Displaying reports 11341-11360 of 84703.Go to page Start 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 End
Reports until 08:49, Friday 26 January 2024
LHO VE
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:49, Friday 26 January 2024 (75566)
1-25 vent vacuum diary
Late entry.
Activities at 1-25:
- The RGA was completely rebuilt at EX, and the RGA tree was already leak checked. Currently it is pumped, and it is already at the E-9 Torr region
- The 12" 3IFO feedthrough was replaced with a blank on BSC5 at EX
- The spare roughing stations were completely finished
So far, everything went as scheduled.
H1 ISC (SUS)
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:59, Friday 26 January 2024 (75565)
Remaining HAM6/OMC work

Mechanical

Electrical tests:

H1 SYS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:11, Thursday 25 January 2024 - last comment - 09:21, Thursday 01 February 2024(75564)
Vent work progress update

So far, the O4 break vent & commissioning work is proceeding as planned, with only minor hiccups.  Yesterday's TCS water leak caused a pause to the HAM6 in-chamber OMC alignment work, but we were able to resume this morning pretty quickly with only a short amount of time down.

The attached snapshot shows the planned schedule outline with green checkmarks next to the items completed so far on the left hand side.  On the right is a running log of the activities which have taken place daily (for ease of viewing all in one place).

Teams currently on:

 

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 14:26, Friday 26 January 2024 (75582)
Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:21, Thursday 01 February 2024 (75666)EPO

Tagging EPO for FARO Alignment, baffle, Output Mode Cleaner photos.

H1 ISC (ISC, SUS)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:53, Thursday 25 January 2024 - last comment - 18:18, Thursday 25 January 2024(75557)
HAM6 work Jan/25/2024: Alignment of the laser into the new OMC, day 2 (Dana, Koji, Rahul, Keita)

Summary:

We restarted the alignment work. The angle and/or the position of the new OMC relative to the cage is significantly different from the old one, and we had to mechanicaly rebalance not just the OMC, but OM3 and OM2 too, and rotate the cage of OM3. We'll see if these were good enough tomorrow.

1. Rebalancing the OMC

Yesterday, we rebalanced the OMC, the beam was on both of OMC QPDs but we didn't have time to touch up OM1 and OM2 to center the beam on OMC QPDs.  This morning we centered the QPDs and relieved the PIT offset of the OM3 as much as I could by using OM1 and OM2. Then we did another push of the balance mass, recentered the QPDs, and relieved PIT offsets of OM1/2/3 such that everybody kind of equally suffer. We ended up doing four iterations of this in total.

Following is the PIT/YAW offset slider values (ASC output to OM1/OM2 due to earlier WFS centering was already folded into these numbers).

Note1: OMn (n=1/2/3) sliders are not calibrated. Due to different EUL2OSEM matrix, OM2 apparent "range" for the sliders is about a factor of 1.7 larger than OM1 and OM3 (i.e. if you compare OM1 and OM2 coil output, the latter has a factor of 1.7 smaller output than the former given the same slider offset).

Note2: By "centering", we really mean centering w/o offsets. Since the position of the QPDs relative to the cavity mode differs from one assembly to another, there's no reason to assume that the good QPD offsets for the new OMC will be the same as the old one.

  OM1 PIT/YAW OM2 PIT/YAW OM3 PIT/YAW

Offsets that worked for the Old OMC with WFS centering ON yesterday (note: OM2 was railing periodically.)

1023/-403 -1440/-3751 230/-930

New OMC before rebalancing yesterday (note: OMC QPDs couldn't be centered at all no matter what. OM2 was railing periodically.)

1663/-519 -2388/-2948 3200/0
After the 4th round of OMC rebalancing. QPDs are nicely centered. 973/-64 713/-1649

-70/1269

2. Beam height measurement, beam centering on OMs

At this point Koji measured the beam height at OM1, OM2 and OM3.

The beam was about 3/64" or about 1mm too high on OM1 (it was 5mm higher than 4" in the past) but it was too low on OM2 by ~16/64" or about 6mm. It quickly went up from OM2 to OM3 where the beam height was about 2/64" or about 0.8mm too low. The beam was clearing the input hole of the OMC shroud cleanly, and the OMCR beam was level.

