Displaying reports 77761-77780 of 78398.Go to page Start 3885 3886 3887 3888 3889 3890 3891 3892 3893 End
Reports until 16:03, Friday 25 March 2011
H2 INS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:03, Friday 25 March 2011 (664)
BSC7 HEPI Status

[Corey, Greg]

SW Location (s/n 77)

A job we hope would be a one hour task turned into a day long endeavor (which is still ongoing).  Yesterday afternoon Greg drilled and tapped holes on the Pier (after the iLIGO Actuation Stack was removed).  This morning we hoisted the new HEPI Assy onto the Pier and discovered that the Support Bracket holding it was an unmodified one, and we had interference issues(!). 

So we lugged the HEPI Assy down to the ground and for safety/alignment reasons, re-installed the iLIGO Actuation Stack. 

We then went to the NE HEPI, confirmed all the HEPI Foot clamping bolts were securely holding the Foot, and also checked that all the Base clamps were torqued down to the Pier.  The Support Bracket here was then removed (note, this one only has the vertical slot modifications, not the cut out on the top of the Baseplate).

The SW Support Bracket was removed and handed over to Bubba for mods, and the NE one was installed at the SW corner.  Vertical Dial Indicators were installed at these two corners to monitor changes.

Once again, we hoisted the HEPI Assy up onto the Pier and we cleared the interference on top, but just as we were getting ready to drop bolts into the Foot on top, we discovered ANOTHER INTERFERENCE!  This time the base of the HEPI Assy ran into the top of the Bottom Plate of the Support Bracket (see photo).  {Crap!}

Greg then checked the position of the Foot just to confirm we didn't make a mistake with pre-positioning of the Foot (we were a little off and in a way which helped us, but still off).  So we now need to wait until we get a fully modified Support Bracket before we can continue anything at BSC7.

Bottom Clamps & Bent Bolts

At one point it was noticed that non-called out bolts were used for Bottom Clamps (see photo #3) for the NW & SE HEPIs.  As these Clamps were loosened up and the bolts were swapped it was noticed that it was hard to remove some of the bolts.  In fact, there was one bolt which was noticeably bent!  (see photo #2)

Looks like the bend in the bolt occurs at the interface between the bottom of the Bottom Clamp & the top of the Pier.  Apparently the 1/2"-20 set screws and the 35ft-lbs we'd been taking them too is just too much for the 1/2"-13 bolts here.  Unless someone else chimes in we will do the following in the future: 

-Torque 1/2"-13 bolt to 67ft-lbs

-Torque top 1/2"-20 set screws to 25ft-lbs

-Tighten the side 1/2"-20 set screws enough so they won't loosen up on their own.

For what its worth the stainless 1/2"-13 bolts were swapped out with the black HoloKrome bolts.  (Need to do this bolt swap on the SE HEPI, too).

Images attached to this report
H2 General
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:12, Friday 25 March 2011 (663)
epics alarms reworked

I cleaned up the vacuum alarm handler to remove those ion pump channels which are always in alarm. All vacuum alarms from now onwards should be treated as real alarms, and hopefull they will be infrequent. I also added the cyropump fill valve alarms, if these go off a pump overfill is imminent. New alarms have guidance text attached.

I changed the alarm startup script (called from the medm site map) to only start the relevant alarm handlers (relevant to the status of the IFO and site at this time).

H2 INS
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:18, Thursday 24 March 2011 (661)
H2 PSL Installation

Table legs were grouted into place today. We attached fans to them to help them dry.

Images attached to this report
H2 INS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:53, Thursday 24 March 2011 (660)
Ops Day Summary
PSL table legs grouted
Wire brushing in HAM 12
Dirty room moved over new location of HAM 8 to drill mounting holes
Sprague arrived
BSC7 HEPI work
H2 INS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:50, Thursday 24 March 2011 (659)
BSC7 NW & SE HEPI Installation Progress

[Corey, Greg]

Had another late start today as we had to give up our crane till late morning (If we had the crane to ourselves, I'm sure we could have easily finished installing HEPIs today).

NW Location

Today, we pulled out the NW aLIGO HEPI (S/N 51) and swapped it with one which had a correctly-positioned HEPI Foot.  As with the SE, this one dropped in nicely and required no horizontal positioning of the Housing (preserving the HEPI Foot range).  As for vertical position, we went with a 0.25" Shim & had to drop the HEPI Foot slightly to accomodate.

Note:  This one is missing a "Right" Housing Clamp.  We have one ready to go and will install it tomorrow.

