Dan, Kiwamu,

Some reports from last night and a little bit from today.

(Non stationary behavior of noise floor in 20-100 Hz)

Last night we worked more on the L2 actuation in order to see what noise are below the ESD DAC noise. The recycling gain was as high as 27 and we could smoothly fully lock the interferometer multiple times. After we worked on the OMC trans fluctuation issue (see Dan's report), we transitioned to ETMY from ETMX. The L1 and L2 stages of ETMY were used. As we saw last time (alog 17367), the DARM spectrum showed a non stationary behavior in 20-100 Hz frequency band when small bias and quadrant voltages (< 100 V) were requested. The noise floor was breathing up and down on a time scale of ~10 seconds. We varied the ESD bias voltage to see if there is a "sweet spot", but because of the non stationary noise floor, we were unable to find it. On the other hand, having +380 V on ETMX ESD consistently brought us back to the previous noise floor. So this agrees with the hypothesis that we were limited by the ESD DAC noise. A funny thing is that changing the ETMY ESD bias did not seem to make the noise floor better or worse -- even with +380 or -380 V on the ETMY bias did not bring the noise floor visibly high.

At one point we noticed that the noise floor seemed to be correlated with DHARD YAW -- when the DHARD YAW deviates from the operating point, the noise floor in DARM seemed to go up. So we newly engaged a boost (to suppress 100 mHz variation) in DHARD YAW which seemed to somewhat reduce the non stationary behavior. We need to investigate this issue a bit more.

Here are some time to look at:

• Undisturbed starts at Mar-21-2015 8:30:00 UTC (locked on DC readout with ETMY L1 and L2. ETMX was disabled. Zero DAC request counts on the quadrant and bias on both ETM ESDs. PSL at 10 W.)
• Undisturbed ends at Mat-21-2015 9:00:00 UTC (started messing around. Engaged a boost in DHARD YAW which seemed to somewhat reduce non stationary behavior in 20-100 Hz.)

I attach a DARM spectrum starting at Mar-21-2015 8:30:00 UTC.

(Unable to damp ITMX roll mode)

Today I happened to be in the control room and so started locking. The recycling gain was as low as 24 today even though I went through the initial alignment. After reaching full resonance with RF darm, the roll mode of ITMX at 13.81 Hz was found to be as high as 10^-12 m/sqrtHz in the DARM spectrum again (alog 17293). Initially I tried the same damping setting on ITMX, but I was unable to damp. Then I even tried the minus sign and +-60 deg phase rotators, but did not have a good luck. I wonder if this is related to the fact that the initial alignment today was far from optimum (i.e. low recycling gain).

I noticed that the X arm green PDH was not able to keep up with the longitudinal motion today. It kept unlocking every 5-10 seconds. I  am not sure if this is due to high wind today. The roof wind monitors read 20 mph on average and reached 40+ mph at highest in this after noon.

I switched the ISI-ETMX stage 1 back to low blend, 45 mHz in X direction (which is exactly opposite of what Sheila's instruction says in alog 16583) without the BRS correction. This apparently helped the PDH locking as it became able to stay locked.

We are still getting RFM IPC errors on the LSC and ASC receivers of end station ISC channels. To gather statistics, I am running  cron job on h1sysadmin0 which performs a DIAG_RESET on these models every minute to clear the latched IPC error. Currently the error rate is between 10 and 20 per hour.

model restarts logged for Mon 16/Mar/2015

no restarts reported

model restarts logged for Tue 17/Mar/2015
2015_03_17 05:42 h1fw0
2015_03_17 10:17 h1oaf
2015_03_17 11:39 h1pemcs
2015_03_17 11:55 h1lsc
2015_03_17 12:02 h1lsc
2015_03_17 12:06 h1dc0
2015_03_17 12:06 h1lsc
2015_03_17 12:08 h1broadcast0
2015_03_17 12:08 h1fw0
2015_03_17 12:08 h1fw1
2015_03_17 12:08 h1nds0
2015_03_17 12:08 h1nds1
2015_03_17 12:23 h1hpibs
2015_03_17 12:23 h1iopseib2
2015_03_17 12:23 h1isibs
2015_03_17 12:31 h1hpibs
2015_03_17 12:31 h1iopseib2
2015_03_17 12:31 h1isibs
2015_03_17 13:11 h1iopseib2
2015_03_17 13:11 h1iopseib3
2015_03_17 13:13 h1hpibs
2015_03_17 13:13 h1hpiitmx
2015_03_17 13:13 h1isibs
2015_03_17 13:13 h1isiitmx
2015_03_17 16:16 h1sushtts
2015_03_17 16:19 h1asc
2015_03_17 16:21 h1sushtts
2015_03_17 16:26 h1broadcast0
2015_03_17 16:26 h1dc0
2015_03_17 16:26 h1fw0
2015_03_17 16:26 h1fw1
2015_03_17 16:26 h1nds0
2015_03_17 16:26 h1nds1
2015_03_17 16:27 h1nds0

