EricA CoreyG HughR Re--WorkPermit 3029 We got 3 vertical and 1 horizontal Actuators connected so 1/2 way there. We didn't get started on the actual attachment til 1pm so I think we should be able to wrap it up in the morning. We'll still need to adjust the Springs after all connected but again, maybe we'll be wrapped up early afternoon. As usual, please be mindful of the dial indicators if you are in their neighborhoods.
D. Cook, J. Oberling
We placed 3 new monuments west of BSC06 at End Y today for use in the in-chamber alignment of the H2 ETMy. These are labeled IAM-25, IAM-26, and IAM-27 and their coordinates are as follows (units of mm):
After powering up the FMy satellite boxes and checking that the EE on the outside of the chamber were functioning properly (thanks, Richard), I went in the chamber to look at the in-vacu stuff. Indeed, the cable that needed an end-to-end swap before the holiday break, had not finished making it to it's connecting octopus cable. When I tried to seat it, I found that the 225 cable needed helicoils, preventing good connection. We're hunting tools now to finish helicoiling these (all 3 225 cables need the helicoils) connectors.
I often use HTML tags in my aLOG entries to change fonts or colors in my entry. Sometimes, I forget to close the tag. This causes the rest of the page of logs below it to inherit the property of the tag I left open. (Others have done this / use HTML tags / caused this error -- I say this only to emphasize that it's not just me; it's beside the point). For example, search the log for my name, and the keyword "/Common/MatlabTools/." This returns several entries (to be sure I demonstrate them getting "infected" by my left-open <font face="courier"> tag). Scroll to entry 1507 (a comment to Jeff Garcia's entry 1506, 5 entries down), and see that all entries below it have their font changed. EVEN MORE CURIOUS: The bug manifests itself differently on different platforms. On a workstation-like machine ( Ubuntu 10.04 LTS, running FireFox 3.6.24), the open tag affects rest of the page in it entirety. On my laptop (Mac OS X 10.7.2, FireFox 8.0.1) it only affects the headers and footers to the entry (Subsystem/Task, Author and Date, and Title; any attachment indicators), the bodies retain their formatting. I usually catch this user error, because I run preview before I post, but sometimes it slips. Regardless, I think the log should be robust against this sort of user error.
J. Betzwieser, B. Bland, J. Kissel While trying to turn on H2SUSFMY, post-cartridge install, we noticed two problems with the sensor signals coming in from the OSEMs. (1) On the input side, the raw ADC channels (H2:SUS-FMY_M1_OSEMINF_*_IN1_DQ) were very small, and oscillating around zero (say, 0 +/- 5 cts). (2) Just after the compensation filters, the signals (H2:SUS-FMY_M1_OSEMINF_*_OUT_DQ) were large (say, 120000 +/- 5 cts). The first problem turned out to be that the H2SUSFMY Rack electronics were not powered on. Once turned on, we found a different problem: signals were all 100 +/- 2000 cts, where these channels should never go negative. If centered and the suspension is free the signals should be +15000 +/- 1000. This is still under investigation, stay tuned for further results. The second problem turned out to be a bug in the OSEMINF deWhite, sat amp compensation filters (installed in FM1 of the H2:SUS-FMY_M1_OSEMINF_* filter banks). These filters were installed with the matlab easyquack/automatic compensation filter generator software suite called using, ${SusSVN}/sus/trunk/Common/MatlabTools/prepare.m some time ago to test out the program (last time I was at LHO, between Nov 13 and Nov 20, 2011; I didn't aLOG it). Since, we've discovered a bug in the generator that adds a factor ~6 DC gain to these filters, when they should have a DC gain of 1. Joe is aware of the bug, and currently fixing it, but in the mean time, in the interest of expediency I've just fixed the bug "by hand," editing the filter text file in foton. These fixed filters have been loaded, and the OSEMINF_*_OUT signals appear as expected (baring in mind the first problem is still there). Once Joe fixes prepare, we'll try running it again (and I'll aLOG it this time!).
Happy New Year: Glad to be back.
- SUS continuing transfer function measurements on H2 ITMY
- IAS at BSC8 aligning baffles
- H1 PSL flooring crew arrives
- Removing iLIGO piers and cross-beams from HAM2
- Setting MC tubes at H2 output
- UniFirst, Praxair deliveries
- FilibertoC by HAM2, pulling cable
The Control Room is no longer in use as it is being upgraded:
- The daily morning INS meeting is now held in the large OSB Conference Room. Extension 203 will no longer lead you to the INS Meeting.