SW Location

Here we had a iLIGO Actuation Stack in place.  This was removed and staged for "trash/recycling".  The iLIGO Adapter Plate was traced on the Pier.  But for the Drill Template, instead of lining up to the Adapter Plate mark, we set the Template to the (4)-corner Holes on top of the Pier.  Greg then drilled and tapped the holes.  I gathered up clamping hardware.

This HEPI (which will be S/N 77) will be installed in the morning to minimal fanfare.

Images attached to this report
X1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:15, Thursday 24 March 2011 (658)
Q3 Build and Q2 Re-Build update
Q3 - The final ECD blocks were added to the Main Chain.  TFs were taken before and after the ECD blocks were installed, for comparisons.  We currently do not have a spec on where to set the ECD blocks, so we'll need someone to look at the plots to discuss.  Unfortunately, there is a problem with DTT's ability to re-display saved REF traces in saved files, so I don't have good plots to upload here.  Jim Batch is looking into this problem which apparenly has been a problem in the controlroom as well.

Q2 has been re-hung in the LSAT, refitted as an ITM with weights as per the following:

PenRe = 59,289 g
TCP dummy = 20,032 g
PEN = 39,710 +/-20 g
TM = 39,610 +/- 20 g

The blades of the UIM and Top Masses had been reset to the new lower blade tip parameter set on the bench, so the hang from the UIM down on the LSAT was quite easy - very minimal adjustments made to the blade tip heights and lateral positions.
H2 INS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:10, Wednesday 23 March 2011 (654)
Today's HEPI Work

(Corey, Greg)

BSC7 NE, SE, & NW HEPI Installation Progress

After consulting with Hugh about NE HEPI work from yesterday, we figured out torque values to work with (1/2" bolts we took to 67ft-lbs & set screws for the base clamps we took to only 35ft-lbs).  We also decided to put (3) thick washers under the two Crossbeam->HEPI Foot bolts which interfered with the HEPI Foot vertical Adjustment Screws.  (Attached is a photo of these bolts---their heads are seen inside the Crossbeam).

In the afternoon, we moved onto doing a full swap at the SE location.  The original HEPI was removed, and then a new one was craned up (this one had a correctly pre-positioned Foot).  The Foot was mated up with the Crossbeam (basically make sure the four bolts on top fit through holes). 

This swap was smooth in a few ways. For Vertical, we were very close to having a 0.25" gap.  So we used the 0.25" Shim and only had to lower the Foot very slightly.  The Foot was then torqued to the Crossbeam.  At this point we checked horizontal positioning of the Assembly (yesterday, the Assembly was slightly off so we had to move the HEPI Housing structure).  Today, our holes lined up, so we didn't have to make any horizontal moves (thus preserving HEPI Foot range---a good thing!).

The HEPI Assy which was installed here (South East) was S/N 45.

We are now staged to do a HEPI swap on the NW Pier in the morning.

HAM HEPI Foot Positioning

We moved to Foot Positioning in the morning since the WEST crane was tied up for most of the morning (HAM12 doors).  Two HEPI Feet were positioned.

Photo Captions:
1)  This is a peak inside the Crossbeam where the heads of the bolts which connect to the HEPI Foot are (notice that two needed several washers as spacers to keep the bolts off of the Vertical Adjustment screws of the HEPI which are below)
2)  The 0.25" Shim installed (and a shot of the Vertical Adjustment screw mentioned above)
3)  Gap between HEPI Housing & Support Bracket (better than yesterday!); this is one of our on-the-fly Support Brackets which was modified by Apollo
Images attached to this report
H2 General
jeffrey.garcia@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:02, Wednesday 23 March 2011 (657)
Ops Day Summary


			
			
H2 General
jeffrey.garcia@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:02, Wednesday 23 March 2011 (656)
Ops Day Summary
Throughout the day:
HEPI install work on BSC7
scrub cleaning prep on HAM 12 – door removed first

~10:15 – contractor on-site for End-Y work

~4:30 – Grant and Robert out to LVEA to crane mounting on the H1 PSL for the squeezer work.

Other:
Dani and Richard modified the Card Access control so the readers will allow exiting doors without an exit swipe.  The enter swipe is still active.  This will reduce alarms in the control room, allow contractors and others to leave and enter without being “locked out”, and not pose any hazards, because  the LVEA is “laser safe”.  

LHO FMCS
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:26, Wednesday 23 March 2011 (655)
CP8 follow-up
I closed the check-valve bypass valve for CP8 this morning and enabled the instrument air to the LLCV.  The PID is back in control of CP8's LN2 level.
LHO FMCS
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:14, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (652)
CP8 alarm, IP12 fix followup
CP8 overfilled following repeated reboot/restore cycles today.  

