Displaying reports 53381-53400 of 86461.Go to page Start 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 End
Reports until 08:50, Thursday 09 February 2017
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:50, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34020)
Ops Day Shift Transition
Ops Shift Transition: 02/09/2017, Day Shift 16:00 – 00:00 (08:00 - 16:00) - UTC (PT)
 
State of H1: IFO locked at NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE, power at 30.9W, range at 68.3 Mpc
Intent Bit: Observing
Weather: Wind is Calm (0 - 3 mph), Upper 20s, overcast with freezing rain forecast throughout the day
Primary 0.03 – 0.1Hz: Currently around 0.09 and flat  
Secondary 0.1 – 0.3Hz:  Currently at 0.8um/s and trending slightly upwards
Quick Summary: In observing for the past 4 hours      
Outgoing Operator: TJ
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:01, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34015)
Ops Owl Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/09 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 69Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jeff
SHIFT SUMMARY: One lockloss that I though may have been an unattended PI, but I talked to Terra and she thinks something else was going on. Had a few issues getting the OMC locked, but it eventually figured itself out after I fiddled for a while. Snow plowing since 13:03UTC killing our range and most likely data.
LOG:

H1 DetChar
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:44, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34019)
Snow plowing starting at 13:05UTC

Bubba started up the large front loader at 13:05UTC so people can get onto the site and has been plowing since. Seismic BLRMS clearly show the plowing from about 1-30Hz, and the range has also taken a hit.

This data most likely will not be good, but I am keeping it in observe just in case.

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:11, Thursday 09 February 2017 - last comment - 08:03, Monday 13 February 2017(34018)
Observing at 12:08

I had to flip the noise eater, run an initial alignment, wait longer than usual for a well-aligned DRMI to lock (~12min), lose lock at SWITCH_TO_QPDS, struggle getting the OMC ready for handoff, and then good.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:01, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34021)OpsInfo

Did you get a VERBAL alarm or DIAG_MAIN message about the Noise Eater?  Just curious.  (Or should operators know to look for the Noise Eater when the IMC isn't locking.)

thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 08:03, Monday 13 February 2017 (34088)
DIAG_MAIN will notify if the Noise Eater needs to be flipped.
H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:19, Thursday 09 February 2017 - last comment - 17:10, Thursday 09 February 2017(34014)
Lockloss 10:15UTC
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 03:36, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34017)

This lockloss may have been caused by PI mode 27? It rang up 06:57UTC and was missed by Travis, but seemed to have turned itself around and began to slowly damp itself down. When I got on shift I also missed this mode somehow and it stayed at around 200counts for about 3 hours. I can't imagine that this was healthy.

Images attached to this comment
terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - 09:51, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34022)

18037 Hz ETMY mode; It shifted down in frequency (since its really an aliased down mode) during the long lock by ~1/2 Hz. BP filter should be double checked - there's about 2 Hz leeway above and below before you hit another mechanical mode, so BP could be widened. In attached plot, black is beginning of lock, red is during the ring up (27 hrs into lock). Peak at 18040 ish Hz is ETMX mode.

This was damping and below the usual break-lock amplitude when we lost lock, so likely wasn't the cause. I don't see the usual coupling down into DARM frequency bands that usually occur before a PI-induced lock loss.

Images attached to this comment
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 17:10, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34032)PSL

Clued by TJ's comment in aLog 34018 about having to toggle the Noise Eater after this lockloss, I was curious as the possiblity of this lockloss being due to PSL FSS PZT oscillation.  I have seen several locklosses at earlier steps in lock acquisition due to the PZT oscillation earlier in the week.  In the attached plot, you can see that the FSS PZT oscillations and Noise Eater issues occur simultaneousely at 10:14:45 UTC.  It seems more likely that this caused the lockloss than the 'below-lockloss-threshold' PI mode.

Images attached to this comment
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:22, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34013)
Ops Owl Shift Transition

TITLE: 02/09 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 67Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Travis
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 1mph Gusts, 0mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.23 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked for 28hours at 67Mpc. DARM looks a bit noisier in the bucket atm, but range doesn't look terrible, I'll investigate.

Current Road Conditions: Terrible. By far the worse road conditions I have ever had on a commute here. Route 10 and the bypass were managable, but on the 240 my traction control would have to kick in anywhere above 25mph just to go straight. I followed a snow plow for a bit and that was also sliding around at times. Please drive safely and let's hope conditions improve in the morning.

