Reports until 16:56, Friday 24 January 2014
H1 SEI (ISC, SUS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:56, Friday 24 January 2014 (9546)
Testing Configurations of Corner Station BSC-ISIs vs Oscillations
S. Biscans, H. Radkins, J. Warner, J. Kissel

[[Belated entry from last night]]

In order to investigate the recently found oscillations and/or frequency combs in ISI ITMX that has been troubling the Green Team (see LHO aLOG 9494), we explored a few different configurations of the corner station BSC-ISIs. This aLOG covers the first three configurations we tested. Since these initial tests, Seb, Jim and Hugh have explored more configurations (see LHO aLOG 9537). This serves as the record for the temporary temporary solution which got the performance needed to satisfy the Green Team (see LHO aLOG 9518) -- the addition of a high-Q notch in the ISI-ITMX displacement sensor blend filters on both both stages.

With the 0.5 [Hz] notch on both stages, we're able to reduce the RMS optic pitch motion from 160 [nrad] to 80 [nrad].

Attachment 1: performance of ST2, as measured by the ST2 GS13s (stage 2 inertial censors) in three different configurations:
(1) Initial measurement in the current best configuration,  Level 1 isolation filters, with "T100mHz_N0.44" blends on ST1 XY and "750mHz" on ST1 ZRXRYRX and all of ST2.
(2) Exact same configuration of ISI-ITMX, but with the ISI-ITMY CPS turned off at the racks in the high-back (via the independent rocker switches on the back panel).
(3) With ISI-ITMY's CPS still off, similar control loop and blend filter configuration of ISI-ITMX except with a 0.5 [Hz] notch filter  in the X and Y degrees of freedom of both stages.

Attachment 2: A comparison between blend filters used in the current best configuration, with and without the 0.5 [Hz] notch filter. Note that this an export from the filters *actually installed* in foton, so the blend filters include the sensor response inversion, so they're not just the complementary blend shape (which is why the 750 mHz filters look screwy upon first glance). 

Remember, this notch is a temporary temporary solution. We're continuing to investigate the source of the problem, and we look forward to both the temporary (see LLO aLOG 10584) and permanent hardware / analog electronics solution (still under development) to the CPS oscillators beating against each other. However, while it's obvious the beating oscillators cured *some* of the frequency comb (comparing Initial Measurement against ISI-ITMY CPS OFF) we're not convinced the beating oscillators is the source of the exactly-0.5[Hz]-line.

For the record, 
- The foton design is notch(0.5,20,20) for a frequency of 0.5 [Hz] a Q of 20 and a depth of 20 dB. It also has a ramp time of 10 sec on the output.
- The notch lives in a separate filter module (FM5, called "notch_narrow") in the CPS blend filter banks (e.g. ITMX_ST1_BLND_X_CPS_CUR)
- You cannot access/turn ON/OFF from the main blend filter screen -- you have to open the "CURR" CPS sub-screen
Non-image files attached to this report