Displaying reports 70521-70540 of 77059.Go to page Start 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 3528 3529 3530 3531 End
Reports until 16:00, Thursday 13 June 2013
H1 ISC
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6745)
EX TMS Lab Operational

With lots of work by many over the last few weeks, we are at a point where the TMS Lab is Operational.  We still have a few more parts to bring down there, but for the most part, we are getting there.  Assembly work (i.e. parts being un-bagged could happen next week) is coming soon and we'll want to transition access to this lab to requiring Full "Bunny" Suit garb (will put a sign up saying so when we are assembling). 

We also moved a Dust Monitor from EY to EX (it wasn't on the network and I notified Patrick about this).

There is a visible air gap in the Entry Door to the lab.  I've been told we covered this up for EY, so we'll want to probably mimic that soon (because Chris has noticed quite a few bugs in this room during her daily cleaning.

H1 ISC
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:55, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6744)
H1 ISCT6 & ISCTEY Cleaned

These tables (currently in East Bay/Squeezer Area) were cleaned by Christina/Karen, and are now ready to be occupied (although they are pretty low priority schedule-wise).

H1 AOS
richard.savage@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:48, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6743)
Pcal periscope fit and function test and move to staging location
ChrisM, MichaelR, GregorioT, RickS

This morning, we moved the periscope structure about a foot toward the BSC chamber, lifted it off of the teflon highway strips using the jack screws and support plates, installed the flexures, loaded them using the flexure adjustment screws, and removed the support plates so that the structure was supported by the flexures only.

Everything went smoothly.   The structure appears to be very rigidly mounted when on the flexures.  We were not able to move it, even with some pretty hard bumps.

We then lowered it back on to the teflon highway strips using the jack screws and support plates, slid it down the staging location at the BSC end of the A7 Adapter, supported it in the adapter using the upper and lower support plates, removed the stabilizing slides, rotated it 90 deg. to its staging orientation, and installed the rotation stabilizing bars.  (See photos).

We did all the work today from the BSC side only.  We wanted to try this because we won't have access to the other side when the Cryopump/Manifold baffle is in place.  It was easy working from the BSC side, so no reason to go to the other side.

The A7 Adapter flange protectors arrived just after we finished our inside work.  We installed them on the flange (see last photo).

We plan to leave the Pcal periscope structure in this location and orientation until the Cryopump/Manifold baffle is installed, then move it into the final location next to the baffle and do the final alignment with the help of IAS.
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:25, Thursday 13 June 2013 - last comment - 11:09, Friday 14 June 2013(6738)
SUS etmy new filters

In order to reduce the motion of the quads at low frequency, I added resonnant gain filters called "LOCK" to the medm filterbank of etmy and itmy. Those filters are designed to help locking the cavity, damping the 0.43Hz and 0.99Hz resonnances of the first longitudinal modes and 0.56Hz of the first pitch mode. The stability of the closed loop hasn't been studied yet, but it looks to be working fine for now. The second and third pictures attached are showing the shape of the damping filters with and without the "LOCK" filter engaged. Those filters are engaged with a ramping time of 10sec.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 16:22, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6747)

In Foton :

longitudinal "LOCK" filter = resgain(0.43,2,10)*resgain(1,2,10)

pitch "LOCK" filter = resgain(0.56,2,10)

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 11:09, Friday 14 June 2013 (6757)
J. Kissel, A. Pele

I've modeled the effect of adding these resonant-gain boost filters on the ETM, and the results are ... interesting. 
 
For Pitch, whose design figure of merit is shown in
dampingfilters_QUAD_2013-06-14_Level2p1_loopdesign_P.pdf
the boost filter only does good. In the 2013-05-01 design, there was plenty of phase margin at low frequency, and the boost was pretty weaksauce. With this boost increase (the previous boost was also at 0.56 Hz), there is still oodles of phase margin on both sides. We shall keep it.

For Longitudinal,
dampingfilters_QUAD_2013-06-14_Level2p1_loopdesign_L.pdf
the situation is a little more dicey. According to the model, with these two new boost filters at 0.43 and 0.56 [Hz], the loop in now only *conditionally* stable, and the phase margin at the last upper unity gain crossing has diminished to 19 [deg]. Assuming that stable locking of the cavity *needs* this level of damping on the lowest two modes, I'll go back the model and look into a redesign that regains unconditional stability and a reasonable phase margin, while continuing to squash these lowest modes.

