TITLE: 09/24 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY: Very quiet day of H1 observing until an earthquake caused a lockloss in the late afternoon. Once the ground motion rings down, Ibrahim will start relocking.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:48 | VAC | Pump | LVEA | N | AIP pumping on HAM6 | 23:43 |
| 16:10 | FAC | Kim | Opt Lab | N | Technical cleaning | 16:26 |
| 17:02 | SEI | Jim, Mitchell | Opt Lab | N | Taking parts out of clean bags | 17:30 |
| 17:58 | CAL | Tony | PCal Lab | N | Looking for a cable | 18:34 |
| 20:08 | ISC | Jennie | Opt Lab | Local | ISS array work | 21:00 |
| 20:41 | CAL | Tony | PCAL Lab | N | Dropping off supplies | 21:25 |
| 20:49 | AOS | Betsy | Opt Lab | N | Checking bag contents | 21:16 |
| 21:26 | SPI | Jeff, RyanS | Opt Lab | N | Looking at SPI optics | 21:41 |
| 22:10 | ISC | Jennie | Opt Lab | Local | ISS array work | 00:09 |
| 22:54 | VAC | Gerardo | LVEA | N | Checking on AIP | 23:16 |
TITLE: 09/24 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: LARGE_EQ
Wind: 6mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.69 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is DOWN due to EARTHQUAKE
Just waiting for this 6.2 EQ from Venezuela to pass through and then back to LOCKING
Lockloss @ 22:31 UTC after 11.5 hours locked - link to lockloss tool
Caused by S-waves from a M6.1 EQ out of Venezuela. Happened less than a minute after the start of the transition to EQ mode, so I didn't get a chance to try the ASC Hi-Gain feature to ride through it (although, in this case I don't suspect it would have helped). Holding H1 in DOWN as it's still 10 minutes before the R-waves are supposed to hit.
Wed Sep 24 10:08:21 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 8min 18secs
Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.
TITLE: 09/24 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 2mph Gusts, 0mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.14 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for 3.5 hours. One lockloss overnight with an unknown cause, but relocking seems to have gone without issue. We will have a short planned commissioning window from 16:00 to 17:00 UTC.
The hour of commissioning time did not happen today due to calibration report issues at LLO. This has been added onto tomorrow's regularly scheduled commissioning time, so we will have a total of 4.5 hours (with the first 30 minutes dedicated to calibration sweeps, as usual).
TITLE: 09/24 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 22:59 UTC (6 hr lock)
We've been locked for the entirety of shift.
LOG:
None
As the other half of Jeff's Side Quest 4 (87102), I took measurements for calculating the absolute calibration of SRM.
Doing this will make the estimator work for SRM easier later on. Like Jeff, I also took two sets of measurements, one with the offsets on (ALIGNED), and one with the offsets off (HEALTH_CHECK). The official measurements that we will be using for getting the OSEM absolute calibration are the ones where the optic is ALIGNED, since that's where it usually is. The set of measurements taken with the alignmet offsets off is to see how much of a difference we see between the two states.
The drive in ISO_{X,Y,Z} correlate with the same optic motion directions as they did when I was taking these same measurements for SR3: ISO_X -> SUS_DAMP_T, ISO_Y -> SUS_DAMP_L, ISO_Z -> SUS_DAMP_V.
These were the settings for the measurements:
- HAM5 in ISI_DAMPED_HEPI_OFFLINE
- SRM in ALIGNED or SRM in HEALTH_CHECK (with damping on)
SRM in ALIGNED (official measurements)
Found in /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SRM/Common/Data/
2025-09-23-1830_H1ISIHAM5_ST1_SRM_ALIGNED_WhiteNoise_ISO_X_0p05to40Hz_calibration.xml r12666
2025-09-23-1830_H1ISIHAM5_ST1_SRM_ALIGNED_WhiteNoise_ISO_Y_0p05to40Hz_calibration.xml r12666
2025-09-23-1830_H1ISIHAM5_ST1_SRM_ALIGNED_WhiteNoise_ISO_Z_0p05to40Hz_calibration.xml r12666
In ALIGNED, here are the suspension positions according to the OSEMs (in urads*, see Jeff's explanation):
M1 OPTICALIGN sliders M1 OSEM M2 OSEM M3 OSEM
P +2520 +1071 +790 +837
Y -3809 +40 -479 -397
The alignment slider calibrations for SRM are P = 1.875 [DAC ct/"urad"] and Y = 2.681 [DAC ct/"urad"]
SRM in HEALTH_CHECK with damping on (extra measurements for looking at difference)
Found in /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SRM/Common/Data/
2025-09-23-1810_H1ISIHAM5_ST1_SRM_NoOffsets_WhiteNoise_ISO_X_0p05to40Hz_calibration.xml r12666
2025-09-23-1810_H1ISIHAM5_ST1_SRM_NoOffsets_WhiteNoise_ISO_Y_0p05to40Hz_calibration.xml r12666
2025-09-23-1810_H1ISIHAM5_ST1_SRM_NoOffsets_WhiteNoise_ISO_Z_0p05to40Hz_calibration.xml r12666
Comparing the two sets of measurements, you can see that between both L's and both V's, the M1 OSEMs for the ALIGNED cases are closer to each other than the Offsets Off case, but they still need a calibration factor.
