Displaying reports 72061-72080 of 85907.Go to page Start 3600 3601 3602 3603 3604 3605 3606 3607 3608 End
Reports until 19:17, Tuesday 30 September 2014
H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:17, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14236)
Conlog running again
I started it back up with the previous channel list. It looks like it must be a problem with one of the channels that Dave tried to add. The error it logged was:

Sep 30 14:23:51 h1conlog2 conlog: ../conlog.cpp: 301: process_cac_messages: MySQL Exception: Error: Out of range value for column 'value' at row 1: Error code: 1264: SQLState: 22003: Exiting.

This would seem to imply that the value for one of the process variables was out of the range of the data type in the database. I'll try to narrow it down tomorrow.
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:27, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14233)
Connected pump cart to HAM6 ion pump -> Running overnight


			
			
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:25, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14232)
WHAM6 HEPI Linearity Test Good, ROM so so

See the linearity results attached.

The Range Of Motion results is unable to check (with the current script) H1-, V1+, & V4+ due to current offset on the IPS.  This needs to be reworked.

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:05, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14231)
Status of CDS code

Maintenance Day Summary of CDS code Status:

Model code with local modifications with respect to SVN repository:

                           lsc/common/models/lscals.mdl  Tue Mar 11 21:57:37 2014    M      
                           psl/common/models/psldbb.mdl  Fri Jan 10 19:19:47 2014    M      
                           psl/common/models/pslfss.mdl  Tue Jun 17 09:57:14 2014    M      
                      sus/common/models/QUAD_MASTER.mdl  Mon Sep  8 16:04:00 2014    M      
                         sus/h1/models/h1susquadtst.mdl  Mon Sep  8 14:57:47 2014    M      
                             sus/h1/models/h1sussrm.mdl  Wed Sep 17 10:14:13 2014    M      
                            sus/h1/models/h1sustmsx.mdl  Tue Sep 16 09:27:51 2014    M      
                       tcs/common/models/TCS_MASTER.mdl  Tue Nov 26 11:57:09 2013    M      
                           lsc/common/models/lscals.mdl  Tue Mar 11 21:57:37 2014    M      
                           psl/common/models/psldbb.mdl  Fri Jan 10 19:19:47 2014    M      
                           psl/common/models/pslfss.mdl  Tue Jun 17 09:57:14 2014    M      
                      sus/common/models/QUAD_MASTER.mdl  Mon Sep  8 16:04:00 2014    M      
                         sus/h1/models/h1susquadtst.mdl  Mon Sep  8 14:57:47 2014    M      
                             sus/h1/models/h1sussrm.mdl  Wed Sep 17 10:14:13 2014    M      
                            sus/h1/models/h1sustmsx.mdl  Tue Sep 16 09:27:51 2014    M      
                       tcs/common/models/TCS_MASTER.mdl  Tue Nov 26 11:57:09 2013    M      
                           lsc/common/models/lscals.mdl  Tue Mar 11 21:57:37 2014    M      
                           psl/common/models/psldbb.mdl  Fri Jan 10 19:19:47 2014    M      
                           psl/common/models/pslfss.mdl  Tue Jun 17 09:57:14 2014    M      
                      sus/common/models/QUAD_MASTER.mdl  Mon Sep  8 16:04:00 2014    M      
                         sus/h1/models/h1susquadtst.mdl  Mon Sep  8 14:57:47 2014    M      
                             sus/h1/models/h1sussrm.mdl  Wed Sep 17 10:14:13 2014    M      
                            sus/h1/models/h1sustmsx.mdl  Tue Sep 16 09:27:51 2014    M      
                       tcs/common/models/TCS_MASTER.mdl  Tue Nov 26 11:57:09 2013    M      
 
Filter Modules with Pending Modifications or Partial Loads:
 
h1asc - was displaying "cannot STAT the filter file" error, performing a full LOAD COEFF fixed this
 
The following models had partial filter module loads, all were fully reloaded: h1psliss, h1isiham2, h1susprm, h1suspr3, h1susim, h1susmc2,
h1sussr2, h1sussr3, h1susbs, h1oaf, h1lsc, h1omc, h1lscaux, h1susetmy
 
The following models had pending filter changes, all were fully loaded after consultation: h1suspr2, h1sussrm, h1susetmx, h1iscex
 
Conlog was reconfigured with the latest channel list. After it was restarted the conlog writer and EPICS IOC stopped running. I tried reverting and rebooting but it is still down. Patrick has been notified.
 