These meant that OM2 was excessively tilted up and OM3 excessively down, both mechanically. Koji and I agreed that this is most likely due to the difference in angle for the old and the new OMC.

1/4" mis-centering on OM2 sounded too much to ignore to me, so we decided to bring the beam up at OM2 by using OM1 bias, and mechanically relieve the PIT of OM2/OM3 and YAW of OM3.

We're done with the 1st round of mechanical relieving. We adjusted OM2 PIT. We adjusted OM3 PIT and rotated OM3 cage for YAW while making sure that the beam is at least partially visible on both of the QPDs. After centering QPDA, the following shows the numbers as of now.

  OM1 OM2 OM3
PIT/YAW offset 0/-64 213/-1649 200/-539

Beam height (relative to the nominal height of 4")

3/64" -2/64" -2/64"

Overall, this looks to be a good improvement, but the beam is still hitting QPDB at the edge. We still have to see if it's possible at all to center both QPDs without further mechanical relief.

3. PZT and DCPD electronics are working

Koji scanned the OMC PZT and saw flashing on the DCPD A as well as B. PZT as well as the DCPD preamp are working.


Remaining tasks:

Center the OMC QPDs using mostly OM2 and OM3. If further mechanical relief is required, do.

After the OMC QPDs are centered, confirm that OMCR path is still reasonably level. Center the beam on the OMCR DCPD.

Center the AS_A and AS_B.

I don't know how to confirm that the OMC transmission will still hit the viewport for the camera. We'll try to use the card and the viewer combined.

Check the grounding.

Comments related to this report
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 18:18, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75563)

While Keita was working on the beam alignment, I swept the OMC PZT2 to see if the DCPDs can see something. Yes, they did see the OMC flashing.
The attached image is the response of DCPD_A and _B as well as DCPD_SUM, while PZT2 was swept.
The calibration of the numbers are unknown, so it's not quantitative but at least the PDs are connected and A&B were identically responding.

Note that the function of PZT1 is not yet confirmed.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:17, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75561)
Ops DAY Shift End

TITLE: 01/26 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: SQZ laser was turned back on and LVEA moved back to Laser Hazard, work continued at HAM6, wind fence repair was started, HAM3 was cleaned in preparation for opening.
LOG:

16:35UTC Team going into LVEA to check on the status of the TCS water leak
17:30 Squeezer laser okay to get turned back on; gets turned on
18:19 LVEA transition to LASER HAZARD

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
18:19 site site LVEA YES LVEA is LASER HAZARD !! Ongoing
22:17 OMC Betsy LVEA yes See if HAM6 peeps need help Ongoing
15:30 FAC Randy LVEA NB n Craning 18:14
15:30 FAC Karen OpticsLab,VacPrep n Tech clean 16:07
16:07 FAC Kim,Karen LVEA n Tech clean HAM 6/7 17:36
16:35 SYS TJ,Betsy,Fil LVEA NO TCS Water Leak Recovery Check 16:54
16:51 FAC Ken MechRoom n Replacing lights 00:22
16:54 VAC Jordan LVEA n Purge air measurement 17:09
17:09 VAC Gerardo, Jordan EX n RGA installation and swapping parts 22:48
17:29 EE Fil,Camilla LVEA n Turn on SQZ laser 17:44
17:34 FAC Chris LVEA yes Helping clean top of HAM3 18:43
17:36 FAC Kim,Karen LVEA yes Tech clean HAM3 19:06
17:44 FAC Jim,Ryan S LVEA n Helping move cleanroom 17:58
17:50 FAC Eric LVEA n Also helping move cleanroom 18:07
18:10 PEM Robert EX n Clean up for yesterday's work (didn't go yet) 18:30
18:22 SQZ Camilla LVEA yes Transitioning LVEA to laser hazard 18:22
18:59 FAC Randy,Mitch,Jim EY n Fixing wind fence 23:16
19:07 SUS Ibrahim LVEA yes Cleaning the outside of sus storage containers 19:51
19:31 OMC Rahul, Koji LVEA yes HAM6 work 19:59
19:33 PEM Robert EX n Clean up for yesterday's work 23:33
19:34   Camilla, Betsy VacPrepLab n   19:51
19:35 PCAL Tony PCal Lab yes(local) RespRat(responsivity ratio measurement) 20:59
20:57 EE Fil EY n Measuring cables 23:52
21:01 TCS TJ LVEA yes Looking for plumbing 21:31
21:03 Health Camilla MY n Getting healthier 21:32
21:15 SUS Ibrahim LVEA yes Cleaning the outside of storage containers pt2 22:05
21:41 Tour Sheila, Alan, interns LVEA yes Tour of LVEA 22:36
21:41 CDS Erik EY n Replace failed power supply 22:08
22:16   Camilla OpticsLab n Looking for stuff 23:31
22:23 FAC Tyler EX n Meet with Jordan 23:07
22:48 VAC Jordan, Janos LVEA yes Looking for parts 23:08
22:53   Jason LVEA yes Check Faro 00:13
23:45   Ibrahim LVEA yes HAM6 express delivery 00:10
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:46, Thursday 25 January 2024 - last comment - 16:23, Thursday 25 January 2024(75558)
h1susauxey front end computer has a failed power supply

