Displaying reports 71021-71040 of 83084.Go to page Start 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 End
Reports until 10:18, Thursday 19 June 2014
H1 AOS (INS, SEI, SUS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:18, Thursday 19 June 2014 (12421)
ITMx Position Alignment - The Story so Far + Historical Look at ITMx/ITMy Pilots
IAS: J. Oberling
SUS: B. Weaver, T. Sadecki
SEI: J. Warner
 
We started the position alignments for the new ITMx on Tuesday.  I immediately noticed the ITMx seemed to be sitting very high with respect to the ACB.  In fact, it was difficult to get a height measurement since it was very hard to make out the top edge of the optic.  After several rounds of adjustments over the next couple days (detailed by Betsy here and here, with Jim taking looks at HEPI here.) we are now out of vertical adjustment range on the quad (we started ~11.0 mm high and ended up 2.8 mm high after all was said and done).  The main issue I was having sighting the optic turned out to be a differential height between the ITMx and the CPx; I thought I was sighting the bottom edge of the ITMx, but it turned out to be the bottom edge of the CPx (we put something between the chains to isolate the ITMx edge yesterday; this was our 1st truly accurate measure of the ITMx height: +7.1 mm)  The remaining vertical error will need to be taken out with HEPI, which involves de-attaching the HEPI actuators, making the move, and re-attaching the HEPI actuators (as Jim noted, starting over with HEPI).  On a positive note the ITMx now looks to be much better centered vertically with respect to the ACB.  The current position errors of the ITMx are as follows:

I looked back through my notes of the pilot ITMx cartridge alignment from way back in September 2013 and the in-chamber alignment from November 2013 to see what the history of the height adjustments are with this quad.  The ITMx height on the test stand is set with respect to the ISI table: we attach a calibrated height stick (with attached scale) to the ISI table and use that to set the total station 1742.0 mm below the ISI table; this is the desired distance the center of the ITMx should be from the ISI table.  We then aligned the ITMx in height to this location.  We started low by 1.6 mm, but adjusted to be high by 0.1 mm.  The cartridge was then craned into WBSC3.  I seem to remember Hugh setting the ISI table to its proper height prior to the alignment work (correct me if I'm wrong here Hugh).  I then took the first set of numbers and found the ITMx to be 3.6 mm low.  We still do not understand where this discrepancy between the cartridge alignment, Hugh's setting of the ISI table, and my 1st in-chamber look at ITMx comes from, but I should note that for the pilot ITMx we needed to raise HEPI by 3.6 mm, now for the production ITMx we need to lower HEPI by 2.8 mm; Betsy floated the idea that it is a possibility that the pilot suspension could have been long and the production suspension is correct, thereby causing the required HEPI adjustments.

At Betsy's suggestion I also looked back at ITMy to see if we could be walking into a similar situation with this optic.  This suspension goes all the way back to WBSC8 in December of 2011.  When this suspension originally left the test stand we were 1 mm low.  After the in-chamber fiber break the ITMy was suspended by a wire for the H2OAT.  In November of 2012 this suspension was moved to WBSC1 to be used for HIFO-Y and the most recent integration work.  The ITMy on the test stand before install into WBSC1 had a height error of 0.2 mm low.  Once installed in WBSC1, we began aligning in January 2013; the initial height error was high by 1.7 mm.  We used HEPI to adjust the ITMy height error to 0.0 mm.  This was the last time we looked at ITMy (~18 months).  Looking at the other BSC chamber optics (BS, ETMx, ETMy), they all had initial height errors of <= 1.0 mm, and with the exception of the BS they all started high (BS was initially low by 0.4 mm, so no problems there).  The pilot ITMx in WBSC3 had the largest initial height error we've seen here at LHO, and was 1 of 2 optics to have a negative initial in-chamber height error.

H1 General
andres.ramirez@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:40, Thursday 19 June 2014 (12420)
Morning meeting summary
Installation Meeting Minutes 


Robert, Christina, Carolyn, Patrick, Aaron, Dale, Jeff B, Travis, Mitchell, Corey, Michael, Jim, Betsy, Keita, Richard, Peter, Arnaud, Daniel, etc.

