Displaying reports 44221-44240 of 88535.Go to page Start 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 End
Reports until 12:30, Monday 03 December 2018
H1 SUS
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:30, Monday 03 December 2018 (45647)
OMC alignment slider calibration

Hugh, Sheila

We noticed that the OMC suspension sliders aren't calibrated, so we did a quick check by moving 100 slider counts in pitch and yaw and looking at the DAMP IN.  We found we got 21 urad of pitch for 100 counts and 9 urad/100 counts in yaw.  So the OMC suspension calibration should be 4.76 counts/urad for pit, and 11.1 urad/count for yaw.  

I updated the slider gains and the current offsets.  

H1 AOS (AOS, SUS)
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:19, Monday 03 December 2018 (45646)
Optical Lever 7 Day trends

ITMX pitch is close to -10 urads

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:10, Monday 03 December 2018 (45645)
~noon local time -> valved-in 500 L/s ion pumps at HAM1 and HAM6

Turbo pumps left valved-in (in parallel) while IPs stabilize.

LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:34, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 17:32, Monday 03 December 2018(45642)
RGA data before & after valving in two corner NEG pumps

RGA text file attached with scans before-during-after valving in last two NEG pumps in corner station (NEGs within several feet of RGA). Gerardo will note the times that he valved in each pump in order to correspond to RGA scans. We were looking for changes in H2 partial pressure but didn't see much change by simply eye-balling the RGA scan; attached is PDF of scan after pumps valved in - H2 partial pressure was at ~ 1e-7 A before and after.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 12:09, Monday 03 December 2018 (45644)VE

NEG2 and NEG1 valved in around 18:52 utc, and NEG2 was valved in first.

gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 17:32, Monday 03 December 2018 (45662)VE

Plot comparing LVEA RGA scans before and after the NEG pumps were valved in.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 IOO (IOO)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:32, Monday 03 December 2018 (45643)
IM4 Trans changes since last week
  
11/25, 5:00 UTC
11/26, 17:50 UTC 11/27, 23:00 UTC 11/28, 1:45 UTC 12/3, 19:00 UTC
IM4 TRANS Pitch -0.030 -0.016 0.230 0.030 0.205
IM4 TRANS Yaw -0.184 -0.174 0.147 -0.020 0.149
     
After L1
lens swap
IM1 and IM2 changed to
center on IM4 TRANS
IM1 and IM2 restored to
historical values

 

change  11/26 11/27, pre, post, L1 swap diff
IM4 TRANS Pitch 0.246
IM4 TRANS Yaw 0.321
1) Changes of 0.23 to 0.32 on IM4 TRANS QPD are large, and will be seen in the IFO
2) The IMC beam spot measurement script (setting P2L and Y2L gains) is being run today if/when the IFO breaks lock
           a) this will tell me how much the beam changed at IM1, a change that is then propagated through the IO system and into the IFO
H1 PSL (PSL)
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:24, Monday 03 December 2018 (45639)
PSL Status Report-Weekly

Laser Status:
Front End Power is 33.37W (should be around 30 W)
70W Output Power is 71.17W
Front End Watch is GREEN
70W Watch is GREEN

PMC:
It has been locked 0 days, 13 hr 53 minutes (should be days/weeks)
Reflected power = 10.78Watts
Transmitted power = 54.36Watts
PowerSum = 65.15Watts.

FSS:
It has been locked for 0 days 1 hr and 1 min (should be days/weeks)
TPD[V] = 4.115V (min 0.9V)

 

H1 PSL
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:23, Monday 03 December 2018 (45640)
Monthly PSL Chiller Filter Check (FAMIS #8315)
   Chillers are running well. Both filters are clean and clear. Both chiller water levels were good; did not add any water to either. No additional leaks from the valve that was worked on last week. 

   Closing FAMIS #8315
H1 PSL (PSL)
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:17, Monday 03 December 2018 (45638)
PSL Weekly Report - 20 Day Trends FAMIS #10585 - 86
Images attached to this report
H1 CAL (CAL)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:47, Monday 03 December 2018 (45635)
DARM Calibration Measurement of Sensing Function Frequency / Amplitude Comparison
J. Kissel

Given the recent success at recovering the interferometer (e.g. LHO aLOGs 45632, 45629), and the pending engineering run, I'm gearing up to craft DTT templates for measuring the DARM loop and its sensing function that are more likely to provide better uncertainty in calibration parameters. One of the sticking points between L1 and H1 calibration analysis in O2 was the difference in frequency vectors over which we'd measured.

As such, I've compared the frequency vectors of latest sensing function measurements between sites. There're some good qualities from each site that we should both do:
(1) L1 has frequency points that directly line up with their calibration lines.
(2) H1 has more densely packed points below 10 Hz in order to better inform the MCMC algorithms that determine the fit SRC detuning spring frequency (f_s) and Q (Q_s) for the reference model.
(3) H1 measures out to 1.2 kHz
(4) L1 has more densely packed frequency points around the cavity pole.
(5) H1's measurement takes 4 minutes for PCAL, and 25 minutes for DARMOLG, for a total of less that a 1/2 hour.

