Displaying reports 81-100 of 87023.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 16:53, Friday 13 March 2026
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:53, Friday 13 March 2026 (89505)
SUS-AUX models' filter-module MEDMs now available

The SUS-AUX models have filtermodules, and until now the MEDMs for these have not been easily accessible.

With help from AI, I have written a python program which produces a set of MEDMs to permit navigation down the SUS-AUX tree to open MEDMs which display the filter modules.

To open the top level screen, which lists all the susaux models, a "SUSAUX Filters" button has been appended to the SUS pull down in the systems section of the SITEMAP (first attachment).

The second attachment shows the resulting FM screen when navigating from h1susauxb13 -> ITMX -> L2 -> NOISEMON

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General (IOO, ISC)
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:43, Friday 13 March 2026 (89504)
Friday Ops Day shift report.

TITLE: 03/13 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY:
The Commissioning crew today were focused on trying to get PRMI locked and stable for most of the day. Thye touched up the REFL A alignment which helped. 
But there seems to be some power lost somewhere.

This spreadsheet was created to document the difference in the ratio of  IMC Trans power/IMC input power back in the O4 run and now.  Specifically when the PSL is set to 2 Watts. Feel free to update this in the future.

 The Gain for H1:ALS-C_TRX_A_LF_GAIN has been bumped from 1.5 to 3 to get past FIND IR without issue.
This may not be the only gain that has been turnt to 11 to get DRMI to almost lock today,  Sheila will be posting an alog later with some laser power acounting that may shed more light on that situation. Yes the Pun was intended.

LOG:                                                                                                                                                                                 

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:39 FAC Randy Xarm N Plowing the Tumbleweeds 17:02
15:06 H2O Water contrators Well N Testing the well water 18:06
17:04 VAC Travis Cleaning Racks & west bay, All ES and Mids N Looking for parts 19:34
17:26 FAC Randy LVEA N Walk about in the LVEA 17:49
18:28 PEM Ryan CER N Checking Dust mons 18:31
18:32 SPI Jeff & Josh Optics Lab Yes Working on SPI setup. 23:07
18:43 ISC Sheila & Oli LVEA Yes Tweaking alignments on ISCT1 19:09
18:50 OPS LVEA IS Birfurcated HAZARD HAM1 LOCAL LVEA Bifurcated LASER HAZARD 11:29
19:37 EE Marc LVEA & CER N placing stickers and parts. 20:07
20:36 EE Fil & Marc Mid Y N getting cables. 21:14
20:49 VAC Gerardo EndY N Anulus ion pump controller testing, unplug replug 21:24
21:15 PEM Ryan C LVEA N chasing cables 22:25
23:24 Cheta Sophie Cheta Lab local Workign on Cheta 00:24
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:10, Friday 13 March 2026 (89502)
OPS Friday EVE shift start

TITLE: 03/13 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.21 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1 CDS
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:34, Friday 13 March 2026 (89500)
ndscope updated

There was a conda update on control room workstations to update ndscope from 0.20.7 to 0.20.8.

The new version fixes a bug where old data could be left on the plot when changing the time window if there was no data for that window from NDS.  Thanks to Jenne for finding this bug.

It also fixes a bug where HDF5 and Matlab exports might be empty, and improves messaging around exports.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:00, Friday 13 March 2026 (89499)
Fri CP1 Fill

Fri Mar 13 10:15:08 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 15min 4secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:59, Friday 13 March 2026 (89497)
9MHz modulation depth was low

Tony, Filiberto, Sheila, Jennie Wright, Oli

This morning we tried to do an OMC scan to check the modulation depths.  The OMC high voltage was off, Filiberto found that the supply was powered on but the output disabled, so he enabled it.  

We used 10W input power single bounce off ITMX.  I compared this to a reference from 65828, it seems as thought the 9MHz is too small. 