I attach the previous two designs without these boosts for comparison:
dampingfilters_QUAD_2013-05-01_loopdesign_L.pdf
dampingfilters_QUAD_2013-05-01_loopdesign_P.pdf


I've discussed the current implementation with Arnaud, and a couple of other details came up in the discussion.
(1) The intent for this additional LOCK filter was that it only be used during lock acquisition, and to be turned off once lock is acquired. As such, the filter has a 10 s ramp on it. It is still yet-to-be tested whether, once lock is acquired, the filter can be turned off, and the QUADs don't ring up again at these frequencies due to ambient excitations. Regardless of this original design intent, I'm going to try and design a filter set than can be left on at all times. I think it's doable.

(2) ONLY the ETM has the extra resgain(1,2,10) filter, because when Arnaud tried this on the ITM the loops went unstable. My guess is that this is because the ITM is still a "wirerehang," and so his resonances are different enough that the open loop gain had instabilities. I'll also look into this.

Finally, I'll use Vincent's recent 2013-05-14 data as my BSC-ISI ST2 input, instead of Matt's model to assess the overall performance.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:30, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6741)
Fixed Frequency Fiber AOM Drive
Since the IMC feedback to the laser is disturbing the fiber PLL lock in the end station, we have temporarily hooked up a fixed frequency oscillator source to drive the AOM in the fiber distribution chassis. The RF doubler has been left in the electronics chain as well. The source is currently set at 79.4 MHz / 13 dBm. This frequency should match the PSL VCO frequency as close as possible.
H1 SEI
vincent.lhuillier@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:23, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6740)
H1 HPI BS - Controlled in position (100mHz)

During testing, we saw that actuator V4 of HPI BS was not able to deliver full power. We didn't try to fix the problem (risk of disturbing alignment). The HEPI at the beam splitter is now controlled in position at 100mHz. We will come back to the problematic actuator later.
Some correction gains were applied to the HEPI actuators to compensate for differences in the actuator drives. The correction gains are:
 

DOF Act Gain
H1 1.016
H2 1.064
H3 0.957
H4 0.970
V1 0.888
V2 0.932
V3 0.978
V4 1.284

 

The offsets used on the IPSs are:

DOF Offsets
X -128873
Y -381126
RZ -79880
HP 19919
Z 536676
RX -16017
RY -32412
HP 84305
LHO VE
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:23, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6739)
END Y pumpdown

60 days of pumping on END Y.

Exponent of T appears to be close to 1 now which means the outgassing may be dominated by water from the surfaces. Have we depleted the reservoir of gas in our cables?

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:11, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6737)
Comments/Plot on yesterday's HEPI pressure loss

I added a plot and comments to my report yesterday on the LVEA HEPI Pressure loss.

report

H1 ISC
jaclyn.sanders@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:16, Thursday 13 June 2013 - last comment - 10:58, Thursday 13 June 2013(6732)
SHG temperature optimization

(Jax)

This was completed yesterday but I got caught up in measuring everything else on ISCT1 so this just didn't make it to the alog until today.

The power out of the SHG on ISCT1 looks best at 34C. 

Data to support this:

T (C) P (uW)
32 75.4
33 92.3
34 98.2
35 85.3
36 58.2

Note: I'm aware that these values look a little low, this isn't an isolated problem. It's in the queue to get addressed, but isn't at the top of the priority list because there's enough power here to get a usable beat note.

Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 10:58, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6734)
H1 AOS
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:09, Wednesday 12 June 2013 - last comment - 14:06, Thursday 13 June 2013(6726)
ALS corner commissioning
(Chris, Kiwamu, Stefan)

We started off by relieving all MC offsets to alignment sliders, and setting some electronics offsets on the MC board. Next we aligned the whole HIFO-Y (green pointing into the arm, PR3 for green transmission, PR3 & IM4 for maximum IR fringing, PRM for maximum power recycling fringing).

Next we peaked into HAM1 and identified the REFL beam - it hits the vacuum chamber right next to the view port. So tomorrow we will have to do another incursion to HAM1 to get that beam out.