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34012)
Ops Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/09 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY:  Locked the entire shift and going on 28 hours now.  Judging by the 1/8 inch of ice on my car, it should be an exciting drive home.  Freezing rain continues and has picked back up since my mid-shift report.
LOG:  None

 

H1 TCS (TCS)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:52, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34011)
TCSY chiller low flow alarms

There have been 4 alarms about TCSY chiller low flow tonight, more frequent I would usually attribute to the known glitches.  See attached 12 hour plot.  It seems to be struggling a bit more than typical.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:17, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34010)
Ops Eve Mid-shift Summary

Observing for 24 hours.  Light freezing rain on site but seems to be tapering off.

H1 CAL
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:10, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34009)
O2 Calibration Line Heights and Frequencies, H1 vs. L1
J. Kissel

Using the canned function that produces the official sensitivity spectra for the public,
    /ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O2/Common/Scripts/DARMASDs/produceofficialstrainasds_O2_C01.m
I grabbed the amplitude spectral density of DCS / GDS-CALIB_STRAIN and PCALY RX PD, with
    - C01 data from Dec 13 2016 @ 10:00 UTC for H1 (because CAL line heights have not changed all run) 
    - C00 data from Jan 30 2017 @ 10:00 UTC for L1 (because C01 isn't ready after Jan 24th, but L1 last changed line heights on Jan 27th)
and recast the calibration line heights into displacement amplitude (in [m_pk]) of all calibration lines as the stand currently in O2 for future reference.

The tables below lists the function of these lines, which actuator is used to drive the lines, the frequency, their amplitude in [cts] at the the drive point, and the amplitude it displaces the test mass at its given frequency.

H1:

Used To Characterize       C (f_s,Q_s)    A (K_TST)      A (REF)     A (K_PU)   C (K_C, f_cc)   C (f_cc, t_C)
Actuator                          PCAL          SUS         PCAL          SUS           PCAL             PCAL
Frequency [Hz]                    7.93         35.9         36.7         37.3          331.9           1083.7
Amplitude [drive ct]              5000         0.55          500         0.44           5000            15000               
Amplitude [m_pk]              4.78e-15     2.71e-17     2.21e-17     1.36e-19       2.71e-18         7.71e-19 

L1: (edit-- there are several errors in the table below. Will fix by the end of the day)

Used To Characterize                      A (K_TST)      A (REF)     A (K_PU)   C (K_C, f_cc)   C (f_cc, t_C)
Actuator                                        SUS         PCAL          SUS           PCAL             PCAL
Frequency [Hz]                                 23.3         22.7        331.3           23.9           1083.1
Amplitude [drive ct]                          0.052          400         0.08           7200            16160               
Amplitude [m_pk]                           2.87e-17     8.73e-20     2.55e-18       3.62e-17         5.42e-19

where the parameters of the sensing function, C, are as listed in T1600278, and the scalar gains in the actuation function, A, and described in T1500377.

On the conversion between raw [m] of each data stream into [m] of amplitude at the calibration line frequency: 
produceofficialstrainasds_O2_C01.m runs the matlab function pwelch over the time series of the data stored in the frames, 
     [ifo ':' subSystemTag '-CALIB_STRAIN' channelSuffix ]
     [ifo ':CAL-PCALY_RX_PD_OUT_DQ']
where subSystemTag is either GDS or DCS, and channelSuffix is either C00 or C01. I used all of the same pwelch/FFT parameters as are used normally in producing G1500623, except reducing the number of averages by a factor of 10 and increasing the frequency resolution, 
    nAvgs = 10;
    detrendOrder = 1;
    windowType = @hann;
    freqRes = 0.01; % [Hz]
    percentOverlap = 50; % %

Making sure that the chosen frequency resolution results in the calibration lines being bin-centered (I chose 0.01 [Hz] bin width), pwelch spits out a power spectral density in units of [(power)_{RMS} / Hz]. So to convert to (amplitude)_{pk}, I do the following (since, after a little pre-processing of the frame data, both channels are in start in [m]):
    sqrt( pwelch output ) * sqrt(ENBW) * sqrt(2)
where pwelch output is in [m^2/Hz], ENBW is the effective noise bandwidth for a Hann window (with normalized effective noise band width NENBW = 1.5) with a frequency resolution of 0.01 [Hz] i.e. ENBW = NENBW*f_res = 0.015 [Hz], and the sqrt(2) is to convert from RMS to Peak amplitude.
H1 PSL
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:15, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34008)
Weekly PSL Chiller Reservoir Top-Off

Added 100 mL H2O to Xtal chiller.  Diode chiller was good.  Filters look clean.