  April 2022 this morning  (EOM driver 23.4dBm 9 Mz, 27dBm for 45MHz) now  (EOM driver 27dBm 9 Mz, 27dBm for 45MHz) modulation depth now (calculated by Oli and jennie W) modulation depth from April 2022 (alog 81816)
9MHz +/00 peak height 11.4e-3 5.04e-3 11.7e-3 .217 0.213
9MHz -/00 peak height 11.7e-3 5.4e-3 11.6e-3 .215  
45MHz +/00 peak height 1.9e-2 1.7e-2 1.7e-2 .266 0.275
45MHz -/00 peak height 1.9e-2 1.7e-2 1.7e-2 .265  

Jennie Wright checked modulation depths in 89456, at that time the EOM driver was set to 27dBm for 9MHz, on 10 am on March 10th it was set to 23.4dBm.  This was in SDF as 23.4dBm, but this channel is not monitored and this table is not in SDF revert. ISC_LOCK prep for locking sets these values because they get changed in low noise, I've changed it in lsc params now.  

Images attached to this report
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:44, Friday 13 March 2026 (89495)
Friday Morning shift report.


TITLE: 03/13 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: EARTHQUAKE
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 1.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.21 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

Site is wet, wind is low.
When I walked in there was an active 6.3M earthquake rolling through from Chile.
I'll give the earthquake about 10 more minutes to roll on through then start locking green arms and PRX for the comissioners.
 

LHO General (SUS)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:21, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89490)
Thurs EVE Ops Summary

TITLE: 03/12 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Jenne/Jennies locked pseudo-PRMI earlier in the shift.  Ran trend plots of sus for comparison between today and Nov2025 (see Jenne's alog).
LOG:

H1 ISC (SUS)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:52, Thursday 12 March 2026 - last comment - 21:19, Thursday 12 March 2026(89492)
Time of PRMI locked from Nov 16 2025

It would be helpful to have a comparison of the top mass osem readbacks for optics, comparing this time in the attachment from Nov 15 2025, to tonight.  In both of these times PRMI is locked with arms held off resonance with ALS (ISC_LOCK state 50). 

Past time for comparison: 15 Nov 2025 00:26:00 UTC, plus or minus 1 minute (but check that ISC_LOCK_STATE_N was 50, and we want closer to the end time of that state 50 time). 

Now time to compare: 2026-03-13 00:40:16.264360 UTC, plus or minus 10 mins. 

Optics to trend:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 21:19, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89494)SUS

Here are comarison screenshots for the SUS Jenne mentions (skipped optional ones) between PRMI-locked-with-arms-held-off-resonance-state today and back in Nov2025.  Comparisons are of upper mass OSEM's pit & yaw IN1 channels.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:42, Thursday 12 March 2026 - last comment - 10:36, Friday 13 March 2026(89491)
PRMI locked 1f using REFLAIR, many analog gains cranked up

[Sheila, Jennie, Jenne, RyanS, Corey]

We have been able to get PRMI locked (with arms held off resonance using ALS).  To do this we:

PRMI locked without too much fuss.  Since we've effectively also increased the noise on the error signals, it's a bit delicate, and I lost lock twice while touching up alignment. The third lock I was able to go a bit slower when touching up BS and PRM alignment, and we've now been locked for more than 20 mins (aka infinity).  Jennie is taking PRCL and MICH OLGs.

The attached image shows all the things that I had changed. 

Nothing is in guardian (except maybe some trigger thresholds which should be reverted), and nothing is saved in SDF. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:36, Friday 13 March 2026 (89498)

I did a sneaky phasing of POP18 yesterday, by 180 degrees, to make the flashes positive. 

jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 18:06, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89493)

I used the lscparams to change the MICH triggers so I shave put these values back.

Below are OLG TFs I ran from userapps/lsc/h1/templates/PRCL and userapps/lsc/h1/templates/MICH

For PRCL the measurement is shown here where blue is the reference measurement in the tenplate, and red and green are the measurements I took today with different injection amplitudes.

We had to raise the injection in PRCL by a factor of 2.5 ti check the wiggles we can see in the gain between 10 to 30Hz are real.

Here is the measurement for MICH. Not sure we understand either of these yet. More investigation to come tomorrow.

