TITLE: 01/22 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 111Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Cheryl
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_CONF state: WINDY
Wind: 10mph Gusts, 8mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.39 μm/s
Microseism has been on a downward trend the last ~5hrs. There are winds but they look to be at or below 10mph.
QUICK SUMMARY:
snapshot of the H1IOPASC0_GDS_TP.adl (the medm) is attached.
Since the live readback is reasonable, continuing Observe.
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_CONF state: WINDY
Wind: 25mph Gusts, 21mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.49 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: locked in Observe
TITLE: 01/22 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ed
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_CONF state: WINDY
Wind: 18mph Gusts, 11mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.06 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.46 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: locked in Observe
TITLE: 01/22 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 118Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Cheryl
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:
(Kyle R, Gerardo M)
In preparation for the replacement of GV20's annulus ion pump, we delivered an aux-cart and components to X-End.
(Gerardo M)
Different items were relocated inside the VEA to allow access to the annulus pipe system, all laser welding safety barriers were moved from one side of the VEA to the other, and the monolithic quad cover was relocated to under one of the cleanrooms.
Crane access to support the annulus pipes was evaluated; a cleanroom is currently covering GV20, to reach and support the annulus pipes a filter will have to be relocated or removed (see photo), still trying to determine how to do that.
This was a Swift alert. LLO was conferred with.
INJ_TRANS Guardian was placed into INJECT_KILL
02:07 Stand-down expired
Camilla, Sheila
We went to ISCT6 to align the 1811 that we had installed in the AS air path this morning in the maintence window. We were able to align onto the diode, there is about 200 uW of 1064 arriving on ISCT6 and about 130uW of that is incident on the diode (which is overfilled with the lens we currently have). We were able to see the 3.125MHz signal on the RF analyzer, but it is only about 20dB above the noise, and we didn't see any of the interesting features that Daniel and I saw on the OMCDCPD spectrum at these frequencies last week.
We also attempted to measure a transfer function from the LO loop to this signal demodulated using the HD demod, however the signal is too noisy for us to get any kind of meaningful measurement.
One thing to note: Before we went to the floor I opened the AS air beam diverter. I expected that this would take us out of observe. Corey took us out of observe manually a few seconds later. I tried to investigate why this didn't take us out, these beam diverter channels are on ECATPLC1 in SDF. There are only 5 beam diverter channels in SDF, although there are more channels that coming from the beam diverter. Perhaps we need to update the channel lists used by SDF?
For the beam diverter my guess is that the open and close commands are push buttons that are released after you pressed them. So, they are alwasy in the inactive state, unless you want to change state. The state of the beam diverter is through readback channels that are normally not monitored. We could make the state readback channels writable, which would include them in the SDF list. Even so, you woudldn't really be able to write to these channels, since they will be overwritten immediately by the beam diverter code.
TITLE: 01/21 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_CONF state: WINDY
Wind: 22mph Gusts, 18mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.55 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
TITLE: 01/21 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Preventive Maintenance
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ed
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Xarm Access (tyler): All clear, but only single lane from MX to EX. (although we did have some 40mph winds after tumbleweed clearing!) :-/
Fairly light Maintenance Day with H1 relocking fairly easily. Ended shift with Commissioning time by Sheila/Camilla.
LN2 delivery at MX (CP6) is due
LOG:
WP 8384 ScottL, ChrisS & HughR
The South Crossbeam of HAM7 was extracted this morning. The Crossbeam was held on the Support Tubes & their Jacks while the East HEPI Housing was removed. The crane was connected to the Crossbeam and lifted off the Support Tubes and translated East. The Crossbeam then was rested on jacks while the crane pick was shifted from the ends to the middle. The Crossbeam was then slid sideways ~ 10' so the center pick could be effected. Then the Crossbeam was lifted off the sliding jacks and craned out of the way. Certainly this was the most difficult extraction in this subject effort. The remainder should be much easier.
Attached is an image of the space between HAM 7 & 8 now with the HAM7 S Crossbeam removed.
During Tuesday maintenance Phil and myself tried to replace the Cisco 3560 switch in the CER for a Fiber-store FS S5500-48T8SP, after we migrated all devices plugged on the Cisco switch to the new one, the switch became unstable loosing connectivity and dropping all connections including the optic fiber link to the core switch. After several reviews of the configuration both at the Core and at the local switch was determined that further load test should be done to this new hardware. As a result we rolled back to the Cisco 3560.
As part of the switch work, the network connection to the PSL Beckhoff OPC (Diode Room) was down for the following three time periods:
| From UTC (local) | To UTC (local) |
| 17:05 (09:05) | 17:57 (09:57) |
| 18:05 (10:05) | 18:15 (10:15) |
| 18:26 (10:26) | 20:52 (12:52) |
45-day trends for HEPI Pump channels. All signals look steady/flat.