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:07, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34007)
Ops Eve Shift Transition

TITLE: 02/09 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 69Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jeff/Patrick
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 20mph Gusts, 16mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.07 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.22 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:  Observing for 20 hours.  Roads to the site weren't terrible, mostly slushy.  Route 10 must have been plowed recently as drifting wasn't apparent.  Snow has stopped falling.
 

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34006)
Ops Day Shift Summary
TITLE: 02/08 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis
SHIFT SUMMARY: Covered end of Jeff's shift. One GRB alert, otherwise quiet.
LOG:

21:38 UTC Ken to mid X
21:45 UTC Chandra and Kyle to mid Y
22:22 UTC Ken back
22:34 UTC GRB alert
23:09 UTC Chandra and Kyle back
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:11, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34004)
CP4 actuator filled with ice

Kyle, Chandra

CP4 did not complete auto fill today and timed out after 1 hour. We found that the electronic actuator has a layer of ice inside that leaked from the flex conduit (same issue that happened to two others over holiday break). We manually overfilled with 1/2 turn on bypass LLCV valve (after some manual overfill from control room). Total time was 30 min.

The actuator still works, so we disabled 24V power by disconnecting lead inside the actuator just to be sure that if/when the ice melts it doesn't short out the device. We will fix when the weather is more favorable. For now it's locked at 39% open.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:33, Wednesday 08 February 2017 - last comment - 14:12, Wednesday 08 February 2017(33999)
LHO Ground STS Spectra

Here are spectra from the several STS2 seismometers we have around the site, all are on the floor except BRS PEM:

HAM2-- Just +X of HAM2

ITMY-- ~+8m +X & +Y

ETMX-- ~3m -X of ETMX

ETMY-- ~3m -Y of ETMY adjacent to BRS Housing

BRS PEM (ADC_0_9[10]_OUT) sitting on table mounted to BRS base plate, see 33387 for images.

These spectra were all taken (except the one reference set) about 1137pst 7 Feb when the Site BLRMS show little wind tilt or EQ affects.

The reference traces on the PEM EY unit mounted with the BRS were before the centering I did 31 Jan.  See Krishna 33648 for the problems it had.  Sadly, my attempts to center it then and as of yesterday, power cycling it and more centering, has managed to center it but has not relieved it of the glitching started on 31 Jan.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 13:24, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34002)DetChar
J. Kissel, H. Radkins, J. Warner

We're collectively surprised that we haven't aLOGged it before, but here's a description of the DTT calibration for the STS channels (i.e. H1:ISI-GND_STS_${CHAMBER}_${DOF}_DQ) -- if you want to properly invert the inertial sensor response of the STS, which is an 8.3 mHz resonant spring with a critically coupled Q of sqrt(2)/2 (or a phase between the complex poles of 45 [deg]). We don't typically invert the response, because we typically only show data down to 10 mHz, and the impact of the inertial sensor response distorting the true displacement/velocity is minimal. 

Also, remember, I'm assuming that the H1:ISI-GND_STS_${CHAMBER}_${DOF}_DQ channels have their gain pre-calibrated to asymptote to velocity units of 1 [(nm/s)/ct].

(Note, it won't really make a difference, but Hugh -- at my imprecise request -- used 8 mHz as the pole frequency instead of 8.3 mHz in the plots above)

    Unit = "m/s"

    gain = 1e-9 * prod( pair(0.0083,45) )             % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] in matlab notation
         = 1e-9 * 6.889e-05                           % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] numerically evaluated
         = 6.5e-14 [(m/s)/ct]                         % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT

    poles = 0,0                                       % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the comma!)

    zeros = pair(0.0083,45)                           % [Hz] in matlab notation
          = 0.005869 0.005869                         % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the lack of comma!)

I prefer to enter in this more simple calibration in velocity [m/s], and let DTT do the integration if I want to convert to displacement [m]. However, if you want to get straight to the punch, then you'll want to enter in

    Unit = "m"

    gain = 1e-9 / (2*pi) * prod( pair(0.0083,45) )    % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] in matlab notation
         = 1e-9 * 0.159 * 6.889e-05 [(m/s)/ct]        % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] numerically evaluated
         = 1.1e-14 [(m/s)/ct]                         % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT

    poles = 0,0,0                                     % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the comma!)

    zeros = pair(0.0083,45)                           % [Hz] in matlab notation
          = 0.005869 0.005869                         % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the lack of comma!)

