Displaying reports 13861-13880 of 87874.Go to page Start 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 End
Reports until 21:28, Friday 08 March 2024
H1 SQZ
naoki.aritomi@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:28, Friday 08 March 2024 - last comment - 09:33, Thursday 14 March 2024(76226)
4.5dB squeezing in IFO with 40 times more CLF power

Naoki, Vicky, Nutsinee, Matt

We recovered the FDS and got 4.5dB squeezing in IFO with 40 times more CLF power as shown in the attached figure. 

First we restored the ZM1/2/3 and FC1/2 OSEM positions to the values in O4a. Then we found the FC green trans in camera and PD. We aligned FC1 and FC2 and successfully locked the FC green. We went to SQZT8 and centered the green camera and green QPD.

Since we aligned the green QPD, the green QPD offset value is not valid anymore so we removed the beam spot control from FC ASC. We made a flag for the beam spot control in sqzparams and it is set to False now. We also set the ADF servo flag to False since the ADF demod phase might not be correct. After we figure out the optimal green QPD offset and ADF demod phase, we should revert them.

We reduced the FC IR gain from -3.5 to -0.1 and reduced the FC ASC gain from 0.1 to 0.005.

We have not done any PSAMS scan so we will do it next week.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
naoki.aritomi@LIGO.ORG - 14:48, Monday 11 March 2024 (76267)

I reduced the FC ASC threshold as shown in the attachment. I also reduced the fcWFS_qDip_lock_threshold in sqzparams from 0 to -50000 although I am not sure if this is useful. 

Images attached to this comment
naoki.aritomi@LIGO.ORG - 13:34, Wednesday 13 March 2024 (76346)

The SQZ-CLF_REFL_LF_OUTPUT is 245uW now and was 5.7uW in O4a so the CLF power is 43 times more now.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 09:33, Thursday 14 March 2024 (76371)

Since the vent, we haven't recovered our squeeze in the region of  that really improves our range: See Yellow BLRMS around 350Hz.

In O4a we had yellow (135Hz), green (broad 1kHz) and blue (1.7kHz)  around 4dB, plot of Jan 10th.  On March 8th we had good 4.5dB sqz above 1kHz but had  <3dB in the yellow bucket region, plot of Jan 9th.
We should focus on improving SQZ in the yellow BLRMs. Using: OPO temp, SQZ angle, ZM alignment. While optimizing BLRMs should watch ADF frequency, currently at 800, but notched in BLRMs at 1300Hz.

Checked SHG pump launch is ~20.5 - 21mW at both times and OPO green trans rejected is similar.

Trending our other signals, just see that OMC_TRANS_RF3 and CLF_REFL_RF6 and FC_WFS_A_ locking signal sare much larger, I think this is expected from increased CLF power. The NLG is simular 15.8  now, was 17.3. Plots of Jan 10th and March 9th.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:27, Friday 08 March 2024 - last comment - 09:55, Monday 11 March 2024(76223)
Simple OMC dither alignment working - very little headroom on OMC SUS T2 T3

Since we have a new OMC, we need to find the best optical gain spot on the new OMC.

To that end I closed the OMC ASC dither loops iwth a simple diagonal matrix (OM3-->OM3 and OM1-->OMC_SUS). It did converge with very low gain, but to a spot with not much headroom on the OMC_SUS (we are at 115000ct out of 131000cts on T2 and T3).

In that setting I reset the H1:ASC-OMC_[A/B]_[PIT/YAW]_OFFSET offsets, so right now we can lock to that spot with either dither or QPD.

Next: hunt for best optical gain around this spot.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 18:53, Friday 08 March 2024 (76225)

Just as with the last OMC the optimal spot optical gain seems to be slightly different from the dither target. Did some manual optimisation to reach the attached QPD offsets.

Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 09:55, Monday 11 March 2024 (76243)

Updated the dither input matrix  H1:OMC-ASC_DACTMAT  in SDF.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:02, Friday 08 March 2024 (76224)
ITMY Mode 5/6 high but coming down slowly

I'm having a hard time deciding if the ITMY violin mode 5/6 damping settings are decent. Stefan has been moving around the OMC alignment which seems to have some large effect on the monitor filters. However, the alignment has converged at some value and I have engaged a 0.01 gain with FMs 6, 7 and 10 and so far the monitors show both modes decreasing. The nominal gain is 0.02, so I think if we lose lock and relock that gain setting will be ok. We are stuck in the OMC_WHITENING state and this mode pair is the only problem- all other modes are low or are decreasing very well in their settings.

