Reports until 21:40, Wednesday 12 November 2014
H1 ISC
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:40, Wednesday 12 November 2014 - last comment - 11:21, Thursday 13 November 2014(15025)
ALS DIFF success

(Alexa, Evan, Sheila, Nic, Kiwamu)

Tonight we locked ALS DIFF with a UGF of 8 Hz, phase margin of 60 deg (2014-11-12-ALS_OLTF.pdf). The in loop noise is 1e-3 um/rtHz RMS down to 0.1 Hz (ALS_Diff_spectra_11122014.pdf). This is comparable to our old ALS_DIFF spectra, which was comparable to HIFOXY days. 

We are running under a similar configuration to LLO. We are using an offloaded distribution for the Quads. Our LSC-DARM and L1_LOCK_L filters are similar to LLO's as described in alog 14961. We have added a resG filter in LSC-DARM to supress noise at 1 Hz and 0.4 Hz. We also added an additional boost in the L1 LOCK L stage to improve our RMS at low frequency. The ESD LOCK L filter was initially empy; however, we added an elliptic filter in L3_LOCK_L to supress noise we saw at around 100 Hz in the ESD coil output, and to reduce the range we use on the ESD coils. The current LSC-DARM filter is shown in LSCDARM_filters.pdf. Meanwhile the L1_LOCK_L filter with the addition of the ESD ellpitcal filter is shown in UIM_filters.pdf.

We have about a factor of 7 headroom in the ESD before we would saturate, and about a factor of 30 head room in the ESD.  Tonight the 1-3 Hz seismic is fairly high (0.1 um/sec) but the low frequency is low (0.2 um/sec at 0.1-0.3 Hz).  So it seems like we have some room for the seismic to get worse without needing to add the top mass.

Our UIM/ESD crossover is at 0.9 Hz with 50 deg phase margin. The L1_LOCK_L_GAIN = 0.28, L3_LOCK_L_GAIN = 1. We collected data from L1_LOCK_L IN1/IN2 to measure the crossover (UIM_measure_EXonly.pdf). The data is also depicted in DARM_crossovers.pdf; this image also shows the same TF produced by the model along with the UIM/ESD.  The model seems to agree with the data well; albeit with a gain of 5 fudge factor. I have also attached the OLTF produced by the model (DARM_TFs.pdf).

We found we could stabily and repeatbly lock ALS DIFF with a LSC-DARM gain of 400. We were ONLY feeding back to EX. We are suspicious of the EY ESD; when we feed back to EY the y-arm eventually drops lock even with a low DARM gain. We did little investigation into this issue.

ALS_DIFF guardian has been updated, and can lock DIFF in this configuration.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 06:36, Thursday 13 November 2014 (15029)

Nice to see this working again. I'm confused by your sentence: We have about a factor of 7 headroom in the ESD before we would saturate, and about a factor of 30 head room in the ESD. Do you mean the UIM stage for one of these? Also, in the future 'ESD coil' should be 'ESD electrode'.

alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - 09:55, Thursday 13 November 2014 (15033)

Sorry Peter, I meant to say: We have about a factor of 7 headroom in the ESD before we would saturate, and about a factor of 30 head room in the UIM. I have also attached the coil spectrum now.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 11:21, Thursday 13 November 2014 (15037)SUS
J. Kissel

Sheila has tasked me into figuring out what's wrong with ETMY. Here're some additional notes that I've gathered from talking to Alexa / Sheila / Evan/ Nic that were not included in the (already amazingly and delightfully detailed) entry above.

- I found EX & EY Yaw damping loops *without* the +12 [dB] gain-only filter on. Sheila / Alexa didn't know when / why the filter was turned OFF; a dataviewer trend reveals that it was just never turned ON after install on Nov 11th. Since this bug is common to both ETMs, I don't expect it was the problem. I've now turned them ON so we have as little difference between the damping loop design as possible, so we have less things to blame.
- EX (ONLY) has a new "NicLP" low-pass filter engaged in FM2 of the L3_LOCK_L control. From what I gather, this elliptic low-pass filter was installed *after* they'd stopped using EY, so I also don't suspect this difference.
- EY (ONLY) has optical lever damping in PITCH engaged. This also was turned on right as the switch to only using EX only, when it was determined that there was a problem with EY. It's also the only QUAD damping loop that has a sufficient amount of documentation associated with it (see LHO aLOG 14878) that we trust it to be functional (thanks Evan)!

I'll now begin measuring stuff, in hopes to find problems...