Dave B. needed to reboot the VE at the X-end to incorportate new parameters into the database.  These new parameters were to correct for the similar but different output (to CDS) of the newly replaced and updated ion pump controller for IP12.  Dataviewer data indicates that the PID output controlling CP8's liquid level control valve (LLCV) was erroneous following the burt restore and not based upon the PID's reading of CP8's actual level.  The result was a rapid overfilling of CP8 following the manual enabling of the instrument air to the LLCV at some point after the restore.  This overfilling resulted in exhaust vapor pressure building and GN2 leaving the 80K pump via three paths:  

1) the normal exhaust line to atmosphere
2) backwards flow through the reneneration line and out to atmoshpere through a preexisting broken weld at the ambient air vaporizer 
and 3) into the VEA through the diaphram of the newly installed magnehelic differential presure gauge which had ruptured due to the high pressure (diaphram rated for 15 psig, nominally 1.5 psig).  

-> I valved-out the broken magnehelic gauge and will replace it later.  
-> I opened the exhaust line check-valve bypass to to reduce exhaust line back pressure.  
-> I placed my hand on the Burst Line pipe (it was warm) and confirmed that the pump's burst disk hadn't ruptured.  

Dave B. was able to repeat the events and to observe the bogus PID output following a subsequent reboot of the VE rack (remote reboot?).  He will continue his investigation next Tuesday to better understand the events and to propose a fix.  

I am leaving the instrument air "not enabled" to prevent any further filling of CP8 overnight and will restore PID control after the pump level receeds back below alarm levels (tomorrow).  

LHO FMCS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:59, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (651)
reboot of h0veex caused CP8 to over fill

Kyle will write a separate alog with the vacuum details of this event.

I rebooted h0veex to fix the ion pump epics database to match the new hardware. After the IOC was rebooted and the PID control of the LN2 level in CP8 was enab led the pump quickly overflowed because the fill valve was incorrectly set by the software to 92% open. I tested the EPICS code and found that if the IOC was soft booted, or reset by the watchdog card, the fill valve was always opened to the LN2 level set point (nominally 92%). I went to EX and power cycled the VME crate twice, the first time the fill valve started at 41% (which happened to be half the setpoint at the time) and the second time the IOC started correctly with 0% valve opening (because CP8 was 112% full at this time).

I did an initial investigation of the database and no immediate problem could be found. Having the output of the PID record be essentially the setpoint indicates that the controlled PV is zero on its first run, but it is not obvious how this could be. Also the different starting behavior between a reboot and a power cycle may indicate the erasure of mv162 RAM may be an issue.

This is the first time we have encountered this error on any PID controlled LN2 level, so aging hardware may also be a factor. We will continue the investigation this week and would like to reboot this system again next Tue maintence to test its robustness.

We are also discussing adding software limits to prevent this from happening again.

H2 INS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:24, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (650)
BSC7 HEPI Work: Positioning Support Tubes/Crossbeams & Installing HEPI

[Corey, Dave, Greg, Hugh, Mark, Mick, Scott]

Support Tube/Crossbeam Centering

Scott, Dave, & Hugh determined that the BSC7 Crossbeams/Support Tubes (a "big metal square") Assembly was roughly out of place (i.e. the ends of the Support Tubes were not centered within their nozzles & hence the Bellows were also flexed a little...not sure how these guys got pushed around).

So with measurements by the crew above, this morning we went about the process of getting the "big square" centered.  For the most part it went well.  Closing the final gap was a little tough in that we could get the assembly where we wanted, but it would spring back to a place where it wanted to be.  So, we manhandled the assembly into place, and then lowered the load via the crane.  The crossbeams were then torqued in place onto the Support Brackets.  We now had the Support Tubes/Crossbeams at a much better place, and wanted to make sure the HEPI are positioned wrt the Crossbeams.

HEPI Swap

Greg & I have been pre-positioning HEPI Foot Assemblies on the floor in preparation for the installation.  Now that BSC7 Crossbeams are better positioned, we wanted to install these pre-positioned HEPIs (instead of adjusting the feet of the HEPIs already in place...would have been a little tough to do this 10' up next to the chamber).

So we pulled out the NE HEPI assembly and replaced it with SN 54 HEPI assembly.  We positioned this HEPI such that the four bolts on top for the Crossbeam/HEPI Foot connection could be made.  This was a VERY TIGHT FIT.  Most of the interference came with the Support Bracket (seemed like there were some spots where we had less than a 1mm of clearance [see photo]). 