- The new ops station is across from the Control Room, in the Computer Users Room. There is a roof-cam for deliveries, EPICS alarm handler, MEDM, phones (x202/Gate and x158), an Mac workstation with two monitors and a miniMac with a huge HDTV (will have PIP with roof-cam once we figure that out). If you run Safari on the miniMac (HDTV), you'll see links to see the cameras in the outbuildings. There's still significant fan noise from the Beckhoff SuperMicro rack-mountable test machine and the LDAS tape library. Nevertheless, we are working on damping these noise sources. Eventually, the LDAS tape library will be shut down.
- There is a large CDS antique collection outside of the Control Room for enhancing your productivity at work (not home). Unclaimed items will be discarded.
There were issues with attempting to engage the ITMY M0 and R0 damping filters. After investigation, the medm filter values for the *COILOUTF_* gains were inconsistent with earlier changes to these gains. The ITMY M0 and R0 damping filters were last engaged on the LVEA SUS Test Stand with these values just before the BSC8 cartridge install. Damping functionality can be confirmed with a live dataviewer session displaying the signal damping. The values have been changed to the following: ITMY M0 COILOUTF_* 01/03/2012 before 01/03/2012 AFTER F1 = -1 F1 = 1 F2 = 1 F2 = 1 F3 = -1 F3 = -1 LF = 1 LF = -1 RT = -1 RT = 1 SD = 1 SD = -1 -------------------------------------------------- ITMY R0 COILOUTF_* 01/03/2012 before 01/03/2012 AFTER F1 = -1 F1 = 1 F2 = -1 F2 = 1 F3 = 1 F3 = -1 LF = -1 LF = 1 RT = 1 RT = -1 SD = 1 SD = -1
I've remotely closed the H2 SUS ITMY M0 and R0 damping loops, and confirmed that they are now functional, as they were when confirmed by Jeff G ! Just to be sure we don't loose this information, I've burt captured two states /opt/rtcds/lho/h2/userapps/release/sus/h2/burtfiles/itmy/ h2susitmy_damped.snap (Damping loops ON) h2susitmy_safe.snap (Damping loops OFF) One thing I'm confused about: the COILOUTF gains shown above are inconsistent with the polarity of the magnets (as per E1000617): COILOUTF Gain Magnet Sign M0 F1 + N M0 F2 + S M0 F3 - N M0 LF - S M0 RT + N M0 SD - S R0 F1 + N R0 F2 + N R0 F3 - S R0 LF + N R0 RT - S R0 SD - S From the chart above, it would be consistent (N == +, S == -), if the M0 F2 and M0 F3 magnet signs were flipped -- either in E1000617, or physically on the suspension. Now -- this raises a flag -- M0 F2 and M0 F3? We had some unresolved cross-coupling between Longitudinal and Yaw drive while the cartridge was still on the mechanical test stand, originally seen in LHO aLOG 1839 and further confirmed in LHO aLOG 1852. If the magnet sign was/is flipped on one of these two sensors and the COILOUTF gains did not properly compensate for them, we would expect to have excess cross-coupling between Yaw and Longitudinal. For now, we have damping loops running, and we will leave the suspension as such, so that the seismic group can press forward. However, in the down-times between the seismic testing suite, and before we close up the chamber, we should (among other planned tests) (1) Retake the low-frequency Y2Y and Y2L transfer functions, to confirm that the cross coupling is still present. (2) If so, we should measure OSEM Basis transfer functions (F2toF2, and F3toF3, and maybe others) and compare. (This should really be a part of our standard testing suite.) (3) If we're still confused, we'll need to take off the F2 anf F3 OSEM sensors and measure the magnet signs.
