Displaying reports 75361-75380 of 83002.Go to page Start 3765 3766 3767 3768 3769 3770 3771 3772 3773 End
Reports until 13:56, Friday 27 September 2013
H1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:56, Friday 27 September 2013 - last comment - 15:09, Friday 27 September 2013(7890)
HEPI-HAM3 - Improved Position Loops

HEPI-HAM3 position loops were designed/tested earlier this week. First performance spectra were posted in LHO aLog #7871.

A new set of controllers was designed today. The goal was to minimize gain peaking, while improving UUG.

HEPI is over constrained. Hence, we do not want to push at DC on all of the 8 DOF. Controllers for HP (Horizontal Pringle mode) and VP (Vertical Pringle mode) were limited to simple notches with no gain at DC.

New performance spectra were taken (purple) and compared to previous performance (blue) and no control (red).

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - 15:09, Friday 27 September 2013 (7891)

Filters are commited in the svn:
/ligo/svncommon/SeiSVN/seismic/HEPI/H1/HAM3/Filters/Matlab/Isolation_Filters/H1_HEPI_HAM3_Isolation_Filters_Tuning_09_26_13_HP.m       -r7595

H1 General
andres.ramirez@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:55, Friday 27 September 2013 (7889)
Ops shift Summary (AM)
Moving  SUS/SEI field cabling from teststand to BSC9 at End X - Filiberto
Baffle work at the LVEA – Thomas Vo
PSL work – Cheryl
Taking a quick check to the suspensions  at End X – Jeff B.
Work on h1lsc and h1iscex front end models n – Chris W.
H1 INS
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:55, Friday 27 September 2013 (7888)
Check out ETM-X and TMS-X
   I pulled up the covers on ETM-X and TMS-X to examine the suspensions after the cartridge installation in BSC9. Both suspensions appear to have made the trip in fine shape. All the fibers are intact, the masses have not shifted on the EQ stops, and all suspension wires are intact. 

   Both suspensions are still on their stops and covered in the C3 socks. 

   Note: The lower left flag on the Penultimate mass is very close to the AOSEM on the Pen-Re mass. They are not touching. Extra care will be needed when releasing these masses from the EQ stops to ensure they do not touch.        
H1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:59, Friday 27 September 2013 (7886)
ITMY-HEPI - Controls On

Turned on the controls (level 2 filter banks) on HEPI-ITMY so BSC-ITMY could be turned on. Arnaud need it to see if Fil's OSEM satellte amp replaement fixed the 6.18Hz sharp peak feature that has shown in recent BSC-ITMY performance spectra.

Note: Offsets were used to remove the DC content of the IPSs, before feeding the ISO loops.

H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:35, Thursday 26 September 2013 - last comment - 10:19, Friday 27 September 2013(7883)
HAM1 in-vac work : tip-tilts in place

[Keita, JoeG, Alexa and Kiwamu]

 We continued working on the installation of HAM1 optics today. We did two major missions:

 

Insertion of a 50 % BS in the REFL path

We've been worried that the 90% S-pol BS, which we installed on this Monday (see alog 7851), may not give us a big enough safety margin to prevent the REFL beam from damaging the PDs. Today we decided to put another 50% BS to attenuate the power a bit more. We unpacked the one we removed on this Monday (see alog 7851) and put it back on the table. It was installed between M1 and HW1 (see the layout D1000313-v10) because it is designed for P-pol. To accommodate it we shifted the position of M14 and HW1 by 2 inches toward HAM2. The reflected light from this new BS was directed such that it is dumped by the pre-installed high power beam dump (HBD). Also HBD was shifted toward the East by 12 inches so that the incident angle of M14 and the new BS doesn't have to be far from 45 degrees.

Of course insertion of this new BS shifted the alignment of the downstream and therefore we realigned them. Finally M7 was steered such that the beam hits the center of the upper periscope on ISCT1 through the viewport and light pipe. Once we re-aligned them Paul confirmed that the beam on ISCT1 was reasonably back to where it was. So we are good.

Also during the alignment we noticed that the beam was too high at HW1 by ~ a few mm and M2 by 1 inch. We asked Paul to check the alignment biases on MC1-3, IM1-4 and PRM and he confirmed that they stayed the same these days. So we guess it has been like this and we had not been careful enough to notice this misalignment.