Edit: nominal low noise achieved. These damping settings are good.

LHO VE
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:24, Friday 08 March 2024 (76221)
3-8 vent vacuum diary
The pressures:
HAM7: ~1.9E-7 Torr
HAM8: ~4.7E-7 Torr
Corner: ~4.4E-8 Torr
EX: ~4.9E-9 Torr

Today's activities:

- HAM8 Turbo was stopped, the cart was disconnected
- Relay tube - HAM7 - HAM8 was valved in to the main volume - RV1; FCV2; FCV3; FCV4; FCV8 are now opened, so the system is back to normal

As the vacuum works now ended, this was the last page of the vent vacuum diary.

Congratulations to the vacuum team, and to all who helped in the vacuum tasks, it was a great effort, and it ended up being a success.
If anyone is interested in the vacuum results and tasks more in-depth, here is a summary document: T2400085-v1
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:02, Friday 08 March 2024 (76216)
Ops Day Shift End

TITLE: 03/08 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: Currently in OMC_WHITENING damping violins before turning on whitening
LOG:

16:00UTC Start of shift, in Manual Initial Alignment
17:00 Having trouble with FIND_IR for YARM, closed ISI ETMY excitation (looked like nothing in exc channel anyway)
17:17 Took detector to DOWN
18:04 Started relocking
18:45 Lockloss from DARM_TO_RF
18:59 Lockloss from DARM_TO_RF
19:22 Initial Alignment done, relocking
19:31 Lockloss from DARM_TO_RF again
20:18 Lockloss from DARM_TO_DC_READOUT
20:53 Lockloss from DARM_TO_DC_READOUT
21:21 Lockloss from RESONANCE
21:33 Lockloss from CARM_TO_REFL, starting INITIAL_ALIGNMENT
22:16 Finished INITIAL_ALIGNMENT, relocking
23:14 Reached OMC_WHITENING!                    

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
23:29 SAF LASER SAFE LVEA - The LVEA is LASER SAFE 21:35
16:38 FAC Tyler EY n Escorting truck to pick up boom lift 17:10
17:18 VAC Travis, Jordan, Gerardo LVEA - HAM7 n Friday vacuum party (Jordan, Travis out) 17:52
17:43 FAC Chris MX n Safety checks 19:27
17:48   Julian Optics lab yes(local) Working on SHG 19:34
17:55 FAC Tyler HAM Shack n Dropping parts off 18:09
18:43 VAC Travis, Janos LVEA n Opening relay tubes 19:04
21:35 VAC Travis HAM Shack n Disconnecting pump carts 22:17
23:31 SQZ Nutsinee HAM Shack n SQZT8 table alignment 01:31
23:36   Gabriele arms n running 01:36
H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:51, Friday 08 March 2024 (76215)
V3 L4C on ETMY ISI is somewhat broken

Sheila found this morning that the ETMY ISI seemed to have a large peak at 1.5hz, which has in the past been indicative of a failing L4C. Most of the BSCs are already running blends that bypass the horizontal L4Cs because, except for ITMX, all BSCs have a flaky H1 L4C. That seems to be the case here with ETMY, when I switched the St1 RX/RY blends to CPS/T240 blends the the 1.5hz motion immediately settled down.

The best way I've found to see which sensor is failing when this happens is to take the L4Cs out of loop and look at the local to local L4C to T240 transfer functions (first attached plot). This gives a measurement of the L4Cs sensor response, and in this case it looks like the V3 L4C (light blue traces) has now become an almost 2hz instrument. The V1 and V2 sensors are normal, what we would expect for an L4C. If you look at these tfs with the L4Cs in loop, you can't measure this  change in response. I haven't had a chance to try because of commissioning, but I suspect you also can't see this with the isolation loops off, or during a driven transfer function. The sensor has to be in a low acceleration state.

Just looking at the blend complementarity with 1 good L4C and 1 L4C with it's pendulum frequency moved to 1.9hz explains what is happening. The sum of all 3 parts of the blend multiplied by their respective sensor responses should be 1, but having mismatched sensor responses in the L4Cs causes a deep notch in the supersensor between 1 and 2hz, which I can easily imagine does bad things to the quality of the feedback controls, second image.