While discussing with Anamaria about what might be going ON, I drew up two tables to help me better elucidate the problem. I include them here, 'cause they might be useful for broader discussion. If we take the magnet polarity from E1000617 as cannon, then I would expect the M0 face sensors to have the following signal-sign-flip chain (assuming a positive coil current repels a N, and attracts a S magnet) Test OUT E2O Gain COILOUTF Gain Current Out Magnet Pol. Resulting Force Resulting Motion { F1 0 +1 0 N none } + Long---{ F2 + -1 - S Push } -- + Long { F3 + +1 + N Push } { F1 - +1 - N Pull } + Pitch--{ F2 + -1 - S Push } -- + Pitch { F3 + +1 + N Push } { F3 0 +1 0 N none } + Yaw----{ F2 + -1 - S Push } -- + Yaw { F3 - +1 - N Pull } This is how I had set up the COILOUTF gains before today (though I was off by an overall minus sign). However, since Jeff G.'s has re-installed COILOUTF gains as he has shown above, and the damping loops close and are stable, then that implies the following magnet polarity Test OUT E2O Gain COILOUTF Gain Current Out Magnet Pol. Resulting Force Resulting Motion { F1 0 +1 0 N none } + Long---{ F2 + +1 + N Push } -- + Long { F3 + -1 - S Push } { F1 - +1 - N Pull } + Pitch--{ F2 + +1 + N Push }-- + Pitch { F3 + -1 - S Push } { F1 0 +1 0 N none } + Yaw----{ F2 + +1 + N Push } -- + Yaw { F3 - -1 + S Pull } In other words, though the magnet polarities are properly compensated for, it doesn't match E1000617. That means if any other suspensions are assembled to the E1000169 specification, we can't necessarily use these COILOUTF gains. Other thoughts: - Because both of the above arrangements should result in the same motion, I'm lowering my EURIKA! flag a little on the guess that this is the source of the cross-coupling. - It's strange that the cross coupling does not appear in both degrees of from, i.e. Yaw resonances don't show up in the L2L TF, but L resonances show up in Y2Y. I think I may have thought this before which let me down the "it's air currents!" path. Anyways, my path forward outlined above still holds... we need a few more measurements before we start changing hardware -- or close the chamber and "aLIGO accept" the suspension.
(Corey, Eric, Greg, Hugo, Jim)
HAMISI Assy#3
With Assy#3 completing its full suite of Testing, we began prepping this Assy for removal. First off was removing the Test GS-13s (the locations and serial numbers for these sensors are below).
There were some issues with cables on this assembly in that some of them had single band clamps near the plugs. Double bands are required for better strain relief and to prevent the cables from coming apart.
HAMISI Assy#1
Actuator Re-alignment & Install
Before disassembling this ISI, Set-Up Bars were installed on the Actuators to maintain their alignment. Unfortunately, some of the Set-Up Bars weren't torqued down, so we lost their alignment (it was visibly noticeable after we installed them on the re-assemebled Assy#1). We have since pulled them off and are re-aligning them with the Actuator Alignment Fixture for re-install.
We have maintained location consistency, and the serial #'s/locations of these Actuators are consistent with what was posted in this older elog.
GS-13 Install
The GS13s from Assy#3 were removed, and then put directly on to Assy#1. We maintained the same locations for both assemblies. So here is location and S/N info for these Test GS-13s on Assy#1:
I have added in the simulink model the block that enables the interractions between the SUS and the HEPI watchdogs. If the SUS wachdogs trip, HEPI actuation will be stopped.
At midnight (UTC) Dec 31 all H2 front end computers went into a DAQ error state. Their GPS times reset back to Jan 01 2011. This was tracked down to a IOP software error in reading out the IRIG-B card, which was fixed today by a change to tag 2.3.1 RCG. All the H2 IOP systems were recompiled and all front end were power cycled at approx 13:30. All models were burt restored to 13:00 today.
So all fast front end framed data has been zeroed by the DAQ from 4pm Sat 31st local time to approx 13:30 local time today. Slow channels in the frame were unaffected by this problem.
Attached is a cartoon of the Y-End test stand cartridge alignment monument locations
I've often been confused by the functionality of the "Quick Search" and the "Search Tasks" shortcuts in the top middle of the aLOG home page. Rather, I understand the "Search Tasks" field -- I just think it's functionality is not needed -- and the "Quick search" is not reliable enough at returning good search results to be useful. More accurately, "Quick search" only searches for the entered text as a keyword. For example a search for "kissel" doesn't return anything written by me, only the one's to which I've added my name in the text. Another example, if I enter in an aLOG entry number "1933" it returns nothing. Conversely, I think the "Search" page has enough versatility that it returns exactly what I want, everytime. In summary I suggest: Removal of the "Search Tasks" possibility, and have the "Quick Search" use the user input as all possible search fields (Section/Task, Report ID, Date, Authors, and keywords), if we want to keep the quick search at all.
The quick search area should be more versatile now. The task selection is staying on the main page so that users can easily filter to only a specific task if needed.
Summary: I measured particle counts in the Y-manifold and newly-cleaned BSC8, and compared them to levels I measured in 2007. High-activity particulate levels (>0.5um) were about 100/ft^3 in BSC8, down by a factor of about 10 from 2007, and about 1000/ft^3 in the manifold, unchanged from 2007. After cessation of activity, manifold particulate levels dropped by a factor of 2 approximately every 7 minutes. To prevent activity in the manifolds from contaminating the clean chambers, I suggest using a dam to separate clean and unclean regions and/or selecting purge air ports so that the air flows from clean BSCs to unclean manifolds.