Files in /opt/rtcds common areas which were not accessible by members of the controls group had their file permissions changed.
 
All INI files in the DAQ system were scanned using inicheck. The following models have DAQ channels with mixed case in their names:
h1lsc, h1isi[itmx, itmy, etmx, etmy, bs]
 
Filter module files were scanned with foton for possible problems. The following files reported various problems:
h1ascimc, h1hpi[etmy,ham1,ham4,ham5,ham6], h1isi[bs,etmx,ham2,ham4,ham5,ham6,itmy],h1odcmaster,h1sus[mc1,mc2,mc3,omc,tmsx,tmsy]
Most problems are obsolete filters in the lower section which are not in the MODULES area.
 

 

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:59, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14230)
WHAM5 ISI Greened and Safe.snap updated

H1 CDS (SYS)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:59, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14229)
h1ecatx1 restarted

Alexa, Kiwamu, Jim, Dave

h1ecatx1 EPICS channels froze at 11:04PDT. The EPICS IOC was stil running, but all data was frozen and white-invalid. We restarted the computer and Alexa restarted the EPICS IOCs for SYS and PLC[1-3].

H1 IOO (PSL)
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:10, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14228)
Intensity noise due to IMC alignment and beam jitter

The ISS second loop photodiodes are very well coherent with the IMC WFS B yaw signal, as visible in the first plot.

This WFS is used for both DOF1 and DOF2 of the IMC alignment. I added an offset to the DOF1 yaw error signal. This improved significantly the intensity noise at almost all frequencies, see the second plot.

The thrid plot is a spectogram of the intensity noise as a function of time. The bottom trace shows the IMC DOF1 error signal. It is clear that a mean value of 250 counts gives lower intensity noise. It is also clear that intensity noise is highly non stationary, even with a good IMC offset.

The fourth plot shows the same story, but this time intensity noise is characterized with a trace showing the band-limited RMS between 100 and 200 Hz. Using the best IMC alignment offset reduces the noise in the band by a factor ~10. The last plot is a zoom into the last minuts of the test. It is clear that the residual fluctuations of intensity noise are related to the residual angular motion of the IMC.

In summary, we can improve a lot the intensity noise at the output of the IMC by choosing a better alignment position, and by improving the accuracy of the angular control loops.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:27, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14222)
Ops DAY Summary

NOTE:  Today there is a tour of the Hanford site for LIGO staff from around lunch time - 5pm.

Day's Activities

Leaving for Tour at 11:30 (Jim W & Dave will help cover the afternoon)

H1 SEI
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:48, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14227)
OPS: reset of HEPI L4C Accumulated WD Counters Tuesday 30th of Sept 2014

This morning I reset Counters for following HEPI systems:  HAM2, HAM3, HAM4, BSC3(itmx), & BSC3 (BS).

Note:  BSC3 & HAM3 continue to have saturations though.

H1 CDS
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:14, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14226)
New software installed for Ubuntu control room workstations
WP 4869

The user environment has been changed to set up the awgstream environment properly.

The CERN ROOT package has been replaced with a version that supports python.