I'll be working on a frequency vector that satisfies all of these good features over the next few days as we measure H1. As soon as I'm happy I'll recommend the same vector to L1.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 General
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:37, Monday 03 December 2018 (45634)
Morning Meeting Minutes

-Dec 10th VAC work will not close GV’s

-PSL lower periscope mount swap set for Dec 11th

Tuesday Maintenance

-HAM1 pressure good, HAM6 pressure a little high, can transition both to ion pump

-Pcal model update

-SUS MC1, MC3M model update (early morning)

-BSC ISI model update (early morning)

-TCS model update (early morning)

-HAM1 illuminator, camera, WFS cabling

-LASER SAFE for removing scaffolding, leak checking

-Potential DOLPHIN fiber swap

H1 ISC
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:41, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45632)
Brief 85 Mpc at 30W

TVo, Dan, Stefan

With the new alignments to get PRG~47.7 at 20W we tried to increase to 30W. The ASC became unstable pretty quick, plot attached, and eventually we lost lock. Briefly had 85 Mpc.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:15, Sunday 02 December 2018 - last comment - 23:12, Sunday 02 December 2018(45629)
Recovered most of the RG at 20W (RG=47.7)
TVo, Dan, Stefan

When I came in, the IFO was lock (by itself?) in low-noise, but quite a bit of low frequency noise. That noise was due to a bad A2L and a bad SRCL decoupling, presumably due to the bad SOFT and PRC1 loop position.

- First we ran an A2L, which indeed fixed the low frequency ASC noise. But we will have to redo that with good RG.

- Next we tuned the SOFT and PRC1 loop positions at 2W, to see where we can get with the recycling gain in that state. We recovered a RG of 48.1 at 2W. 
- That's a slightly lower than the before the vent and TCS pre-loading (we had around RG=50). But note that if the pre-loading adds extra arm-scatter-loss, then it is most likely due to the CO2 heating. (The ring heater lens is very clean.) But the CO2 heating will be backed off anyway at high power.
- Offsets at 2W:
   DSOFT  P  +0.03  Y  -0.02
   CSOFT  P  +0.02  Y  +0.07
   POP_A  P  -0.65  Y  -0.15

- So we went to 20W with these offsets. Initially the RG dropped to 41.6. But through careful tuning we got it back up to 47.7. The attached plot shows our offset-walk.
- Offsets at 20W:
   DSOFT  P  +0.19  Y  -0.32
   CSOFT  P  +0.03  Y  +0.03
   POP_A  P  -0.52  Y  -0.03

- On top of the SOFT and and PRC1 offsets (i.e. the pointing loops), we also noticed that PRC2 liked some small offsets:
    H1:ASC-PRC2_P_OFFSET +20
    H1:ASC-PRC2_Y_OFFSET -30
  (We also checked MICH OFFSETS, but that didn't make a difference. We haven't checked INP1 and the SCL loops.)




Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 21:43, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45630)

We had issues with the OMC pitch railing again when going to DC readout. We changed H1:OMC-ASC_POS_Y_SW2R to 0.2 and H1:OMC-ASC_ANG_Y_GAIN to 0.175 to stop driving the OMC suspension so hard. We then held the output.

stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 23:12, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45631)
We noticed that the Radiation Pressure Compensation has insufficient roll-off (with bad A2L it actually limited DARM).

Attached is a comparision between the main loop roll-off and the RPC roll-off. Note that the RPC has >10x signal around 100Hz.
Images attached to this comment
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:55, Sunday 02 December 2018 - last comment - 09:14, Sunday 02 December 2018(45627)
Dolphin IPC errors in corner station at 00:25 PST this morning

Front end systems look good this morning. The only item to note is that h1sush56 detected Dolphin IPC errors from h1lsc0 and h1sush34 early this morning. These errors then propagated down the chain to the IOP models of h1seih16 and h1sieh45. The attached images show the IPC status for h1susomc, h1sussrm, h1sussr3 (on h1sush56), h1iopseih16 and h1iopseih45. The IPC overview medm is also shown.

All the events happened at GPS 1227774329 which is Dec 02 2018 00:25:11 PST

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 09:14, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45628)

I have captured the Dolphin dis_diag stats, nothing of note since yesterday morning.

Scans of front end logs and dolphin stats are run as user controls on h1build, and write their results to the /opt/rtcds/lho/h1/log/h1build/[full, dolphin] directories. Within each directory a 'current' symbolic link points to the most recent data.

H1 TCS (TCS)
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - posted 03:58, Sunday 02 December 2018 - last comment - 14:38, Wednesday 05 December 2018(45625)
ITMY HWS without point absorbers, HWS self absortion spot motion, CO2 tests

Danny, Craig, Dan Brown

We had a long lock run in low noise tonight. During this we were adjusting the PRC1 offset resulting in some slight alignment drifts of the BS and ITMs (45623). You can see the affect this has on the HWS spherical power here. The alignment offsets started around -3000 seconds on the time axis, first in pitch and then in yaw.