 

Here is an ndscope with the 'good PRMI ACQUIRE time' we were using to scale gains and trigger levels. That is a prmi where we eventually locked and I picked the highest flash that occurred before we did.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:05, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89489)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 03/12 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: More alignment work today to recover H1; see other alogs for more detailed accounts of the day, some of which will be posted after this one). This afternoon we are attempting to lock PRMI using the main locking steps in ISC_LOCK, which will give us a better sense of our overall IFO alignment. And it happened for just over a minute!
LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:44 FAC Kim, Nellie LVEA N Technical cleaning 15:46
15:05 FAC Randy LVEA N Walkabout 15:30
15:21 EE Fil LVEA N Cable dressing, equipment cleanup 18:06
15:31 AOS Betsy, Randy LVEA N Moving optics table 16:03
15:57 ISC Sheila LVEA Local Align ISCT1 REFL path 17:00
16:09 FAC Kim, Nellie LVEA N Technical cleaning 17:04
16:16 SEI Jim LVEA N Checking test stand 16:28
16:34 EE Marc LVEA N Cable dressing, equipment cleanup 18:06
16:46 SPI Jeff Optics Lab Local SPI characterization 19:16
17:01 SPI Jim Optics Lab Local SPI characterization 19:16
17:20 TCS Sophie Prep Lab Local CHETA table work 19:16
17:26 FAC Randy X-arm N Tumbleweed clearing 17:50
17:52 VAC Travis LVEA N Working on feedthru kits 18:11
17:53 ISC Sheila LVEA Local Align ISCT1 REFL 18:31
18:22 VAC Travis LVEA N Turn off HAM1 cleanroom 18:25
18:23 PEM RyanC CER N Looking at comtroller box 18:37
18:32 ISC Sheila, Oli LVEA Local ISCT1 REFL 20:29
18:48 VAC Travis, Betsy LVEA N Sorting parts kits (Betsy out @ 19:00) 19:09
19:44 SPI Jeff Optics Lab Local SPI characterization 23:16
19:47 AOS Betsy LVEA Local HAM1 viewport sighting 19:56
19:58 AOS Jennie Optics Lab - Looking for camera 20:22
21:29 ISC Oli, Jennie LVEA Local Checking beams on ISCT1 22:26
21:53 PEM RyanC CER N Plugging in DMs to comtrol box 22:36
21:57 ISC Sheila LVEA Local Checking beams on ISCT1 22:26
22:02 VAC Travis LVEA N Looking for parts 22:15
22:51 SEI Jim EY N Checking wind fence 23:07
23:12 TCS Sophie Prep Lab Local CHETA table work 00:05
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:37, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89488)
Thurs EVE Ops Transition

TITLE: 03/12 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.25 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

Crew continues recovery work as I walked in:  they were working on a pseudo-PRMI and then moved on to CHECK MICH FRINGES.  And allof this was after work out on the floor at ISCT1 (see 89485).  Much calmer breezes.

Operational Note: 

What we can do alignment-wise with ALIGN IFO:  Green Arms, PRX_LOCKED (for PRM touch ups).  But basically have  issues for any IR cavities alignment-wise that need WFS at this point.  (Some MICH & SRC states also work, but we don't need them at this point)

H1 SUS
thomas.roocke@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:12, Thursday 12 March 2026 - last comment - 07:27, Tuesday 17 March 2026(89487)
QOSEM Flag Gluing
[Tom R, Ibrahim]

We glued 6x of the QOSEM flags, attaching the lens (D2500277) to the aluminium body (D2500253). This was done using a jig (D2600054) to ensure the lenses were aligned to the body of the flag. We used EP30.

Only a tiny drop of glue is required, and was applied directly to the lip of the body using a thin wire. The flags will be left to dry overnight before another batch of 6 will be glued.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.roocke@LIGO.ORG - 19:12, Friday 13 March 2026 (89513)
The flag gluing yesterday was successful, with a strong joint and nothing obscuring the lens itself. We continued and glued another 6x flags up, and will do 6x more next week
Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 07:27, Tuesday 17 March 2026 (89533)EPO

Tagging For EPO.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89485)
ISCT1 alignments

Oli, Sheila, Jennie Wright, Ryan Short, Jenne Driggers

Today we aligned the ISCT1 refl and pop paths.  First, we remembered that both refl and pop are now on the same top periscope mirror: 84558.  Then we realized that the RF signal from PRMI flashes on POPAIR A was unrelated to light on the diode, it didn't go away when we blocked the diode, closed the beam diverter or shutter, or increase when we did get beam on the diode.  