The gds software (diaggui, foton, etc) has been updated to gds-2.16.12.2, which has a number of bug fixes and a few enhancements:

* python scripting capability for awg and foton have been added.
* Cut/paste added to the Calibration dialog box in diaggui (and foton).
* Long channel names are no longer ignored in the Calibration dialog box.
* Fix bug preventing diaggui from reliably making continuous measurements.
* Unsigned 32 bit integer data support for diaggui time series.
* Foton legacy write option has been removed.
* Fix foton bugs for file path option, add "-o " option for non-gui file processing.
* Fix foton bug which caused crashes when invoked from diaggui.
H1 CDS (PEM)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:07, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14225)
Power cycle of h1iscey to fix bad PEM ADC channels

Sudarshan, Jim and Dave

We power cycled h1iscey as part of the investigation to fix some dodgy ADC channels, we were not successful.

sequence:

take h1iscey out of dolphin, stop models, power down CPU, power down IOChassis, power down PEM AA chassis.

power up AA, power up IOChassis, power up CPU.

H1 PSL (PSL)
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:53, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14224)
Fine tuning of ISS pointing sensitivity

Sudarshan, Gabriele

To try to reduce as much as possible the beam pointing sensitivity of the ISS photodiodes, we wrote a python script that reads the PD signals and demodulate them with the excitation sent to IM3. In this way we could send a 12 Hz, 1000 cts sinusoid in yaw and a 17 Hz, 1000 counts sinusoid in pitch, and look at time domain traces of the demodulated signals, as shown in the first attached plot. We moved a bit the picomotors, and we could improve quite a lot the situation. As shown in the second plot, right now we almost can't see the sinusoids in the PD signals, since they're below the noise background. Here are therefore upper limtis on the dP/P/dx:

Photodiode Pitch [1/m] Yaw [1/m]
PD5 18 105
PD6 18 64
PD7 20 107
PD8 21 79

The optimal position we found is not exactly with the QPD centered (both x and y are around 0.3). Maybe we could improve this, but for the moment we guess the situation is good enough.

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:30, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14220)
PSL Diode Chiller Topped Off

Per the weekly Tues Maintenance task, the chiller was topped off to the MAX level mark (needed ~250ml to do this).  The stopper for the Chiller isn't ideal (seems a bit big and sheds a bit to make it seat in the inlet).  Last time the chiller was filled was on 9/15/14.

H1 PSL
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:22, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14206)
Beam pointing sensitivity of ISS photodiodes

I measured the beam pointing sensitivity of all the eight ISS second loop diodes. The naming is the one corresponding to the new slow channel acquisition, we'll check tomorrow the correspondence to the PD1-8 signals. For some diodes, in pitch, I was not able to see any significant modulation

Channel dP/P/x [1/m] PITCH dP/P/x [1/m] YAW
CH24 - PD1 - 560
CH25 - PD2 140 910
CH26 - PD3 170 340
CH27 - PD4 - 150
CH28 - PD5 - 370
CH29 - PD6 220 1610
CH30 - PD7 780 520
CH31 - PD8 270 540

For those not familiar with the meaning of these numbers, the typical values measured for the ISS array before installation were between 1 and 30, depending on the array and on the diode. So the numbers I got are in general quite large.

This beam position on the PD is maybe not the best one, since we are not at the maximum power for all the diodes simultaneously. For each diode, it is possibile to find a beam position that gives maximum power. This also corresponds to undetectable coupling of beam motion to dP/P (at least at this level of excitation). However, the good position is different for each diode, and the non optimal one can have a significant loss of power and large coupling of beam motion to dP/P. The table above is representative of what we normally get.

Here is the procedure in details

  1. Move the beam using the picomotors to center the QPD. Dither IM3 with an amplitude of 100 counts at 1 Hz in both pitch and yaw (H1:SUS-IM3_M1_OPTICALIGN_P_EXC and H1:SUS-IM3_M1_OPTICALIGN_Y_EXC), and measure the normalized signal on the QPD. I got 0.14 peak to peak in pitch and 0.22 peak to peak in yaw. The beam size on the QPD should be 250 um. The normalized signal should be given by sqrt(8/pi) * deltaX / w where deltaX is the beam motion on the QPD and w is the beam size. Therefore, 100 cts at 1 Hz of IM3 correspond to 22 um in pitch and 35 um in yaw of beam motion on the QPD. I assume that the motion on the photodiode is the same. 
  2. With the dither on, I measured the mean value of each of the photodiode and the peak to peak oscillation at the dither frequency, separately in pitch and yaw. I had to move pitch of 300 counts (70 um beam motion on the diodes) and yaw of 100 counts (35 um of beam motion on the diodes). Larger amplitudes were giving weird signals.
  3. From the photodiode signals I computed the dP/P and then the dP/P/x reported above
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:15, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14219)
Early AM Spectra for HAM6 on Lvl3 Controller

Comparable to other Level3s.

