The SUS-AUX models have filtermodules, and until now the MEDMs for these have not been easily accessible.
With help from AI, I have written a python program which produces a set of MEDMs to permit navigation down the SUS-AUX tree to open MEDMs which display the filter modules.
To open the top level screen, which lists all the susaux models, a "SUSAUX Filters" button has been appended to the SUS pull down in the systems section of the SITEMAP (first attachment).
The second attachment shows the resulting FM screen when navigating from h1susauxb13 -> ITMX -> L2 -> NOISEMON
TITLE: 03/13 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY:
The Commissioning crew today were focused on trying to get PRMI locked and stable for most of the day. Thye touched up the REFL A alignment which helped.
But there seems to be some power lost somewhere.
This spreadsheet was created to document the difference in the ratio of IMC Trans power/IMC input power back in the O4 run and now. Specifically when the PSL is set to 2 Watts. Feel free to update this in the future.
The Gain for H1:ALS-C_TRX_A_LF_GAIN has been bumped from 1.5 to 3 to get past FIND IR without issue.
This may not be the only gain that has been turnt to 11 to get DRMI to almost lock today, Sheila will be posting an alog later with some laser power acounting that may shed more light on that situation. Yes the Pun was intended.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:39 | FAC | Randy | Xarm | N | Plowing the Tumbleweeds | 17:02 |
| 15:06 | H2O | Water contrators | Well | N | Testing the well water | 18:06 |
| 17:04 | VAC | Travis | Cleaning Racks & west bay, All ES and Mids | N | Looking for parts | 19:34 |
| 17:26 | FAC | Randy | LVEA | N | Walk about in the LVEA | 17:49 |
| 18:28 | PEM | Ryan | CER | N | Checking Dust mons | 18:31 |
| 18:32 | SPI | Jeff & Josh | Optics Lab | Yes | Working on SPI setup. | 23:07 |
| 18:43 | ISC | Sheila & Oli | LVEA | Yes | Tweaking alignments on ISCT1 | 19:09 |
| 18:50 | OPS | LVEA IS Birfurcated HAZARD | HAM1 | LOCAL | LVEA Bifurcated LASER HAZARD | 11:29 |
| 19:37 | EE | Marc | LVEA & CER | N | placing stickers and parts. | 20:07 |
| 20:36 | EE | Fil & Marc | Mid Y | N | getting cables. | 21:14 |
| 20:49 | VAC | Gerardo | EndY | N | Anulus ion pump controller testing, unplug replug | 21:24 |
| 21:15 | PEM | Ryan C | LVEA | N | chasing cables | 22:25 |
| 23:24 | Cheta | Sophie | Cheta Lab | local | Workign on Cheta | 00:24 |
TITLE: 03/13 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.21 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
There was a conda update on control room workstations to update ndscope from 0.20.7 to 0.20.8.
The new version fixes a bug where old data could be left on the plot when changing the time window if there was no data for that window from NDS. Thanks to Jenne for finding this bug.
It also fixes a bug where HDF5 and Matlab exports might be empty, and improves messaging around exports.
Fri Mar 13 10:15:08 2026 INFO: Fill completed in 15min 4secs
Tony, Filiberto, Sheila, Jennie Wright, Oli
This morning we tried to do an OMC scan to check the modulation depths. The OMC high voltage was off, Filiberto found that the supply was powered on but the output disabled, so he enabled it.
We used 10W input power single bounce off ITMX. I compared this to a reference from 65828, it seems as thought the 9MHz is too small.
| April 2022 | this morning (EOM driver 23.4dBm 9 Mz, 27dBm for 45MHz) | now (EOM driver 27dBm 9 Mz, 27dBm for 45MHz) | modulation depth now (calculated by Oli and jennie W) | modulation depth from April 2022 (alog 81816) | |
| 9MHz +/00 peak height | 11.4e-3 | 5.04e-3 | 11.7e-3 | .217 | 0.213 |
| 9MHz -/00 peak height | 11.7e-3 | 5.4e-3 | 11.6e-3 | .215 | |
| 45MHz +/00 peak height | 1.9e-2 | 1.7e-2 | 1.7e-2 | .266 | 0.275 |
| 45MHz -/00 peak height | 1.9e-2 | 1.7e-2 | 1.7e-2 | .265 |
Jennie Wright checked modulation depths in 89456, at that time the EOM driver was set to 27dBm for 9MHz, on 10 am on March 10th it was set to 23.4dBm. This was in SDF as 23.4dBm, but this channel is not monitored and this table is not in SDF revert. ISC_LOCK prep for locking sets these values because they get changed in low noise, I've changed it in lsc params now.
TITLE: 03/13 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: EARTHQUAKE
Wind: 5mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 1.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.21 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Site is wet, wind is low.
