We have finished generating and fine-tuning the filters we will use for the recalibration of ER8/O1 data. The filters are generated using the LHO DARMmodel:
H1DARMOLGTFmodel_O1.m
with paramsters file H1DARMparams_1125963332 from SVN r1616 in the calibration SVN (aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Scripts/DARMOLGTFs)
The filters file to be used for recalibration is located in the calibraiton SVN under aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/GDSFilters:
H1DCS_1128173232.npz
The TST actuation filter was generated using
par.A.getFreqResp_TST(f)
The PUM/UIM actuation filter was generating using
par.A.getFreqResp_USUM(f)
The sensing filter was generated using
par.C.getFreqResp_total(f)
In addition, we have filters to dewhiten (IFO):CAL-DARM_ERR_WHITEN_OUT_DQ and (IFO):CAL-DARM_CTRL_WHITEN_OUT_DQ. The whitening schemes for these filters can be found in DCC T1500463. The dewhitening filters are made by switching the poles and zeroes and adjusting the gain appropriately.
The filters file also contains reference values of the calibration model needed for the computation of the time-varying calibration factors (kappa's). These reference values are obtained from EPICS records in online mode, but since the EPICS records are not accurate for the entire time we are recalibrating, the reference values will instead be read from the filters file for recalibration.
Attached are plots that compare the frequency response of the FIR filters for TST actuaiton, PUM/UIM actuation, and inverse sensing to their respective frequency domain models, obtained as described above.
I have also attached a plot that compares the output of the online GDS-CALB_STRAIN channel to the output of DARM_ERR and DARM_CTRL calibrated using these FIR filters. The two agree to better than 1% in magnitude and 1 degree in phase.
TITLE: 10/6 [EVE Shift]: 23:00-07:00UTC (16:00-00:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC"
STATE Of H1: Observing at 79 Mpc. The range has been slowly increasing since the lock was acquired an hour ago.
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ed
QUICK SUMMARY: We finally locked and Observed for the first time in 8 hours. Clean DMT Omega in the past hour. Wind below 5 mph. Nominal seismic activity in the earthquake band. Terramon reported a 3.9M earthquake off the coast of Oregon that should have arrived 17:33 UTC and dropped us out of lock. We seem to have ridden through it just fine.
Jonathan, Dave
we initially intended to run the new code on h1fescript0 (Ubuntu 12), but this ran into errors this morning. To run a long term test overnight on H1 we are running a gentoo version on h1build. This system is not monitoring Beckhoff, rather it monitors three weather station wind speeds (so we get continuously varying "setpoints"). This test has shown an interesting problem not seen on the DTS tests. Jonathan is investigating, we'll keep this running overnight.
The online GDS calibraiton filters were updated today to fix several bugs and add a few more corrections that were uncovered by the calibration group over the past week. The updates include the following changes:
1) Compensation for known IIR warping by Foton in the inverse sensing filter installed in the CALCS model. See DCC G1501013.
2) Fix bug in how digital response of AA/AI filters were called. (par.C.antialiasing.digital.response.ss -> par.C.antialiasing.digital.response.ssd andpar.A.antiimaging.digital.response.ss -> par.A.antiimaging.digital.response.ssd)
3) Additional compensation for OMCDCPD (par.C.omcdcpd.c).
The new filters were generated using
create_partial_td_filters_O1
checked into the calibration SVN under
aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/Common/MatlabTools/
H1GDS_1128173232.npz
under aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/GDSFilters/.
Attached are plots comparing the frequency response of the GDS FIR filters to the model frequency response.
There was a request to see how the inverse correction filters for the sensing chain were rolled off at high frequencies in these filters. This is done with a simple smooth roll-off above ~6500 Hz. I've attached plots that zoom in on the 5000-8192 Hz range to show how the rolloff causes the GDS filters to differ from the ideal inverse correction filters for the sensing chain.
Today we noticed that the EX beam diverter has been open since June 18th. We don't normally switch this so it is not guardian controlled but we "usually" leave it closed. It is beckhoff controlled so it is not monitored in SDF. Today TJ added all the beam diverters we don't normally change in guardian to SYS_DIAG to prevent this from happening again (it was already checking the others).
We have now locked with the beam diverter closed, and see that the QPD spectra look the same between EX and EY. (20418 and 21767 have some history.) The peak in DARM at 78 Hz is also not here. We will see if it stays gone, and check soon to see if the blinear coupling of ETMX ISI motion to DARM is gone with the beam diverter closed.