•	Cleaning on HAM2/HAM3 – Christina
•	Assembly work continues in Staging building – Mitchell/Scott
•	Still problems with ITMX HEPI position. More work will be done (maybe completely re-doing HEPI)
•	Conducting experiments on HAM 6 (Structure resonances, damping, etc ) - Robert
•	Work will continue on H1 PSL – Peter/Oliver
•	Finishing Baffle work activities - Gerardo
H1 ISC
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:18, Thursday 19 June 2014 (12417)
HAM6 Work (Wed)

Activities for Wednesday:

Installed Collars on all Picomotors for HAM6.  These collars are clamped onto the shaft of the Picomotors and positioned up against the knobs of the Picomotors. (see attached photo)

Took photos of the OMC.

The ISI is Locked.  And this completes ISC HAM6 work for this go around.  Will next work in HAM6 when we have a beam and can align everything on the table.

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:46, Thursday 19 June 2014 (12418)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Wednesday 18th June 2014

model restarts logged for Wed 18/Jun/2014
2014_06_18 06:20 h1fw1
2014_06_18 20:17 h1fw1

unexpected restarts of fw1, maybe time for a solaris reboot.

H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:43, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12416)
PSL water flow sensors
High Power Oscillator Flow Sensors
==================================

We replaced the water sensor block in the high power oscillator because the flow rate sensor for head 4 was not working and appeared to be jammed.  Inspection of the water filters in the water sensor block revealed a number of particles and remnants of PTFE tape.  After installation of the spare water sensor block, we noticed that the sensor for head 4 was not working, so a sensor from the previously installed block was removed and substituted in.  Re-installation of the spare water sensor block was successful.  The water was left on for a period of time to check for water leaks, none appeared.  The chiller flow rate was between 18.9 and 19 litres per minute.

Photos of the filters are attached.  The filenames correspond to the head number.  The last image is one of the flow sensor body.

After completion of the installation, the frontend laser was fired up.  The FSS and PMC were locked.  Some problems were experienced with the ISS.  We could lock the ISS but only with a relatively high diffracted power (~15-20%).  Efforts to reduce the diffracted power were thwarted by the control signal to the AOM oscillating, even with the servo gain turned down.



O. Puncken, P. King
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (SEI)
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:57, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12415)
ITMx BSC1 install work

After Jim "reset"/checked HEPI this morning, we went in and removed ~3mm worth of shims from the main chain.  THis dropped the main chain down, removing some more of the height error.  Note, we have no more shims to remove, so we'll need to be crafty in dropping the suspension masses further.  Jason reports that we are still ~a few mm high (number to be reported by him shortly).  We are wondering if the +3mm HEPI adjustement that was required for the ITMx-PILOT optic install months ago is needing to be undone now with this "real" suspension.  We'll need to track down if we had a short pilot suspension compared to the monolithic we are installing now.

H1 INS
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:37, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12413)
HAM3 HEPI is locked
Apollo is gearing up to remove the doors off of HAM3, so I locked HEPI on that chamber. I plan on doing HAM2 tomorrow morning, unless plans change.
H1 CDS (CDS)
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:21, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12411)
updated conlog channel list
The following 12 channels are still unmonitored:
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_ETMX_DACKILL_PANIC
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_ETMX_OSC_CLKGAIN
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_ETMX_OSC_COSGAIN
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_ETMX_OSC_FREQ
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_ETMX_OSC_SINGAIN
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_ETMX_OSC_TRAMP
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_TMSX_DACKILL_PANIC
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_TMSX_OSC_CLKGAIN
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_TMSX_OSC_COSGAIN
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_TMSX_OSC_FREQ
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_TMSX_OSC_SINGAIN
H1:IOP-SUS_EX_TMSX_OSC_TRAMP
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:17, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12410)
HAM6 Dust Monitor
Replaced the failing dust monitor in the HAM6 cleanroom. Ops will notify CC if there are additional dust problems in HAM6. 
H1 IOO (IOO)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:05, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12409)
IOT2L exterior cables disconnected: table is ready to move