It's possible we might "fix" this sensor by giving the ISI a kick, but the L4C would probably eventually return to this bad state. Or we could try adding a filter to compensate for the sensor changed response, but it seem like this sensors mode has probably been drifting around for a few weeks at least. Third attached image show trends of log blrms motion for the St1 RX/RY over the last 30 days, typically these seem to sit at around -1, when the ISI is healthy, but it goes up to 1-2 when the L4C is misbehaving.

 

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:38, Friday 08 March 2024 - last comment - 19:32, Friday 08 March 2024(76207)
locking today: close to nominal low noise

We've had a large crew in the control room today working on locking:

Comments related to this report
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 19:32, Friday 08 March 2024 (76220)SQZ

Naoki, Sheila, Vicky

While damping violins, we re-injected squeezing during OMC_WHITENING, ran SQZ-IFO ASC, and got 3dB of squeezing immediately. Up to almost 4.5dB with this 40x higher CLF power.

Opening the beam diverter, we immediately saw the squeezer in OMC transmission. The CLF_RF3 signal in OMC trans (SQZ-OMC_TRANS_RF3_DEMOD_RFMON) went from -25 (no sqz),  to -8 (just opening bdiverter),  to 0 (after running SQZ_AS42_ASC after resetting no-sqz offsets).

SQZ_MANAGER can successfully take the squeezer to FREQ_DEP_SQZ again. FC-IR handoff works, we adjusted gains according to FC_IR_OLTF to match old loop gain with higher CLF. Adjusted FC_ASC gain. SQZ_ANGLE_ADJUST guardian has the nominal state now as "DOWN" (set using flag=False in sqzparams.py). FC beam spot control left at False.

Images attached to this comment
H1 GRD
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:14, Friday 08 March 2024 - last comment - 10:36, Monday 11 March 2024(76214)
Guardian changes useful for vent recovery

This is a summary of information that is spread across different alogs in the last few days.  When recovering from a vent, in which the green camera reference may have been lost when the gate valves are actuated, these are some useful steps and guardian changes.

We have made and reverted these changes this week, I'm not sure if we've reverted the change to the INCREASE_FLASHES timer.

Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 10:36, Monday 11 March 2024 (76251)ISC

I've reverted the increased INCREASE_FLASHES timer; it is now back to 2 minutes during LOCKING_ARMS_GREEN.

Code changes loaded and committed to svn (along with the SQZ_MANAGER re-management and SDF states weight reversion).

H1 ISC (CAL, ISC)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:17, Friday 08 March 2024 - last comment - 17:42, Friday 08 March 2024(76213)
Correlated noisebudget revived - Dec 20, 2023
Louis, Vicki, Craig

Today we revived the correlated noise budget code located at https://git.ligo.org/aligo_commissioning/correlated_noise, first made in June (alog 71333).
This code is a standalone singular script which grabs the raw DCPD data, grabs the DARM calibration OLG and sensing function info, does some math from Kiwamu's DCC T1700131, and produces a correlated noisebudget.

Formerly, I had used my own noise_recorder white noise injections to get the DARM calibration information.  But since I am gone, it would be better if we used a maintained piece of software to get the calibration.
Today, Louis helped me to use a pydarm .npz file to get the DARM OLG and sensing functions.  
The code we developed today is in /ligo/gitcommon/correlated_noise/code/plot_cross_correlation_pydarm_npz_calibration.py

Attached are the correlated noisebudget results for GPS start 1387130434, over 600 seconds of data.  
I posit that we don't really need a ton of time to integrate down, both because the shot noise floor is not that far away from the correlated noise floor, and we can use logbinning averaging to achieve a higher effect number of averages in a shorter amount of time.

Results
I've used the Dec 18 noisebudget traces made by Camilla in /ligo/gitcommon/NoiseBudget/aligoNB/out/H1/lho_darm_noisebudget/lho_darm_noisebudget.hdf5.
Overall, the correlated noise results seem decently sensible, especially at high frequency.
I note that the correlated noise limit we are hitting at 1 kHz seems to be laser frequency noise (third plot attached).

At 500 Hz, we are running into our "thermal noise floor".  
Whether or not this is really thermal noise is anyone's guess, since it is above our official estimate, but the story for O4a remains the same as from O3.

