Displaying reports 69461-69480 of 84478.Go to page Start 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 End
Reports until 08:59, Thursday 04 December 2014
LHO FMCS
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:59, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15437)
Well pump running normally
The well pump and water system is back up and running normally.
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:40, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15436)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Wednesday 3rd December 2014

model restarts logged for Wed 03/Dec/2014
2014_12_03 08:33 h1nds0
2014_12_03 09:38 h1dc0
2014_12_03 09:40 h1fw0
2014_12_03 09:40 h1fw1

2014_12_03 09:40 h1iscex
2014_12_03 09:40 h1nds0
2014_12_03 09:40 h1nds1
2014_12_03 09:41 h1broadcast0
2014_12_03 12:43 h1fw0

2014_12_03 13:32 h1iscex
2014_12_03 13:34 h1broadcast0
2014_12_03 13:34 h1dc0
2014_12_03 13:34 h1fw0
2014_12_03 13:34 h1fw1

2014_12_03 13:34 h1iscey
2014_12_03 13:34 h1nds0
2014_12_03 13:34 h1nds1

no unexpected restarts. Completion of minute trend offloading on fw0/nds0. Completion of code changes for end station ISC models (with associated daq restarts). Conlog frequently changing channels report attached.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:51, Wednesday 03 December 2014 - last comment - 19:19, Friday 05 December 2014(15432)
Y arm lossy ?

Dave O. Elli, Daniel, Kiwamu,

We briefly checked how lossy our arm cavities are by locking the individual arm without recycling.

For the X arm:

ASAIR_A_LF = 1180 cnts when unlocked.

ASAIR_A_LF = 1155 cnts when locked.

 

For the Y arm:

ASAIR_A_LF = 1180 cnts when unlocked.

ASAIR_A_LF = 970 cnts when locked.

 

We made a corase estimation of intra cavity loss (or a.k.a round trip loss) for the y arm, which is estimated to be about 750 ppm (!). In the calculation, we did not take a mode-mismatch or RF sidebands into accout. We need a closer look at this arm cavity to see why it is so lossy.

Comments related to this report
paul.fulda@LIGO.ORG - 09:28, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15439)

If beam mis-centering on the TMs is the cause of all the extra loss, it will have to be quite a big mis-centering. I did a quick calculation, and to get 750ppm loss at the ETM, the beam has to be offset from the center by about 6cm (roughly one beam size). The attached plots show the intensity spill over for a 62mm radius beam on a 163mm radius coating, with no offset and with a 6cm offset. The proportions of beam power outside the coating, with no offset and 6cm offset, are 0.991ppm and 762ppm respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - 15:38, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15448)

Just in case someone wants a plot ...

Images attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 19:19, Friday 05 December 2014 (15477)

Dave has a calculation which makes some assumptions about mode-mismatch and sideband power for the X arm.

Suppose the power in the sidebands is 6% of the incident beam, and 15% of the incident carrier doesn't enter the cavity because of mode matching issues; i.e., about 20% of the light is nonresonant. Then the equivalent power reflection is (1155 - 236) / (1180 - 236) = 0.974. This gives a loss of 108 ppm in the X arm.

H1 ISC
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:07, Wednesday 03 December 2014 - last comment - 05:30, Thursday 04 December 2014(15424)
CARM at 0pm, controlled by digital REFL9 I

Kiwamu, Sheila, Evan, Lisa, Daniel, Elli, Dave O., Dan, Alexa

 

On December 3rd 2014, 3:01 UTC we had the IR resonanting in all the cavities. MICH, PRCL, and SRCL were still on the 3f signals; DARM was on AS 45Q and CARM was on REFL 9 I at 0 pm. This is what we did:

 

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 21:47, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15426)

Here are the REFL and arm powers for a few values of the CARM offset (controlled via TR_REFL9, the digitized REFL9I error signal). These were taken with tdsavg and a 5 s average.

It appears that we are indeed sitting at a minimum of REFL LF and a maximum for the arm transmissions.

TR_REFL9 offset (ct) TRX QPD sum (ct) TRY QPD sum (ct) REFL LF (ct)
−1.5 78 87 53
−1.0 100 112 45
−0.5 118 134 39
0 129 146 36
+0.5 129 146 36
+1.0 119 134 39
+1.5 101 115 45
+2 80 90 51
+2.5 56 63 60
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 21:18, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15425)ISC
This is a trend of relevant signals during the locking sequence. 
We are running ASC loops with low bandwidth on BS, PRM and DHARD. 

The transition to REFL_9I happens at time = 600 sec. The relative increase in the power build up is only 15%.

Dan will post more precise numbers, but his first estimate is that we have a total of 280 mW at the AS port, 75% due to sideband power, 25% carrier.

POP_DC only increases by a factor of 3 when the carrier is resonant..it should be more like 10-20. 
Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 21:44, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15427)
Congratulations! Way to go.

Now let's chase that buildup..
albert.lazzarini@LIGO.ORG - 21:45, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15428)
Excellent!
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 22:10, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15429)

Here are the OLTFs taken at 0 pm CARM offset. The CARM loop has turned out kind of weird as it crosses unity, but it seems the phase bubble can support it. We might need to do some retuning.

Non-image files attached to this comment
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - 22:12, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15430)

We rung up the BS roll mode at 25.7 Hz

daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 22:26, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15431)

And we beheld, once again, the stars.