one unexpected restart, restarts of h1seib2,3 for unexpected timing error on h1seib2 chassis. Maintenance day, FE model changes with associated DAQ restarts.

model restarts logged for Wed 18/Mar/2015

no restarts reported

model restarts logged for Thu 19/Mar/2015

no restarts reported

model restarts logged for Fri 20/Mar/2015
2015_03_20 03:31 h1fw1

one unexpected restart.

Kiwamu, Dan

For a while now the OMC transmitted light has been flickering with an amplitude of ~20% of the full light level; this makes it look like the OMC is about to lose lock and generally puts everyone on edge.  The first image is a ten second trend of OMC-DCPD_SUM to give a sense of the size of the excursions.

The RIN is dominated by a broad plateau from 1-4Hz with an ampltiude of about 0.01 RIN / rt{Hz}. see the second plot attached.  Tonight we made some studies of this noise to pin down the source:

• The OMC TRANS intensity noise is much quieter when the OMC is locked to a single bounce beam, or to the 45MHz sidebands with the IFO fully locked.  (See the black trace in Fig. 2.)  So, the problem is not from the OMC LSC loop, and it's probably not from the DRMI.
• With the OMC locked on the carrier light, but DARM still on AS45_Q, the intensity noise is just as bad.  Compare the blue and green traces in Fig. 2.  This means that when DARM is handed off to DC, the intensity noise is not suppressed -- apparently this is from real DARM motion that is already being suppressed as much as the loop can manage in RF readout.  This appears to rule out AS port beam jitter that would couple to OMC TRANS but not AS45_Q.  Probably we could improve things with more DARM gain, but we'd prefer to fix whatever is moving.
• There's precious little coherence with anything.  The 3Hz peak is coherent with DHARD_Y and the ETMX_OPLEV_YAW.  There is a feature in the DHARD_Y plant inversion at 3Hz, and we thought maybe it was a little mis-tuned or tuned for lower power, but we measured the loop (Fig. 3) and it looks ok.  As a test we reduced the DHARD_Y loop gain by 6dB and the noise did not improve.  Anyways the 3Hz noise is just the tip of the iceberg.

One thing to do is run BRUCO and see what turns up in the 1-4Hz band.

Really slow day. Eeryone either on vacation or at the LVC conference.

LOTS of time to play with the IFO. Locking is an issue due to some spiking low frequencies. Kiwamu is working on it.

06:15 P King out to LVEA near PSL rack

07:00 Cris and Karen in to LVEA

07:26 P King out of LVEA

08:26 Corey to MidY

10:00 Corey back from MidY and into the LVEA

10:30 Jodi and Gary back from Mids

11:11 Andres out to W Bay to retrieve tools

11:17 Andres out of LVEA

11:50 for the last 30 minutes there has been multiple seismic trips and consequently, TMS wd trips. No one is at the end station.

12:24 EX Pump Diff Pressure alarm

15:00 Dust monitor 15(Beer Garden) keeps going off.

16:00 weekend time

Scott L. Ed P. Chris S.

The crew vacuumed all tube supports and sprayed water/bleach solution between X-1-6 double doors and single door towards X-1-7. We took dirty samples of the tube posted here and started cleaning, finishing 15 meters. 
All had appointments in the afternoon so only half day.
The new generator performed very well. 