Back in March, I ran a modulation depth test, with several goals in mind related to providing useful calibration information for modeling. That alog is still unfortunately sitting in my drafts. However, I was able to use the results to make a side-by-side comparison with a modulation depth test Sheila ran last Thursday, after the power outage. We are still trying to understand what the overall effect of the power outage was on the IFO. Namely, we have lost 1% of optical gain, 86964.
Some background: the modulation depth test aims to measure the fraction of carrier, 9 MHz and 45 MHz power at each port. This is done by measuring the powers at the nominal settings, and then individiually stepping the 9 and 45 MHz modulation up or down by a known value. Using a measured calibration of V/dBm and rad/V (see alog 62883), and using the bessel functions, the power fraction of each field can be measured at each diode based on how much the total diode power changes at each step. (note: I still have a to do list item to better calibrate the modulation depth in radians using OMC scan data).
Procedure: I stepped both down and up in modulation depth, resulting in 5 different measurements (nominal, 9 down, 9 up, 45 down, 45 up). In March, I stepped down by 3 dBm and up by 2 dBm, but in September we were able to step both down and up by 3 dBm. I measured for 3 minutes at each step in March, and 1 minute at each step in September.
EDIT: I realized I made an error, and the first results I report below are actually from Feb 2025. The significant difference here is that in my February measurement I only stepped down by 3 dBm for 9 and 45 MHz each, so there is less data to fit. In my March measurement, I stepped up 2 dBm and down 3 dBm, getting 5 total different measurement times. There should be very little difference in the interferometer between February and March 2025, so the differences in the results I believe are due to the fact that more points (5 versus 3) gives you a much better fit to the data. I would compare March and now for a more accurate understanding of the differences.
February results, well before power outage, only fit from 3 data points:
| Field | Input | POP | REFL | AS |
| carrier | 0.9771 | 0.9842 | 0.9419 | 0.3386 |
| 9 MHz | 0.01278 | 0.01527 | 0.02950 | 0.1787 |
| 45 MHz | 0.01003 | 0.000474 | 0.02860 | 0.4827 |
March results, before power outage, fit from 5 data points:
| Field | Input | POP | REFL | AS |
| carrier | 0.9779 | 0.9831 | 0.9164 | 0.2134 |
| 9 MHz | 0.01212 | 0.01332 | 0.04059 | 0.2761 |
| 45 MHz | 0.009687 | 0.002302 | 0.04431 | 0.5413 |
September results, after power outage (and reduction of PSL power, attenuation at IMC REFL), fit from 5 data points:
| Field | Input | POP | REFL | AS |
| carrier | 0.9783 | 0.9833 | 0.9333 | 0.3556 |
| 9 MHz | 0.01195 | 0.01325 | 0.02533 | 0.1852 |
| 45 MHz | 0.009486 | 0.001909 | 0.04199 | 0.4641 |
EDIT: Including the March results (and trusting them more than the February results) changes the conclusion. The input ratios are very similar between all three measurements. This is also true for POP where carrier and 9 ratios are concerned. 45 MHz is the hardest field to measure because the 9 and carrier are so strong at POP. There may be less 45 MHz at POP, or this is just the measurement uncertainty. At REFL, there may be an increase in carrier light now after the power outage, and there may be half as much 9 MHz as in March.
The most dramatic differences are at the AS port. Just comparing the February and March measurements, there may be considerable uncertainty in how much of each field is at AS in general. However, if we choose to believe the March results, this would suggest a significant increase in carrier at AS, and a significant decrease in 9 and 45 MHz. However, comparing February and now, the 9 MHz and carrier are nearly the same, and the 45 seems to have decreased.
