary
TITLE: 11/06 [OWL Shift]: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC
STATE Of H1: Observing @ ~ 81 MPc.
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Cheryl
QUICK SUMMARY: From the cameras the lights are off in the LVEA, PSL enclosure, end X, end Y and mid X. I can not tell if they are off at mid Y.
Seismic in 0.03 - 0.1 Hz band is between .007 and .03 um/s. Seismic in 0.1 - 0.3 Hz band is between 0.08 and 0.3 um/s. Winds are less than ~ 5 mph.
ISI blend filters are on Quite_90.
H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:55, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23152)
Ops Eve Summary

Title: Ops Eve Shift Summary, 00:00UTC to 08:00UTC1(6:00PT to 23:59PT), all times UTC

 

State of H1: locked in Observe 12+ ours, Range is 81Mpc

 

Incoming Operator: Patrick

 

Shift Summary: quiet evening with good range

 

Shift Activities:

- 00:07:01UTC ETMY saturation

- 00:09:00UTC, Kyle called and reported that he and Gerardo were back from x28 port 

- 01:08:23UTC ETMY saturation

- 01:08:26UTC ETMY saturation

- around 01:21UTC, earthquake arrived

Time: Fri Nov 06 01:09:55 UTC 2015

Location: 87km SSW of Nikolski, Alaska; LAT: 52.3, LON: -169.5

Magnitude: 5.5

- 03:57:03UTC ETMY saturation

- 04:19:40UTC ETMY saturation

- 04:40:56UTC ETMY saturation

H1 General
peter.shawhan@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:51, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23148)
GWIstat restarts
Cheryl emailed me to say that the durations shown by GWIstat were incorrect.  I looked and it turns out that GWIstat (and also gwsnap) got restarted by Condor a few times today, for reasons which are not yet clear.  Each time it restarts, the duration counters for LHO and LLO get reset to zero, since the program doesn't currently have a way to look back in time to set the duration properly.  But I have added a little code to add a greater-than sign on the duration when the program restarts, until the status changes, so at least there will be a visual indicator that the duration shown is just a lower bound.
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:46, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23147)
Optical gain comparisons

[JeffK, Jenne]

More thought required, but here is a plot overlaying the power recycling gain as measured by PD DC powers, and the optical gain as measured by the calibration lines.  Both of them are normalized, so that we are looking at percent changes rather than absolute values.  The calibration line data is taken from Sudarshan's aLog 22908.

Non-image files attached to this report
LHO FMCS
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:40, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23145)
END Y temperature run away

I noticed that the End station temperature had just started to climb rapidly so I checked out the chilled water system and found CWP1 tripped off. Since this pump tripped earlier in the week with no obvious reason I elected to start the alternate pump CWP2. The VEA temperature is returning.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:03, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23144)
Updated beam spot positions

Marie at LLO has finalized the calibration / conversion from the A2L gain to actual beam spot position, and posted the LLO results at aLog 22426.  I have downloaded the updated code, and redone the plots of LHO results, and it's still clear that our beam positions change very little lock-to-lock.

Again, the color of the spot indicates the length of time since the power-up:  blue is a cold IFO, and more pink is a warmer IFO.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23143)
Shift Summary - Evening

TITLE:    Nov 5 DAY Shift 16:00-23:00UTC (08:00-04:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC

STATE Of H1: Observing

SUPPORT: N/A

LOCK DURATION: Entire shift

INCOMING OPERATOR: Cheryl

END-OF-SHIFT SUMMARY: IFO locked the entire shift.(currently 74.1Mpc) The winds picked up to over 20mph twice but for short periods. GraceDB Ext Not system continues its vener ending pass/fail cycle. Sei and µSei remain the same. Handing off to Cheryl.  

ACTIVITY LOG:

16:30 Chris called to inform me that he would be heading out to do  the aluminium stripping on the X arm

17:07 Joe out to join Chris on the Xarm

17:10 Karen into CS mechanical room to swiffer

17:15 Increase in EQ band x-axis to .1µm/s due to a pair of earthquakes around New Guinea and Timor

17:30 Winds increasing to ≤20mph

18:17 Joe back temporarily to get necessaries then heading back out. Chris is back and out to an appointment

19:57 Joe back from x-arm, for now.