When I walked in there was an active 6.3M earthquake rolling through from Chile.
I'll give the earthquake about 10 more minutes to roll on through then start locking green arms and PRX for the comissioners.
TITLE: 03/12 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Jenne/Jennies locked pseudo-PRMI earlier in the shift. Ran trend plots of sus for comparison between today and Nov2025 (see Jenne's alog).
LOG:
It would be helpful to have a comparison of the top mass osem readbacks for optics, comparing this time in the attachment from Nov 15 2025, to tonight. In both of these times PRMI is locked with arms held off resonance with ALS (ISC_LOCK state 50).
Past time for comparison: 15 Nov 2025 00:26:00 UTC, plus or minus 1 minute (but check that ISC_LOCK_STATE_N was 50, and we want closer to the end time of that state 50 time).
Now time to compare: 2026-03-13 00:40:16.264360 UTC, plus or minus 10 mins.
Optics to trend:
[Sheila, Jennie, Jenne, RyanS, Corey]
We have been able to get PRMI locked (with arms held off resonance using ALS). To do this we:
PRMI locked without too much fuss. Since we've effectively also increased the noise on the error signals, it's a bit delicate, and I lost lock twice while touching up alignment. The third lock I was able to go a bit slower when touching up BS and PRM alignment, and we've now been locked for more than 20 mins (aka infinity). Jennie is taking PRCL and MICH OLGs.
The attached image shows all the things that I had changed.
Nothing is in guardian (except maybe some trigger thresholds which should be reverted), and nothing is saved in SDF.
I did a sneaky phasing of POP18 yesterday, by 180 degrees, to make the flashes positive.
I used the lscparams to change the MICH triggers so I shave put these values back.
Below are OLG TFs I ran from userapps/lsc/h1/templates/PRCL and userapps/lsc/h1/templates/MICH
For PRCL the measurement is shown here where blue is the reference measurement in the tenplate, and red and green are the measurements I took today with different injection amplitudes.
We had to raise the injection in PRCL by a factor of 2.5 ti check the wiggles we can see in the gain between 10 to 30Hz are real.
Here is the measurement for MICH. Not sure we understand either of these yet. More investigation to come tomorrow.
Here is an ndscope with the 'good PRMI ACQUIRE time' we were using to scale gains and trigger levels. That is a prmi where we eventually locked and I picked the highest flash that occurred before we did.
TITLE: 03/12 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: More alignment work today to recover H1; see other alogs for more detailed accounts of the day, some of which will be posted after this one). This afternoon we are attempting to lock PRMI using the main locking steps in ISC_LOCK, which will give us a better sense of our overall IFO alignment. And it happened for just over a minute!
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14:44 | FAC | Kim, Nellie | LVEA | N | Technical cleaning | 15:46 |
| 15:05 | FAC | Randy | LVEA | N | Walkabout | 15:30 |
| 15:21 | EE | Fil | LVEA | N | Cable dressing, equipment cleanup | 18:06 |
| 15:31 | AOS | Betsy, Randy | LVEA | N | Moving optics table | 16:03 |
| 15:57 | ISC | Sheila | LVEA | Local | Align ISCT1 REFL path | 17:00 |
| 16:09 | FAC | Kim, Nellie | LVEA | N | Technical cleaning | 17:04 |
| 16:16 | SEI | Jim | LVEA | N | Checking test stand | 16:28 |
| 16:34 | EE | Marc | LVEA | N | Cable dressing, equipment cleanup | 18:06 |
| 16:46 | SPI | Jeff | Optics Lab | Local | SPI characterization | 19:16 |
| 17:01 | SPI | Jim | Optics Lab | Local | SPI characterization | 19:16 |
| 17:20 | TCS | Sophie | Prep Lab | Local | CHETA table work | 19:16 |
| 17:26 | FAC | Randy | X-arm | N | Tumbleweed clearing | 17:50 |
| 17:52 | VAC | Travis | LVEA | N | Working on feedthru kits | 18:11 |
| 17:53 | ISC | Sheila | LVEA | Local | Align ISCT1 REFL | 18:31 |
| 18:22 | VAC | Travis | LVEA | N | Turn off HAM1 cleanroom | 18:25 |
| 18:23 | PEM | RyanC | CER | N | Looking at comtroller box | 18:37 |
| 18:32 | ISC | Sheila, Oli | LVEA | Local | ISCT1 REFL | 20:29 |
| 18:48 | VAC | Travis, Betsy | LVEA | N | Sorting parts kits (Betsy out @ 19:00) | 19:09 |
| 19:44 | SPI | Jeff | Optics Lab | Local | SPI characterization | 23:16 |
| 19:47 | AOS | Betsy | LVEA | Local | HAM1 viewport sighting | 19:56 |
| 19:58 | AOS | Jennie | Optics Lab | - | Looking for camera | 20:22 |
| 21:29 | ISC | Oli, Jennie | LVEA | Local | Checking beams on ISCT1 | 22:26 |
| 21:53 | PEM | RyanC | CER | N | Plugging in DMs to comtrol box | 22:36 |
| 21:57 | ISC | Sheila | LVEA | Local | Checking beams on ISCT1 | 22:26 |
| 22:02 | VAC | Travis | LVEA | N | Looking for parts | 22:15 |
| 22:51 | SEI | Jim | EY | N | Checking wind fence | 23:07 |
| 23:12 | TCS | Sophie | Prep Lab | Local | CHETA table work | 00:05 |
TITLE: 03/12 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.25 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Crew continues recovery work as I walked in: they were working on a pseudo-PRMI and then moved on to CHECK MICH FRINGES. And allof this was after work out on the floor at ISCT1 (see 89485). Much calmer breezes.
