Displaying reports 901-920 of 85656.Go to page Start 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 End
Reports until 19:29, Tuesday 30 September 2025
H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:29, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 21:14, Tuesday 30 September 2025(87239)
Mid-Shift Status: H1 Down 90 Min With Good DRMI But No Locking

H1 had a lockloss about 90min ago for no obvious reasons.  All was quiet as well.  Attempted to relock but DRMI did not look great; also went for Check MICH Fringes + PRMI---could not even get PRMI locks after letting it try for 20min.  Ultimately went for an alignment and where we are.  Flashes look mostly decent and POP18/90 are flashing close to 200, but just have not had any locks (only a few short ~1sec locks thus far).  Microseism is just under the 95th percentile.  Currently at 20min of DRMI locking.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 21:14, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87240)

After over 3hrs, H1 finally locked an "xRMI"!!  It took lots of waiting, 2-alignments, and me leaving the Control Room (with Lockloss Alerts on my phone) and working on the JAC table to stop me looking at DRMI and H1 trying/struggling....and just let them do their thing!  (was about ready to make some phone calls!  Oh and we are currently in USEISM state.

4:05utc Back to Observing (since being down since 0:51utc).

H1 SEI
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:47, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87238)
H1 ISI CPS Sensor Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

Famis task 26658 H1 ISI CPS Sensor Noise Spectra Check - Weekly


Compairing to https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=87025
HAM7_CPSINF_V2 & HAM7_CPSINF_V3 look a bit elevated around 36hz. 
ETMX_ST2_CPSINF_V3 has a 16hz increase in it, actually so does ST1.



 

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:51, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87235)
Tues EVE Ops Transition

TITLE: 09/30 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 7mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.40 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1's been locked 3+hrs (locking post-Maintenance went smoothly according to TJ!).  

There is a CE/ET beam tube meeting going on this week (will be locking doors at "close of buisiness tonight).

Also got word from Erik that we can test a new ndscope with "ndscope -test".

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:35, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87234)
New ITM HWS References Taken while at 25W Move spots.

Dave, TJ, Camilla

While Dave was troubleshooting a HWS file issue (started in 84865 but just noticed via HWS Live issues), TJ and I took new HWS references for ITMX and ITMY while we were re-locking at 25W in, MOVE_SPOTS. This is not the best place to take new references, so we plan to take new references again next Tuesday while in DOWN with a cool IFO. 

Yesterday Matt and I realized that the ITMX HWS frequency had been at 57Hz rather than the nominal 1Hz since the power outage which was making the SPHERICAL_POWER signal very noisy, reverted to 1Hz.

H1 SQZ
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:28, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87233)
SQZ Pump Path Alignment Adjusted

WP12822, Sheila, Camilla 

Followed what we did in 82881, but did not need to adjust alignment through the EOM. Last done only ~6 weeks ago in 86323

SHG Power dropped when we opened the table and turned on the fan and again when we closed up so we adjusted the SHG TEC temperature twice, it ended up where it started, plot attached

Starting with:

Then with 0V on ISS AOM controlmon, increased throughput, this was a yaw move of the AOM, moving the AOM in +X. Then put 5V on controlmon and started to maximize the 1st order beam. We decided to not completely maximize 1st order as this reduces overall throughput and our current aim is to increase total green throughout, not ISS AOM range.

Ended with:

Sheila then adjusted the alignment into the fiber and maximized H1:SQZ-OPO_REFL_DC_POWER (needed to reduce power going into fiber with pico-waveplate to avoid saturating PD).

This allowed us to have an OPO setpoint of 80uW with 25mW going into the fiber, with 5 on the controlmon and a spare~20mW that we could give to the fiber.  Note that after ~2hours, the controlmon had decreased from 5 to 4. So the power to the AOM may need to be increased next time we loose lock.

I checked the NLG and OPO temp in the process:

OPO Setpoint Amplified Max Amplified Min UnAmp Dark NLG
80 0.0132987 0.000179 0.0005779 -1.67e-5 22.4
Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:32, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87220)
Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 09/30 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: Fairly light maintenance day, with relocking being automated other than me testing out some tramps at find ir. as of right now we have been locked for 1 hour.
LOG:

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:23, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87232)
HWS EY Power Measured.

WP#12819 Elenna, Camilla 

Elenna and I went to the EY VEA, opened the ALS table and measured the power out of the HWS collimator, there was 9uW out of the collimator and 31uW out of the fiber, before the collimator. We didn't take the wincam down there but I've attached two photos of the beam, one straight after the colimator, and one before HWS-S2 D1400241. It looks very top-hat like. 