Fil, Jonathan, Erik, Dave:

At EY Fil found h1susauxey has its front panel FAIL LED lit. He tracked the issue down to a failed power supply. This is a redundant dual power supply system.

Strangely this system is not beeping, which is the default behaviour if a power supply unit is inserted but not operational.

The IPMI shell confirms that the system has correctly identified the failure:

ipmi sensor output:

  OK     | (2751) PS1 Status        |           Presence detected           |
  Fail   | (2818) PS2 Status        |     Power Supply Failure detected     |
 

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 13:48, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75559)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:23, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75562)

Erik replaced the failed power supply with a good spare, status is good

h1susauxey:   OK     | (2751) PS1 Status        |           Presence detected           |
h1susauxey:   OK     | (2818) PS2 Status        |           Presence detected           |
 

H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:23, Thursday 25 January 2024 - last comment - 09:23, Thursday 01 February 2024(75550)
CO2X Laser Swap

TJ, Jason, Camilla, Fil.

WP11612, FRS25384, swapping because current CO2X laser was slowly deteriorating, details in 75249.

Removed: Access 50LT 20706.21015D. Installed 20306-20419D, which was refurbished/re-gassed in March 2020. Table layout: T1200007.

Still to do after the CO2X cooling line issue is solved:

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 09:09, Friday 26 January 2024 (75567)

FRS 30283 Created for this issue. 

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Thursday 01 February 2024 (75667)EPO

Tagging EPO for Thermal Compensation System (TCS) photos.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:10, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75555)
Thu CP1 Fill

Thu Jan 25 10:02:32 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 2min 30secs

Images attached to this report
H1 AOS
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:55, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75553)
Through-viewport damping of EX Cryobaffle reduced Q from 400 to 20, which should reduce scattering shelf cut-off proportionally

Robert, Mitchell, the vacuum team, the SLiC team

This morning we opened up 3 viewports and inserted dampers in between the baffle and the beamtube wall (Fig. 1). I was able to gently move the baffle, using the ”rails” of the eddy current dampers as position indicators in order to adjust the dampers to return the baffle to its original position. Before/after measurements did not deviate by more than 1/16 of an inch.

I used the laser vibrometer shining through a viewport to monitor the baffle. Figure 2 shows time series for beam tube impulses, indicating that the damping reduced the Q from about 400 to about 20 for the problematic 4 Hz peak. Thus, the cutoff frequency of the scattering shelf during high 4 Hz vibration levels should drop from the typical 50 Hz to about 2.5 Hz (so mostly just the 4Hz peak should remain and not harmonics). The second page of Fig. 2 shows before and after laser vibrometer spectra, which show that the main peaks did not move much, and adds evidence that the baffle is unlikely to be rubbing.

The viewports were closed this evening.

