Displaying reports 18501-18520 of 86948.Go to page Start 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 End
Reports until 16:00, Friday 16 June 2023
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Friday 16 June 2023 (70522)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 06/16 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
SHIFT SUMMARY: Shift was full of earthquakes, keeping us down for several hours.

Lock #1:

Lock #2:

Lock #3:

Lock #4:

Lock #5:

Handing off to Corey, H1 currently at MAX_POWER.


LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
15:45 FAC Karen Optics/Vac Labs - Technical cleaning 16:05
16:12 CAL Ryan CR - Sensing function calibration meas. 16:46
16:56 CDS Marc, Jonathan CER - Check on HAM6 camera 17:06
17:06 VAC Janos MY - Check pump 17:23
17:18 PEM Robert LVEA - Set up scatter test on HAM3 17:23
18:35 PEM Robert LVEA - HAM3 scatter test (Wifi on) 18:47
18:47 FAC Kim H2 - Technical cleaning 19:04
21:27 VAC Janos EX - VAC checks 21:51
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:59, Friday 16 June 2023 (70532)
Fri EVE Ops Transition

TITLE: 06/16 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 18mph Gusts, 14mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.09 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Arrived to see h1 working on getting back to NOMINAL LOW NOISE due to a big earthquake.

HAM6 OMC camera is still not on nuc30.

It's a little windy, but still better than earlier this week!

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:41, Friday 16 June 2023 (70529)
SEI_ENV earthquake transition thresholds adjusted to stay in eq mode longer

I have found a couple cases lately where SEI_ENV was switching out of earthquake mode too quickly. Peakmon was still around 1000nm/s, fairly high, and SEI_ENV would switch back to the nominal state. During the winter, I had to increase this transition threshold from 600 to 1100 because the high microseism was fooling the SEI_ENV guardian. After that, I made an adjustment to the bandpass filter peakmon uses, to better filter out the microseism (here), but didn't reassess the SEI_ENV thresholds. I've set it back to 600 for now, I'll try to figure out if we can live with this threshold wrt the filter I installed in January.

This shouldn't really affect my alog about the earthquake robustness. This threshold affects the transition out of the earthquake mode, there is a separate threshold of 400nm/s for the transition into the eq mode with seismon early notifications, and we are mostly losing lock before even reaching that threshold.

H1 SEI (CSWG)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:15, Friday 16 June 2023 (70527)
Updated plot_current_blends.m in the face of blend fader filter bank name changes (for HAMs only so far)
J. Kissel

For quick reference -- the current HAM-ISI blend filters are:
    (X, Y, Z) are all using the "comp_250" blend filter pair, whose blend frequency is 0.18 Hz (or 180 mHz -- hilariously *not* 250 mHz...)
    (RX, RY) are both using the "many_notches" blend pair, whose blend frequency is 0.375 mHz
    (RZ) is using the "fc_yaw_filt_lp." 

The recent ECR E2200473 that improves the performance of switching between blend filters also completely revamped the naming scheme for the filter banks which house the blend filters. That means older, extremely useful code like 
    /ligo/svncommon/SeiSVN/seismic/Common/MatlabTools/plot_current_blends.m
which converts the "as installed" foton representation of the blend filters into their design-intent, dimensionless "complementary" form broke.

Not having that code forced the infrequent viewer / non-designer to cut corners and only look at the displacement sensor blend, and either waive their hands guessing at the blend frequency / frequency-shaping or invent their own metric for "at what frequency do we start to get inertial isolation," e.g. as in LHO:70313.

I've now fixed the above mentioned code for the HAMs -- see attached collection of plots which show the 4 pairs of blend filters which are in play on ALL HAM ISIs at LHO (ISI HAMs 2 - 8).

Along the way, I couldn't help myself but to improve the plots:
    (1) I've added an explicit indication of the the blend frequency,
    (2) tightened up the frequency range and magnitude limits so you can quantitatively read off the magnitude better
    (3) For the phase, we used to plot both the individual filter's phase and the sum, but really only the sum matters. The sum of the HP and LP pair's deviation from 1.0 magnitude and 0.0 phase is a metric for *lack* of complementarity, and thus 
        (a) how much the open loop gain shape is impacted for *this* pair of filters and 
        (b) how much the phase will *change* when we switch to another set of blends with different [lack of] complementarity)

The code still needs further updates to handle BSC-ISI ST1 sensor blends, but I leave that for another day, or the initiative-full reader.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General (Lockloss, PEM)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:46, Friday 16 June 2023 (70528)
Lockloss @ 18:40 UTC

Lockloss @ 18:40 UTC from placing the retro-reflector into a viewport on HAM3 for a backscatter test.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:39, Friday 16 June 2023 (70525)
DAQSTAT reporting frame writer disk usage, alerts if it is becoming full

I have added a disk-usage section to the DAQSTAT system. It will report a warning if the disk usage is between 93-95% and an error is greater than 95%.