In the past two or three days, Sheila, Dan and I have worked more on switching of the ETM actuators from the ESD to L2 stage with the goal of reducing the ESD DAC noise (see Evan's latest noise budget). Last night, I was again able to reduce the ESD biases all the way to zero by actuating on the ETMY L1 and L2 stages (see previous attempts in alog 17267). The DARM spectrum improved in 30-200 Hz band as expected, but only by a factor of ~ 1.7. Lock was not so stable (which seemed to be related to a peak at 12.52 Hz) and it stayed locked only less than 10 minutes. I was not able to test different bias voltages yet.

(DARM noise)

Here are two DARM spectra, one with the 380 volts ETMX ESD bias (in purple) and the other with zero bias voltage (in red). The ETMY ESD had zero DAC voltage in all the quadrants and bias all the time. As you can see, the noise floor went down in 30-200 Hz band with a slight increase at around 20 Hz. Also a peak at 12.5 Hz has been prominent in this week (for example, look at alog 17355) and it looks like this peak rings up every time before we lose lock. The peak usually becomes clearly visible in the DHARD signals in time series several seconds before the lock loss.

(Actuation Scheme)

We used to switch off the ETMX ESD and switch on the ETMY L2 stage while keeping the ETMX L1 stage active (see alog 17267) in the last week. This time, we tried a different scheme in which we actuate the L1 and L2 stages of ETMY and we do not actuate ETMX at all. In a sense, this is a transition of the ETM suspensions from X to Y. Before trying the transition, we measured the transfer function of the L1 and L2 stages at different times in order to check the cross over frequency. The attached below is the ratio of the two transfer functions (i.e. L1 / L2) together with a LSC DARM open loop, L1 and L2 transfer function models:

As shown in the plot, the measurement can be mostly explained by the model. However, according to the model, the phase at 1.8 Hz touches 180 degrees and thus unstable at this frequency. Unfortunately our measurement incidicated that the ratio of L1/L2 exceeds unity gain at around 1.6 Hz and I noticed that this would be a potential risk of unstable loop. Indeed, this configuration gave me unstable DARM which rang up at 1.6-ish Hz as expected when I tried transitioning to ETMY. I decided to insert a lead filter around this frequency. With the lead filter (a simple zero-pole pair at 0.3 and 1.5 Hz respectively), the L1/L2 transfer function should now look like the following:

This has two cross-over points, one at 0.45 Hz and 1.8 Hz with phase mergines of 57 and 43 degrees. I installed the lead filter in FM8 of SUS-ETMY_L1_LOCK_L. This allowed a repeatable transition. The transition process is also coded in the ISC LOCK guardian.

Slowly, over the past week, I have found a set of filter settings that damp the violin modes.  In the tables below I identify the mode frequencies that are matched to each test mass; the matching was done based on which lines were suppressed or excited using bandpass filters in the L2_DAMP filter banks for each test mass.  I also indicate which filter damps that particular line. 

The filter settings are given at the bottom of each table.  For all the L2_DAMP filter modules, FM1 is the bandpass filter (with +120dB gain in the pass band), FM2 and 3 are phase shifters (+/-60deg respectively), and FM4 is a 100dB gain.  FM1 and FM4 are always on.  FM2 and FM3 are used as indicated.  The gain settings are included in the Guardian - the filters shouldn't change in the locking process, but I haven't updated the safe.snap files for the suspensions!

The attached figure compares the noise spectrum from Friday and today.  The first harmonics of the violin modes are now the dominant feature in the spectrum, along with 60Hz and the 2.5kHz BS butterfly mode.

Scott L. Ed P. Chris S.

Cleaned the remaining 12 meters of tube to X-1-6 double doors. Results are posted here.
Relocated lights and equipment this afternoon.
New generator arrived this afternoon. John & I removed from shipping crate, added engine oil, hooked the up the battery and test fired the engine. It is ready to go tomorrow morning.

Only ETMy and ITMy ISI SDFs have anything 'DIFF.'  These are the Blends Jim is running alogged 17295.   Attached is the DIFFs at ITMY; the numbers at endy are the same.  We'll likely save these as nominal soon.  Either the BURT or PRESENT settings will work if the SHTF.