This drift was enough to see how the self heating spot moves relative to the HWS probe beam: ITMY before and after. The red cross is where the IFO beam was before the vent. The other thing to notice is that by choosing the reference time for when the point absorbers have heated up we can get the wavefront distortion without them included, so we see the broader absorption. We also ramped the CO2 heater to get a position of the CO2 relative to the interferometer beam, which is noticeably offset.

We did the same alignment shift images for ITMX, before and after. For ITMX the self heating spot wasn't in a bad position to begin with, however with the new offsets it's become misaligned to the HWS probe beam, so we need to do some picoing.

Lastly, we ramped CO2Y up and down to find the position on HWSY but also to see how the PRC gain and noise was affects. Turning the CO2Y power up 2X resulted in the ASC becoming unstable and noise increased at low frequencies, PRC gain didn't really change. Turning it down 1/2X did the same, DHARD yaw became unstable and we lost lock. We did notice a high frequency bump appearing at several kHz, similar to the frequency noise bump when changing the CO2 laser significantly. More investigation needed on that though. When HWSX is sorted out again we'll run some better comm and diff CO2 tuning.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 14:38, Wednesday 05 December 2018 (45718)

Added movie of ITMY point absorber heatup. First movie is with a reference before powerup. The second is using a reference when the point absorbers have reached a steady state. Zip files contains Numpy compressed npz files, each of these have the wavefront aberration data for the CO2 reduction and the ITMY heatup without point absorbers.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SEI (ISC, SEI)
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:09, Saturday 01 December 2018 - last comment - 09:55, Monday 03 December 2018(45618)
Recovering from dolphin crash

Danny, Craig, Dan Brown

Here's a chronological list of observations and things we did today after the Dolphin crash to try and get the interferometer back up and locking.

Comments related to this report
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - 03:10, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45623)
We achieved 65 Mpc tonight, with large low frequency noise.  There is a peak around 32 Hz that comes and goes, not visible in the DARM spectrum I posted.

Calibration Adjustments
- I've been adjusting the sensing calibration by hand to match our DARM spectrum to the PCAL calibration lines.  It seems that our high frequency calibration has been changing from lock to lock.  I've moved the CAL-CS_DARM_ERR gain from 1.0 to 1.2 last night, and 1.2 to 1.3 earlier today, to 1.4 now.  During the lock the calibration drifts as well.  It seems that the DARM optical gain is drifting on the order of 10%, causing our calibration to breath on the order of a minute.  

FSS
- We've had at least three lengthy FSS locklosses when the IFO goes down.  When the FSS has been unlocking, it has been railing at 11 V for almost exactly two minutes, probably as it cycles through to an acceptable temperature.

ASC 
- We've had locklosses from DHARD P ringups twice tonight.  If we are patient and wait a bit before increasing power, we tend to avoid the ASC instabilities during INCREASE_POWER.

POP A QPD alignment adjustment
- Dan and Danny began adjusting the PRM alignment by changing the POP A QPD P and Y offsets I reset earlier today to try and win back some of the PRG we lose on powerup due to actual laser heating vs. CO2 heating.  Not only did we win some PRG (from 40.5 to 43), but the DARM BLRMS went down in association with their changes.  Danny is composing a comment illustrating the DARM BLRMS and PRG changes with the offsets.

        POP_A_PIT_OFFSET     POP_A_YAW_OFFSET
-------------------------------------------
Old                -0.71                -0.08
New                -0.6                 -0.4  


REFL A vs REFL B
- We ran Keita's template comparing REFL A to the newly installed REFL B.  Keita reports that REFL A 9 I is equivalent to REFL B 9 Q for now.  Things are coherent above 1 kHz where frequency noise dominates, otherwise there is no coherence.  
Images attached to this comment
daniel.vander-hyde@LIGO.ORG - 03:49, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45624)TCS

As Craig mentioned Dan adjusted ASC-POP_A_QPD pitch and yaw offsets at nominal low noise and saw improvement in the recycling gain and DARM (mostly at 10-20 Hz).

Images attached to this comment
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 04:03, Sunday 02 December 2018 (45626)

It seems PRMI needs touching up after a lock loss each time at the moment, BS pitch in particular

jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 09:55, Monday 03 December 2018 (45637)ISC

Referencing the errors with the SEI_CONF sensor correction errors, the best way I've found to fix the seismic configuration after front end restarts, dolphin crashes or whatever, is to select something like the SC_OFF or LARGE_EQ_NOBRSXY state, letting SEI_CONF arrive, then going back to the state you actually want. There were other configuration errors on ITMY (specifically the stage 1-2 sensor correction was off) that did not get fixed by turning on stuff by hand. TJ says that re-requesting a state will cause the guardians to re-run the state, but I haven't seen that yet and TJ wasn't sure if that code is running on all the SC nodes yet.

Displaying reports 44221-44240 of 88535.Go to page Start 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 End