The disk usage information is updated hourly by cds_report running on cdsmanager.

DAQSTAT was restarted several times yesterday and once today after lock-loss to install the new code.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:31, Friday 16 June 2023 (70524)
Fri CP1 Fill

Fri Jun 16 10:03:52 2023 INFO: Fill completed in 3min 52secs

Jordan confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
jonathan.hanks@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:14, Friday 16 June 2023 (70523)
Checked the switch port for cam15 for liveness
During a lock-loss around 10am localtime we took another device out to the CER switch to check that the port that cam15 is plugged into is live.  It was able to power another device.  So referring the next steps to Filiberto when he is available to go to ham6 and find/replace the camera.
H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:05, Friday 16 June 2023 - last comment - 11:05, Friday 16 June 2023(70521)
Lockloss @ 16:54 UTC

Lockloss @ 16:54 UTC, possibly from CSOFT_P ringup. I don't notice excess ground motion or other immediate cause.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 11:05, Friday 16 June 2023 (70526)ISC

This lockloss actually looks more like PRCL again, see attached ndscope. These LSC locklosses are so fast you have to zoom in to the scope to see them.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:00, Friday 16 June 2023 (70520)
Sensing Function Calibration Measurement

After having been locked for 3+ hours, I started a "sensing function only" calibration measurement following the instructions on the TakingCalibrationMeasurements wiki. This measurement took ~30 minutes after taking H1 out of Observing mode and into NLN_CAL_MEAS.

Attached are a screenshot of the calibration monitor screen prior to the measurement and the generated calibration report: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/reports/20230616T161654Z/H1_calibration_report_20230616T161654Z.pdf

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
LHO FMCS (PEM)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:01, Friday 16 June 2023 (70517)
HVAC Fan Vibrometers Check

FAMIS 23810

Noise on EX_FAN2_570_2 seems to have slightly increased 3 days ago.

All other fans look good.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:03, Friday 16 June 2023 (70516)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 06/16 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 138Mpc
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 13mph Gusts, 9mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Taking over from Austin; H1 has been locked and observing for 2 hours.

LHO General
austin.jennings@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:00, Friday 16 June 2023 (70510)
Friday Owl Shift Summary

TITLE: 06/16 Owl Shift: 07:00-15:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 137Mpc
SHIFT SUMMARY:

- Lock #1:

- Waiting in DOWN for ground to settle, before starting an IA - which went smoothly

- Lock #2:

- Lock #3:

- Leaving H1 to Ryan S. locked and in observing

LOG:

No log for this shift.

H1 General (Lockloss)
austin.jennings@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:53, Friday 16 June 2023 (70515)
Lockloss @ 11:48

LOCKLOSS @ 9:07, a 5.7 EQ from Tonga. Ground motion was still ringing down when this EQ hit, peakmon was ~1000 counts at the time of the lockloss. There was also what looked to be an ASC ringup for MICH P/Y on nuc29, but I'm attributing this to the earthquake. Peakmon is already starting to drop so I'm going to give it a few minutes and try relocking.

H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:19, Thursday 15 June 2023 - last comment - 09:19, Wednesday 21 June 2023(70497)
60W configuration Notes

Here is a list of the things we need to change to return as closely as possible to a desirable 60W configuration.

If you are looking for a timestamp to determine when the power change occurred, the last full lock at 60W was on April 6 from about 17:00 UTC to April 7 3:30 UTC.

Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 09:35, Friday 16 June 2023 (70519)

Under LSC controls, I claimed that we should revert the PRCL loop design, however Gabriele reminded me that the new PRCL design has better suppression, see alog 68817. We should keep this new design, but we should still determine how/if we need to change the gain to ensure the loop UGF is around 30 Hz.

Under LSC feedforward, I forgot to mention that we did not run with PRCL feedforward at 60W, so we can turn that back off at 60W.

I have also recovered the old MICH FF filter that was in FM9, called "May_d". At 60W, we will need to engage FM6-9. labeled May a-d.

elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 15:51, Friday 16 June 2023 (70530)

We will need to update the violin mode threshhold checker. The counts value for the DARM offset was hard coded, and will be different at 60W. This value will only need to change if we change the DARM offset.