We had a bit of difficulty aligning onto the pop diodes because PRMI flashes are infrequent.  With 2W PRMI flashes right now, we have about 1/10th of the POPAIR B LF light we expect, and roughly similar low RF18 flashes.  

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:19, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89483)
Moved IMC uncontrolled degree of freedom, very subtle output pointing change

[Commissioners]

As yet another thing to try alignment-wise, I moved the IMC's uncontrolled alignment degree of freedom.  

In the attached plot, the y-axis references are set from our Nov 16th, 2025 15:32:00 UTC reference time.  During this time today PRX was locked, so the absolute values on the ASC POP QPDs aren't really comparable to the reference time, but since there was no PRX ASC, there should still be changes on the POP QPDs. 

I moved MC1 (top left traces in attachment) temporarily to the top mass osem position from Nov 16th while IMC ASC DoFs 1,2,3 were all closed (with a little higher than normal gain) and indeed see that MC3 responds in the expected way for the uncontrolled DoF.  For a reminder on the uncontrolled degree of freedom, I'm looking at Jeff's G1301131 page 23. I expect the sign of the yaw on MC3 to be the same as the sign on MC1 (and it is), and I expect the sign of the pitch motion on MC3 to be opposite of that of MC1 (and it is).  So, I think that indeed I've moved the uncontrolled DoF (called DOF4 in that slide deck).  

When the uncontrolled degree of freedom is moved, I'd expect the pointing of the beam coming out of the IMC to change (I have not calculated by how much).  In the attachment, I see that IM4 trans indeed looks like it has moved by about 0.04 normalized counts.  I don't see much change on POP A or POP B QPDs - if there's any change, it's extremely small.  

Anyhow, I'm not sure there's anything deep here, but perhaps we could go back to this MC1 position from Nov 2025 and then move IM3 to get back to the reference position on IM4 trans and then move IM4 to get back to the reference position on POP QPDs, and see if that changes anything.  We've moved more than this on the IM4 and POP QPDs already over the last few days, so I'm not sure that doing so will magically fix things.

Images attached to this report
H1 TCS
sophie.muusse@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:55, Wednesday 11 March 2026 - last comment - 15:17, Thursday 12 March 2026(89475)
CHETA progress

S. Muusse


Calibrating sensors

I have been working on calibrating the sensors on the cheta tables. When calibrating the power at the pick off  that will be used to monitor CHETA power on ITM using beckhoff I was seeing voltage jumps up to saturation at 2.5V as shown in attached plot. This was determined to be due to the auto range on the thermal power head being on. This setting was turned off ( as outlined in T2600081 ) and a range of 0-22mV was selected as max incident power was ≈ 11mV.  After which a linear relationship was observed and shown in the attached plot. The laser power vs laser current and the measured V vs laser current have been takem but I havent calculated the responsivity value for the beckhoff screen yet. 


Profiling CHETA beam 

The beam profiler has been shipped back from LLO to check the alignment against the model and profile the beam size as the second lens is moved by the translation stage. This is how we aim to control the CHETA beam size.
On the Y-table the beamsize was measured over a 60mm distance and the profile was fit with a non linear fit for w0 and z0 setting M2 =1. This is shown in the attached plot.

--- Horizontal (A1) Fit ---

Fit converged: w₀=896.3+/-37.1 µm, z₀=-528.0+/-47.8 mm

Model: w₀=1020.9 µm, z₀=-704 mm

--- Vertical (A2) Fit ---

Fit converged: w₀=977.3+/-40.1 µm, z₀=-449.0+/-40.1 mm

Model: w₀=999.36 µm, z₀=-459 mm

The vertical fit agrees for both w0 and z0 within the fit uncertainties and the horizontal profile was just outside the uncertainty bounds. 
Subsequently, the beamsize has been measured along the same positions with L2 at its minimum and maximum displacements on the translaiton stage (±50mm) but this data hasnt been processed yet at will be added in a comment. 


 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sophie.muusse@LIGO.ORG - 15:17, Thursday 12 March 2026 (89484)

As described above the beam was profiled with L2 at different displacements and w0 and z0 determined using a non linear fit. The q from the fit values was then propagated to the ITM and the beamsize at the ITM was compared to the model. 

