J. Kissel, K. Izumi We haven't gotten these two measurements since the tail end of Calibration week, and we want to confirm that our model (that's under development) is still valid after 1.5 weeks, so we've taken new DARM OLG TFs and PCAL to DARM TFs. We'll analyze these in the next few days and confirm what we can determine from the calibration lines. Data lives here: /ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/ER8/H1/Measurements/ DARMOLGTFs/2015-09-08_H1_DARM_OLGTF_7to1200Hz.xml PCAL/2015-09-08_PCALY2DARMTF_7to1200Hz.xml For the record, this pair of measurements takes almost exactly 1 hour. However, to knock down the measurement time to that one hour, one needs to run the DARMOLGTF first, and start the PCAL TF once the DARM OLG TF hits the frequency points around 15 to 10 [Hz]. Note, calibration lines were turned OFF during these measurements. They're now back ON.
Paramter file:
aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/ER8/H1/Scripts/DARMOLGTFs/H1DARMparams_1125813052.m
And the analysis results in pdf format are attached. It seems that adjusting the optical gain and cavity pole such that match the Pcal measurement results in frequency-dependent descrepancy in the open loop model by 3% at 120 Hz. The residual in open loop seems similar to what Darkhan reported (alog 21318).