Rereading this alog, I see that I should say specifically which diodes measure these powers:
Input == IM4 trans
POP == POP A LF
REFL == REFL A LF
AS = AS_C DC NSUM
Here are plots of various channels during the March and September mod depth tests. The shaded region indicates which step was being taken at the time, and the dotted line matching each shading color indicates the median of the channel at that time.
S&K Electric onsite. Floor cable tray between SUS racks R4 and R7 installed. Isolated cable tray from supports with teflon. Insulated ground bar installed and tied to rack SUS-R7.
Work in the mechanical room mezzanine (power suppy and cabling for SUS-M2) caused h1sush7 IO chassis to glitch. See alog 87095 for details.
D. Barker, F. Clara, and S&K Electric
Jennie W, Rahul K, Keita K
Executive Summary: The measurements of ISS input beam dither coupling to the PDs need repeated as their may be some settings on the oscilloscope we didn't setup properly.
Measurement Theory:
To get a coupling measurement of the ISS diode array to input beam motion we need:
AC measurement for each of the 8 diodes (ACPD1, ACPD2, etc.).
simultaneous AC measurement for the X and Y channels of the QPD (X, Y).
We have a calibration measured previously that tells us that the QPD calibration [Cal] is 45 V/mm when the input beam is dithered horizontally, and that the direction we dither the beam in is 14.9 degrees from the X axis of the QPD (presumably because the QPD is not quite aligned rotationally in its support).
To work out the movement in the actual horizontal plane on the QPD (R_QPD) we use:
Mag = sqrt(X^2 + Y^2)
theta = atan2(Y, X)
R_QPD = Mag * e^(i*theta)
Average DC voltage for each of the 8 PDs to normalise the coupling measurement (DC1, DC2, etc)
Coupling = (AC PDn / DCn)/ (R_QPD/Cal)
When Mayank and Shiva were here we were doing this measurement using the average and peak to peak values for the voltages of DC and AC signals respectively. This throws away the phase info, so now we are trying to do this using transfer functions between the motion of the input beam on the QPD and the PDs.
On August 18th we re-aligned the input to the ISS in the optics lab to minimise the coupling to each of the PDs by eye on the oscilloscope traces showing the AC coupled time series.
The dither used to measure the coupling is applied on a steering mirror after the mode-matching lens but before the PBS used to fix the polarisation of the beam.
The dither we used initially was 1Vpp, but we made some effort to reduce noise on the signal by tuning the resistance of the laser temperature controller.
The new dither is 40mVpp at 100 Hz, and has an offset of 2.5V to keep the mirror aligned into the ISS array input aperture.
All three oscilloscopes are synced via a square wave from the signal generator used for the dither and can be controlled by USB hookups to the opticslab PC.
The code to trigger them at once is from the ipython notebook saved on C:\Users\opticslab as meas_TF_osc.ipynb:
All this does is trigger the scopes, the channels have to be turned on manually and saved manually. Francisco has worked on a much better bersion of this code but I haven't had time to test it yet.
The data we gathered on the 18th is shown below.
The time series for X and Y is shown here.
The time series for ACPD1-8 is shown here.
One can not really see a coherence, this could mean the array is perfectly aligned, but this is not likely as we have not done very fine adjustments.
This is more obvious if one looks at the ASD of each of the PDs, I have just attached one of these but none of them show a signal above the surrounding noise at 100 Hz where the injection was.
We are seeing this signal on the X and Y ASDs.
The csv files I saved for AC, DC and QPD all had different time steps, but the same span meaning they were all different lengths. We might need to retake this data and mess around with the display and save settings to fix this - Keita investigated earlier today and it is possible to change the save resolution to be larger and also to reduce the number of samples the oscilloscope saves via the trigger menu.
I might also try to increase the dither amplitude if this still doesn't help us do the measurement.
Once we have this measurement working we will need to iterate this measurement a few times while making small adjustments to the alignment into the array and possibly moving one or more of the PDs in their mounts.
The next steps are to repeat this measurement for vertical dither and then to do beam scans across each PD to see how well centred they are with respect to the beam.