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 14:24, Tuesday 20 June 2023 (70622)AOS, CAL, DetChar, ISC, OpsInfo, SUS, SYS
Tagging a lot of the teams who will either need to be involved in these changes, or at least be impacted by these changes when/while we revert.
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 14:31, Tuesday 20 June 2023 (70623)CAL, ISC, SYS
J. Kissel, J. Driggers, N. Aritomi, S. Dwyer

Just FYI I brought up the open question in Elenna's aLOG about 
    DARM offset: 20 mA, not sure if we want to revert this value

The quick consensus (without agreeing to write it in stone) is that we "plan" to *not* revert the DARM offset, leaving us with 40 mA of current on the DCPDs, as has been the case since May 05 2023 (see LHO:69358).
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 08:31, Wednesday 21 June 2023 (70650)
J. Kissel, J. Driggers, S. Dwyer

Regarding the following setting suggestions in this bullet point,
    SRCL offset: we had been running with an offset of -175. 
    This was also with the previous LSC-POP_RF45 whitening at 21 dB. 
    We could revert the whitening change as well if we think it's better 
    for noise considerations

The plan is to *definitely* go to the -175 ct SRCL offset, however -- upon discussion this morning -- we've decided *not* to revert the reduction in POP A RF45 whitening gain from +21 dB to +15 dB. Said with all positives to avoid confusion, we'll continue to reduce the gain to +15 dB rather than revert to +21 dB.

We think
    - the extra ADC range head room is nice, 
    - the sacrifice in SRCL / PRCL sensing noise is minimal, and/or has minimal impact***
    - for now, today, when we power down, we want to change as little as is need to achieve stability, rather than revert absolutely everything.

***One may find the assessment of the noise impact in LHO:69350.
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 09:19, Wednesday 21 June 2023 (70661)
I forgot to include this in this alog, but the CSOFT P gain should probably be reduced to 20 again. This was a change made late last week.
H1 ISC (OpsInfo)
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:31, Wednesday 14 June 2023 - last comment - 09:47, Friday 16 June 2023(70452)
Added new PI28 path for 80 kHz PI damping on ETMX

Naoki, Vicky

To try damping the 80 kHz PI recently causing locklosses (LHO:70434), today we installed a new path on PI28, with drive sent to ETMX. To phase-lock the ESD damping drive to the PI mode, we bandpassed the DCPD signal around 80.296 kHz (foton here). This frequency was chosen based on the DCPDs full-spectrum signal around 80.3 kHz, which today we saw the 3 peaks in red here between 80.295-80.301 kHz in full lock. It seems like our problem is the bigger peak around *296, where pink cursors are centered. We are trying to damp on ETMX first, since it seems like PI29 80kHz damping on ETMX could impact this mode.

The new path for PI28 has been updated and damping is guardianized, but this PI28 damping is untested, and there are no verbal alarms for PI28 yet.

Summary with the current status of PI damping:

PI frequency PI damping mode number Test Mass PI Guardian status _DAMP_GAIN
10.428 kHz  24  ETMY  automated 1000
10.431 kHz  31  ETMY  automated 1000

80.302 kHz (LHO:68760)

 29  ETMX  automated, likely working 
(LHO:70243)

50000
(LHO:69800)

80.296 kHz (LHO:70443)

 28  ETMX  guardianized, testing now 

50000

SDFs were recoinciled after, see screenshots -- mainly, we un-monitored guardian-controlled things like the damping phase and PLL integrator.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 11:35, Thursday 15 June 2023 (70486)OpsInfo

I've added in a test for PI mode 28 into verbal alarms with an RMS threshold of 1 for now (the same as mode 29).

victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 16:32, Thursday 15 June 2023 (70501)

Just checking in, looks like PI28 does at least see a mode come through ~1-2 hours into lock (RMSMON spikes just before NLN b/c OMC whitening, the second peak is the real one), but this hasn't run away yet. Then ~10 min after PI28, looks like PI29 sees something pass through.

Images attached to this comment
victoriaa.xu@LIGO.ORG - 09:47, Friday 16 June 2023 (70518)TCS

Looking at disaggregated temperature trends across the EX VEA over the last year, it might be a bit misleading to only look at the "average EX VEA" temperature. Temperatures in some parts of the EX VEA seem to have drifted by up to 0.5-2 deg F over the past few months. Temps now seem to be returning to where they were about 6mo - 1 year ago.