At 20 Hz, the correlated noise seems to overestimate what is actually in DARM, which cannot be correct.  
This is something Sheila has been concerned with in the past (alog 70978).  
This could be chalked up to a small change in the actual vs pydarm DARM OLG, unclear what else it could possibly be.

It is worth noting that the DARM OLG cannot really affect the correlated noise results massively above 500 Hz, just because the magnitude of the DARM OLG is around 0.1 there and falling quickly.  

Future Work
The next steps is for Vicki to import this code to the aligoNB, removing all calls to my nds2utils library (avoiding a dependency there).
Louis also wants to add some functionality to aligoNB so that the noisebudget can call pydarm at a GPS time and get the most recent calibration.  (Craig loves this).
Louis will clone the aligoNB env to verify everything still works before making a "pull request" to the actual aligoNB repo.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - 17:42, Friday 08 March 2024 (76222)
After some further conversation with Vicki and Gabriele, they asked me to put in some artificial 40% increase in the thermal noise to see if that could explain our correlated noise in December.

It seems like potentially yes, pretty good agreement.

Additionally, we realized that the Squeezed DARM should be below the Correlated Noise at 20 Hz.  
Because they are taken at different times, one with sqz and one with no sqz, then the filter cavity should be reducing the quantum radiation pressure noise. 
There is no discrepancy between the Correlated DARM and the Unsqueezed DARM, which can be seen from the .svg noisebudget here:
https://lhocds.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/exports/craig.cahillane/gitcommon/correlated_noise/figures/20231220_180016_utc/correlated_darm_calibrated_zoomed_binwidth_0p1.svg
Also attached as a PDF.
I made the Unsqueezed DARM a different color and a thicker line so you can see it behind the Correlated DARM.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:30, Friday 08 March 2024 (76211)
OMD QPD dark offset

Updated the H1:ASC-OMC_[A/B]_SEG[1..4]_OFFSET (OMC QPD dark offsets) for the channels to read 0 inthe dark state.
Cleared the H1:ASC-OMC_A_[PIT/YAW]_OFFSET, since we have a new OMC, so the old offsets are no longer meaningful.
Updated the DCPD offsets, even thout they were tiny.

SDF attached.

 

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
matthewrichard.todd@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:16, Friday 08 March 2024 (76209)
OMC alignments comparison between yesterday and this morning

Trent Matt and Jennie

We looked at the pitch and yaw of the IFO output mirrors (OM1-3+C) this morning around 6am and the same pitch and yaw channels at 6am yesterday; the only one that we saw with significant differences were OM2 Pitch and Yaw, which both went down about 30 and 20 microradians (we think this is the unit counts represents), respectively.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:15, Friday 08 March 2024 (76210)
Fri CP1 Fill

Fri Mar 08 10:11:29 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 26secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside. TCs started around -30C, so I've transitioned to -100C trip temps. Plot's y-cursors have been changed accordingly.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
jennifer.wright@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:10, Friday 08 March 2024 (76208)
Checking OMC Alignment + QPDs

Stefan B, Jennie W, Sheila

Summary: Checked OMC step responses and they converge in 30s or less without saturating suspensions. These loops can be slowed down if need be.

Since locking yesterday there has been no light through the OMC.

Sheila decreased the OMC QPD whitening gain as the QPDs were saturating. This was turned up during the vent so she changed it back to what it was in O4a.

We still had some sort of signal into the OMC QPDs. We turned off the pitch and yaw offsets to these QPDs and then went into the whitening filters and turned off the bottom row of gain filters so only the low pass filters are on and set the offsets to be the negative of OUTMON. First image is original filters for QPD B and second is the filter once setting the offsets (QPD A was done in the same way).

We did this dark offset procedure for QPD A and B on OMC and then Stefan manually set the offsets on DCPD A and B to 0.03 on input to filters.

Sheila did the step responses for the OMC ASC loops by switching on offsets in the POS X, Y and ANG X, Y filters in turn.

POX X offset causes POS X and ANG X to move, POS X converges in 30s and ANG X converges in less than 5s. This means we could decrease the gain in ANG X loop. See image 3.

POS Y offset coupled to both POS Y and ANG Y (half as much) and they both converge in 30s.

ANG Y offset does not couple to other DOFs and converges in 20s.

ANG X offset also does not couple in to other DOFs and converges in 20s.