Next we touched up the beat node on ISCT1. With 0.1mWatt into the beam combiner from the SHG, and 1.4mWatt from the y-arm, we expected a maximum of 220Vpkk (assuming 1kOhm transimpedance and 0.6A/W). we got 150mVpkk.

Next we checked out the electronics. The cable from the common PD went to the differential PFD (Phase Frequency Discriminator), and vice versa. So we switched the cables. Next we noticed that the Bekoff control between COMM and DIFF is also switched - this needs to be fixed.

Next we started playing with the feedback to the IMC and PSL. We were able to get the PFD off the rails by some slow feed-back to MC2, but unfortunately we have no way of doing this without already putting a signal into MC2 length. Next we tried to simply increase the the REFL_SERVO_SLOW to MC2 length gain, but we get an oscillation at 6Hz to 8Hz (depending on the slow integrated). It seems like we are missing some filters in the chain...

Looking at DTT spectra of H1:IMC-L_OUT and H1:LSC-CARM (both frequency sensors) we find that the PFD is still in the non-linear regime. The 8Hz signal upconverst noise everywhere, dominating the frequency noise in H1:IMC-L_OUL (the two signals look identical, with opposite sign).

So we have a chicken and egg problem: no signal from ALS_COMM without feed-back, and no feed-back without checking that the signal makes sense.

In other words: It is time for a complete IMC and ALS model in MATLAB - otherwise we are running blind.



Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 21:13, Wednesday 12 June 2013 (6727)
Attached are snapshots of the good full alignment, as well as of the ETMY, ITMY, MC1, MC2 and MC3 medm screens in the good state. They correspond to Arnaud's burtrestore snapshots.
Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 21:44, Wednesday 12 June 2013 (6728)
Also, the 6-8Hz oscillation we observed also showed up in the green PDH signal (ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO) (but not in the PLL loop). We do not understand why.
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 21:55, Wednesday 12 June 2013 (6730)
Should also mention that the arm was very stable tonight. We only used Arnaud's lock filters (extra damping for the .44 length and .55 pitch mode), as well as a .44Hz notch in the length drive to ETMY M0 (Mark's idea).
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 07:54, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6731)
Attached is the output of the two frequency sensors H1-IMC-L_OUT and H1-LSC-CARM_OUT (no CARM filtering is done).

Note that the ALS drive to MC2 is dominating the noise (produced by the wrapping of the PFD) - hence the two signals look equal ond opposite (phase=180deg).
Non-image files attached to this comment
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 10:59, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6735)
COMM and DIFF VCO cables were swapped at the Beckhoff end. This corresponds to the cable pull list.
mark.barton@LIGO.ORG - 14:06, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6742)

I wrote the contribution of mine alluded to above up as https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1300534-v1 . It addresses the problem that if you want to drive the optic in L (longitudinal) from the top mass then there is a significant and annoying coupling to P (pitch). It turns out that in the crucial low frequency zone up to about 1 Hz, the most bang-for-the-buck thing to do is ignore P and simply notch out the 0.434 Hz fundamental L mode in the L drive. This was tried yesterday and made a useful improvement.

It would be good to try the rest of the recipe, which involves some P actuation to cancel the remaining L->P cross-coupling. (The filter for this is much simpler when the L peak is handled by the L filter.) However it turns out there's no convenient place to inject this. The L filter is currently in FM1 of the H1:SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L. However we don't want to put the P filter in H1:SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_P, we want to fork the ISC L signal, put a different filter on it and inject it as P. That is, we need a mini-DRIVEALIGN just for the LOCK. We plan to test the idea with the H1:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_L and H1:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_P filters and see if it works well enough to warrant topology changes.

X1 SUS
andres.ramirez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:31, Wednesday 12 June 2013 - last comment - 21:49, Wednesday 12 June 2013(6721)
Latest TF/Spectras Test Results for HSTS I1-SRM
These are the latest TF/Spectras Test Results for HSTS I1-SRM


Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stuart.aston@LIGO.ORG - 21:49, Wednesday 12 June 2013 (6729)
Both undamped and damped transfer functions for the India SRM (HSTS) raise no concerns. All peaks are in agreement with model predictions and are consistent with other HSTS suspensions. Also, power spectra agree with noise floor expectations, with the exceptions of M3 L and P DOFs (pg 25 & 26). These are however consistent with other HSTS measurements (so I shall investigate if the correct sensor noise expectation is being used).

