Unforunately the frequency noise cable got unplugged, so the lines did not come on. As it's clearly visible at high frequency I just plot the spectrum changes. Less CO2 seems to help here at this thermal state.
We're not seeing as large a jitter suppression as seen previously. The only point that does reduce it all across the frequency range is also the point which reduces the PRCL gain and rotates the squeezing, so not ideal.
LSC to LSC couplings look better after changing the input matrices.
LSC-CHARDY couplings seem worse with less common CO2
LSC-CHARDP couplings seem better with less common CO2
Overall there's one obviously bad setting to run the annular CO2s, no option is clearly better than where we are currently.
Still processing the line demodulations but certain diferential CO2 seem to hurt both the PRCL gain and what seems to be a squeeze rotation
Unforunately the frequency noise cable got unplugged, so the lines did not come on. As it's clearly visible at high frequency I just plot the spectrum changes. Less CO2 seems to help here at this thermal state.
We're not seeing as large a jitter suppression as seen previously. The only point that does reduce it all across the frequency range is also the point which reduces the PRCL gain and rotates the squeezing, so not ideal.
LSC to LSC couplings look better after changing the input matrices.
LSC-CHARDY couplings seem worse with less common CO2
LSC-CHARDP couplings seem better with less common CO2
Overall there's one obviously bad setting to run the annular CO2s, no option is clearly better than where we are currently.