WP 12802
ECR E2400330
Modified List T2500232
The following SUS SAT Amps were upgraded per ECR E2400330. Modification improves the whitening stage to reduce ADC noise from 0.05 to 10 Hz.
| Suspension | Old | New | OSEM |
| PRM M2 | S1100080 | S1100064 | ULLLURLR |
| PRM M3 | S1100106 | S1000285 | ULLLURLR |
| SRM M2 | S1100078 | S1100095 | ULLLURLR |
| SRM M3 | S1000274 | S1100091 | ULLLURLR |
| ITMY L1 UIM | S1100070 | S1100129 | ULLLURLR |
| ITMX L1 UIM | S1100141 | S1000287 | ULLLURLR |
| BS M2 | S1000295 | S1100117 | ULLLURLR |
| ETMY UIM | S1100159 | S1100088 | ULLLURLR |
F. Clara, J. Kissel, O. Patane
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100064, assigned to PRM M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100064_PRM_M2_ULLLURLR_20250917.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design PRM M2 S1100064 CH1 UL 0.0961:5.24 120.25 zpk([5.24],[0.0961],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0950:5.18 120.25 zpk([5.18],[0.0950],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0961:5.24 120.25 zpk([5.24],[0.0961],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0962:5.25 120.00 zpk([5.25],[0.0962],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1000285 , assigned to PRM M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1000285_PRM_M3_ULLLURLR_20250917.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design PRM M3 S1000285 CH1 UL 0.0956:5.22 120.250 zpk([5.22],[0.0956],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0967:5.27 120.250 zpk([5.27],[0.0967],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0955:5.21 120.375 zpk([5.21],[0.0955],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0950:5.18 120.375 zpk([5.18],[0.0950],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100095 , assigned to SRM M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100095_SRM_M2_ULLLURLR_20250917.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design SRM M2 S1100095 CH1 UL 0.0955:5.22 120 zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0975:5.33 120 zpk([5.33],[0.0975],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0951:5.19 120.25 zpk([5.19],[0.0951],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0955:5.20 120.25 zpk([5.20],[0.0955],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100091 , assigned to SRM M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100091_SRM_M3_ULLLURLR_20250917.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design SRM M3 S1100091 CH1 UL 0.0983:5.37 120.25 zpk([5.37],[0.0983],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0959:5.23 120.25 zpk([5.23],[0.0959],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0955:5.23 120.00 zpk([5.23],[0.0955],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0957:5.24 120.00 zpk([5.24],[0.0957],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100129 , assigned to ITMY L1 (UIM) ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100129_ITMY_L1_ULLLURLR_20250916.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design ITMY L1 S1100129 CH1 UL 0.0956:5.23 121.75 zpk([5.23],[0.0956],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0966:5.28 120.00 zpk([5.28],[0.0966],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0978:5.34 120.00 zpk([5.34],[0.0978],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0966:5.27 120.00 zpk([5.27],[0.0966],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100287 , assigned to ITMX L1 (UIM) ULLLURLR OSEMs. (Note the typo in Fil's main entry -- he quotes S1000287, but it's S1100287. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100287_ITMX_L1_ULLLURLR_20250916.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design ITMX L1 S1100287 CH1 UL 0.0958:5.23 120 zpk([5.23],[0.0958],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0966:5.28 120 zpk([5.28],[0.0966],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0941:5.14 120 zpk([5.14],[0.0941],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0955:5.23 120 zpk([5.23],[0.0955],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100117 , assigned to BS M2 ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100117_BS_M2_ULLLURLR_20250917.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design BS M2 S1100117 CH1 UL 0.0970:5.31 120 zpk([5.31],[0.0970],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0975:5.33 120 zpk([5.33],[0.0975],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0967:5.30 120 zpk([5.30],[0.0967],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0955:5.22 120.375 zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.
Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100088 , assigned to ETMY L1 (UIM) ULLLURLR OSEMs. This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807. The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/ plotresponse_S1100088_ETMY_L1_ULLLURLR_20250916.m Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are Optic Stage Serial_Number Channel_Number OSEM_Name Zero_Pole_Hz R_TIA_kOhm Foton_Design ETMY L1 S1100088 CH1 UL 0.0968:5.29 120 zpk([5.29],[0.0968],1,"n") CH2 LL 0.0956:5.23 120 zpk([5.23],[0.0956],1,"n") CH3 UR 0.0955:5.22 120 zpk([5.22],[0.0955],1,"n") CH4 LR 0.0959:5.24 120 zpk([5.24],[0.0959],1,"n") The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/ Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), I nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%. shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.