Spectra attached. The performances of the X and Y QPDs are now comparable.
Glad it was found. Attached are before/after spectra from good science times at 9UTC yesterday and today. The first two show the differences in the strain channel. The biggest feature removed is a nasty wide bump around 78Hz. The last three show the differences in the QPD signals. Very different. For detchar folks that might be wondering about what the beam diverter does, see the intro in T1100252.
Finally, the last three plots shows another difference I spotted. There is a nasty feature at 640Hz that is gone today. I'm not sure if this is associated with the diverter and will keep an eye on it.
Stan pointed out that a line around 1278Hz also disappeared. See spectrum below. The spectrogram of how this line varies is quite similar to the 640Hz line, and lo and behold 640*2 = 1280.
I still don't know if the 640 and 1278 are for sure from the diverter. If the diverter was switched off during lock, and I knew the exact time, I could tell. But I haven't been able to find the time or the diverter switch channel to read in my MEDM hunting, please advise.
Josh -
The beam diverter was closed in between lock stretches. Because it is mounted on the suspended TMS, moving the diverter moves the TMS, which requires realignment of the interferometer.
It was open through the lock stretch that ended ~14:00 UTC on 6 Oct 2015, and was closed before the beginning of the lock stretch that started ~00:30 UTC on 7 Oct 2015.
The beam diverter readback channels are:
H1:SYS-MOTION_X_BDIV_A_POSITION (similar for Y) 1 is closed.
Thanks Sheila and Jenne, the 78, 640, and 1278Hz stuff was all there at the end of the last lock when the X BDIV was zero (open). They were all gone on the first lock when X BDIV was 1 (closed).
Just to note, I got a chance to make a few excitations on ETMX ISI last night (WP5528 again) and it seems that there is still a bilinear coupling from ETMX ISI motion to DARM which is much larger than the linear coupling from ETMY ISI motion; that this coupling at 75 Hz hasn't changed much with the beam divereter closed; and that noise from this is not neglibigle in the DARM noise budget over a broad range of frequencies from about 50-90 Hz.
Taped signs on fume hood sashes stating the fume hoods were off for O1
I have placed an additional gige camera on the AS_Air path on ISCT6, in order to measure the gouy phase of the SRC. For reference the ISCT6 table layout is in D1201210.
Attached is a diagram of the modified table layout, and photos of the changes. I added two new components to the table. I placed a 50/50 BS after AS-BS1, so that half of the beam going to the AS-Air Gige camera is sent across the table to the new Gige camera. I am powering the new camera with the cable intended for the OMC Refl Gige camera, which is currently not being used. In the photos, Optic A is the additional beamsplitter. Camera C is the additional camera. Camera D is the OMC-Refl camera from which I borrowed the ethernet cable to run Camera C. Optic B is the beamsplitter AS-BS4, I adjusted this optic to keep the image on AS_Air gige centered.
Jim added the additional camera to the gige camera system. This camera is Cam_17 and can be accessed through the digital video cameras medm screen. If we want to use OMC_Refl, we can still switch the ethernet cable back to the OMC_REFL camera.
Because the power going to the AS_Air Gige camera has been dropped by 50%, we have doubled the exposure setting of this camera. (The AS_Air camera is used to visually assess Mich aligment during initial alignment.) The exposure of AS_Air is sett in the guardian, so I have modifed the ISC_LOCK guardian (lines 380 and 2644) and the ALIGN_IFO guardian (line 316) to set VID_CAM_18_EXP to double what it was previously (origional exposures were 1800 in DOWN state of ISC_LOCK, 18000 in CLOSE_BEAM_DIVERTERS in ISC_LOCK, and 80000 in MICH_SET in ALIGN_IFO.) We believe this is the only effect of adding the additional camera, and does not change the IFO configuration in full lock.
TITLE: Oct 6 DAY Shift 15:00-23:00UTC (08:00-04:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC
STATE Of H1: Aligning/Locking
LOCK DURATION: N/A
SUPPORT: Sheila, Jenne, TJ
INCOMING OPERATOR: Nutsinee
Activity log:
14:55 Safety Kleen is on site
14:57 Sheila performing scattered light noise hunting testing on EX WP#5528
14:58 Richard starting his temperature Beckhoff system room temperature sensor work. WP#5534
15:00 Jeff B running forklift WP#5506
15:08 Lockloss
15:12 Jody to begin executing WP#5537 upon completion of Jeff B’s work (#5506)
15:13 Ken out to EY for Solar Panel work WP#5493
15:15 Jim batch informed of DMT maintenance. EQ blrms, range, IR integrand. etc
15:19 Joe out to LVEA to check water, batteries. etc
15:22 Robert’s equipment is unloaded and he will begin PEM injections
15:24 Greg Mendell informed me of the start of the DMT update WP#5522
15:26 Joe turning on lights in LVEA
15:27 Kyle and Gerardo out to execute WP#5532. Informed me that new LN2 vendor will be arriving on site today.
