Displaying reports 78221-78240 of 81621.Go to page Start 3908 3909 3910 3911 3912 3913 3914 3915 3916 End
Reports until 09:20, Thursday 19 July 2012
H2 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:20, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3496)
Reflective Memory Loop reconfigured at EY

It appears that the RFM loop on the managed hub (VMIC 5595) is in the opposite way to which we imagined, from the higher numbered port down to the lower numbered port. Because we put the loop together "backwards" it turned out that for the IOP watchdog on the SUS ETMY frontend to communicate with the SEI BSC6 front end less than a foot away phyiscally, it had to run through 8km of fiber because we extended the loop to the LVEA on Tuesday this week. To run through 8km of fiber optics cable takes about 40uS. The IOP runs at 64KHz, with a processing loop taking about 15uS. So not surprisingly the SEI BSC6 IPC receiver was giving 65538 error per second.

The EY ISC was also going through 8km of fiber to communicate with SUS ETMY. This system runs at 16KHz and has 60uS loop time. 40uS could have been just sufficient, and indeed I did see a non-zero communication error rate, at about 1 error per minute.

I reconfigured the RFM loop at EY to the following

[ISC EY] -> [SUS ETMY] -> [SEI BSC6] -> [LVEA SUS ITMY] -> back to ISC EY

Now the EY IOP watchdog error rate is zero. I'll trend the ISC EY -> SUS ETMY to check it is now truely zero, but I watched it for several minutes last night and it was zero.

H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:45, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3495)
H1 MC2 Transfer Functions

I am running some TFs on MC2.  This is noted for other tester staff.  Everyone else should continue work as normal in the LVEA.

H2 ISC
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:23, Thursday 19 July 2012 - last comment - 09:42, Thursday 19 July 2012(3492)
OAT - spectrum with ISI Isolation

Vincent left the ISIs on with their new isolation loops tonigiht.  Their performace is noticably better than a few days ago at 1Hz, and the lock is quite stable.  The attached plot shows 3 spectra: green is with the BSC8 ISI tripped, blue with both ISIs running their isolation loops, and red with some more SUS damping (the SUS settings suffered a setback after recent changes to the models).

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - 02:25, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3493)

Bram, Matt

The cavity is left unlocked (ISCTEY HEPA fan off) in anticipation of Hartman work starting in a few hours.  The CM PDH path is off, the ETM offload path is open, and the ITM is misaligned by ~1000 counts in YAW from +554 to -500.

vincent.lhuillier@LIGO.ORG - 09:42, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3497)

New blend filters were installed on the 2 ISIs (750mHz blend - less agressive than the initial ones). 250mHz low blend filters were installed on stage 1 - Y direction on BSC8 exclusively. Isolation filters of the 2 ISIs had some minor tweaks.

H2 SUS
jeffrey.garcia@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:45, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3488)
Revisions to H2 SUS ITMY & ETMY Simulink models
Dave B., Jeff G.

The Simulink models for H2 SUS ITMY and ETMY were modified today to add the RFM capabilities between the Corner and End-Y stations.  Both models 'h2susitmy.mdl" and "h2susetmy.mdl" been compiled and installed on the frontends 'h2susb478' and 'h2susb6', respectively.  The top level of each custom model needed the inputs re-connected to the common "QUAD_MASTER" library part.  There were six additional inputs added to the "QUAD_MASTER.adl" inputs and three outputs, which were terminated from the top level.  The changes to the top level were also intended to facilitate the use of the newly-installed IPC card on 'h2susb6'. 

Changes saved and committed to the SVN under:
'~/userapps/sus/h2/models/'  as  "h2susitmy.mdl" & "h2susetmy.mdl"
H2 ISC
bram.slagmolen@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:16, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3491)
ISCTEY (ALS Table) WFS installed nad new lens for RF LSC Diode

Alberto, Keita and I finalised the WFS beam paths. The beam sizes are ~3-4mm in diameter on each of the WFS, with a picomotor mirror mount as the last optic/mirror before the WFS.

The beams are 'mostly' centered on the WFS. I haven't measured any power levels.

We placed a R=100mm (focal length ~200mm) lens infront of the RF LSC diode. This inturn seems to work properly, and there are no gain fluctuations in the CM PDH transfer function (as was the case with the previous attempt, although it tunred out that we could not work out the focal length of the other lens).

The CM PDH lock is ~12 kHz with -14dB of gain at the input. We may want to shift this gain down the path somehow.