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:02, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87231)
OSEM Calibration Update for PRM and SRM

Edgard ran the OSEM calibration calculations for the measurements Jeff and I took last week for PRM(measurements, results) and SRM(measurements, results). Today, I updated the OSEMINF gains with the newly calibrated ones for their respective suspension and OSEM, and I also installed the compensation gains into the DAMP filters for PRM and SRM to counter the apparent shift in alignment due to the updated calibration OSEM gains.

To update the OSEMINF gains I put the stage, OSEM, and gain values into a txt file and used my script /ligo/home/oli.patane/Documents/WIP/estimator/OSEMcalib_updateOSEMINFgains.py to go through and update all the OSEM gains. Here are the outputs for that - PRM, SRM.

To add the DAMP compensation gains in the DAMP filter bank, I put the dof and gain values into a txt file (only for M1) and used my script /ligo/home/oli.patane/Documents/WIP/estimator/OSEMcalib_DAMPcomp.py to remove the old filters that were in FM7 (they were not being used and are sdf'd if we end up needing them again) and replaced them with the compensation gains. Here are the outputs for that - PRM, SRM, and here are the filter changes before I loaded them in - PRM, SRM.

I then went through and turned FM7 on for DAMP M1 for PRM and SRM, and then went through the safe.snap and observe.snap and accepted the gain and filter status changes (PRM, SRM).

These updates means that there will be an apparent change in alignment on PRM and SRM, but this change in alignment is not real.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 OpsInfo
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:27, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87230)
Reduced ALS_DIFF Find IR tramps

There are two tramps in the LONG_SEARCH_IR state in ALS_DIFF for when we are trying to find IR, I've changed these to 1 second when stepping around a known value and to 2 seconds when transitioning to a new known value. Previously these were 4 and 10 respectively. 

Years ago I tested this and found that I couldn't rush this pzt, but I didn't document why or to what extend. I've been frustrated with how long it has been taking, so I wanted to try it out again and see if I could speed it up and/or find out why I couldn't before. I couldn't really create any issues, but perhaps they only rear their head up when we aren't the best aligned. I ended up bringing them down to the values listed above with repeated success so I'll leave it there and continue locking.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:55, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87228)
OSEMINF compensation filters updated to align with satamp swap: PR2 (M2, M3) and SR2 (M2, M3)

Continuing with our satamp swaps for the lower stages, Fil swapped out the M2 and M3 satamps for PR2 and SR2 today (87225). To properly compensate for this change, I used the TIA measurements Jeff took for each satamp's channels and used my script /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/Common/PythonTools/satampswap_bestpossible_filterupdate_ECR_E2400330.py to update the compensation filters (satampfilterupdate_output). I then checked that they looked good(PR2, SR2) and loaded them in.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:24, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87227)
LVEA swept

I adjusted a PEM cable to be more out of the walking path by the TCSY table and I also unplugged, rolled up, and moved an unused extension cable out of the way in the same area. I also put folded away a ladder that was out next to SUS R4.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:20, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 09:10, Wednesday 08 October 2025(87226)
HAM4 ISI coil driver found making a ticking noise, probably a fan

This morning while in the CER for other reasons, I heard a coil driver on HAM4 ISI making a ticking/chirping noise. Fil suggested this was probably a fan, so we've pulled the chassis to check it out. We've put in a spare and will run that until next maintenance probably.

Chassis pulled is S1100320, the spare we put in is S1103567. Frs is https://services1.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=35547 

Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 09:10, Wednesday 08 October 2025 (87369)

We swapped the old chassis back in yesterday, after Fil replaced the fan last week.

H1 SUS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:31, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 15:59, Monday 13 October 2025(87225)
Sat Amps Modified: PR2 and SR2

WP 12813
ECR E2400330
Modified List T2500232

The following SUS SAT Amps were upgraded per ECR E2400330. Modification improves the whitening stage to reduce ADC noise from 0.05 to 10 Hz.

Suspension Old New OSEM
PR2 M2 S1100174 S1100159 ULLLURLR
PR2 M3 S1100093 S1100141 ULLLURLR
SR2 M2 S1100169 S1100070 ULLLURLR
SR2 M3 S1100134 S1000295 ULLLURLR

F. Clara, J. Kissel, O. Patane

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:21, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87237)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100159, assigned to PR2 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1100159_PR2_M2_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
PR2      M2       S1100159         CH1                UL           0.0956:5.22      120.25    "zpk([5.22],[0.0956],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0967:5.28      120       "zpk([5.28],[0.0967],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0978:5.34      120       "zpk([5.34],[0.0978],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0969:5.3       120       "zpk([5.3],[0.0969],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:19, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87262)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100141, assigned to PR2 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1100141_PR2_M3_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
PR2      M3       S1100141         CH1                UL           0.0957:5.22    120.25    "zpk([5.22],[0.0957],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0949:5.17    120.5    "zpk([5.17],[0.0949],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0977:5.33    120.375    "zpk([5.33],[0.0977],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0946:5.16    120.25    "zpk([5.16],[0.0946],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:24, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87263)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100070, assigned to SR2 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1100070_SR2_M2_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
SR2      M2       S1100070         CH1                UL           0.0961:5.24    120.25    "zpk([5.24],[0.0961],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0965:5.27    120.375    "zpk([5.27],[0.0965],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0961:5.23    120.5    "zpk([5.23],[0.0961],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0963:5.26    120.75    "zpk([5.26],[0.0963],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 15:26, Thursday 02 October 2025 (87264)