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:14, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14218)
PSL Weeklies
Weekly report of various things.

There are daily spikes in the H1 chiller and diode room relative humidity.  The spikes also occur in the chiller room temperature but not in the diode room,
or at least the ones in the diode room are not as large.
Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:07, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14216)
PSL Diagnostic Breadboard Scan
Relative power noise looks nominal.  Better than the reference measurement below 10 Hz and a factor of a few worse between 10 Hz and 4 kHz.  The ISS was locked at the time with a diffracted power of ~9%, REFSIGNAL -2.03 V, and output DC of 10.01 V on PDA, 10.19 V on PDB.  Gain slider on 10 dB.

Frequency noise is better than the reference measurement above ~500 Hz, worse below.  Otherwise the same as per previous weeks.

Beam pointing looks nominal.  All better than the reference measurement.

Mode scan looks nominal.  Higher order mode count slightly higher than last week, 55 cf. 56.  Higher order mode power slightly higher too, 4.7% cf. 4.6%.  Nothing to worry about.

ISS relative power noise looks good.  The out of loop measurement (PDB) is flat from 3 Hz to ~100 Hz, at ~1.3E-8.  Rising to ~2E-8 at 1 kHz.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:54, Monday 29 September 2014 - last comment - 09:15, Tuesday 30 September 2014(14202)
3IFO QUAD 06 Phase 1B testing

Now with added "damped" plots.  Note, the damping loops on the electronics test stand are hodge podge and so damping was poor for some regions of many loops.  As well, like I mentioned in earlier logs, the coherence of this in-air QUAD is poor at lower frequencies.  I spent some time trying to work out better excitation filtering/boosting but to no avail.  Damping works on both M0 and R0 chains of Q6.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stuart.aston@LIGO.ORG - 09:15, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14221)
Attached below is a comparison of undamped and damped Phase 1b QUAD06 TFs, which are also compared to QUADs of similar construction.

Summary:

As already noted above, damping loops are in no way optimised on this test-stand, however, damping on all DOFs on both chains of QUAD06 can be observed. The most egregious damping behaviour occurs on the R DOF of the reaction chain. It should be noted that, since the undamped TF for this DOF appears clear, this indicates that issue is most likely filter configuration related when attempting to engage damping loops. Thus alleviating any concerns.

All data, plots and scripts have been committed to the sus svn.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:58, Tuesday 23 September 2014 - last comment - 19:32, Tuesday 30 September 2014(14095)
3IFO QUAD 06 Phase 1B testing

QUAD 06 (Q6) Phase 1B transfer function plots are attached.   We had a hard time obtaining good coherence in the Transverse TF, so it is a bit hashy.  Will try again.  

 

Most notably is that, like Q8, the second pitch mode frequency is unexpectedly pushed upward on the main chain.  Recall, we never found the mechanism to fix it on Q8.  Interestingly, both the Q8 and Q6 assemblies are of the same batch of wires and are fresh builds, but by 2 different assembly teams, and on 2 different solid stack/test stand units.  Q8 is an ETM type of QUAD while Q6 is an ITM QUAD, but both main chains have the same pendulum parameters - both are detailed in the 'wireloop' model.

 

The Q6 data is plotted as QUADTST.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 15:14, Tuesday 23 September 2014 (14100)

We've checked that all wire diameters are as per the specs and that the wire segment clamps are seated properly on the masses.  We've also checked that the wire segments have been assembled with the proper assymetry as per specs (looking for something obvious).

 

Attached are pix of this unit, in case someone wants to look at them.  To me, they look just like the last few QUADs we've built, including Q8.