Karen and Cris in LVEA
08:16 Hugh setting SEI guardian nodes to 'Ready', charging HEPI accumulator
08:22 Gerardo to LVEA to look at pump carts by HAM1 and HAM2
08:26 Hugh and Gerardo back
08:36 Corey to squeezer bay
09:04 Gerardo turning on power supplies for annulus ion pumps at HAM1 and HAM2
09:39 Jodi and Gary to LVEA near HAM6 to tag boxes
09:41 Gerardo done
09:45 Jim B. to mechanical room mezzanine
09:56 Jim B. back
09:56 Andres to LVEA to look for beam splitter part in west bay
10:15 Andres done
10:18 Jodi and Gary done
11:22 Pepsi truck through gate
11:33 Gerardo to HAM1 and HAM2
11:40 Gerardo done
12:57 Tour in CR
13:01 Jodi and Gary to west bay
13:03 Andres in LVEA
13:09 Corey to squeezer bay
13:23 Jodi and Gary done
14:34 Cheryl to VPW
16:17 Cheryl in optics lab

Plots are found in SeiSVN: HEPI/H1/Common/2015-03-18_H1HPI_PumpControllerNoise.xml

The reference traces are from Monday 17 March 0900utc before the Tuesday Maintenance Accumulator Charging.  The current traces are 24 hours later after the charging effort (BSC2SupplyNorth not done.)

My assessment is this assessment is a bit too noisy and this didn't make much difference.  All the controller improvements have made things pretty good already.  The largest coherence was in the BS RZ which shows some broadband signal between 10 and 100mhz and that is reduced a good bit.  However, there are spikes of greater coherences in other dofs.  I would never say this is not worth doing.  Jeff may have some suggestions to better assess this is worhwhile.

I added the plots now.

Summary: The twin bumps at around 3300Hz comes from the OMC LSC loop, which has a 100Hz UGF.

Of course OMC length dither at 3300Hz should make some sidebands in the DC readout by design, but these twin bumps look really unnecessarily big.

We can reduce these by making the OMC length bandwidth much smaller.

Details:

In the attached, Red is with nominal setting (H1:OMC-LSC_SERVO_GAIN=60 and H1:OMC-LSC_OSC_CLKGAIN=6).

Blue is with 50% servo gain but with nominal dither amplitude (SERVO_GAIN=30, CLKGAIN=6), so it has half the open loop transfer function of red.

Green is is with nominal servo gain and 50% dither (SERVO_GAIN=60, CLKGAIN=3), so again it has half the OLTF of red.

IF the OMC length signal is sensing the true OMC length as opposed to just some noise that is not proportional to the dither amplitude, the OMC length control signal (middle row) for green and blue should be the same. But in reality they're 6dB apart from 8Hz and up.

Also you will expect that the OMC length error signal (bottom row) for blue and green have the same shape but different by 6dB, as the OLTF is the same but the sensing is 6dB different. That's only the case for f<8Hz.

So it's all noise for f>8Hz, and probably that's just  the noise floor of DC readout at 3300+-f Hz downcoverted by the demodulator (not dither) to f Hz, fed back to the OMC length, and upconverted by the dither back to 3300+-f. See the left column. Blue and green on the top left are the same because the sideband amplitude around 3300Hz produced by this mechanism is proportional to the product of the feed back gain and the upconversion gain (dither), the sensing part is independent of the dither amplitude.

In summary,

• OMC length signal is dominated by some noise, probably DC readout noise floor, not length fluctuation, from 8Hz and up.
• We can reduce the BW of the length control to maybe a few Hz to make the bump smaller and see if there's any ill effect on the DC signal.
• We can also filter out the feedback to make the width of the bumps smaller.

Later Dan will try some low BW filters.

(John W, Gerardo M)

Turned on the ion pumps at 9:05 am local time with both pump carts valved in, both pump carts were on the low 10^-06 torr

At 11:40 am I valved out the pump carts, but left the pump carts ON (connected to the annulus system and running).

Yeah :)

Jamie, Dave, Jim:

Jamie reported that the location of the MEDM Print selection, being at the top of the right-mouse pull-down menu, has resulted in many accidental printer jobs. This explains the printouts of things like the sitemap screen with no data content and no one picking the print-outs up.

Jim modified the LHO CDS MEDM this afternoon to move the print section from the top to second from the bottom of the pull down menu. Please see the attached before and after images.

During tomorrow's maintenance we will stop all old MEDMs in the control room so the new feature will be picked up. This is only a linux change, it was not applied to Mac OS.