Displacement: 0.0 mm

X:
Fit converged: w₀=896.3+/-37.1 µm, z₀=528.0+/-47.8 mm, wITM = 58.14mm
Model: w0=1020.9 µm, z=725.22 mm, wITM = 52.26mm

Y:
Fit converged: w₀=977.3+/-40.1 µm, z₀=449.0+/-40.1 mm, wITM = 53.21mm
Model: w0=999.36 µm, z=458.67 mm, wITM = 53.00mm


Displacement: 50.0 mm

X:
Fit converged: w₀=794.4+/-25.4 µm, z₀=506.2+/-38.8 mm, wITM = 74.48 mm
Model: w0=818.78 µm, z=537.12 mm, wITM = 64.91mm

Y:
Fit converged: w₀=882.3+/-36.1 µm, z₀=465.0+/-44.9 mm, wITM = 65.7 mm
Model: w0=836.41 µm, z=358.2 mm, wITM = 63.24 mm

Displacement: -50.0 mm

X:
Fit converged: w₀=1164.2+/-38.2 µm, z₀=712.0+/-33.5 mm, wITM = 34.79mm
Model: w0=1321 µm, z=901.17 mm, wITM = 40.54mm

Y:
Fit converged: w₀=1117.9+/-49.5 µm, z₀=456.1+/-34.1 mm, wITM = 40.85mm
Model: w0=1214.4 µm, z=521.06 mm, wITM ​​​​​​​= 43.36mm

Images attached to this comment
H1 IOO (ISC)
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:26, Friday 20 February 2026 - last comment - 09:39, Friday 13 March 2026(89218)
JAC work today summary

Jennie W, Keita K, Rahul K, Ryan S,

 

This morning Keita turned the power up to 1 W and the purge air down in order to scan the OMC and measure the modulation index.

We had some work to do to lock the JAC, the cavity wouldn't scan properly when managed by the guardian code.

Ryan and I have looked back at it and think there may be something wrong with the feedback to the PZT. It can't be the PZT itself though, because Keita and I were able to lock on the TRANS PD signal with the dither locking done manually by tuning the PZT offset to find the resonance and then turning on the feedback.

I have enclosed a picture to aid problem solving next week.


We then had problems keeping the IMC locked so Keita had to change the threshold used to check if the cavity is locked down to 2. This was changed at line 133 in ISC_library.py at userapps/h1/isc/guardian/.

trans_pd_lock_threshold = 2

We then managed to do three scans,

one with 45 MHz off, one with both on, and one with 9 MHz off. Detailed analysis in progress.


After turning the power back down Keita and Rahul swapped the mirror we currently have in front of the TRANS PD, with the uncoated laser window that is meant to be there (JACT_BS1).

They had to top gun and swab it to remove two dust particles first.

This replacement means the power to the PD is lower and so we needed to power up to 1W to check this alignment.

I have left the mirror we took out on the table on the -Y side labelled as 'HR mirror taken out of JACT-BS1'. Need to check which exact mirror this is with Masayuki on Monday.

Keita locked the cavity manually with the REFL PD and optimised the amount of light falling onto the TRANS PD.

I powered down to 100mW and de-energised the rotation stage and closed the light pipe at the end of the day. We also had the rotation stage de-energised and locked out when we were working in chamber.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 15:31, Monday 23 February 2026 (89230)IOO, ISC

FSR = 265 MHz (see this ref and table on P.110).

FSR in s on scan = 8.39 s

For the 9 MHz on the measurement with both sb at nominal power: : 0.0103mA is the upper 9 MHz sb  vs. 0.745 mA carrier (left-hand TM00 peak).

m_9 = 2*sqrt(0.0103/0.745) = 0.235

For 45 MHZ in same measurementdata : 0.0151 mA is the upper 45MHz carrier  vs. 0.745 mA carrier (left-hand TM00 peak).

m_45 = 2*sqrt(0.0151/0.745) = 0.285

 

The 9MHz seems similar to this (alog #89001) measurement with the previous crystal (0.26) but the 45MHz is different (0.31).

jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - 09:39, Friday 13 March 2026 (89496)

Here is the scan results pic which I forgot to include.

 

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 81-100 of 87023.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End