Please consider the I1-SRM suspension approved for India. Nice work again the LHO triple assembly team! 
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:08, Wednesday 12 June 2013 - last comment - 10:15, Thursday 13 June 2013(6714)
high dust counts in small cleanroom between HAM2 and HAM3
For a while the 227b dust monitor in this clean room has been reporting high counts. (see attached plot back to May 15th)

One theory was that this may be due to a missing prefilter on one of the HEPA units. (alog 6375)

This cleanroom is split in two, with a garbing area on the HAM2 side and cleaned parts on the other. Each half has two HEPA units. The HEPA unit with the missing prefilter is over the cleaned parts. The 227b dust monitor is also in this half.

This morning I took further measurements with one of the HHPC-6 particle counters. In the cleanrooms over the two test stands, and the larger one closer to HAM3, the counts were flat zero.
The counts I measured in the small cleanroom with the HHPC-6 appeared to confirm earlier counts with the 227b. The counts were elevated in both halves. I did not see a noticeable difference directly under the HEPA unit with the missing prefilter. However, inside the cleanroom near the floor of the entrance to the gowning side, the counts were repeatably and exceptionally high, I believe up to from 480 counts at 0.3 um to 160 counts at 5.0 um.

I plan to do more detailed measurements tomorrow.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 10:15, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6733)
John W., Patrick T., Richard M.

It turns out that the GFI was tripped and the HEPA units were not powered. Richard reset it this morning. It has likely been this way for a long time. Attached are dust plots going back 45 days. The Y scale is in particles per cubic foot. From these it appears to have tripped around May 6, 2013. However, at some point this dust monitor may have been outside the clean room.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:18, Wednesday 12 June 2013 - last comment - 11:08, Thursday 13 June 2013(6715)
HEPI LVEA Pump Stations found off-Problem understood mitigated
I was up on the Mezzinine measuring for cables and noticed that the pumps were not turning.  No level trip, no VFD trip, servo running pushing max volts.  Richard reminded me of a problem that we should have corrected some time ago.  The output from the servo has 4 BNCs to the four pump stations.  There was a bad BNC that has shorted in the past and it did so again.  Once it shorts, no matter what the servo does, the outputs are shorted and the VFD gets zero volts hence no revs.  As soon as I unplugged the bad BNC they rev'd back up.  We took it back down and Filiberto replaced the BNC.  This should not happen again.  I may have bumped the cable and caused the short but I'm pretty sure it happened 10s of minutes before I was in the area.

The pumps went down at ~1818utc and the BSC2 HEPI moved a fair bit, several .001".  After the BNC repair I got the Pump Output back to operating pressure ~2040utc with the HEPI Actuators reaching equilibrium position a few minutes later.  The difference in before & after position at BSC2 was ~0 to ~600 counts, all less than 0.001".  Obviously a need for alarms--working on it!
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 11:08, Thursday 13 June 2013 (6736)
Attached is a plot during the pressure loss event.  The lower left graph shows the pressure drop; the other graphs are the shifts seen of HEPI at BSC2.  The sloped section in the second quarter is a DAQ data loss period.  About halfway thru I found the problem and disconnecting the shorting BNC allowed the pumps to restart and pressure & positions to recover.  The third quarter is while Filiberto is repairing the cable.  Finally all back on and settling back into position.

The main thing here is the huge shift of the positions during the pressure loss.  A few hundred counts or even a couple mils (1310 cts) could be tolerated. But here the best is v3 (Ch 8) with a shift of just 1200 counts.  Most shift are quite a bit more and H4 shifts more than 7000counts almost 11 mils more than 25% of the range.  This suggest to me a problem with the Actuator.  Either the Large Pin Valve or the Parker Valve is miss positioned or calibrated.  It seems we should be able to tune these in situ to reduce/minimize this affect but I'm not sure I heard about it.

Hopefully, HEPI Pressure losses will be far and few between but it would be nice if we really weren't badly impacted.
Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 70521-70540 of 77059.Go to page Start 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 3528 3529 3530 3531 End