In preparation for installing the arm cavity and cryopump baffles, which will require work in the un-cleaned manifolds, I compared in-chamber particle levels for activity in the manifold to levels for activity in BSC8. I did not want my manifold measurements to contaminate clean BSC8, which has the ITM and FM, so I ensured that purge air was flowing out of the Y-manifold where it is open at the gate valve, and my simulated activity took place between the purge air port and the opening at the gate valve. The manifold measurements were made after vacuuming of the manifold. My measurements in BSC8 took place while Travis was unlocking and preparing the quad, which involved a lot of movement and sliding on the chamber floor.
I took several tens of 1 liter measurements, which are summarized here and compared to measurements taken at the same locations in 2007, here, before the cleaning of BSC8.
Counts per cubic foot >0.5 micrometers in diameter
Y-Manifold BSC 8
Activity level 2007 2011 2007 2011
High (sliding, walking) ~1000 ~1000 ~1000 ~100
Low (careful movement) ~200 ~150 ~25
The cleaning of BSC8 appears to have reduced particulate levels during heavy work by about an order of magnitude. I also experimented with brushing the chamber wall with my bunny suit. In the manifold I got large pulses of counts (>1000/ft^3) as particles came off the wall, but in BSC8 I got no evident increase in particle levels (~25/ft^3).
Thus the cleaning of BSC8 was successful but, if we are not careful, the particle load from activities in the manifold may swamp any gains from cleaning BSC8. For the part of the arm cavity baffle installation procedure that requires moving in equipment through the manifold, we plan to install the dam between the manifold and BSC8, with the aperture in the dam mostly blocked with foil in order to reduce the quantity of particles that enter BSC8 from the manifold.
After settling (counts dropped by a factor of 2 in about 7 minutes) we will remove the dam and retrieve the staged equipment from the manifold while trying to minimize scuffing the floor and brushing the walls. I find that I can walk in the manifold and maintain ~100/ft^3 level by not sliding my feet and not brushing the walls.
I also suggest that, where possible, the purge air be set up so that the flow is from clean chambers into the dirty manifolds. This is currently not the case at BSC8 and would require switching purge air ports.
Robert
Kyle, John -> Verified BSC10 annulus volume was vented by opening to atmosphere -> No change in Y-end indicated pressure (as expected since volume had yet to be pumped by aux. cart) -> Stopped pumping BSC6 annulus volume with aux. cart and vented to atmosphere -> Y-end pressure responded by increasing from 7.7 x 10-7 torr to 8.1 x 10-7 torr -> Torqued BSC6 South, West and East door bolts as well as spool bolts -> Y-end pressure responded by returning back to initial value of 7.7 x 10-7 torr. Resumed pumping BSC6 volume with aux. cart. Kyle -> Sprayed helium around new feed throughs and conflats on BSC6 and new GNB spool -> signal fell linearly from a starting value of 5.0 x 10-9 torr*L/sec to 1.9 x 10-9 torr*L/sec during period of helium application (this does not mean that these joints "pass" a leak test).
Greg, Dan, Cyrus, Jim, Dave
We have relocated the iLIGO CDS servers to the LDAS server room. Details can be found in the DCC document D1102272.
Services include: old ilog, blue web pages, lho supported wikis (cdswiki, 40m, upconv, iLIGO, mLIGO). Work is in progress to relocate the 40m wiki to Caltech.
We have attempted to retain the old URLs to make the transition transparent. These systems are now read-only and are not being backed up beyond this point of time.
please email any suggestions/problems to david.barker@LIGO.ORG
In anticipation of putting the Arm Cavity Baffle on to the ISI Stage0, we've put the HEPI (and entire Cartridge) on stops at the HEPI Crossbeam Foot. This lifted the assembly 1 to 2 mils (.001-.002") monitoring the dial indicators. We also brought in the out board stops (facing inward) on each Foot just to further constrain the position. In case I don't make it back after the new year please don't forget. GregG knows the story and where the numbers are recorded. *** Please don't disturb the dial indicators at the Support Tube ends *** Once the ACB is mounted up, we'll lift the load off the set screws, back them out of the way and set the payload back where it started.
For the record, we left the ITMy fully suspended and un-clothed for the break, in the event some testing took place. The FMy is still stopped with it's EQ stops. Also for the record - just before the break, Travis finished attaching the FMy baffle to the FMy (Thomas and I started this but didn't finish).
Correction: FMy was left off it's stops over the break as well. All suspensions in BSC8 are currently hanging and awaiting TFs in preparation for the handoff to SEI for their portion of testing.
Today I finished helicoiling and connecting the FMy cabling at the optical table. While this eliminated a possible source of problems, it turned out the real problem was a bent pin on the air side of the feedthrough. After straightening the bent pin, the cable was reconnected and successfully tested for functionality.