First image shows POS X and ANG X offsets being inplemented and second shows POS Y and ANG Y.

 

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:48, Thursday 07 March 2024 - last comment - 16:53, Friday 08 March 2024(76180)
Record of Guardian Changes

ISC_LOCK.py changes since 2024-01-07

 

 

Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 10:09, Thursday 07 March 2024 (76181)

No changes in ALIGN_IFO, ALS_ARM (ALS_XARM/YARM), ALS_COMM, ALS_DIFF

ISC_DRMI changes since 2023-12-21

  • self.useINP1/ PRC1 / PRC2 / SRC1 SRC2 all changed from True to False 76172

ALS_DIFF changes since 2023-11-07

  • FINE_TUNE_IR ALS-C_DIFF_PLL_CTRL_OFFSET ThreshLow reduced from 0.05 to 0.04

IMC_LOCK changes since 2023-11-21

  • Notification in OFFLINE state if IMC WFS need to be centered
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:51, Friday 08 March 2024 (76218)

Some notes on sqz guardian changes that were made, then reverted: 76154

jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:53, Friday 08 March 2024 (76219)

The change to use TRY as the DARM normalization was reverted back to the formerly-nominal TRX.

When we were using TRY, we had also made some changes in PREP_DC_READOUT_TRANSITION, but those have now been reverted.

H1 ISC (OpsInfo)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:37, Wednesday 06 March 2024 - last comment - 16:49, Friday 08 March 2024(76154)
Changes to ISC_LOCK Guardian for O4b Commissioning

Per commissioner request, I've made two changes to the early main locking steps as set in ISC_LOCK:

  1. By default, ISC_LOCK now goes through CHECK_SDF rather than SDF_REVERT so settings are preserved lock to lock
  2. The timer for moving the ALS arm nodes to INCREASE_FLASHES during LOCKING_ARMS_GREEN has been increased from 2 minutes to 20

Changes have been loaded and committed to svn.

Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 15:43, Wednesday 06 March 2024 (76163)OpsInfo, SQZ

I've also commented out SQZ_MANAGER from the list of managed nodes in ISC_LOCK. This allows SQZ to work independently without main IFO locking telling SQZ_MANAGER what to do for now.

EDIT: We later learned that lines 214-215 of ISC_LOCK needed to be commented out as well since this is a request of SQZ_MANAGER in the DOWN state.

ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 16:11, Thursday 07 March 2024 (76195)

Furthering this effort as main IFO locking is progressing, I've commented out the first couple lines in the LOWNOISE_LENGTH_CONTROL state which interacts with SQZ_MANAGER, which at this point is not managed.

victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 16:49, Friday 08 March 2024 (76217)ISC, SQZ

Naoki, Vicky - We have undone these changes guardian changes for the break (brought back SQZ_MANAGER in list of managed nodes, in first few lines of LOWNOISE_LENGTH_CONTROL, and lines 214-215 requesting sqz to down).

SQZ_MANAGER is back to being managed in ISC_LOCK as usual. We will see the lock sequence through a few times and get it running smoothly, and update on that after relocking.

H1 SQZ
naoki.aritomi@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Friday 01 March 2024 - last comment - 11:16, Friday 08 March 2024(76078)
LOCK_PMC state in SQZ_MANAGER guardian

I made a LOCK_PMC state in SQZ_MANAGER guardian. The LOCK_PMC state is between LOCK_TTFSS and LOCK_SHG states. The LOCK_PMC state is copied from LOCK_SHG state, but I commented out the PZT checker because the PMC_PZT_OK function is not defined now.  

Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 14:34, Wednesday 06 March 2024 (76156)

Camilla, Nutsinee

SQZ_MANAGER now takes charge of PMC Guardian. For now we commented out FC related activities in LOCK_OPO_AND_FC state of the SQZ_MANAGER and LOCKING_HD state in SQZ_LO_LR. Look for "NK March 6" for any changes made today in SQZ_MANAGER and SQZ_LO_LR Guardian. These should be reverted when we have the filter cavity back. For now we can lock PMC all the way to LO with SQZ_MANAGER and will automatically relock themselves when IFO kills the PSL. 

nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 11:16, Friday 08 March 2024 (76212)

We have filter cavity. Changes have been reverted. 

Displaying reports 13861-13880 of 87874.Go to page Start 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 End