Images attached to this comment
brett.shapiro@LIGO.ORG - 17:20, Tuesday 23 September 2014 (14112)

Maybe this is a long shot, but we've exhausted all the simple causes...could the top wire be the wrong material? If the modulus of elasticity was higher, within a factor of 2 from where it is supposed to be, that would explain this strange pitch mode.

One way to test this is to measure the violin modes of the topmost wire in situ and see if it is right. Or maybe more simply, cut some wire from this wire stock, hang some wieght off of it, and measure its violin mode.

The correct 1.1 mm diameter wire should have a violin mode of 

frequency in Hz = sqrt(tension/0.0067)/(2*L)

where 0.0067 is the mass per unit length.

 

For example tungsten has a modulus about 2 times higher than what we are supposed to have. If for whatever reason we ended up with a tungsten wire, it would have an in-situ violin mode in the low 200s of Hz, rather than the 332 Hz spec (much denser than the usual piano wire).

brett.shapiro@LIGO.ORG - 17:52, Tuesday 23 September 2014 (14113)

Or even more simply, you could weigh some length of wire. The piano wire should be something close to 7 g/m. If you get different value from that, then the wire is the wrong material.

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 15:52, Wednesday 24 September 2014 (14129)

To confirm Brett's latest suggest regarding the wrong wire:  We have 2 rolls of 1.1mm diameter top wire here at LHO which could have possibly been used for QUAD builds.  Both are labeled as the correct stuff.  We weighed a 1m segment from each spool.  One measures 7.1g, the other measures 7.3g.

 

To be continued...

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 15:59, Wednesday 24 September 2014 (14131)

Another sanity check:

The Top Mass blade sets used for these 3 pitch-problematic QUADs are as follows:

Q6 - SET 10

Q8 - SET 8 - although I can't find the actual records

Q9 - SET 2

 

Q7 - SET 7 - still to be tested, unknown pitch frequency TFs

 

The SETs go from SET 1 being the most STIFF to SET 16 being the most SOFT.  So, the sets we are using for the 3IFO QUADs are somewhat scattered or in the middle of the pack.  They are not all clustered at the soft end, nor all at the stiff end...

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 14:43, Thursday 25 September 2014 (14151)

And here's the spectra of this Q6.  Note, the lowest stage (L2) does not have flags during the all-metal Phase 1 assembly, so the spectra plots of L2 are junk.

Non-image files attached to this comment
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 16:16, Thursday 25 September 2014 (14155)

And now attached are a damped TF from each R0 and M0.  As we all have noted in SUS - damped TFs on Phase 1 test stands are not useful since the damping is a function of the code on the out-dated test stands and the loops are not tuned very well.  Long story short, there is a little bit of damping evident, given whatever filters and gains are loaded, and we can see healthy excitations run through the suspension so all seems well with damping capabilities of Q6.

Non-image files attached to this comment
brett.shapiro@LIGO.ORG - 19:32, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14235)
I ran the matlab model fitting code on the wireloop model for QUAD06. I used the measured top mass resonance frequencies, as well as the long-pitch frequencies from the triple hang data that Betsy collected. The latter was extremely helpful in refining the results beyond what top mass TFs provide on their own.
 
NOTABLE RESULTS:
 
* The top mass and UIM inertias converged to the same values obtained from the fiber H1ETMY fitting results (lho log 10089), within the error bars. This includes +12% on the UIM pitch inertia from what is given in the final quad design doc T1000286. Note, this means the same large shift has been found on two different configurations of different quads. So it is likely that the fitted value is correct. But great news for consistency on the suspensions.
 
* Some of the d's moved significantly. However, the move is noticebly less if you start from the previous fit to H1ETMY rather than the base model.
    -dn (top blade tip) increased by 1.25 mm relative to the H1ETMY fit. It is +2 mm relative to the base model. Note, one could alternatively shift dm instead.
    -d1 (uim blade tip) did not move significantly relative to the H1ETMY fit. However, it is +3 mm from the base model. Note, one could alternatively shift d0 instead.
    -d2 (PUM round prism, not part of fiber model) decreases by 1.25 mm.  This actuall could be due to errors in my previous estimate of what this value should be. In fact, this shift puts it about where it is supposed to be for the fiber quad.          Not sure if that is the intent with this prism.
 