(Since Jeff is out of town, I'm putting these in for these swaps.)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1000295, assigned to SR2 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284.

The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
         plotresponse_S1000295_SR2_M3_ULLLURLR_20250924.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are
Optic    Stage    Serial_Number    Channel_Number     OSEM_Name    Zero_Pole_Hz    R_TIA_kOhm    Foton_Design
SR2      M3       S1000295         CH1                UL           0.0964:5.27    121.75    "zpk([5.27],[0.0964],1,""n"")"
                                   CH2                LL           0.0954:5.21    121.625    "zpk([5.21],[0.0954],1,""n"")"
                                   CH3                UR           0.0955:5.22    121.375    "zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,""n"")"
                                   CH4                LR           0.0964:5.26    122    "zpk([5.26],[0.0964],1,""n"")"
                                   
  
The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in
    ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:41, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87223)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Sep 30 10:09:27 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 24secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:08, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 13:27, Wednesday 01 October 2025(87221)
Measurements of IMC ASC DOFs coupling to RIN

M. Todd


Summary

This morning I used the early maintenance day to come in and make some measurements of IMC DOF Transfer Functions to ISS Second Loop RIN. I started by doing some OPS/GRD settings as I was here about an hour before the operator was set to come in.

I got through the first DOF measurement (DOF_1_P) without any hiccups; however a 7.0 earthquake from Philippines came in an unlocked us. Fortunately, I did not have to wait long for the IMC to relock and I proceeded with the other measurements.

DOF 1 and DOF 2 are relatively robust, but upon starting the DOF 3 measurement I had to lower the gain even more than anticipated, as the 1 and 3 Hz resonances are quite strong. The first run at this unlocked the IMC. After clearing the IMC DOF 3 P history, I let the IMC relock (it was having trouble) and continued with the subdued measurements.

I also tried to measure the UGF of each DOF loop, but was nervous about injecting that hard at the frequencies I suspected would contain the UGF.

Later, I will post a comment that tries to map the quiet time IMC contributions to the ISS Outer RIN in the regions we have enough coherence.


List of Figures

  1. DOF 1 P Measurement of IMC to ISS 2ND LOOP RIN
  2. DOF 1 Y Measurement of IMC to ISS 2ND LOOP RIN 
  3. DOF 2 P Measurement of IMC to ISS 2ND LOOP RIN
  4. DOF 2 Y Measurement of IMC to ISS 2ND LOOP RIN
  5. DOF 3 P Measurement of IMC to ISS 2ND LOOP RIN
  6. DOF 3 Y Measurement of IMC to ISS 2ND LOOP RIN
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - 13:27, Wednesday 01 October 2025 (87250)

I'm adding a plot of projections of the quiescent noise in each IMC DOF loop to the ISS second loop. Note, I've cut off the TFs above 3 Hz due to coherence loss.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 CDS
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:59, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87222)
Laptop update and search at the end stations

[Tony, Erik]

We updated laptops at both end stations and looked for laptops left lying around.   We found one disconnected Zotac in the CER at EY and brought it back to the corner station as a spare.

H1 TCS
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:58, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87219)
TCS sock filters replaced

FAMIS31407

Swapped the filters in the two chillers while they were running this morning. There was slight discoloration in both. The mesh diffusers/flow straighteners had some gunk buildup in them. I have some that should have arrived today that I will put in later.

H1 CDS (SUS)
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:57, Tuesday 30 September 2025 - last comment - 10:43, Tuesday 30 September 2025(87218)
ETMX Hardware Watchdog Verified

[Tony, Erik]

We verified that the ETMX hardware watchdog started to count down when the connection from the satellite amps for ETMX was removed.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 10:43, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87224)
Images attached to this comment
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:10, Tuesday 30 September 2025 (87217)
Fire pumps testing, cell phone alarms have been bypassed for the duration of the test.

Bypass will expire:
Tue Sep 30 12:08:51 PM PDT 2025
For channel(s):
    H0:FMC-CS_FIRE_PUMP_1
    H0:FMC-CS_FIRE_PUMP_2
 

Displaying reports 901-920 of 85656.Go to page Start 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 End