 

 

Adjustment of Tip-tilts:

 Keita managed to tune the height of the mirror on the tip-tilts (see the previous alog #7870 about tip-tilts) by replacing the screws by shorter ones and tightening them down. Then after a long time of balancing the mirror holder and centering OSEM, we put them in place coarsely.

Before placing them we adjusted the pitch of the mirror by using a laser pointer as a a optical lever for measuring the horizontality of the reflected light. Then Joe started adjusting the centering of the OSEM and their flags. Both of two tip-tilts showed a similar symptom at the beginning --- the mirror holder was off as if it was shifted along its plane horizontally. RM2 had a bigger horizontal displacement in the mirror holder by about 5 mm or so. RM1 was somewhat smaller. Somehow Joe empirically figured out a way to adjust this horizontal shift. He loosened the four screws which support the entire blade structure on top of the suspension cage and slided to obtain a good horizontal position. Later on Keita came over and told us a way to adjust it, which Bram told him. Interestingly it coincided what Joe did. By looking at the flags, we could tell that the they are well-centered with a precision of roughly 1 mm or perhaps less. Note that all the adjustment described here was done on the HAM1 in-vac table in order to have a flat and leveled surface.

One (new) concern :
The insertion depth of OSEMs look different among the two tip-tilts. One has all OSEMs inserted deeper so that they stick out by about 2 cm toward the mirror holder while the other is about 5 mm or so. We are not sure what is right and what is wrong for this. Hmmmm...
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 09:32, Friday 27 September 2013 (7884)

Some more pics are available in ResourceSpace.

kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 10:19, Friday 27 September 2013 (7885)

As for the OSEM positions, Bram reminded me that we just need to do the usual half-light adjustment for them. Unfortunately there is no cables installed yet for powering up and reading out the OSEMs. So the half-light adjustment is not going to happen right away.

H1 General
hernan.daveloza@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:19, Thursday 26 September 2013 (7882)
Ops summary (16:00)

Nothing new below the control room roof:

- Kiwamu and company still working in HAM1

- Jim W. and company installed the cartridge at EX (see Jim W aLOG 7881)

- Hugo waiting for works on HAM1 to start HAM2/3 TF

- Isolation measurement on hold while HAM1 work continues

 

Have a nice evening!

 

pablo

H1 INS
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:31, Thursday 26 September 2013 (7881)
BSC9 Cartridge has landed

Apollo (Bubba, Randy, Scott, Tyler), GregG, MitchR, JeffB, AndresR, JimW

After an earlyish start at 8am and an abbreviated lunch, the cartridge install wrapped up at 2pm. No major hitches beyond a somewhat "poofier" C3 wrap job than previous installs. This necessitated the removal of a cleanroom filter unit to allow the cartridge to clear. (Note: SUS covers need to their  bottoms clipped to the side (for maximum clearance), not bunched at the bottom, as is the usual practice). Otherwise very smooth. SUS and TMS should head in chamber next to inspect their systems.

LHO General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:14, Thursday 26 September 2013 (7880)
OPS up to 1PM

Corner: --------

 

- HAM1 work
--- continues today with alignment - needs IMC locked

 

- IO
--- isolation measurement on hold while HAM1 work continues 

 

- HAM2/3
--- HEPI transfer functions tonight

 

- Optics lab to laser hazard, now back to laser safe
--- Kiwamu and Pablo measuring reflectivity

 

 

MY: -------------
- Corey going to get a bin

 

 

EX: --------------
- flying the cartridge today, as of 1PM cartridge is partly lowered into the clean room

 

 

Alarms: -------------
- some spikes at EX, but due to move, and cartridge is wrapped in C3
- CP1 filled, level is coming down, currently at 101.2%

H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:34, Thursday 26 September 2013 - last comment - 11:43, Saturday 28 September 2013(7879)
reflectivity measurement of REFL in-vacuum 90% beam splitter

[Pablo and Kiwamu]

 We have measured the reflectivity of another 2" P-polarizing beam splitter (E040512-B3 SN: I0822-07) for S-polarization this morning at the OSB optics lab.
The results are :
    HR reflectivity R = 92.5 % for S-pol @ 1064 nm, 45 deg
    AR reflectivity R =  2.8 % for S-pol @ 1064 nm, 45 deg


Background :

Even though we already installed a 90% S-polarizing beam splitter on HAM1, we still thinks that this 90% might not be big enough to attenuate the reflection beam to avoid damaging the detectors. One way to increase the safety margin is to simple replace this 90% BS by one with a higher reflectivity. Because we have 90% P-pol BS in hand we simply wanted to try measuring the reflectivity with a S-polarizing beam.