* Still not clear what caused the shift in dn (or dm) relative to previous suspensions, like H1ETMY. The model fitting wouldn't say that though. All it can do is say that either dn or dm is off.
 
 
MORE DETAILS:
 
Plots of comparisons of the before/after models against the meadured data are attached. The first 6 pages show the top mass TFs. The 7th and final page merely shows the triple hang long-pitch frequencies since this data was pulled from an amplitude spectrum. In these plots, there are notable shifts in just 2 modes. The 2nd pitch mode (1.5ish Hz) on the top mass TF, and the first mode of the triple hang (0.4ish Hz), which is also pitch. The updated model shows pretty good agreement all around.
 
The parameter shifts required to make the match were originally rather large, for both the d's and the pitch moments of inertia. Interstingly, the moments of inertia for all the top two masses (didn't need to float the lower ones) consistently converged to the model fitting results from the fiber ETMY quad. Thus, I updated the wireloop model (update not committed to the svn yet) with the fitting results from H1ETMY for all the parameters of the top two masses (springs, inertias, d's). I then used this updated wireloop model as the staring point for the model fit.
 
The shifts in the parameters are below. The d's moved noticeably. The spring stiffnesses did not move a great deal, but were useful in fine-tuning the fit. The inertias did not need any further refinement from H1ETMY. I find this last point extremely exciting.
 
* mm shifts in the d's from H1ETMY fitting results
dn: 1.2438 +- 0.069243 mm   -> top mass blade spring tip
d1: 0.38916 +- 0.16088 mm   -> UIM blade spring tip
d2: -1.2815 +- 0.10267 mm    -> round PUM prism
 
* % shifts in the blade spring stiffnesses from H1ETMY fitting results
kcn: 2.1235 +- 1.8491 %         -> top-most blade stiffness
kc1: 0.56079 +- 0.45919 %     -> top-mass blade stiffness
kc2: -1.493 +- 0.58382 %        -> UIM blade stiffness
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SEI (DetChar, PEM)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:46, Monday 22 September 2014 - last comment - 09:46, Tuesday 30 September 2014(14086)
H1 GND STS Kerfuffle
J. Kissel

I was warned that -- though all the GND STS channels are mapped from the instrument to the frames correctly now (see LHO aLOG 14072) -- what actually gets fed into the sensor correction filter banks is a total mess in the corner station. I've scoured the front-end simulink models, toggled some switches at the racks in the EE bay, and stomped on the ground near the STSs themselves trying to map it out, and all I can say is WOW do I agree. I'll work with the SEI and CDS groups to clean up.

Here're the facts, as they stand now, in order of my discovery:
(1) In reality, we want the following seismometer-location-to-channel map for all 17 digital instances of the signals in the corner (6 HAM HPIs, 5 HAM ISIs, 3 BSC HPIs, 3 BSC HPIs):
       Just +X of HAM2    => STS A
       In the Beer Garden => STS B
       Just +Y of HAM5    => STS C
as determined by D1002704, revised due to Integration Issue 45, and DCN E1400111.
(2) I've confirmed that the above mapping is correct for ITMY (the "master" front-end model responsible for storing these STSs and "GND" channels in the frames) by performing my finest hill-billy hoe-down near the respective STS, and watching the ISI-GND channels on a CDS laptop. 
(3) Because of the STS-2 analog distribution chassis, and that the SEI BSC wiring diagram (D0901301), and SEI HAM wiring diagrams (D1101584, D1101576, and D1000298) were written before the ABC convention was established and not addressed in E1400111, there're 17-choose-3 = 680 possible combinations, and I'm pretty sure we used all of them.