15:30 Richard is turning on wireless in LVEA. WE NEED TO REMIND THE SWEEP TEAM TO TURN IT OFF.
15:35 Switched observatory mode to Corrective Maintenance
15:40 NORCO on site for LN2 delivery Y end
15:42 Vinnie into the electronics room to investigate two accelerometers.
15:46 Jody called to inform that forklift was loaded and they’re headed down X arm. WP#5537
15:49 Richard finished temp sensors in corner. He’s headed to EX
15:51 Sheila will be breaking the current lock. Betsy will do some charge measurements.
15:53 Hugh out to do weekly HEPI fluid checks at all out buildings and corner.
16:02 Christina called. Leaving EY headed to EX.
16:06 John W driving down to EY to meet LN2 driver.
16:08 Jason in to LDR to do regular weekly Watchdog reset .
16:15 Septic truck on site
16:19 Richard called to confirm operation of sensors at EY
16:23 Ellie and Miguel headed out to ISCT6 to execute WP#5540. (camera)
16:26 Gerardo back from EX to remove some vac equipment to take back to EX
16:30 Richard and Fil at EX for Ecat Temp sensor install/test
16:40 Second Norco truck on site to service CP2
16:42 Christina leaving EX. Returning to get mid station key.
17:01 Sheila is going to start the A2L script testing.
17:05 Vinnie to EX
17:06 Jodie and Jeff done at MX and headed to MY.
17:07 Kyle back from EX
17:07 Safety Kleen leaving site
17:08 John Back from EY
17:15 Richard and Fil are done.
17:28 Eliie and Miguel out of the LVEA for the moment. They plan to return.
17:30 Fil out to Biergarten to label TCS racks.
17:37 Christina leaving MX and heading to MY
17:48 Ellie and Miguel back out to ISCT6. Misaligned SRM, PRM and ITMX for single beam
17:55 Jody called. They’re done at the Mid stations. They’re going to park the forklift by the LSB.
17:57 Richard down to EY to join Ken.
18:03 Ace finished on Y arm and heading down X arm
18:04 Bubba moving something with a forklift from LSB to OSB.
18:05 Vinnie called to let me know that he’s at EY.
18:14 Jody and Jeff out to LVEA to pull temperature data from 3IFO containers
18:19 Hugh to end stations for photos
18:20 Christina and Karen into LVEA for cleaning
18:23 EY LN2 truck leaving
18:26 Evan out to LVEA to look at ISC racks by the PSL
18:29 Evan back
18:44 Ellie and Miguel out of LVEA
18:46 Ellie back out to put in a beam dump
18:47 Jody and Jeff are out of the LVEA
18:48 Carlos done for the day
18:52 Ellie out
18:54 Landry into LVEA for photos
19:06 Richard out to LVEA to turn wireless router off and turn off power distribution cart by output arm.
19:15 Gerardo called from EX (phone showed MY). Pumpe replaced but auc cart neds to stay running for another hour to hour/half
19:30 Kyle leaving Xarm and travelling to EY to check something
19:31 Vinnie back from EY
19:38 Robert and Vinnie ou to EY to position a magnetometer
19:57 LVEA sweep team headed out to the LVEA
20:01 Science mode (after locking) will be hindered by an aux pump still running at EX, Dave and Jonathan doing computer work and an SDF change that’s going to happen due to PEM work at EY to investigate glitching. THe latter will require a work permit that will remain open as the present work will be a temporary fix.
20:18 Ellie is still in the LVEA for Fine Aligning of ISCT6 LVEA sweep will be final upon her exit. Wireless Router was turned back on for her use.
20:35 Dither align script has been renamed from what the wiki page says “ ./dither_align.py” to “./ditherAlign.py”
20:35 Begin initial alignment
22:25 Jeff B into the optics lab
22:33 Jeff B out of the optics lab
23:00 Still struggling to re-lock. Handing off to Nutsinee
Shift Summary: See Activity Log
The PSL Diode was showing a low water alarm this afternoon. I added about a quart, and cleared the alarm.