Non-image files attached to this report
LHO VE
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:10, Wednesday 24 January 2024 - last comment - 15:57, Friday 26 January 2024(75552)
1-24 vent vacuum diary
Today's activities:
- 3 viewports have been taken off at EX for baffle works. These have been inspected, and found intact in every aspect - the inspection report is in the comment section
- These viewports have been already taken back, as the works were already finished
- The EX RGA is being rebuilt after many leaks have been found - it is in progress, will be finished tomorrow
- The new Hepta header elbow pieces have been staged at all stations
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 15:57, Friday 26 January 2024 (75589)

Measured dew point at corner station, result of -42.6 degrees C.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (ISC)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:10, Wednesday 24 January 2024 - last comment - 09:36, Thursday 25 January 2024(75548)
HAM6 work Jan/24/2024: Alignment of the laser into the new OMC, day 1 (Dana, Vicky, Koji, Rahul, Keita)

Following the installation of the new OMC yesterday ( alog 75529), we started aligning the laser into the OMC.

Preparation:

Vicky enabled the WFS centering to center the SQZ beam (LOCKED_SEED_DITHER state) reflected by the SRM on AS_A and AS_B. At this point almost nothing was visible on the OMC QPDs.

We increased the whitening gain of the OMC QPDs (H1:ASC-OMC_A_WHITEN_GAIN and H1:ASC-OMC_B_WHITEN_GAIN) to 45dB from the original 0dB and reset the dark offset.

Initial beam search. Beam visible on OMC QPDs only when OM3 is totally railed in PIT no matter what:

We started scanning OM3, and saw nice beam at the edge of both of the QPDs but only when OM3 was completely railing in PIT. 

We disabled the WFS centering and started using OM2 and OM1 to make the beam more centered on the OMC QPDs. I was able to make it somewhat better but not really, and more importantly, no matter what I did, I could not releave OM3 PIT offset at all. Whenever I removed a bit of OM3 PIT and tried to use the combination of OM1 and OM2, I was only able to make it worse.

I also used OMCS offsets, but it made no meaningful impact as  the alignment was so bad and the OMCS range so small.

Diagnosis and mitigation part 1, things are making sense:

These all indicated that the OMC has a big PIT tilt relative to the old OMC. This was corroborated by our observation yesterday that one corner of the OMC breadboard was hitting the EQ stop structure and we couldn't release the OMC without moving the EQ stop bracket itself down. According to alog 75529, "We noticed a corner of the OMC on the HAM5 side was bottoming on an EQ stop. We decided to lower the EQ stop by releasing the fixing screws for the EQ stop holder. The holder was tilted, and the OMC became free."

With this knowledge, we went back to HAM6 to rebalance the OMC suspension in PIT.

Rahul and Koji pushed the PITCH Insert mass (part number 14 in https://dcc.ligo.org/D060502) by about 5mm into the direction of HAM7. We immediately lost the beam on the OMC QPDs, but relieving the PIT offset by 1000 counts (out of the total of 3500 counts), we regained the beam, so the adjustment was in the right direction.

The intermediate conclusion is that OMC breadboard is tilted in PIT such that the long edge at -X side was too low. We at least partially relieved it by tilting the intermediate mass to counter that.

I thought that another step or two would be great, but at that point we had to stop our work. We'll continue tomorrow.

Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:14, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75549)

Picture 1: Rahul, Dana and Koji from left to right.

Picture 2: Tired scientists.

Images attached to this comment
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 17:43, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75551)SUS

Anatomy of the "T-section" Pitch Balancer on OMCS

The attached snap shot taken from D060502 explains how the pitch balancer works.

  • A movable mass (D060503) is inserted in the "T-section" D070032.
  • The movable mass can be moved in the direction of the magenta arrow to pitch the OMCS, which is the soft DOF due to the two-wire suspension of the upper stage
  • Normally this mass is fixed with two #8-32 set screws (No.16 in the figure)
  • The cylinder is used for the coarse adjustment. If we want a finer adjustment, the center screw (1/2-20 UNF SHCS) can be turned with 1/4" allen key. However, 1/2-20 has no fixing set screw or anything.
     
