In the top panel of the attached, red is the ETMX OL PIT, pink is the dark noise (this is ETMX OL PIT when there's no light on the OL, but a fake offset of 9900 counts was applied to OL SUM so the scaling of red and pink become the same).
The RMS of the red line for f>0.1Hz is about 0.15urad (that's about 0.5 urad pk-pk). The dominant hump at 0.4-0.5Hz is about 0.12urad RMS, but it seems like the microseism is adding another 0.9urad RMS, resulting in sqrt(0.09^2+0.12^2)=0.15urad RMS.
Dark noise is well below the PIT signal up to a few Hz.
Green is the OL SUM normalized by OL SUM DC, and then scaled by H1:SUS-ETMX_L3_OPLEV_PIT_GAIN. If the green stays on top of the red for some frequency band you'd be suspicious that the OL quadrants are measuring some noise that is incoherent across the quadrants (shot, dark), but that's not the case.
So OL seems to be measuring the angle at least for f<1Hz, probably we don't have to worry too much about injecting more noise than we want by using OL damping. Even if the actual PIT noise floor is as big as green (which is not likely), the RMS due to noise injection is not bigger than brown dashed curve.
OTOH, at least for the time when the measurement was done, it seems like the damping for 0.4-0.5Hz hump is not good enough, microseismic should be attacked too.
Commissioners remain in the control room. Earlier, Richard went to EX to investigate the dust monitor that Patrick reported below. The DM's behavior remains unresolved.
Doug and Jason are out of EY, leaving the station in laser hazard.
With uncontrolled position/controlled target differences of 10 & 13urads in Rx & Ry, the turn on of HEPI rings up the trilliums and makes ISI turn on (especially when HEPI trips) not one button. Are these tilts really needed?
Andres, Scott, & Jeff The H1-SR2 suspension has been installed in HAM4. No significant issues or problems were encountered during the installation. A big thank you to the Apollo crew for all their support with the prep work and the installation.
(Alexa, Sheila, Stefan, Evan)
Using the picomotors, we have centered the beam onto both POP A and POP B QPD. For reference... with a whitening gain of 45dB, H1:ASC-POP_A_SUM_OUTMON = 11450 cnts, H1:ASC-POP_B_SUM_OUTMON = 10436 cnts.
We have also calculated how many counts we expect on each quadrant: We have 8.8W into MC. There is 15% loss due to input optics losses (IMC and faraday), 3% transmission of PRM and 230ppm from PR2. This gives about 6.4uW for each quadrant of the QPD. With a responsivity of .8 A/W, a transimpedance of 1kOhm and a gain of 45dB, there is 1V on each quadrant. This amounts to about 3000 counts on each quadrant, which is consistent with what we see.
Once these were centered we wanted to get a (rough) calibration of the PIT and Yaw in terms of beam radii. To do this we moved the IM4 alingment slider until the QPD sum dropped to half of its centered value, then moved IM4 back until the sum reached it maximum again. This gives us an approximation of the beam radius in units of counts on IM4 slider. (for PIT, QPD A hwhm =1600 IM4 PIT, QPD B hwhm=1720 counts IM4 PIT).
Then we returned IM4 to its original alingment, (so the beam was again centered on the QPDs) and measured the response of the QPD PIT and YAW to moving IM4. We saw:
For the calibration of PIT and YAW in beam radii we get:
This is only rough.
We also saw that the QPDs are about 1.8 times the size of the beam
Attached are spectrum of the POP QPDs, and RMS, not calibrated. You can see that the beam motion is a small fraction (less than 1%) of the beam radius, so input beam motion (at PR2) is not the cause of our difficulty aligning the IR into the arm.
As a prep for the PRC length measurements, I hooked up a DAC cable of LSC, CAB_H1_ISC_421, to the Dsub breakout board D1201450 at the 18th floor of the ISC rack R4 as specified in E1200408-v14. It is connected to the right half of the breakout unit.
Then I connected a TNC cable from the 2nd output port of the breakout board to the A excitation of the IMC servo board. This is a temporary configuration and allows us to remotely excite the IMC length using the LSC_EXTRA_AO_2 signal (see T1100242-v11 for the signal assignment).
Jeff and Andres report that SR2 now sits inside HAM4. The installation arm remains on the chamber and will come off Tuesday morning.
I noticed last week that the IPC receive errors at all end station SUS and HEPI for the LSC signals is non-zero. Following the discovery of LLO LSC transmit errors to the end stations due to CPU overrun on the LSC model, I verified that our errors are also due to the LSC model running longer than its average of 40uS. The attached plot shows the error going to ONE at the time the LSC cpu increased to 44uS. The error latches, which is why we don't see any indication of the subsequent 45 and 44uS excursion. I am running a script which clears the diagnostics on H1SUS-ETMX every minute. The next time an IPC error is seen it will reset after a minute ready for the next event. All the error rates I've seen so far are only for ONE transmission of the 16384 sent that second. So the error rate is about 3 in an hour or 5.e-6 %
Currently underway (~1:30PM local): ** Doug is transitioning EY to laser hazard for IAS. Betsy and Travis have been at EY this morning and might return this afternoon depending on Doug's results. ** Rich continues to test BS ISI. He's pausing while Filiberto attends to a CPS cable at BSC2. ** A semi from LLO carrying storage containers, etc. has driven down the X arm.