I think Robert and Aidan have both made the point that, to understand temperature drifts, it's helpful to look at the individual temperature sensors across the VEA, rather than the average VEA temperature. For example, see Aidan's alog LLO:25785 where he also thought about stabilizing the VEA temperatures to a different sensor, which is better correlated with the test mass temperature. For this 80 kHz PI though, Aidan's also said that the temperature dependence of the mechanical mode freq is about 80ppm/K, so for ~0.5K (delta~1degF), the HOM frequency changes by ~3 Hz for the 80 kHz mechanical mode, and it seems unlikely we're just within 3 Hz of the PI going unstable -- so it's not totally convincing that our recent 80 kHz PI ring ups are simply b/c VEA temperature drifts. But at least, at LLO, he found their ETMY is most correlated with the EY VEA_202B sensor. 

I'm not sure which of LHO's EX VEA sensors are most correlated with ETMX. But, it may be worth considering more than the average VEA temperature. Especially since the individual temperature sensors have seen some drifts over the past year, which aren't seen by trends of the average VEA temperature.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
brina.martinez@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:43, Wednesday 14 June 2023 - last comment - 16:29, Friday 16 June 2023(70450)
Ham1 FF off test for 5 mins

Commissioning period,

The Ham1 FF was turned off for testing on 06/14/23 21:32:15. It stayed off for 5 minutes and was turned back on at 21:37:15.

Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 12:54, Thursday 15 June 2023 (70491)

My motivation for this test came from a bruco that I ran on the data from a long lock over the weekend: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~elenna.capote/brucos/CAL_1370343461/

Specifically, the CHARD P, INP1 P and HAM1 TT L4C RY coherence were much higher than expected, and much higher than they had been in the past after successful HAM1 FF tuning and A2L gain adjustments.

The test first confirmed that we are still seeing decent subtraction of the HAM1 noise from the ASC loops, as seen in an OMC DCPD sum comparison with the feedforward on and off. I also grabbed spectra of each of the ASC loops with the feedforward on and off (in this plot the red, live traces are with the feedforward off, and the blue reference traces are with the feedforward on).

I used the feedforward off time to run the NonSENS training code and calculate a new feedforward for CHARD P, INP1 P and PRC2 P. The code also makes plots of the expected subtraction of the loops. I compared the expected subtraction plots (linked below) to the current subtraction plots linked above, and I conclude that:

  • CHARD P feedforward currently is subtracting about as much as the code predicts, so an update of the feedforward will likely not change much
  • PRC2 P is not subtracting as much as it can, and should be updated. This update might help
  • INP1 P is almost not subtracting at all, but the code predicts it could subtract much more, so this should be updated

I didn't check any yaw loops because there is already decent noise removal, and coherences are low. I don't expect to see much improvement there.

I will install the new INP1 P and PRC2 P feedforward filters, labeled with today's date. I think they should be engaged for the next lock if possible.

I don't understand why the coupling has changed, but I think this is a similar mystery change that changed like several other things in the IFO changed recently- perhaps some new alignment from the PR3 move? In other words, unless we have to make another big alignment change like that, I don't expect us to need to update this feedforward for a while.

Images attached to this comment
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 14:12, Thursday 15 June 2023 (70495)

Turning off the HAM1 feedforward made the CHARD and PRC2 noise signficantly larger, by about a factor 10. The effect on DARM is significant, and consistent with the fact that CHARD or PRC2 are coupling more now than before, and when the FF was on were just below the measured DARM. This is consistent with the measured coherence between DARM and CHARD or HAM1 sensors.

One possible reason for the higher coupling of HAM1 noise to DARM is that the beam spot might have moved on PR2 (where PRC2 is driven) and therefore the A2L we tuned some time ago might be wrong. It's worth and quick retuning the PR2 A2L and see if that improves the coupling of PRC2 to DARM and maybe even DARM noise.

elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 17:35, Thursday 15 June 2023 (70505)

The new filters have not yet been installed because I am getting errors from foton when I try to copy them in. I will try again tomorrow.

elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 15:38, Friday 16 June 2023 (70531)

I have installed the new feedforward filters for INP1 and PRC2. They are labeled with "0616" for today's date. They are currently not in use, but can be quickly tested during a commissioning period. A thermalized IFO is best for the test, but they can be tried at any time.

elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 16:29, Friday 16 June 2023 (70534)
New filters implemented and SDFed.
Displaying reports 18501-18520 of 86948.Go to page Start 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 End