  • D070032 has additional holes (4x #8-32 at the sides and 1x 1/4-20 at the bottom) they are utility holes to attach addon masses if we want. They are not intended for pitching the unit.
Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:36, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75554)EPO

Tagging for EPO photos.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:08, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75534)
Wed EVE Ops Summary

TITLE: 01/24 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:

LOG:

H1 SQZ
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:04, Wednesday 24 January 2024 - last comment - 11:34, Thursday 25 January 2024(75537)
SQZ PMC work

Naoki Vicky Daniel

We physically placed the PMC, the RF photodetector, and a bunch of steering mirrors into the empty space on SQZT0. Everything seems to fit as planned. No beams yet!

We also installed the Thorlabs PDA100A that serves as the PMC_TRANS monitor. It is installed along the seed path. There is a 50:50 splitter that reduces the seed power by 2. We installed a one-side AR coated wedge in the path of the beam dump to get about 19mW of light that we steered onto the PDA100A.

The slow controls system was upgraded to add new channels associated with the PMC and update some channels names. There is no longer a FIBR_REJECTED PD, instead we added a FIBR_INPUT PD that monitors the fiber power from squeezer laser in the beat note box.We no longer have a monitor for light in the wrong polarization at the laser locking beat note. Instead, we have to use the beat note strength to optmize the input polarization.

Comments related to this report
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 13:38, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75546)

Some photos here. Here is the PMC TRANS PD path and aligment, including the beam dumps. Here's a photo of PMC + RFPD fitting into the table, to-be aligned afterwards. The SHG beam path clears the back of the PMC, so that's good.

Images attached to this comment
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 13:41, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75547)

We also installed a longpass filter onto the SEED_LAUNCH_PD (FEL0850, cuts-on above 850nm), so we can now open the SQZT0 table lights without changing the measured seed launch power.

daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 11:34, Thursday 25 January 2024 (75556)

Updated medm

Images attached to this comment
H1 SQZ (ISC, SQZ)
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:34, Tuesday 23 January 2024 - last comment - 15:33, Tuesday 30 January 2024(75509)
1/22 HAM7 - Found SQZ beam to place irises in HAM6/7 post-vent

[Julian, Naoki, Camilla, Sheila, Vicky]

Summary to get SQZ alignment beam: Launched 76mW into seed fiber, ~25 mW incident on opo cavity, ~0.85 mW transmitted through opo cavity. Had to find opo transmission past the VIP, for this we used green SK path as a reference. This ~0.85 mW opo transmission was bright on an IR card at the HAM5 gate valve, and enough to iris the SQZ beam in HAM7 and HAM6 (for OMC work 75512). DC 3/4 centering loops engaged easily, then OMC A/B QPD's saw the sqz beam.

----------- Notes from today ------------------------------------------

Launched power into SEED fiber (SQZT0): 76 mW

OPO IR REFL (CLF_TRIG_REFL_DC_POWERMON @ SQZT7): 24.8mW   (when opo is dither-locked).

Fiber rejected power PD in HAM7 (CLF_REFL_REJ) is 5.3 mW.
  -->  Seed fiber coupling: ~34% of the seed fiber launched power was incident on the opo cavity. 
  -->  40% coupling through fiber, ~6% mispolarized and rejected after fiber. This is similar to recent fiber alignment 75344, even after more recent on-table work 75486.

We had to find the OPO IR transmitted beam after the VIP. Nothing at first despite restoring suspensions 75502. Notes to self on what worked to find the SQZ beam post-vent:

OPO IR TRANS (OPO_IR_PD_DC_POWERMON @ SQZT7): 0.85 mW  -- Just before opening the HAM7/5 gate valves. Opened the beam diverter, SQZ beam was bright on an IR card held at the HAM5 gate valve.

After opening gate valve, immediately saw the beam on AS A/B/C QPDs.

ASC-AS_A/B_DC_SUM_OUTPUT ~ 60.  ASC-AS_C_NSUM_OUT16 ~ 0.65-0.67.  

HAM6 crew irising SQZ beam, 75512.

HAM7 crew irising SQZ beam. Julian has some photos of HAM6 and HAM7 irses. Sheila -- looks like there is some clipping on the VIP (we have not totally optimized FC_REFL path slider alignments post-vent, just found the beam). Revisit this FC REFL alignment later.