[Sheila, Kiwamu]

As a preparation for moving the IOT2L table, we have disconnected all the relevant exterior cables. The table is ready to move. The attached is a cable layout as of this morning jsut for a book-keeping purpose.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SUS
mark.barton@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:53, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12408)
Control Room OSEM overview screens

The OSEM overview screen that has been running on the top leftmost monitor in the control room has been showing the raw OSEM signals (e.g., H1:SUS-MC1_M1_OSEMINF_T1_INMON) before normalization to ±15000 counts and conversion to microns. This makes it harder to see anomalous offsets because the working positions are all over the place. Therefore I changed them to look at the OSEMINF_*_OUTPUT channels.

In userapps I edited 

^/trunk/cds/h1/medm/H1CDS_SUS_OSEM_OVERVIEW.adl

and 

^/trunk/cds/h1/medm/H1CDS_SUS_OSEM_LARGE_OVERVIEW.adl

with gedit to change all instances of _INMON to _OUTPUT and all instances of hoprDefault=32000 to

loprDefault=-350

hoprDefault=350

where 350 = 15000*0.0233333. With these limits the working position of each indicator should be vertical if the GAIN and OFFSET fields are set to normalize raw signals in the range 0 to ≈22-31K to exactly ±15000 (per the standard SUS procedure), and FM5 is engaged to convert to microns.

After testing the changes I committed the files.

H1 INS
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:21, Wednesday 18 June 2014 - last comment - 11:16, Thursday 19 June 2014(12407)
ITMX IAS/HEPI
As a follow up to Betsy's log last night, I went out to ITMX this morning to release HEPI and look at actuator gaps. Payload is almost back to full, so I would expect if everything is healthy for HEPI to be pretty much centered. This is what I found, BUT... the vertical stops were all loose, meaning the platform had moved up some. I've also looked at IPS trends and they don't look horrible, reasonable shifts considering I locked with the loops on, a lot of payload came off then back on and we are still light some payload.So, a couple thoughts on what could have happened.

- Basically nothing. The error Jason found is all somehow in SUS. Seems unlikely.

- Some incredibly lucky/unlucky combination of horrible shifts. SUS removed a lot of payload, then pushed up on the platform a lot when they added back. I didn't get a really hard lock on HEPI because I was trying to preserve the aligned position, and it's really hard to reach all of the stops necessary. This means the platform could have moved up, moved the actuators in their mounts (if SUS pushed REALLY hard, seems unlikely) and somehow we have come back down just the right amount for HEPI to look more or less ok. I would expect that if we had come up enough to move the actuators 6mm (presumably when we removed payload or when SUS pushed on the platform with their arm), the platform would come back down and the HEPI actuators would be bottomed out. That's not what I found, so I don't know what's happening here.

Anyway, if Jason finds we are still 3 mm high, it means completely re-doing HEPI at that chamber. We should also re-check the level of the ISI at this point. Will probably also require re-doing some tests on HEPI, that we wouldn't otherwise do.
Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 11:16, Thursday 19 June 2014 (12422)
Travis helped me look at the level of the optical table yesterday, and we found the table to be level to within ~.1mm. The cross-hair of the optical level never moved out of the etched line on the ruler as Travis moved the target around, and these lines are <.1mm across. I would take this to be another point indicating that HEPI probably didn't move, it just seems too unlikely that HEPI would move purely vertically.
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:55, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12405)
Ops DAY Summary

Jim is the Operator on shift today, but he is needed to help out with work at BSC3 for the ITMx alignment.  Here's my summary from 8:15 - 10:55am:

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:37, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12406)
Morning meeting summary
-Troubles with ITMX HEPI position, IAS found 3-6mm height errror, will try releasing HEPI stops to see if it returns

-HAM6 OFI/OMC? in chamber is done, ISI needs rebalanced, Robert has measurement to do before unlocking

-HAM4 septum coming out soon, so doors need to come off, TVo working on oplev

-Richard working on ESD feedthrus bsc1

-Gerardo doing viewport survey, lho drawings incomplete, so we are copying llo's layout