Setup:

Same as the previous measurement (see alog #7817).
 

Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 11:43, Saturday 28 September 2013 (7903)

This measurement is now archived in DCC:

https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-E040512.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:52, Thursday 26 September 2013 (7878)
PD interface boxes ISC end tables
	Alexa and I mounted the PD interface box on the new end Y table this morning.  We used brackets from Mcmaster, and 2 inch long 10-32 bolts from the mechanical room.   The bolts are long enough that the box hangs just below the lights.  This is a little different from what they've done at LLO  LLO alog 8847 , but it works with the brackets we have.  We turned the box around with respect to the way it is on the ISCEX table, so that it will be easier to reach the connectors when the HWS interface box is installed. This is the position we had in mind when we measured the cable lengths. 

The last image attached is the ISCEX table, with the HWS interface box already installed just for reference.  
Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:16, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7876)
HAM1 in-vac work : some pictures

Pictures of today's HAM1 activity are posted in ResourceSpace:

https://ligoimages.mit.edu/?c=1375

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:36, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7874)
plots of dust counts
Attached are plots of dust counts requested from 4 PM September 24 to 4 PM September 25.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:02, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7871)
HEPI HAM3 - IPS Position Loops ON!

I designed an initial a set of position loops for HEPI-HAM3. 

Those are not polished at all, and cause un-necessary gain peaking. They however show that our matrices (which I reinstalled today) are good.

Performance spectra are attached.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:31, Wednesday 25 September 2013 - last comment - 22:23, Wednesday 25 September 2013(7870)
Pre-assembled Tip-tilts have the wire clamps on the wrong side of the blades (JoeG, Alexa, Pablo, Kiwamu, Bram, Keita)

(Update: The title of this entry turns out to be wrong. See addendum.)

After putting optics in the tip-tilts and very roughly balancing, the BOSEM flags looked very high, probably between 1.5mm and 2mm even though the blades were brought all the way down. See the first and second picture, note that the table is not level in these pictures, but it's obvioius that the mirror is too high. 

Bram pointed out over the phone that the wire clamps should be under the blades, not the other way round. And sure enough, our clamps were sitting on top of the blades on both of two pre-assembled tip-tilts. In the third picture you can see that the clamp is on the wrong side and that the left blade adjustment is already bottoming out (tension screw is too long). 

If the clamps move to the correct side of the blades the mirror height will be OK (though the blades should be set as low as possible).

It seems as if the wire length is about right (Alexa measured the height difference of the blade clamp and the mirror clamp, and it was about 140mm). 

Problem is, there might be no way to move the clamps from one side to the other without compromising the wire direction. I'm asking Bram the best way to proceed.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 17:36, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7872)

Addendum: Now Bram says that the clamps are OK, they're supposed to be on top of the blades!

He looked up some document and it turned out that the clamps are supposed to be on top.

He suggested to bring the blade down further by using washers for the blade angle adjustment screws.

suresh.doravari@LIGO.ORG - 22:23, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7875)
I did face this misalignment in some of the tiptilts that I assembled and in all cases could solve the problem by swapping out the blade height adjustment screws for shorter ones (allowing us to lower the blade tips further).

I have attached the original design document here and some annotated pics to help you with the adjustments.  Essentially there are three things which could make the flags go too high:
1) the suspension points are high
2) the backplane on which all the BOSEMS are mounted has slid down within the play in the mounting screws
3) the optic is pitched too far face-down, raising the tips of the flags inside the BOSEMS.