Operational Note:
What we can do alignment-wise with ALIGN IFO: Green Arms, PRX_LOCKED (for PRM touch ups). But basically have issues for any IR cavities alignment-wise that need WFS at this point. (Some MICH & SRC states also work, but we don't need them at this point)
[Tom R, Ibrahim] We glued 6x of the QOSEM flags, attaching the lens (D2500277) to the aluminium body (D2500253). This was done using a jig (D2600054) to ensure the lenses were aligned to the body of the flag. We used EP30. Only a tiny drop of glue is required, and was applied directly to the lip of the body using a thin wire. The flags will be left to dry overnight before another batch of 6 will be glued.
Oli, Sheila, Jennie Wright, Ryan Short, Jenne Driggers
Today we aligned the ISCT1 refl and pop paths. First, we remembered that both refl and pop are now on the same top periscope mirror: 84558. Then we realized that the RF signal from PRMI flashes on POPAIR A was unrelated to light on the diode, it didn't go away when we blocked the diode, closed the beam diverter or shutter, or increase when we did get beam on the diode.
We had a bit of difficulty aligning onto the pop diodes because PRMI flashes are infrequent. With 2W PRMI flashes right now, we have about 1/10th of the POPAIR B LF light we expect, and roughly similar low RF18 flashes.
[Commissioners]
As yet another thing to try alignment-wise, I moved the IMC's uncontrolled alignment degree of freedom.
In the attached plot, the y-axis references are set from our Nov 16th, 2025 15:32:00 UTC reference time. During this time today PRX was locked, so the absolute values on the ASC POP QPDs aren't really comparable to the reference time, but since there was no PRX ASC, there should still be changes on the POP QPDs.
I moved MC1 (top left traces in attachment) temporarily to the top mass osem position from Nov 16th while IMC ASC DoFs 1,2,3 were all closed (with a little higher than normal gain) and indeed see that MC3 responds in the expected way for the uncontrolled DoF. For a reminder on the uncontrolled degree of freedom, I'm looking at Jeff's G1301131 page 23. I expect the sign of the yaw on MC3 to be the same as the sign on MC1 (and it is), and I expect the sign of the pitch motion on MC3 to be opposite of that of MC1 (and it is). So, I think that indeed I've moved the uncontrolled DoF (called DOF4 in that slide deck).
When the uncontrolled degree of freedom is moved, I'd expect the pointing of the beam coming out of the IMC to change (I have not calculated by how much). In the attachment, I see that IM4 trans indeed looks like it has moved by about 0.04 normalized counts. I don't see much change on POP A or POP B QPDs - if there's any change, it's extremely small.
Anyhow, I'm not sure there's anything deep here, but perhaps we could go back to this MC1 position from Nov 2025 and then move IM3 to get back to the reference position on IM4 trans and then move IM4 to get back to the reference position on POP QPDs, and see if that changes anything. We've moved more than this on the IM4 and POP QPDs already over the last few days, so I'm not sure that doing so will magically fix things.
S. Muusse
Calibrating sensors
I have been working on calibrating the sensors on the cheta tables. When calibrating the power at the pick off that will be used to monitor CHETA power on ITM using beckhoff I was seeing voltage jumps up to saturation at 2.5V as shown in attached plot. This was determined to be due to the auto range on the thermal power head being on. This setting was turned off ( as outlined in T2600081 ) and a range of 0-22mV was selected as max incident power was ≈ 11mV. After which a linear relationship was observed and shown in the attached plot. The laser power vs laser current and the measured V vs laser current have been takem but I havent calculated the responsivity value for the beckhoff screen yet.
Profiling CHETA beam
The beam profiler has been shipped back from LLO to check the alignment against the model and profile the beam size as the second lens is moved by the translation stage. This is how we aim to control the CHETA beam size.
On the Y-table the beamsize was measured over a 60mm distance and the profile was fit with a non linear fit for w0 and z0 setting M2 =1. This is shown in the attached plot.