21:00 X-arm crew back out to work

21:34  Noticed a slight downward trend in range starting about 2 hours ago. µSeism is around .3 mocrons

21:38  Kyle asked about driving forklift from shipping and recieveing area of OSB to woodshop for loading a generator to bring to X-2-8. I recommended that he doesn’t do that at this time as we are in coincidental observing mode with Livingston. I will contact him if we should break lock.

21:44  Got the OK from Landry to move the green forklift from LSB for the abovementioned task.

21:48 John W informed me that they were fixing the FMCS computer and that I was going to get some errors and alarms. ie;   CS temperature is low (Nov 5 21:48:23 UTC)

22:59 Range is back up to 80Mpc

23:08  Joe reported back from X-arm. Chris will follow shortly.

23:30  Dave Barker will be going into the MSR to change tapes.

 

H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:00, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23140)
Mid-Shift Summary - DAY

MID-SHIFT SUMMARY:  Nothing big to report except for some ETMY glitches (usual). the wind picked up for a bit, around 20mph, but it’s starting to die down. Also, one GraceDB External Notification script failure and recovery as I’m writing this. (that I’ve noticed).

H1 CAL (CAL)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:22, Thursday 05 November 2015 - last comment - 13:47, Thursday 05 November 2015(23137)
LHO O1 Calibration Uncertainty
I have posted the latest LHO calibration uncertainty plots.

I have reduced our kappas' uncertainty to 1% in mag and 0.5 degrees in phase.  We are now limited by our measurements.

I believe that our "statistical uncertainty only" plots are underestimating error.

This is because the systematic error that remains in our measurements is ignored when we consider only the uncertainty bars.  
One way to combat this underestimation is to not fit our systematic to the final weighted mean of all our measurements, but instead fit to each of our measurements and take the std of our remaining systematic errors as our total systematic error.  This ought to fix the fact that I was ignoring remaining systematic errors in our "statistical uncertainty only" plots.

Plots 1-4 show nominal O1 model mag and phase uncertainty (the statistical uncertainty and systematic error summed in quadrature).  
Plots 5-8 show the systematic corrections model mag and phase uncertainty (statistical uncertainty only).  I believe these are currently underestimated.
Plot 9 is the comparison of the nominal O1 calibration response function to the systematic corrections model I make.  (The red line is the systematic correction model, the dashed lines are the associated uncertainty)

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 13:47, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23142)
Several follow up comments:
- On describing I would say it differently, plots 1-4,
    (1) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Magnitude.pdf
    (2) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Phase.pdf
    (3) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Squared_Magnitude_Components.pdf
    (4) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Squared_Phase_Components.pdf
are not the "nominal" uncertainty. These are the uncertainty if we incorrectly add systematic errors with statistical uncertainty in quadrature (i.e. implying we don't know the sign of systematic error and/or that they don't affect the mean of the Gaussian distribution, which we do and we know does). The reason we show these is to show how the uncertainty has traditionally been quoted, given the level of sophistication search algorithms had been able to handle. It's also much each to make a "single number" statement from this curve, which is what most people want so they can discuss the uncertainty colloquially.
 
Now that parameter estimation groups are interested in greater detail (i.e. have asked questions like "what do you *really* mean by '10%'??"), and we have solid handles on some of our systematic errors, we can offer an alternative display of the statistical uncertainty ONLY, namely plots 5-8,
    (5) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Magnitude_Systematics.pdf
    (6) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Phase_Systematics.pdf
    (7) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Squared_Magnitude_Components_Systematics.pdf
    (8) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Squared_Phase_Components_Systematics.pdf
and then display the resulting affect on the mean in plot 9,
    (9) 05-Nov-2015_Strain_Uncertainty_Systematics_vs_Nominal_Residuals.pdf
Black solid shows a zero mean error on the response function, with statistical uncertainty and systematic error incorrectly added in quadrature, shown in black dashed. Red solid shows the mean, corrected by the systematic errors, with the correct statistical uncertainty surrounding it.


- The f > 1 [kHz] statistical uncertainty is more ill-defined than reported. We simply don't have the measurements up there to confirm such small precision, so Craig, for the time being, has merely cut off the uncertainty at the last frequency sweep's data point (~900 [Hz]) and used that as the default value out to the limit of the frequency range. As such, the uncertainty appears to be limited by the 1% / 0.5 [deg] statistical uncertainty of the calibration lines, translated from lower-frequency (~330 [Hz]) because that's we scale of the overall optical gain in the sensing function. While we don't expect the uncertainty to be much larger at high frequency, we simply don't have any quantitative upper bound. Nor do we have any idea what kind of systematics dragons tharr be. As such, I suggest we continue take the f > 1 [kHz] uncertainty with a grain of salt.