Engaged DC 3/4 centering. It just worked. Control signals near 0. 

We see the beam on the OMC QPD's, power is consistent with ASC-AS_C power, around 300-400e-6 on each OMC QPD A/B. Power goes away when SQZ beam diverter is closed. See omc powers screenshot with as_wfs powers.

TO-DO SQZ work later:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:09, Tuesday 23 January 2024 (75516)EPO

tagging for EPO

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 09:30, Tuesday 23 January 2024 (75517)SUS

Accepted ZM1,2,3,4,5,6, FC1,2 OPTICALIGN sliders in sdf. Attached is the photo so we'll know where to bring them back to after pumpdown.

ZM4,5,6 are not monitored - should remember why that is....

Images attached to this comment
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 18:48, Tuesday 23 January 2024 (75527)

Camilla, Naoki, Vicky

Next day 1/23, we tried to help check OMC alignment, but after turning the SQZ laser back on, we didn't find the beam past the VIP at first.

To re-find the sqz beam, we had to move FC1 quite a bit (pitch slider by 100 counts, yaw slider by 65 counts). See FC1 SDF's of today's move, compared to what Camilla just accepted in SDF after we first found the beam yesterday 75517.

Naoki checked FC1 and ZM1-2-3-4-5-6 SUS, and did not see any anomolous movements of the optics.

We left FC1 with an alignment that maximizes signal on both HAM7 FC WFS (RLF QPD's). Both QPD's are now saturated with 75mW into the fiber. With 5mW into the fiber to un-saturate, both QPD's are close-ish to centered.

Hopefully this is enough to use AS A/B WFS centering tomorrow. Today when we tried it, DC3 worked, but DC4 railed as the beam wasn't hitting AS_B well.

Images attached to this comment
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 11:05, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75542)

Sheila, Camilla, Vicky

We re-found the SQZ beam in HAM6 this morning after opening the ham5 gate valve. Steps taken this morning 1/24, after yesterday using FC1 to align onto the HAM7 FC WFS QPD's:

  • With TTFSS locked, 75mW launched into seed fiber, brought SQZ_MANAGER to LOCKED_SEED_DITHER
  • Watch using opo-ir-dither-locking scope to make sure OPO dither locked properly on red. Can check OPO IR REFL locks at its aminimum (see H1:SQZ-CLF_TRIG_DC_POWERMON, or SHUTTER_I_TRIGGER on the opo-ir-dither scope, successful dither lock example here).
  • Check there is power on the HAM7 FC WFS QPD's. When aligned to OMC, we've been saturating RLF_QPD_A, and ~40-70 on RLF_QPD_B.
  • Open HAM7 SQZ beam diverter
  • Open HAM6 Fast shutter
  • (check AS WFS DC centering is off, check that suspension histories on OM1,2 are clear)
  • Use ZM5 P/Y to align onto AS_C, AS_A, AS_B
  • If beam is hitting AS_A/B, the AS_WFS_P/Y_INMON input signals should all be < 1.  When the beam was missing AS_A/B, their WFS_P/Y_INMON signals were ~1e6. Once the beam start to hit QPD's, INMONs were < 1.
  • With the beam hitting AS_WFS, turn on inputs for DC3/4 WFS centering, control signals ~ 0.
Images attached to this comment
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 13:52, Wednesday 24 January 2024 (75545)

For convenience while vented, I made the following guardian changes so far:

  • SQZ_MANAGER -- these changes can be reverted post-break
    • "LOCKED_SEED_DITHER" is now requestable from drop-down menu -- Line 597 -- change back later
    • "DOWN" no longer closes squeezer beam diverter -- commented out Line 213 -- change back / re-evaluate later
  • SQZ_OPO_LR: trying to improve dither lock's lockless detection -- keep these changes

All guardian edits (+sqz angle servo flag in sqzparams.py) commited to svn revision 27088.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 15:33, Tuesday 30 January 2024 (75635)

Attached Julian's photos of the iris locations on HAM6 and HAM7. 

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 11341-11360 of 84703.Go to page Start 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 End