Front end models:
(4) ALL HAM-ISIs use the library part, ${userapps}/release/isi/common/models/isihammaster.mdl. There is another library, isiham236master.mdl, that looks deceiving in the same directory, but it's unused according to the tar balls of source code for what's actually running on the IFO. This should be removed from the repo.
(5a) The HAM-ISIs  are reasonably consistent, in that, 
       ADC_0 or ADC_2 Channels 24-26 => STS A XYZ
       ADC_0 or ADC_2 Channels 28-30 => STS B XYZ
       ADC_1 or ADC_3 Channels 24-26 => STS C XYZ
where it's ADC_0/1 on the "first" HAM-ISI in the I/O chassis, and ADC_2/3 on the "second" HAM-ISI (HAM2, HAM4, and HAM6 are the "firsts," HAM3 and HAM5 are the "seconds."). 
(5b) EXCEPT HAM2, who has ADC_0 channels 24-26 mapped into BOTH STS A and STS B. 
(6) Because of an RCG "feature" even though different ADC *card* numbers are used between the seconds and firsts, the block name is always ADC 0 or ADC 1. 
(7) The HAM-HPIs all use the same library part, ${userapps}/release/hpi/common/models.
(8a) HPIs HAM2-5 have GND STSs hooked up, also, reasonably consistent in that they all use
       ADC_0 or ADC_2 Channels 24-26 => STS A XYZ
all piped into STS A, with STS B and STSC terminated. Again, the "firsts" use ADC0, and the "seconds" use ADC 2. 
(8b) EXCEPT HAMs 1 & 6 have all STS inputs terminated.
(9) The BSC ISIs and the BSC-HEPIs are consistent, but consistently bonkers.
       BSC1 ITMY ADC_3   23-25 => STS A
                         26-28 => STS B
                         29-31 => STS C
       BSC2 BS   ADC_3   29-31 => STS A
                         23-25 => STS B
                         26-28 => STS C
       BSC3 ITMX ADC_3   26-28 => STS A
                         29-31 => STS B
                         23-25 => STS C
That's right -- the channels have been cyclically rotated between BSC chambers.

Electronics Chain:
To test out which STS chassis maps to which GNDSTSINF (for ISIs) or STSINF (for HPIs), just in case the STS distribution chassis had been used to rectify the front-end badness, I toggled the period switch on the front of each of the three chassis, in consecutive order, and followed which channels showed the characteristic flip to (more) AC coupled signal (1 [sec] period) and then drove off into tilt land after switching back to the low-frequency mode (120 [sec] period). Since I didn't want to disconnect any cables, and couldn't simultaneously look at all the channels needed with the tiny laptop while zydeco dancing, all I could determine which which *rack* affected which GNDSTSINf or STSINF channel.
(10) BSC 1 (ITMY) ISI and HPI on-board sensors are read out in rack SEI-C4, BSC2 (BS) ISI and HPI are read out in rack SEI-C5, and BSC3 (ITMX) ISI and HPI are read out by rack SEI-C6. As such, I'll refer to the STS chassis that I switch as C4, C5, and C6, after the rack in which they're mounted, since I was unable to determine which was HAM2 (STS A), Beer Garden (STS B), or HAM5 (STS C).
(11) For the BSC-ISIs, the matrix of channels affected by the switching is as follows:
          ITMY     BS      ITMX
     C4     A       A       A
     C5     B       B       B
     C6 (bonkers)   C       C
This indicates that, even though the ADC to model mapping is some crazy, cyclic thing, the cables from the STS distribution chassis have been arranged such that what goes into the ADC is "normal." The ITMY STS C channel doesn't make any sense to me. It didn't respond to any of the period-switch toggles, but still showed live tilt-full signals. Need to debug that one.
(12) For the BSC-HPIs, it's different:
          ITMY     BS      ITMX  
     C4    A        B       C
     C5    B        C       A
     C6    C        A       B
This indicates, that the cabling matches the crazy-bonkers front-end mapping.
(13) For the HAM-ISIs, it's different:
           HAM2     HAM3     HAM4     HAM5     HAM6
     C4    A&B       A      (dead)   (dead)      A
     C5 (no change)  B      (dead)   (dead)      B
     C6     C        C      (dead)   (dead) (no change)
HAM2 is weird, but is consistent with the model layout described in (5b). HAMs 4 and 5 are receiving only ADC noise -- maybe this means the channels aren't hooked up? I didn't check.
(14) And finally, the HAM-HEPIs, they're the worst off:
           HAM1     HAM2     HAM3      HAM4      HAM5     HAM6
     C4   (n/c)      A        B       (dead)    (dead)    (n/c)
     C5   (n/c)     (n/c)    (n/c)    (n/c)      (n/c)    (n/c)
     C6   (n/c)     (n/c)    (n/c)    (n/c)      (n/c)    (n/c)
where "n/c" is not connected in the front-end model as described in (7a). Still no help as to why HAM4 and HAM5 are reading out ADC noise.
And that's the anti-climactic end of the list. We've got some work to do!

