Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 21:40, Wednesday 12 November 2014
H1 ISC
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:40, Wednesday 12 November 2014 - last comment - 11:21, Thursday 13 November 2014(15025)
ALS DIFF success

(Alexa, Evan, Sheila, Nic, Kiwamu)

Tonight we locked ALS DIFF with a UGF of 8 Hz, phase margin of 60 deg (2014-11-12-ALS_OLTF.pdf). The in loop noise is 1e-3 um/rtHz RMS down to 0.1 Hz (ALS_Diff_spectra_11122014.pdf). This is comparable to our old ALS_DIFF spectra, which was comparable to HIFOXY days. 

We are running under a similar configuration to LLO. We are using an offloaded distribution for the Quads. Our LSC-DARM and L1_LOCK_L filters are similar to LLO's as described in alog 14961. We have added a resG filter in LSC-DARM to supress noise at 1 Hz and 0.4 Hz. We also added an additional boost in the L1 LOCK L stage to improve our RMS at low frequency. The ESD LOCK L filter was initially empy; however, we added an elliptic filter in L3_LOCK_L to supress noise we saw at around 100 Hz in the ESD coil output, and to reduce the range we use on the ESD coils. The current LSC-DARM filter is shown in LSCDARM_filters.pdf. Meanwhile the L1_LOCK_L filter with the addition of the ESD ellpitcal filter is shown in UIM_filters.pdf.

We have about a factor of 7 headroom in the ESD before we would saturate, and about a factor of 30 head room in the ESD.  Tonight the 1-3 Hz seismic is fairly high (0.1 um/sec) but the low frequency is low (0.2 um/sec at 0.1-0.3 Hz).  So it seems like we have some room for the seismic to get worse without needing to add the top mass.

Our UIM/ESD crossover is at 0.9 Hz with 50 deg phase margin. The L1_LOCK_L_GAIN = 0.28, L3_LOCK_L_GAIN = 1. We collected data from L1_LOCK_L IN1/IN2 to measure the crossover (UIM_measure_EXonly.pdf). The data is also depicted in DARM_crossovers.pdf; this image also shows the same TF produced by the model along with the UIM/ESD.  The model seems to agree with the data well; albeit with a gain of 5 fudge factor. I have also attached the OLTF produced by the model (DARM_TFs.pdf).

We found we could stabily and repeatbly lock ALS DIFF with a LSC-DARM gain of 400. We were ONLY feeding back to EX. We are suspicious of the EY ESD; when we feed back to EY the y-arm eventually drops lock even with a low DARM gain. We did little investigation into this issue.

ALS_DIFF guardian has been updated, and can lock DIFF in this configuration.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 06:36, Thursday 13 November 2014 (15029)

Nice to see this working again. I'm confused by your sentence: We have about a factor of 7 headroom in the ESD before we would saturate, and about a factor of 30 head room in the ESD. Do you mean the UIM stage for one of these? Also, in the future 'ESD coil' should be 'ESD electrode'.

alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - 09:55, Thursday 13 November 2014 (15033)

Sorry Peter, I meant to say: We have about a factor of 7 headroom in the ESD before we would saturate, and about a factor of 30 head room in the UIM. I have also attached the coil spectrum now.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 11:21, Thursday 13 November 2014 (15037)SUS
J. Kissel

Sheila has tasked me into figuring out what's wrong with ETMY. Here're some additional notes that I've gathered from talking to Alexa / Sheila / Evan/ Nic that were not included in the (already amazingly and delightfully detailed) entry above.

- I found EX & EY Yaw damping loops *without* the +12 [dB] gain-only filter on. Sheila / Alexa didn't know when / why the filter was turned OFF; a dataviewer trend reveals that it was just never turned ON after install on Nov 11th. Since this bug is common to both ETMs, I don't expect it was the problem. I've now turned them ON so we have as little difference between the damping loop design as possible, so we have less things to blame.
- EX (ONLY) has a new "NicLP" low-pass filter engaged in FM2 of the L3_LOCK_L control. From what I gather, this elliptic low-pass filter was installed *after* they'd stopped using EY, so I also don't suspect this difference.
- EY (ONLY) has optical lever damping in PITCH engaged. This also was turned on right as the switch to only using EX only, when it was determined that there was a problem with EY. It's also the only QUAD damping loop that has a sufficient amount of documentation associated with it (see LHO aLOG 14878) that we trust it to be functional (thanks Evan)!

I'll now begin measuring stuff, in hopes to find problems...
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.