The RF LSC diode gives ~29 mV DC.

H2 ISC
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:16, Thursday 19 July 2012 - last comment - 15:17, Thursday 30 August 2012(3490)
OAT - first dither alignment

It is a long way from being robust, and it is quite slow, but the cavity dither alignment worked this evening.  The commands are:

YAW
./tdsdither 1.9 30 4 0 300 H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_TEST_Y_EXC H2:ISC-ALS_EY_REFL_PWR_MON_OUT H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_OFFSET_Y 10 5
./tdsdither 2.3 50 5 0 300 H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_Y_EXC H2:ISC-ALS_EY_REFL_PWR_MON_OUT H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_OFFSET_Y 10 5

PIT
./tdsdither 1.9 30 4 90 300 H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_TEST_P_EXC H2:ISC-ALS_EY_REFL_PWR_MON_OUT H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_OFFSET_P 10 5
./tdsdither 2.3 50 5 30 300 H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_P_EXC H2:ISC-ALS_EY_REFL_PWR_MON_OUT H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_OFFSET_P -10 5
 

The new tdsdither is a perl script replacement for the malfunctioning ezcademod which currently lives in userapps/trunk/isc/common/scripts.  The attached image shows the power increase as the ITM and ETM alignment are dithered.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - 15:17, Thursday 30 August 2012 (4042)

With the new channels names the commands are:

PIT

./tdsdither 1.9 30 4 90 300 H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_TEST_P_EXC H2:ALS-Y_REFL_B_PWR_OUT H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_OFFSET_P 10 5

./tdsdither 1.9 30 4 90 300 H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_P_EXC H2:ALS-Y_REFL_B_PWR_OUT H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_OFFSET_P -10 5

 

YAW

./tdsdither 1.9 30 4 90 300 H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_TEST_Y_EXC H2:ALS-Y_REFL_B_PWR_OUT H2:SUS-ITMY_M0_OFFSET_Y 10 5
./tdsdither 1.9 30 4 90 300 H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_TEST_Y_EXC H2:ALS-Y_REFL_B_PWR_OUT H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_OFFSET_Y 10 5

H2 AOS
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:12, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3489)
Beam on ETMY

After a lot of work from Dave and the Jeffs, we got the SUSs running again.  Keita and Bram also finished revamping the ALS WFS telescopes, so there is now beam on ETMY and some power in the cavity.  It should be ready for Hartman work in the morning.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:52, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3487)
plots of dust counts
Attached are plots of dust counts > .5 microns in particles per cubic foot.
Non-image files attached to this report
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:47, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3486)
Operated LVEA East crane from ~1530 to ~1630 hrs. local


			
			
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:13, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3485)
H1 HAM3 HEPI Actutors Attached & Released--IAS says OK!
Completed the Horizontal Actuator attachment and release of all the Actuators today.  Jason (IAS) checked and we are in spec.  I still want to do to a final Vertical Elevation & Level check of the Table.
H1 AOS
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:11, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3484)
Initial Alignment of HAM3 ISI
IAS: J. Oberling
SEI: H. Radkins
 
Initial alignment of the HAM3 ISI has been completed, pending a final level/elevation check by Hugh.  Alignment was done by using 2 sets of crossed scales for x-axis position and rotation measurements and a corner cube for distance measurements for the y-axis position.
 
A smaller scale is mounted perpendicular to a larger scale with the smaller scale sitting horizontally and centered on the edge of the larger scale.  This assembly is then attached to a fixture (a "scale mounting fixture") designed to place the crossing point of the two scales on the centerline of the ISI table.  2 of these assemblies are used and mounted at opposite ends of the ISI table, ~2m apart.  This allows us to measure both x-axis (North/South) position and yaw rotation.  Measurements from both scales will be given, denoted by the side of the ISI table the scale is mounted on, East or West.  For the y-axis position, we know the location of the monument our equipment is set up on and the location of the East scale mounting fixture on the ISI table.  It is then a simple subtraction to calculate the required distance from the total station to the first scale mounting fixture to zero the ISI table on the y-axis; the distance is 2009.3mm.  Since the total station only reports distance to 1mm, we used 2009mm.  All specs for table position are ±1 mm (totat station EDM accuracy for y-axis position is ±2 mm, it's the best we can do with this equipment); specs for table rotation are ±100 µrad.
 