 

Here are some power calculations for the AS port and the TMS IR QPDs:

 

==== AS_C sum output (the channel that is used for the shutter logic) ====

quantum efficiency = 0.8, QPD transimpedance = 1000 ohms, sum output gets a factor of 1/4 from R23 (see D1001974)  -->  200 volts / watt on the QPD

OM1 transmission = 5%, M6 is 50/50 splitter (see T1200410)--> AS_C gets 2.5% of the light entering HAM6

AS_C sum output is 1.4V when locked at zero CARM offset:  1.4 V * (1/200) * (1/0.025) = 0.280 W into HAM6

 

==== Transmitted power through the arms ====

Using the IR QPDs on the transmission monitor tables, H1:ASC-X_TR_A_SUM_OUTPUT and similar, and assuming the same QPD transimpedance electronics.  (I am not sure of the calibration of the other PDs, like LSC-Y_TR_A_LF.)

These four channels currently have one stage of analog whitening and 18dB of gain --> 7.9x analog gain

Quantum efficiency = 0.8, QPD transimpedance = 1000 ohms, 2x from differential output, 32768 counts per 20V --> 2621440 counts per watt

On the TMS (see T0900385), M4 is 100% reflector for IR (assumed), M12 transmission is 5%, each QPD gets half of this signal --> TR QPDs get 2.5% of light leaving arm

The QPD signals were about 6000 counts (see attached).  6000 counts * (1/2621440) * (1/0.025) * (1/7.9) = 11.5mW leaving the ETMs

From the galaxy optics page the H1 ETMs have 3.6ppm transmission, this implies about 3.2kW in the arms.

 

The first figure attached is a striptool of the second lock of the evening; the second figure has trends of the TMS QPDs.

Images attached to this comment
peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 05:30, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15435)

That's great, congratulations. LLO had high arm losses (maybe not this high) at one point from poorly centered beams on the test masses; that would be something to check if you haven't already.

david.shoemaker@LIGO.ORG - 02:26, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15433)
Wonderful to see! and well-earned. Congratulations!
gabriela.gonzalez@LIGO.ORG - 04:22, Thursday 04 December 2014 (15434)
Great job, congratulations! 
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:05, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15422)
SR3 Damping filters engaged

This morning, after my failed attempt to engage the new LLO-imported filters on the SR3 damping loops, Evan managed to be successful.  Attached is spectra of the SR3 OPLEV PIT and YAW signals comparing the original state of the SR3 (LHO filters and gains, OL damping enabled) with engaging the filters.  Note, I increased the gain to compliment the LLO ones a few hours after we switched the filters and added new spectra.   It does not apear that the new loop filtering and gain are helping, but instead hindering.  Hmm...  I've since dropped the gains back to the original LHO values, and leave it to the commissioners to flip back the filters if they see fit.

Images attached to this report
LHO FMCS
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:52, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15420)
Well pump disabled
Today the fire protection water tank was filled which required the well pump to be switched over to a manual mode. After the tank was filled I was unable to switch the well pump back to the "auto mode" therefore I manually turned the well pump off. The domestic water tank is completely full and there should be sufficient water through the night. We will address this issue in the morning.
H1 AOS
daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15419)
RM1,2 lockin oscillators turned off

I was checking on the HTTS today and noticed that the lockin oscillators for RM1 & 2 were enabled.  It looks like these have been exciting the optics for the last three months.  The plot attached shows the amplitude and frequencies; RM1 was a few Hz, RM2 was a few mHz.  I've zeroed the amplitudes.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15418)
HAM 5 info

Sheila was asking about extra glinting showing up in HAM5 somewhere between the SRM and SR3 suspensions which sit almost side-by-side when viewed face-on from HAM4.  I've dug through the log and have reposted below some HAM5 pics which confirm that

1) the SR3 HR baffle location and orientation look to match the L1 HAM5 position, and the specified mechanical layout drawings of HAM5 (phew)

lho log 12599 pic

2) the baffle does not appear to completely block the line-of-sight to the left edge of the SR3 suspension cage which appears to be light up

llo log 7180 HAM5 pic

 

I also confirmed that according to E1200145, the SRM, SR2, and SR3 optics all have a vertical wedge, so no secondary back reflections in the cavity should be propogating from the SR optics along the yaw axis.

 

Although she was specifically asking about light just to the left of the SR3 optic, there are light splashes above the optic on the SUS cage and below the optic on the HAM table, outside of the baffle frame.  It is difficult to see the right edge of the baffle and cage with the existing camera view.  I supect this is just the low power, non-gaussian tail of the beam which the cameras are very sensitive to.  Will have to watch to see if this correlates to anything bad the commissioners see twitching around in the cameras.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Wednesday 03 December 2014 (15416)
Ops Summary
07:16 Cris into LVEA
08:06 Karen into LVEA
08:10 Jim B. reconfiguring fw0
08:46 Corey to squeezer bay for 3IFO ISCT work
09:21 Filiberto, Aaron and Sudarshan to end X to power up magnetometers
09:37 DAQ restart
10:03 Gerardo to H2 PSL laser enclosure to work on OFI
10:09 Dick G. to ISC rack 2 to test RF signals
10:36 Betsy taking transfer functions on SR3
10:37 Karen cleaning at mid Y
10:38 Keita to end Y to check cross cabling of green WFS
11:07 Dick G. done
11:30 Karen leaving mid Y
12:06 Corey out of LVEA
12:26 Aaron and Filiberto done, Sudarshan still checking channels
12:34 Sudarshan back
12:35 Keita done
12:56 Gerardo done
13:15 Let truck with portable toilets through gate
13:19 Dan and Rob working on ISCT6
13:32 DAQ restart
14:07 Dan and Rob back
Displaying reports 69461-69480 of 84478.Go to page Start 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 End