This morning I finished rolling out available guardian updates for suspension (following alog 9733)
guardctrl create SUS_MC1
guardctrl start SUS_MC1
Suspension | Currently saved offset (Pitch/Yaw) | Last time saved / Offset (Pitch/Yaw) | |
MC1 | 883.3 / -1945.7 | Jan 31st :17:10 | same as current |
MC2 | 470.4 / 257.2 | Jan 31st 17:20 | same as current |
MC3 | -460.4 / 2119 | Jan 31st 17:10 | same as current |
PRM | -730 / -459 | Jan 31st 17:20 | same as current |
PR2 | 462.8 / -314.5 | Feb 2nd 19:14 | same as current |
PR3 | -240.32 / -252.3 | Jan 31st 16:35 | same as current |
ITMX | 64.3 / -56.8 | Feb 2nd 19:19 | same as current |
ITMY | 46.8 / -140 | Feb 2nd 19:19 | same as current |
ETMX | 256.7 / 79.8 | Jan 17th 18:54 | 253.5 / 79.7 |
TMSX | 267.9 / -242.7 | Jan 17th 20:33 | 244.2 / -239 |
BS | 44 / -251 | Jan 31st 17:21 | same as current |
changed the command of the guardian button from /ligo/apps/ubuntu12/guardian/bin/guardmedm to -> guardmedm
- The sitemap needs to be started from a terminal in order to either save the offsets, or open a guardian medm screen.
- Managing the way the offsets are saved. For now there is 4 txt files per suspension under /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/burtfiles.
one .req file defining the two offset epics channels, one snap file for the aligned value, one snap file for the misaligned value, one file saving all the aligned offsets with the date it was changed.
Installed Trillium Interface Chassis S1101837 in Rack SEI-C1 (slot U18). Trillium was placed close to southwest side of BSC9. Outputs from Trillium were connected to AA Chassis U30, CH21-26 (Port 5). Trillium may need to be zero-ed. Filiberto Clara
The serial number of this T240 is 000531. Also, for information about calibration and cabling layout, checkout LHO aLOG 10635.
Seismometer installation completed at 12:06. Patrick had earlier returned from EX.
Seismometer installation completed at 12:06. Patrick had earlier returned from EX.
The dust monitor at end X has stopped communicating. From trending back it appears to have stopped sometime around Jan. 31 2014 17:46 - 17:55 UTC (9:46 - 9:55 PST). It is odd. The dust monitor itself acts as though it is receiving commands (the front panel goes into remote mode), but the software times out waiting for a response. I checked the front panel settings, the cabling, turned the dust monitor on and off, restarted the IOC and power cycled the Serial to Ethernet converter, all to no avail.
Rich will begin evaluating the low frequency performance of the beam splitter ISI.
Rich M, Richard, Dave Between the times 11:11 and 11:22 local I power cycled the h1seih16 front end and IO Chassis as part of the investigation of the intermittent 0.5Hz noise on HAM6 ISI CPS. The procedure followed was: in MSR Kill all user models and then the IOP model remove unit from Dolphin fabric power off the CPU from the console in CER power down h1seih16 IO Chassis using front panel switch remove 24V power cord for about 15 seconds reapply 24V power cord power up IO Chassis using front panel switch, verify timing slave start correctly in MSR power up h1seih16 CPU, verify no error on console
Spent some time looking at the noise of the CPS on the BSC after rerouting the sync signals
One figure is a matlab plot of some calibrated signals using a fixed target on which there are some VERY bad BS channels
the second plot is a dtt screen of all of the BSC CPS channels in counts, (BS-V3 is looking at a fixed target, all other channels are looking at motion) with all of the ISIs OFF.
there are a number of icky channels
Phil rewired the CPS distribution box ( i think that it is now identical to what is at LLO) and the really horrible noisey channels got better
there is still some excess noise in ITMY stage 2 corner three and may itmx stage 1 H3 although that might not be real
Stefan, Kiwamu
The PRMI lock is now quite solid. After we engaged a dither alignment system for ITMY, we turned on the ring heater on ITMY with a hope it is going to improve the mode matching.
Below are Aiden's plot and remarks: I've attached some plots of thermal lens vs time for a RH running at 1W. The slope of the linear section, dS/dt, from t = 2000s to 3000s is 6.75E-9 diopters per second per Watt. The final steady-state defocus, S_steady, is about 13.75E-6 diopters. In the initial state, it takes t_S_steady1, 2037 (= 13.75E-6/6.75E-9) seconds to reach assuming an immediate and linear increase in defocus, t_S_steady1 = S_steady/dS/dt .... In other words, the 20W/2.1x = 9.4W should give the maximum mode matching after 2037s of linear increase in defocus AND in the steady-state.
I modeled the 18MHz sideband buildup in the H1 PRMI as a function of ITMY Rc to see how it compared to the observations made recently. The attached plot shows POP 18MHz I and Q signals over ITMY Rc. The leftmost side of the plot is for the measured value of ITMY Rc from the nebula page, with no ITMY substrate lens, and the measured value of ITMX Rc from the nebula page with an -80km substrate lens. MICH was locked using REFL45Q and PRCL was locked using REFL45I. The POP demod phase was tuned to minimize Q-phase signal at the starting ITMY Rc value. The input carrier power in the model is 10W, the 9MHz modulation depth is 0.1, and the 45MHz modulation depth is 0.07. No optics after the PR2 transmission were included in the model.
As expected, the buildup increases as PRX and PRY become better matched. In the model, the buildup increases to a maximum of around a factor of 10 from the initial value. This is a much larger increase than was seen in the experiment. This could be because the model does not include clipping at the BS, which would increase as the beam sizes increase (see lower panel of the plot). Also, it is possible that ITMY has a non-thermal substrate lens (no measurement data is available for this), putting it closer to ITMX in the no-ring-heater state. Beyond the maximum, the PRMI quickly becomes unstable. This may explain the lock loss in the experiment past the maximum POP18 buildup (though many other things could too).