The measurements are:
LHO General
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:05, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3483)
Moved Broadband Photodetector S1200235
Broadband photodetector S1200235 has been removed from MY, and is now in the LSB for testing of the ALS fiber distribution chassis. 
H2 ISC
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:44, Wednesday 18 July 2012 - last comment - 12:44, Wednesday 18 July 2012(3480)
Cavity Motion Noise Budget -- getting there!
J. Kissel, F. Matichard, P.Fristchel

After putting together information from all over the everywhere, I've produced (dare I call it) a NoiseBudget for the H2 OAT Y Arm cavity. Attached are the results. 
[[Editorial Note: I've uploaded -v2 of the plots. Now the calibration for the cavity length signal is just 1e-9 [m/nm], as Matt suggests in his comments below. Also removed the free-running laser frequency noise from SARM L budget since it's not applicable when the PLL is on, and corrected the ylabel typo on the Pitch estimate, so it now reads [rad/rtHz] as expected.]]

All data was measured starting at 2012-07-17 04:50UTC (7 averages, BW 0.005, 50% overlap), which we believe is the second stretch of cavity lock shown in LHO aLOG 3463.

Captions (labeled by page number):

(1) The Money Plot, showing the my predicted cavity length against the directly measured cavity length, in [m/rtHz]
(2) A similar model of the cavity pitch, but still a prediction without a measurement that directly confirms it

[[The remaining plots are merely for support of the first two:]]
(3 - 5) For ITMY, individual NoiseBudget breakdown of test mass motion degree of freedom used in the model (L, V, and P)
(6 - 8) For ETMY, individual NoiseBudget breakdown of test mass motion degree of freedom used in the model (L, V, and P)
(9) A comparison between the BSC-ISI's input spectra for Y (projected to L in the model), and RX (projected to P in the model)
(10 - 11) For ITMY and ETMY respectively, the contribution of every degree of freedom input to pitch of the test mass
(12 - 13) Directly measured spectra of BSC8- and BSC6-ISI's ST2 GS-13s,
(14 - 15) Model transer function between all DOFs at the SUS point and the test mass.


Calibration Details:

ISI ST2 GS13s
     - Channels: H2:ISI-$(OPTIC)_ST2_DAMP_$(DOF)_IN1_DQ
     - Input filter calibration: ON (creates an ideal 1 Hz geophone, that asymptotes to 1 [(nm/s) / ct] at high frequency)
     - DTT: (Based on LHO aLOG 3458)
         units: [m]
         gain: 1.59e-10 [m/ct] (1e-9 [m/nm] * 1/(2pi) [rad / (rad/s)])
         poles: 0,0,0
         zeros: 0.7 0.7
         (I gathered/plotted/calibrated the data in DTT for sanity check, then exported the data, uncalibrated, to Matlab)
     - Matlab:
         Used production calibration file:
         $(SeiSVN)/seismic/BSC-ISI/Common/Calibration_BSC_ISI/aLIGO/aLIGO_BSC_ISI_Calibration.mat
         code snippet:
              isiCalibration = load(bscCalibFile);
              gs13Model_nm = abs(squeeze(freqresp(isiCalibration.GS13_Model,2*pi*freq)));
              rawData = load(bscDataFile);
              rawFreq = rawData(:,1);
              for  iChan = 2:size(rawData,2)
                  interpData(iChan,:) = interp1(rawFreq,rawData(:,iChan),freq);
              end 

              for iDOF = 1:6
                  % X Y RZ Z RX RY
                  bscData(1).ST2.CART(iDOF,:) = interpData(iDOF+1,:) ./ abs(gs13Model_nm' * 1e9);
                  bscData(2).ST2.CART(iDOF,:) = interpData(iDOF+7,:) ./ abs(gs13Model_nm' * 1e9);
              end 

Cavity Length Signal 
     - Channel: H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DQ (which is the control signal from the VCO FMON [[I think]], but passed directly to the M0 TOP stage of the QUAD)
     - DTT: (Based on LHO aLOG 3482)
         units: [m]
         gain: 1e-9 [m/nm]
         poles: (none)
         zeros: (none)
     - Matlab: (Based on above)
         code snippet:
              % H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_LOCK_L_IN1_DAQ is already calibrated into [nm], so we just
              % need to multiply by 1e-9 [m/nm]
              cavityData = interpData(14,:) .* 1e-9; % [m] 


Data collection details:

The original data collection .xml can be found here:
$(SusSVN)/sus/trunk/Common/Data/2012-07-17_H2OAT_ASDs.xml

which has been exported to 
$(SusSVN)/sus/trunk/Common/Data/2012-07-17_H2OAT_ASDs.txt


Model script: $(SusSVN)/sus/trunk/QUAD/Common/MatlabTools/plotsinglearmmotion.m
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthew.evans@LIGO.ORG - 09:55, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3482)

The output of PDH_FMON, and ISC input to the ETM, is already calibrated in nm.  That, this part:

cavityModel_m.gain      = 6.1e-10;   % [m/ct]
              cavityModel_m.poles_Hz  = [1.6 10 10];
              cavityModel_m.zeros_Hz  = [40 100 100];

Is already in the PDH_FMON filter bank.
H2 SUS
jeffrey.garcia@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:17, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3481)
H2 SUS ETMY burt restore file updated
The safe-state burt backup file for H2SUSETMY was updated yesterday after some newly-installed Simulink parts were added to the "h2susitmy" user model.  The damping filters were turned off and DC alignment offsets zeroed for the snapshot.  The snapshot file is under SVN control locally in:
'/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h2/burtfiles/etmy/h2susetmy_safe.snap'.

The DC alignment offsets on the ETMY M0 stage used to align the beam were initially:
H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_PIT_OFFSET = -2820
H2:SUS-ETMY_M0_YAW_OFFSET = 1215

These values were set to zero for the safe snapshot file.  This file is used by the start-up process when rebooting the user model "h2susetmy".  The intention is to have the system in a state that is not actuating on the suspension when rebooted.
H2 SUS
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:45, Tuesday 17 July 2012 - last comment - 08:01, Wednesday 18 July 2012(3478)
What's going on with ETMY?

Nothing seems to work (MEDM screen all white), and from Dave's alog entry it sounds as if RFM work was not the direct cause of this.

Why no alog?

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 08:01, Wednesday 18 July 2012 (3479)
Attempts were made to both upgrade the h2susitmy and h2susetmy models, in addition to adding RFM parts. The attempt to upgrade the SUS was left incomplete and non-functional, unbeknownst by those adding the RFM parts who also tried upgrading. The result is the current disaster you found. I will dive in an rectify, in concert with Dave B., this morning. 

All apologies.
H1 ISC
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:06, Thursday 12 July 2012 - last comment - 09:45, Thursday 19 July 2012(3420)
TMS ISC Table Stability

I measured the TMS ISC table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet last night.

I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appears to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively.

See attached plots. The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table's doors reduced its amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details). Fianlly I compensated for the loop gain.
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The airflow due to the HEPA filters was shaking the PZTs and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are meant to stay off. The plot attached shows a comaprison of the PZT control signal spectra with the HEPA filters ON (reference traces) and OFF.
 
Data and matlab code code are in the svn: /svn/cdsutils/trunk/ALS/TMS_stability 
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
I measured the TMS table angular and lateral stability when the end station VEA was quiet.
I found the table displacement to be around 5-10 um rms laterally and 1-3 urad rms in angle over 100s. The motion thus appear to be within the requirements: 100 um and 1 urad, respectively. See attached plots.
 
The bump below 1 Hz is probably due to the table's roll mode. A peak shows up at about 8 Hz due to the table enclosure: opening the table doors reduced the amplitude.
 
The measurement was done with the PZT loops closed. These loops use the TMS green QPD error signals and have a UGF of about 8 Hz. I then calibrated the PZT control signals according to the manufacturer's specs and used the ABCD matrix of the beam path from the PZT onwards on the ALS table (see attached drawings for the optical details).
 
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.Initially the spectrum looked mostly flat up to 10 Hz, masking any features of the TMS table motion. After checking for several causes, eventually turning off the HEPA filters in the ALS table as Bram suggested, solved the problem. The intense airflow due to the filters was shaking the PZT and the other optics on the table. This shouldn't be a problem during science mode, when the filters are off.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - 06:49, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3494)

These are the close loop plots of the same measurements.

Non-image files attached to this comment
alberto.stochino@LIGO.ORG - 09:45, Thursday 19 July 2012 (3498)

As Keita noted, the HEPA-off curves show a large bump at around 100mHz which which goes above spectra with the HEPA on. It's not clear why.

Displaying reports 78221-78240 of 81621.Go to page Start 3908 3909 3910 3911 3912 3913 3914 3915 3916 End