Two accelerometers in the corner station have been showing unusual looking spectra. During maintenance today I moved them to different endevco channels to see if that was the problem, and it their resulting spectra would suggest that it is.
H1:PEM-CS_ACC_LVEAFLOOR_BS_Z showed excess low frequency noise in its spectra. When switched to a different endevco channel the noise was noticeably lower below ~6-7 Hz. Both images are attached to this post.
H1:PEM-CS_ACC_LVEAFLOOR_HAM1_Z also showed an unusual spectrum. When ran through a different endevco channel the overall noise level changed by a factor of ~10. Two images of these spectra are attached as well.
Added 250ml water to the TSC-Y chiller. This is the second time I've added water to this chiller. The TCS-X chiller water level was fine.
(Kyle, Gerardo)
Removed and replaced the AIP for BSC5.
Pump had failed early last week.
Attached are the September temperature and relative humidity plots for the SUS and 3IFO controlled environment storage boxes. All RH data is good. There were a couple of temperature spikes on DB1 and DB4 but no issues with humidity.
I have powered down DB2 and DB3, which are currently unused.
Richard et al hooked up the missing temperature probes in the electroncis rooms. Attached is the new medm screen.
Channel names
H1:PEM-C_MSR_RACK1_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-C_MSR_RACK2_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-C_CER_RACK1_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-C_SUP_RACK1_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-X_EBAY_RACK1_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-X_EBAY_RACK2_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-Y_EBAY_RACK1_TEMPERATURE
H1:PEM-Y_EBAY_RACK2_TEMPERATURE
In the corner station electronics room the sensors are located: CER_RACK1 below the mezzanine above space in front of ISC racks. SUP_RACK1 above mezzanine center of the wall just below one of the air handlers. In the end stations Rack1 is above the electronics racks mounted to the bottom of the cable tray Rack2 is above the DC power supply racks mounted to the bottom of the cable tray In the MSR Rack1 is above Rack 2 Rack2 is above rack 11 EndX input module has a problem. The disconnected probe did not read the same value as the others and now that the RTDs are connected the signal is glitching. To fix this will require opening the box and replacing the module. This will take down the entire EX beckhoff system as this is the main link to the corner
Betsy, TJ
Walked through and followed the checklist as closely as we could. There is still a power distribution box on near ISCT6 that seems to be plugged into many differenet things. Last week this was deemed OK for the time being so we left it as is. There are many cables still hanging from racks not plugged into anything. These will need to be cleaned up in a future Maintenance Day.
Lights are OFF
Monitors/Work Stations OFF
Wifi OFF
Phones disconnected and batteries taken out of handsets
Cranes in "parking spots"
Cleanrooms OFF
ISC table fans OFF
Forklifts are not charging
I have been somewhat curious about how our power recycling cavity's optical gain changes throughout a lock stretch. This is a somewhat different analysis to Sheila's from aLog 21073, where she looked at what optical gain we first lock at.
My first attachment shows the power recycling gain for both Hanford and Livingston for the first ~21 days of O1. Hanford is green xs, Livingston is blue dots. For Hanford, I estimate the PRC gain by multiplying the Yarm transmission by the PRM transmission. For Livingston, I estimate the PRC gain by dividing the POP DC power by the power input to the IFO. Both of these methods assume that the signals I'm using are appropriately calibrated, but they're the same way that seems to be used at each respective site by others. So, while I don't guarantee the absolute values of the PRC gains in my plots, the trends are what I'm looking at. Note also that these are every lock stretch that gets as far as the power-up state, regardless of comissioning/observing intent.
I am only plotting the PRC gain at times when the IFOs have completed their respective power-up states (LHO = INCREASE_POWER, LLO = RF_LOCKED_AT_25W). I don't have much to say about this plot other than that overall, LHO seems to be a little more consistent at getting to the same PRC gain each lock.

Perhaps more illuminating are the following 2 plots (one per IFO), where I have lined up the maximum PRC gain from each lock stretch (t0 for each trace is the time where the maxima occurs. The start of the traces are the time when the state following the power-up state begins). There are 49 traces on the LHO plot, and 111 on the LLO plot, so I'm just trying to look at the general character of the traces, rather than pick any one particular trace out of each plot.
Here at LHO we have a large spike in the recycling gain right after we power up, then we settle out. At LLO, they seem to have a much smaller, more smooth hump before settling out, although the time constant seems to be roughly similar between both sites. At LLO (at least according to their guardian state names) they spend some time at 10W before going to full power, so that could be the reason for the difference in character.