-HAM2/HAM3 ISS work coming up

-CPB is ready to balance,

-Apollo moving storage containers into high bay, drilling/cleaning

-NSF Review next week, mostly LVEA and control room
H1 AOS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:43, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12404)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Tuesday 17th June 2014

model restarts logged for Tue 17/Jun/2014
2014_06_17 06:22 h1fw1
2014_06_17 11:23 h1lsc
2014_06_17 11:29 h1pslfss

2014_06_17 11:37 h1broadcast0
2014_06_17 11:37 h1dc0
2014_06_17 11:37 h1fw0
2014_06_17 11:37 h1fw1
2014_06_17 11:37 h1nds0
2014_06_17 11:37 h1nds1

2014_06_17 12:13 h1susitmy
2014_06_17 13:00 h1iopsush34
2014_06_17 13:03 h1iopseih45
2014_06_17 13:42 h1iopseih23
2014_06_17 14:17 h1iopseih23
2014_06_17 14:19 h1iopsush2a
2014_06_17 14:52 h1susmc1
2014_06_17 14:54 h1susmc3
2014_06_17 14:54 h1suspr3
2014_06_17 14:54 h1susprm
2014_06_17 14:56 h1hpiham2
2014_06_17 14:56 h1susmc2
2014_06_17 14:56 h1suspr2
2014_06_17 14:56 h1sussr2
2014_06_17 14:57 h1hpiham3
2014_06_17 14:57 h1isiham2
2014_06_17 14:59 h1hpiham4
2014_06_17 14:59 h1hpiham5
2014_06_17 14:59 h1isiham3
2014_06_17 14:59 h1isiham4
2014_06_17 15:01 h1isiham5

2014_06_17 15:04 h1broadcast0
2014_06_17 15:04 h1dc0
2014_06_17 15:04 h1fw0
2014_06_17 15:04 h1fw1
2014_06_17 15:04 h1nds0
2014_06_17 15:04 h1nds1

2014_06_17 18:18 h1fw1
2014_06_17 21:14 h1fw1
2014_06_17 21:20 h1fw1
2014_06_17 21:25 h1fw1

red=unexpected restarts of fw1. light-green=psl/lsc rfpd work, dark-green=IOP-SWWD install, blue=DAQ restarts to support aforementioned work.

H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:08, Tuesday 17 June 2014 (12403)
IOP watchdogs sus medm

Following Dave's changes, I modified HSTS/HLTS/OMC medm screens to have the iop dackill state reported correctly on HAM2 (MC1 MC3 PRM PR3) HAM3 (MC2 PR2) HAM4 (SR2) HAM5 (SRM SR3) and HAM6 (OMC).

Since the upgrade, the state channel names include the suspension name eg. :

old : H1:IOP-SUS_H2A_DACKILL_STATE
new : H1:IOP-SUS_H2A_MC1_DACKILL_STATE

The following files were modified but NOT commited to the svn (they won't be until LLO get the new iop software watchdog)

/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/hxts/SUS_CUST_HLTS_OVERVIEW.adl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/hxts/SUS_CUST_HSTS_OVERVIEW.adl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/omcs/SUS_CUST_OMCS_OVERVIEW.adl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/common/medm/SUS_CUST_IOP_DACKILL.adl
 

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS (SEI, SUS)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:49, Tuesday 17 June 2014 (12402)
New software watchdogs installed on remaining HAMs

I have installed the new SWWD on the IOP models associated with HAM2,3,4,5.

The SWWD laucher MEDM was updated (see attachment). I have also attached an example of the generic macro substituted detail screen.

Models changed today are: h1iopsush2a, h1iopsush34, h1iopseih23, h1iopseih45. All were built against branches/branch-2.8.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:16, Tuesday 17 June 2014 - last comment - 16:43, Wednesday 08 October 2014(12392)
HAM6 checked out for grounding

I and Dan replaced the bad UL BOSEM unit (SN of bobbin part of that assy is SN250, D0601106-C) with a good one (SN282) pulled out of spare "half-assembled" tip-tilt assy (base plate SN 034).