Happy low frequency hunting!
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 14:12, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34003)

Site Common DOF Spectra

The attached 3 plots put the four GND STSs on common DOF graphs to better compare there performance.  They are the same traces as above.

Let's start with Z.  Cause it looks easy. Pretty similar between 0.010 and 1 Hz.  Above that band, ETMX gets quieter or the others get noisier.  Below, ITMY gets quieter.

For the Y Dof, maybe this shows how well the ITMY's location is free of tilt, even in this relatively wind free data.  All the other sensors show a similar low-f response above 10mHz.

The X DoF too is interesting as the HAM2 and the ETMX data approaches the performance of the ITMY instrument: These sensors' X axes is along the long axis of the building and may see less inherent tilt. But, that would suggest I should argue that the ETMY Y axis is not performing as it should...and maybe it isn't.  No matter how you slice it though, this plot suggests the ETMY X axis is not doing as well as it could.  I don't think the ETMY sensor is too much closer to the outside wall than is the ETMX, maybe a little.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
logbook/robot/script0.cds.ligo-wa.caltech.edu@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:10, Wednesday 08 February 2017 - last comment - 15:14, Wednesday 08 February 2017(34000)
CP3, CP4 Autofill 2017_02_08
Starting CP3 fill. LLCV enabled. LLCV set to manual control. LLCV set to 50% open. Fill completed in 32 seconds. TC B did not register fill. LLCV set back to 14.0% open.
Starting CP4 fill. LLCV enabled. LLCV set to manual control. LLCV set to 70% open. Fill not completed after 3600 seconds. LLCV set back to 39.0% open.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 15:14, Wednesday 08 February 2017 (34005)

Captures CP3 autofill and CP4 manual fill.

Images attached to this comment
LHO FMCS
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:27, Wednesday 01 February 2017 - last comment - 03:30, Thursday 09 February 2017(33813)
Y End Humidity
John and I started up HU-2 yesterday at Y End to add some humidity to the VEA. 
In the process of starting this unit up we removed the lid on the reservoir and found that a large piece (~9" square) of bubble wrap had been left in the water discharge area of the reservoir. We removed the bubble wrap and started the humidifier. It is set at ~50% (5V on a 0-10V scale). 
The 5 day plot shows an increase in the humidity.   



Note:The 14 KW heater is powered from a electrical panel located in the VEA and was cycling several times a minute.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:04, Wednesday 01 February 2017 (33819)DetChar, ISC, OpsInfo
Tagging DetChar, OpsInfo, and ISC.

There is suspicion from DetChar and Schofield that humidity, or the lack there of, at EY is causing electronics to glitch which propagate through the interferometer. So this *may* start to improve the IFO glitch rate. Maybe.

Also note the "cycling several times a minute." The humidifier's water heater is power from the YVEA, and it's controlled with a bang-bang servo, so look for changes in electronic / electromagnetic signals that show some characteristic ON / OFF signatures.

Again -- keep your eyes peeled!
miriam.cabero@LIGO.ORG - 03:30, Thursday 09 February 2017 (34016)DetChar

We have been working on a low latency blip glitch hunter. It uses PyCBC Live but with a smaller template bank focused on finding possibly only blip glitches. We also generate summary pages, updated every 5 minutes:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~miriam.cabero/blips_live/H1/day/20170209/detchar/pycbc_live/

Unfortunately it has only been running stably since Feb 3, so we cannot really compare directly if the humidifier added on Feb 1 made a significant change in the rate of blips. However, I started using this code on Jan 30, so there are some results for previous days but the code was still a little bit unstable. It can be looked at anway:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~miriam.cabero/blips_live/H1/day/20170131/detchar/pycbc_live/

 

By glancing at this plot from Jan 31

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~miriam.cabero/blips_live/H1/day/20170131/plots/H1-OBSERVING_2FC680_PYCBC_LIVE_END_TIME_TEMPLATE_DURATION_SNR_TRIGGERS-1169856018-86400.png

and from e.g. yesterday

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~miriam.cabero/blips_live/H1/day/20170208/plots/H1-OBSERVING_2FC680_PYCBC_LIVE_END_TIME_TEMPLATE_DURATION_SNR_TRIGGERS-1170547218-86400.png

it doesn't look like there has been an improvement...

Displaying reports 53381-53400 of 86461.Go to page Start 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 End