--- Horizontal (A1) Fit ---
Fit converged: w₀=896.3+/-37.1 µm, z₀=-528.0+/-47.8 mm
Model: w₀=1020.9 µm, z₀=-704 mm
--- Vertical (A2) Fit ---
Fit converged: w₀=977.3+/-40.1 µm, z₀=-449.0+/-40.1 mm
Model: w₀=999.36 µm, z₀=-459 mm
The vertical fit agrees for both w0 and z0 within the fit uncertainties and the horizontal profile was just outside the uncertainty bounds.
Subsequently, the beamsize has been measured along the same positions with L2 at its minimum and maximum displacements on the translaiton stage (±50mm) but this data hasnt been processed yet at will be added in a comment.
As described above the beam was profiled with L2 at different displacements and w0 and z0 determined using a non linear fit. The q from the fit values was then propagated to the ITM and the beamsize at the ITM was compared to the model.
Displacement: 0.0 mm
X:
Fit converged: w₀=896.3+/-37.1 µm, z₀=528.0+/-47.8 mm, wITM = 58.14mm
Model: w0=1020.9 µm, z=725.22 mm, wITM = 52.26mm
Y:
Fit converged: w₀=977.3+/-40.1 µm, z₀=449.0+/-40.1 mm, wITM = 53.21mm
Model: w0=999.36 µm, z=458.67 mm, wITM = 53.00mm
Displacement: 50.0 mm
X:
Fit converged: w₀=794.4+/-25.4 µm, z₀=506.2+/-38.8 mm, wITM = 74.48 mm
Model: w0=818.78 µm, z=537.12 mm, wITM = 64.91mm
Y:
Fit converged: w₀=882.3+/-36.1 µm, z₀=465.0+/-44.9 mm, wITM = 65.7 mm
Model: w0=836.41 µm, z=358.2 mm, wITM = 63.24 mm
Displacement: -50.0 mm
X:
Fit converged: w₀=1164.2+/-38.2 µm, z₀=712.0+/-33.5 mm, wITM = 34.79mm
Model: w0=1321 µm, z=901.17 mm, wITM = 40.54mm
Y:
Fit converged: w₀=1117.9+/-49.5 µm, z₀=456.1+/-34.1 mm, wITM = 40.85mm
Model: w0=1214.4 µm, z=521.06 mm, wITM = 43.36mm
Jennie W, Keita K, Rahul K, Ryan S,
This morning Keita turned the power up to 1 W and the purge air down in order to scan the OMC and measure the modulation index.
We had some work to do to lock the JAC, the cavity wouldn't scan properly when managed by the guardian code.
Ryan and I have looked back at it and think there may be something wrong with the feedback to the PZT. It can't be the PZT itself though, because Keita and I were able to lock on the TRANS PD signal with the dither locking done manually by tuning the PZT offset to find the resonance and then turning on the feedback.
I have enclosed a picture to aid problem solving next week.
We then had problems keeping the IMC locked so Keita had to change the threshold used to check if the cavity is locked down to 2. This was changed at line 133 in ISC_library.py at userapps/h1/isc/guardian/.
trans_pd_lock_threshold = 2
We then managed to do three scans,
one with 45 MHz off, one with both on, and one with 9 MHz off. Detailed analysis in progress.
After turning the power back down Keita and Rahul swapped the mirror we currently have in front of the TRANS PD, with the uncoated laser window that is meant to be there (JACT_BS1).
They had to top gun and swab it to remove two dust particles first.
This replacement means the power to the PD is lower and so we needed to power up to 1W to check this alignment.
I have left the mirror we took out on the table on the -Y side labelled as 'HR mirror taken out of JACT-BS1'. Need to check which exact mirror this is with Masayuki on Monday.
Keita locked the cavity manually with the REFL PD and optimised the amount of light falling onto the TRANS PD.
I powered down to 100mW and de-energised the rotation stage and closed the light pipe at the end of the day. We also had the rotation stage de-energised and locked out when we were working in chamber.
FSR = 265 MHz (see this ref and table on P.110).
FSR in s on scan = 8.39 s
For the 9 MHz on the measurement with both sb at nominal power: : 0.0103mA is the upper 9 MHz sb vs. 0.745 mA carrier (left-hand TM00 peak).
m_9 = 2*sqrt(0.0103/0.745) = 0.235
For 45 MHZ in same measurementdata : 0.0151 mA is the upper 45MHz carrier vs. 0.745 mA carrier (left-hand TM00 peak).
m_45 = 2*sqrt(0.0151/0.745) = 0.285
The 9MHz seems similar to this (alog #89001) measurement with the previous crystal (0.26) but the 45MHz is different (0.31).
Here is the scan results pic which I forgot to include.