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:38, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23135)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Wednesday 4th November 2015

O1 day 48

model restarts logged for Wed 04/Nov/2015
2015_11_04 11:16 h1nds1

Unexpected restart of nds1, maybe due to overloading and/or testpoint activity.

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:07, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23134)
Shift Summary
TITLE: 11/04 Owl: 8:00-16:00 UTC 
STATE Of H1: Observing @ ~80 MPc.
SHIFT SUMMARY:It ended well... 
SUPPORT:
ACTIVITY LOG:

H1 was locked when I came in. Lost lock about 11:00 UTC. Flashes weren't great during DRMI, so after 15 minutes of waiting for DRMI, then another 15 minutes of PRMI, all with low or no flashing, I did an initial alignment. After that DRMI was still rough. 

Back to observing at 14:00.

15:00 LLO called to say they were doing some environmental measurements, but not going out of low noise for a while.
H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:06, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23133)
Shift Summary -Day Transition

TITLE: Nov 5 DAY Shift 16:00-23:00UTC (08:00-04:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC

STATE Of H1: Observing

OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jim

QUICK SUMMARY: IFO is in Observing @ ~78.2Mpc. Eq sei bands are all in the .23micron range. µSei is around .2µ. Wind is <10mph. All light appear to be off in E, M, CS & PSL. CW injections are running. Cal lines are running. Livingston is up and running. Quite 90 blends being used.

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:12, Thursday 05 November 2015 - last comment - 16:08, Friday 06 November 2015(23132)
Mid shift summary

Lost lock about 2 hours ago, not sure why. Trying to relock now, but DRMI is not cooperating. Otherwise, things are quiet. Winds down, useism is down. RF45 has not been awful.

Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:08, Friday 06 November 2015 (23165)

Not sure what the cause of the power drift / alignment drift was, but it looks like we may have lost lock when the power recycling gain dropped below 33.5-ish.  See aLog 23164 for some plots and details.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23130)
Ops Eve End Shift Summary
TITLE: 11/04 [EVE Shift]: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC
STATE Of H1: Observing @ ~80 MPc.
SHIFT SUMMARY: Rode through magnitude 5.2 earthquake in Russia. Taken out of observing for 20 minutes to offload SR3 M2 to M1. RF45 noise has not reappeared. No major change in wind or seismic.
SUPPORT: Jenne
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jim

ACTIVITY LOG:

Lost lock twice on DRMI split mode.
00:28 UTC Evan and Keita to LVEA to check on RF45 noise.
00:29 UTC Caught lock on split mode. Moved BS in pitch from 164.84 to 165.32 to lock DRMI on 1f.
00:34 UTC Lock loss on CARM_5PM
00:51 UTC Lock loss on PARK_ALS_VCO
00:57 UTC Lock loss on CARM_ON_TR
01:01 UTC Keita and Evan done
01:31 UTC Observing
07:21 UTC Out of observing to offload SR3 M2 to M1
07:41 UTC Observing
H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:42, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23129)
Observing
Jenne finished offloading SR3 M2 to M1.

Intention Bit: Commissioning (Nov 5 07:21:59 UTC)
Intention Bit: Undisturbed (Nov 5 07:40:52 UTC)
H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:27, Wednesday 04 November 2015 - last comment - 01:00, Thursday 05 November 2015(23128)
Out of Observing
Jenne, Patrick

Happened to notice that a bit on the ODC mini overview on nuc1 was red. Traced it to a DAC overflow on SR3 M2. Jenne trended it back. It looks like it started about 2 hours ago. The signal originates from the guardian cage servo. We have taken the IFO out of commissioning to manually offload it to M1.
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 01:00, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23131)

The SR3 cage servo hit its limit, and started going crazy.  This wouldn't have caused (and didn't cause) an immediate lockloss, but probably would have caused one eventually, after SR3 drifted far enough that the other ASC loops ran out of range. 