With a fairly light Maintenance Day, started locking early, and once the LVEA became quiet and network switch work (i.e. cameras) completed, we were able to get back to OBSERVING fairly easily. Range looks a little lower than the previous locks (hovering at 115 vs 119 Mpc).
Attached are SDF diffs which were all Accepted after being reviewed (for ETMy Test Offsets [known issue noted by Camilla], ITMx/y Noisemon [Sheila's work this morning], & CAL CS [rounding errors]).
I increased the size of some of the labels on H0_VAC_SITE_OVERVIEW_CUSTOM.adl and committed the change to svn. I then regenerated all of the vacuum medm screens from svn. I then regenerated H0_VAC_SITE_OVERVIEW_CUSTOM.ui from H0_VAC_SITE_OVERVIEW_CUSTOM.adl and copied it to nuc22. I then changed the startup script for nuc22 to use caQtDM for the vacuum overview screen instead of medm.
I have written a python script to clear all open testpoints. To run it from the command line:
clear_all_testpoints
It can also be ran from the CDS Overview MEDM screen by pressing the 'ClearTestPoints' button in the lower right corner of the screen.
In both cases, if there are testpoints to be cleared a confirmation message is displayed (see attachment). If confirmed, then the open testpoints are cleared.
Note that the h1calinj model is exempted from this due to hardware injection testpoints.
FAMIS 11527 I think I accidentally put too much water in the TCS Y chiller. I didn't see it do anything abnormal though. TCS X Before: 28.9 After: 30.5 Added: 150 mL TCS Y Before: 9.3 After: 10.8 Added: 100 mL
The levels of the water after your filled look okay. I wouldn't worry about it being overfilled here.
She'll be 'right.
In the comments to this aLOG are a number or supporting figures for the suspension model changes for LHO calibration.
Demonstrating Measurement to Model residual systematic error.
I have plotted the diffference between observed data of the UIM L2L transfer function in comparison with the following models:
The order is chesen to be in decending order with increasing "goodness" - this way to best one is plotted on top of the rest
The plots are broken up into 5 parts of the freuquency spectrum (where we have data: 5 to 550 Hz), to make the lare amount of infromation more readable.
Going through these plots is informative in understanding how each model is "good" is various parts of the spectrum, and how it can be "bad" in other parts.
The take home message is that the new pyDARM model is good up to 200 Hz, and the new CALCS filter is approximately identical to it, and reflects the data just as well.
Demonstrate Model to CALCS residual systematic error.
I had plotted this with MATLAB before, but for improved clarity I'll plot the CALCS differences from pyDARM for all stages L1,L2 and L3 (UIM, PUM, TST) L2L transfer functions: so that it is clear where the models are good and bad when we fit these models into the front end filter banks.
The most drastically different is the L1 stage (which the comment preceeding this claims to be a pretty close fit to observed data). You can see the effect of the removal of a vast amount of poles and zeroes from the TF impacting the low frequency, as well as the two missing features at 90 Hz and 134 Hz, also visible in the previous comment.
At high frequency, gain and phase difference comes about from the fact that the front end model is a discrete model (with a sample rate of 16384) and hence has a Nyquist frequency around 8kHz, so what you see is the contributing fraction of that coming into lower frequencies.
Remake the "contributions to R" plot, using the new 20200103 parameter file.
Now that the paramter file is all its detail about it updated, the previous estimates to the contribution of that 152 Hz feature to the response can be more accurately modelled.
Where I previously said that the contribution was about 8.5%, it is clear that it is closer to 7%.
Make the "final" version of R_foton_new / R_foton_old plot.
With the parameter file update fully, this plot also changes from the one I plotted previously.
This plot is generated by:
This was the expected change in DELTALEXT/PCAL. The actual observed change was here,with further discussion.
The H1CALCS filter banks were rearranged to make more sense and to make it obvious that there is plently of room to add more filter bank blocks that would do an even *better* job of representing the full transfer functions in the front end.
Attached are the images so that you can see how things are arranged. Below I define what the abbreviations mean:
minor clarification on the biassign, in the above comment, since I was in a rush and not thinking: its the bias on the ESD drive for actuation on the TST stage
To find the code to generate the figures in this alog, consult the following directory:
/ligo/home/vladimir.bossilkov/Work_Done/20200111_calibration_checks
Also as a backup I've included the files from this directory as an attachment. I had to omitted the very densely evaluated transfer function from foton that was used to produce plots in the first set of figures, because it makes the attachment too large. You can probably use ETMX_L1 new and old files used in the second set of files without much error.
While writing the O3A cal paper, I made a comparison plot showing the UIM contributions in 0909 O3A, and the 0909 O3A model with O3B SUS data (trunk/Common/pyDARM/matlab_scripts/20200107_H1_EX_O3_susdata.mat).
The comparison is show in the attached pdf. The "old UIM" is the actual 0909 model. The "new UIM" is 0909+O3B sus.