We also replaced UR one (SN258) with a spare (SN134) that was pulled out of the same half-assembled TT assy simply because we were not sure if the open voltage of SN258 (about 20000 counts) was too small. Later it turns out that 20k counts open voltage is not abnormal.

The newly installed units were of course assembled in the past but without fit check, and it turns out that the gap around the connector was non-existent and I had to loosen some screws and shift things around to make a good gap. I also used aluminum foil shim trick.

After this, we centered BOSEMs for all Tip-tilts to half the open voltage.

  UL LL UR LR
OM1 -16k -12k -16k -13k
OM2 -11k -11.5k -15.5k -16k
OM3 -16k -14k -16k -11.5k

WFS DC, AS_C QPD, OMCR QPDs, OMC QPDs and OMC DCPDs all responded to flash light.

Beam diverters moved back and forth.

Picomotors moved. On cable #234, the first, the second and the third channels correspond to WFSA, WFSB and AS_C picomotors. On cable #235, the first channel is the downstream 2" mirror for the QPD sled, the second the upstream 1" steering.

Checked ground loops from outside the chamber, and all cables including SUS were good except beam diverters (we know that they ground inside the chamber) and OMC QPDs (shield grounted to the DCPD signal ground) and OMC PZTs (same as OMC QPDs).

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 14:28, Tuesday 17 June 2014 (12393)

OMC PZT cable shielding also is grounded to DCPD signal ground.

Same as OMC QPDs. It's not clear from D1300376 (OMC PZT cable document) but there seems to be continuity from the shield to the mighty mouse connector shell, which is mounted on the aluminum bracket on the OMC.

LLO alog explaining these: https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=10121

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 14:48, Tuesday 17 June 2014 (12396)

As of now, ISI is locked. OMC is free.

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 14:32, Tuesday 17 June 2014 (12394)

Beam diverter cable sheild needs to be cut at the rack or at the chamber.

With the cables disconnected from the remote rack Beckhoff motor driver module, there's continuity between the cable shell and the rack. Relevant cables are cable #316 and #317.

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 14:35, Tuesday 17 June 2014 (12395)

PZT capacitance:

From the outside of the chamber, used a short DB25 and a break out board to check that PZT pins are not short circuited to stupid things. Since I was able to, I also measured the capacitance.

Pin1-14: 474nF.

Pin2-15: 428nF.

These of course include the in-vac cables and short DB25 cable I used outside.

koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 14:56, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12412)

Sounds the correct range for the PZTs. (spec: 470nF)

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:43, Wednesday 08 October 2014 (14376)

Correction: Corey found that the S/N of the pulled and newly put in BOSEMs are swapped in the above entry.

Bad BOSEM that has one PD pin grounded to the coil bobbin part is SN282.

  Pulled Newly installed
UL SN282, broken SN250
UR SN134, turns out that nothing was wrong. SN258
H1 TCS (TCS)
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:30, Friday 13 June 2014 - last comment - 16:45, Wednesday 18 June 2014(12365)
ITMy Ring Heater Forensic
Thanks to the efforts of SUS I was able to get in and look at the ring heaters of ITMy today. There are no apparent problems with breakage of either the glass formers or the macor retaining pieces. However, the center macor piece (D1002545) looks to have wandered off center quite significantly. I didn't have any pictures from that angle while the quad structure was still in chamber. So, unfortunately, I am unable to determine when it wandered off, but it definitely warrants looking at ITMx closely before it leaves BSC 3 if possible. 

It should be noted that this is the older style of ring heater, but the macor element standoff is the same throughout all but the most recent version.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - 09:10, Monday 16 June 2014 (12370)TCS
As requested a picture with a few labels, showing how the macor has wandered off the center point where it should be.
Images attached to this comment
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - 16:45, Wednesday 18 June 2014 (12414)TCS
The old ring heaters on ITMy have been removed from the old quad structure. While I was packaging the upper and lower ring heater I noticed quite a bit of particulate coming out. Looks like glass, certainly warrants a closer inspection.
Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 71021-71040 of 83084.Go to page Start 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 End