Step-one will be to update the SEI wiring diagrams to clearly define how each STS gets into each front-end via an ADC channel list. Next, change the top-level front end models to match the convention in the drawings. Third, change the cabling at the racks around so we get the expected behavior. At the moment, although it's don't in an icky way, the BSC-ISIs are our best case.
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:46, Tuesday 30 September 2014 (14223)CDS, DetChar
B. Abbott, J. Kissel

Sorry for the belated post on this: I got a reply from B. Abbott on this, that is detailed enough that it should be put here for future reference.

-------- Ben's reply ---------
Looking at D0901301,, page 11 some things can be seen:  
In answer to item (12), i.e.:
      ITMY     BS      ITMX  
     C4    A        B       C
     C5    B        C       A
     C6    C        A       B
This is actually necessary, and had been planned as such. Each of the corner-station STS2s (HAM2, ITMY, and HAM5) are actually read out by the BSC chamber racks, i.e. the ITMX, BS, and ITMY chamber racks. These are the analog "home" where the STS is read out. Because the "Home" BSC chamber for each STS wants to bring in both the XYZ channels, and the UVW channels, the XYZ channels must come in to the local AA chassis on channels 23, 24 and 25, respectively (starting at channel 00, of course).  That leaves the next STS-2 in the sequence to go into Ch26-28, and the next one to go into 29-31.  This may not be optimal for ease of model-making, but it is necessitated by the desire for all six signals (which necessitates a 15-pin DSub cable).

Looking at D1101576, Page 3, we see the HAM 2 (HAM3) mapping is: STS A on ADC0 (ADC2) Chs 24-27, STS B on ADC1 (ADC3) Chs 24-27, and STS C on ADC0 (ADC2) Chs 28-31.

In D1000298, page 4, we see the analogous wiring to HAMs 2&3: the HAM 4 (HAM5) mapping is: STS A on ADC0 (ADC2) Chs 24-27, STS B on ADC1 (ADC3) Chs 24-27, and STS C on ADC0 (ADC2) Chs 28-31.

Suggestions:
(a) I like the way that HAMs 1&6 are hooked up, and suggest that we move all of the cables to match that mapping, with STS A coming in on ADC0 (or ADC2) Chs 24-27, STS B on ADC1 (or ADC3) Chs 24-27 and STS C on ADC1 (or ADC3) Chs 28-31.  

(b) I don't see any way to change the BSC mapping in the corner by moving cables, unless we fundamentally change the kind of cable (make a 15-9 pin converter) and don't care about the UVW channels.

(c) I don't think there's much of any way to help out with the HEPI channels in hardware.  I think this is solely a simulink model thing.

---------- End Ben's reply

My thoughts on (a) and (c): I still have to do some research and talk with LLO on this. After conversing with Ryan DeRosa, he says "we have a functional system here!", so I want to make sure we don't re-invent the wheel and start another new convention before we write stuff down and change anything here at LHO.

Regarding (b), fair enough. I had just forgotten about the need. But we at least need to make sure its consistent everywhere!
Displaying reports 72061-72080 of 85907.Go to page Start 3600 3601 3602 3603 3604 3605 3606 3607 3608 End