You might be facing an unfortunate co-incidence of all three at the same time.
Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
christopher.wipf@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:02, Tuesday 24 September 2013 - last comment - 11:34, Friday 27 September 2013(7854)
h1lsc updates

After a third ADC card was added to the h1lsc0 I/O chassis (alog 7842), I edited the h1lsc model as follows:

The new model has been compiled, started, and checked into SVN.  Its MEDM overview, safe.snap and filter files will be updated and checked in tomorrow.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
christopher.wipf@LIGO.ORG - 15:01, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7856)

MEDM screens, filter file, and safe.snap have been updated and checked in. The filters from ALS_C_COMM_A_RF_I were moved to ALS_C_COMM_A_RF_ERR. More details about the rewiring:

  • MCREFL was moved from adc_0_28 to adc_2_0
  • All ALS inputs except DIFF_LF and COMM_LF are now on the new ADC (previously only one of them was connected, on adc_0_29)
christopher.wipf@LIGO.ORG - 11:34, Friday 27 September 2013 (7887)

The reflective memory links between h1lsc and h1iscex were not working, because the card number parameter of the cdsIPCx_RFM parts was wrong.  I had just copy-pasted the parts from EY to EX and forgot to change this parameter.  For the record, the correct card number settings are: "0" for EX and "1" for EY.  After the h1lsc and h1iscex models were updated to get this right, the RFM links came up. The updated models have been checked in to SVN.

H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:57, Tuesday 12 February 2013 - last comment - 16:45, Friday 18 October 2013(5468)
B&K Hammer Measurement
Arnaud P. Betsy W. 

Did B&K hammer measurements on Friday feb 8th on the BeamSplitter that will be installed in BSC2. 
Config: BSC-ISI Unlocked, QUAD Unlocked, Baffles ON, Vibration Absorbers ON, Damping ON.

Attached, pictures describing the position of hammer impacts, and accelerometer + corresponding pulse files.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stuart.aston@LIGO.ORG - 14:26, Thursday 21 February 2013 (5551)
Raw data has been exported from the B&K Pulse files, in accordance with the procedure outlined in the SUS Operations Manual (see How to do B&K Hammer Testing).

Exported ASCII data files have been committed to the SUS svn at the following location, ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/BSFM/H1/BS/BandK$, these files include the following (n.b. files have been renamed to comply with convention detailed in the Op's Manual) :-

SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-Bottom-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-Bottom-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-BottomLeft-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-BottomLeft-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-BottomRight-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-BottomRight-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopLeft-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopLeft-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopLeft-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopLeft-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopMiddle-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopMiddle-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopMiddle-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopMiddle-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopRight-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopRight-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Ximpact.txt
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopRight-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.pls
SimpleHammerDisplay3-BS-TopRight-SUSunlocked-ISIunlocked-VAfitted-Yimpact.txt

The above B&K data has been processed using v12 of the "BandK_plot.m" Matlab script, available in the /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/Common/MatlabTools$ directory.

The merged plot attached below shows:-
pg1 - Y response of the structure to Y hammer impact excitations at various locations, from 1Hz to 400Hz.
pg2 - X response of the structure to X hammer impact excitations at various locations, from 1Hz to 400Hz.
pg3 - X response of the structure to X hammer impact excitations at various locations, ZOOMED IN from 50Hz to 400Hz.

n.b. hammer impact locations are viewable in the attachment to the original aLOG entry above see "Hammer_Impacts.pdf".   
Non-image files attached to this comment
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 18:27, Wednesday 25 September 2013 (7873)

For acceptance review, I reprocessed the data for the beamsplitter, after seeing a legend mismatch between the plotted results and the raw data from PULSE software.
Therefore the attached results below are the ones to look at, and are following the accelerometer axis convention represented on the last attachement

(1) BandK_results_X_Exc.pdf

(2) BandK_results_Y_Exc.pdf

(3) Picture of BS with axis convention and hammer impact location

The X and Y hits have been chosen to correspond to the "Top Middle" hits on the picture

Non-image files attached to this comment
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 16:45, Friday 18 October 2013 (8173)

Those results in X to X (blue of 1st pdf) and Y to Y (green of 2nd pdf) are not showing any high Q resonnances below 150Hz, meaning the vibration absorbers are working as expected, and the test passed succesfully.

Displaying reports 75361-75380 of 83002.Go to page Start 3765 3766 3767 3768 3769 3770 3771 3772 3773 End