As a reminder, the "cage servo" puts an offset into the M2 stage of SR2, such that the OSEM witness sensors on the M3 stage are kept at a constant pitch value.  There is no offloading of this offset to M1, and we just ran out of range on the M2 actuators. 

In the attached plot, the offset that we send to the M2 actuator is the "TEST_P_OUTPUT", which is multiplied by 8.3 and then sent to the M2 coils.  This factor of 8.3 in the Euler-to-OSEM matrix means that if the Test_P output is above 15,600, we'll saturate the DAC output.  You can see that about when the output hits 15,000 the SR3_M3_WIT starts to drift away from the 922 setpoint, and the Test_P_OUTPUT starts going crazy since it thinks it needs to keep pushing harder, since the witness is below 922. 

While I don't think the data is compromised, we did take the IFO out of Observing mode while I manually offloaded the pitch actuation to the M1 stage.  I moved the M1_OPTICALIGN_P_OFFSET by about 3 urad, and that brought the cage servo offset back to near zero.  The SRC1 and SRC2 ASC loops reacted to this, but I did the offloading slowly enough that we didn't have any problems. 

I have added a notification to the SR3 cage servo guardian to put up a message if the TEST_P_OUTPUT gets above 10,000 counts, so there's plenty of time (days) to offload the SR3 alignment before we run into this problem again.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:56, Monday 26 October 2015 - last comment - 12:48, Thursday 05 November 2015(22847)
Third order violin modes look OK

In light of the violin mode stuff over the weekend, I wanted to make sure we aren't going to be caught unawares by other harmonics ringing up.

We have paid considerable attention to damping the fundamentals and second harmonics of the violin modes, but in general we leave the higher harmonics undamped. (We have had some isolated cases in which we have had to temporarily apply damping to high harmonics; see, e.g., LHO#18599).

I checked the heights of the third harmonics during the first long lock (25 hours long) that we had after the power outage. I chunked the DCPD sum timeseries into 1000 s segments and then took ASDs of each. To identify the violin modes, I simply looked for peaks in the DCPD spectrum that were higher than some threshold above the noise (in this case, the noise floor is about 1×10−7 mA/Hz1/2, and the threshold I chose was 5×10−6 mA/Hz1/2). This resulted in 25 peaks being identified. For each ASD, I integrated under each peak to get an rms mode amplitude. Since the violin modes are anharmonic, I believe that these peaks (which range in frequency from 1456.18 Hz to 1484.67 Hz) are truly third harmonics, rather than upconverted first harmonics (which range from 498 to 509 Hz, and hence we would expect upconversion to appear from 1496 to 1527 Hz).

All 25 peaks appear to be ringing down, with time constants on the order of 2×105 s (≈50 hours). I fitted each ringdown to an exponential, which resulted in Qs ranging from 0.55×109 to 1.28×109. [For similar results on lower-order mode Qs, see, e.g., Keiko's measurements on L1 IY.]

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 17:02, Monday 26 October 2015 (22855)

Similarly, we don't have any damping on the second harmonics of the ITM violin modes. Here, we see 16 modes, and all of them ring down, with Qs ranging from 0.72×109 to 1.43×109.

For a discussion on the behavior of some of the ETM second harmonics after the power outage, refer to Nutsinee's alog.

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 12:48, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23141)

For fourth and fifth harmonics, there are fewer traces which show clear ringdown; many appear to be complete garbage. Not clear why.

Anyway, for the fourth harmonics, Qs range from 0.6–1.1×109, and for the fifth harmonics, Qs range from 0.6–0.9×109.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:28, Thursday 01 October 2015 - last comment - 09:46, Thursday 05 November 2015(22174)
HXTX MEDM channel typo

Today, I discovered that on all of the HXTX Aux Ch screens (SUS_CUST_HXTX_MONITOR_OVERVIEW.adl) each of the M3 stage indicator lights are COPY/PASTEs of the M2 ones.  The channel values are all reading the appropriate channels, but the visual is incorrect for M3.  See attached.

Need to fix...

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 09:46, Thursday 05 November 2015 (23136)

Disregarding my "HXTX" references above which should read "HXTS", I've fixed the error in the screen and committed it to SVN.

Screen address:

/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/hxts/SUS_CUST_HXTS_MONITOR_OVERVIEW.adl

Displaying reports 63121-63140 of 85662.Go to page Start 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 3160 3161 End