Once the HEPI Foot was in place, we selected a Shim to fit between the Foot & Crossbeam (previously, a 0.5" shim was used).  This time the 0.25" shim looked the best (vs. the 1/8" shim).  To make this shim fit, we had to the lower the HEPI Foot a little.  We were able to lower the Foot a little via the Vertical Foot Clamping Bolts, but we also had to loosen the "top" bolts of the Spring.

ISSUE:  now that we have 0.25" less space here, the bolts we were using could not be used---they were too long.  Two of them would be ok, but the other two would run into the heads of the vertical HEPI Foot positioning bolts (see photo of how much these bolts run through the HEPI Foot top plate).  So, we need to find new bolts for this connection.

For the time being, we torqued down the two bolts which had no interference.  Once the foot was clamped to the Crossbeam, we backed off all of the HEPI Foot Clamping Bolts and then moved the HEPI Assy to line up with bolt holes on the Pier.  We want to move as little as possible here so we don't jeopordize any range of the Foot.  The two carbon steel 1/2-13 HoloKrome bolts on the inside of the HEPI Assy which bolt to the Pier technically have torque values of 150ft-lbs (!), but since they are going thu such a big hole/with a wide washer, we didn't want to use this value (went with 45ft-lbs).  (Is this ok??)

This HEPI Assy is close to being complete, but we still have a few issues we'd like to go over with Hugh.  We'll then move onto the other HEPIs.

Images attached to this report
LHO FMCS
dani.atkinson@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:06, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (649)
Ops Day Shift Summary
  • A reboot of the EX vacuum system front-end this morning caused the overfilling of CP8 and some damage to equipment. Kyle resolved the immediate problem and other repairs will be necessary. Dave rebooted several times and eventually resolved the issue in the code.
  • HAM8 was removed from its usual location, and work is underway to prepare its new spot behind HAM7.
  • Preparations were made for preparing to prepare the grout preparation at H2PSL.
  • Oscar baled tumbleweeds.
LHO FMCS
mark.lubinski@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:16, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (648)
Well pump
Ran well pump to fill tank.
H2 INS
michael.rodruck@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:44, Monday 21 March 2011 (644)
H2 PSL Installation

Linoleum was removed inside the grout dams and table legs were set inside, and leveled. We plan on grouting the legs into place tomorrow with hydrostone.

X1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:15, Monday 21 March 2011 - last comment - 10:44, Tuesday 22 March 2011(640)
Q3 ECDs mounted
I installed the ECD blocks on the R0 Top Mass/Tablecloth.  Attached is a plot showing the TF taken just before the addition, as a reference, and with the ECDs set to within a mm of touching the mass.  The green and black peaks are with the ECDs, and show significant attenuation of peaks.  We need to determine if the placement of the blocks is acceptable, or if they need some in or out adjustment. - Plot to be uploaded when test stand power is recovered.
Comments related to this report
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 15:32, Monday 21 March 2011 (641)


		
		
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 07:50, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (645)


		
		
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 07:51, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (646)


		
		
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 10:44, Tuesday 22 March 2011 (647)


		
		
Non-image files attached to this comment
H2 INS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:10, Thursday 17 February 2011 - last comment - 10:08, Wednesday 23 March 2011(554)
dust monitors replaced
Yesterday Robert and I found that the pump in the mechanical room that pulls air for the dust monitors that have their internal pump removed was not pulling air. Today I read the flow on the attached flow meter as .15. This means that the data from locations 1 (ISCT4), 7 (H2 racks) and 10 (H1 PSL) has been invalid for an unknown period of time. Also possibly location 8 (H1 racks), which had been replaced with one with an internal pump earlier. So today I went and replaced locations 1, 7 and 10 with ones that have an internal pump. Note also that dust monitor 3 was moved yesterday into a clean room next to where the jack hammering is taking place. Also for a period yesterday, location 4 was moved onto the floor by the H1 PSL, but has been moved to location 8 today.

Locations of LVEA dust monitors:
1 ISCT4
3 Clean Room over BSC4
5 Beer garden
6 Diode room
7 previous location of H2 racks
8 H1 racks
10 H1 PSL
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 10:08, Wednesday 23 March 2011 (653)
3 moved into clean room over HAM 12
4 added outside clean room over HAM 12
9 added at H2 PSL area
Displaying reports 77761-77780 of 78398.Go to page Start 3885 3886 3887 3888 3889 3890 3891 3892 3893 End