Displaying reports 53641-53660 of 83254.Go to page Start 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 2686 2687 End
Reports until 06:01, Wednesday 12 October 2016
H1 PSL
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:01, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30443)
PSL Weekly 10 day Trends FAMIS #6117
Images attached to this report
H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:25, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30441)
Mid-Shift Summary - Owl

11:26UTC I'm still increasing power manually. PI mode 26 seems pretty buried at this point.

11:27 OMC DCPD Saturation - lockloss; SUS OMC and HAM6 ISI WD tripped.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:53, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30440)
frequency noise coupling, a little ASC

A few other things tonight:

A little bit of ASC work:  

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:48, Wednesday 12 October 2016 - last comment - 08:34, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30442)
OPS: reset of HEPI L4C Accumulated WD Counters Wednesday 12th Oct 2016: FAMIS #7075

Cleared ST1 and ST2 BS accumulators.

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 08:34, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30446)

Thanks Ed.  Couple things.  Not sure where St1 and St2 come in to play for HEPI, that sounds like ISI.  Plus, with the upgrade done to HEPI yesterday, no seismic system should need the Watchdog saturations clearing anymore.  I'll remove the FAMIS task associated here for HEPI.

H1 CDS (Lockloss)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:04, Wednesday 12 October 2016 - last comment - 17:11, Tuesday 18 October 2016(30439)
lockloss tool not working

 Possibly after some changes made durring maintence, the lockloss tool stopped working. I can use lockloss plot, but not select. 

sheila.dwyer@opsws4:~/Desktop/Locklosses$ lockloss -c channels_to_look_at_TR_CARM.txt select

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 403, in <module>
    args.func(args)
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 254, in cmd_select
    selected = select_lockloss_time(index=args.index, tz=args.tz)
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 137, in select_lockloss_time
    times = list(get_guard_lockloss_events())[::-1]
  File "/ligo/cds/userscripts/lockloss", line 112, in get_guard_lockloss_events
    for t in guardutil.nds.find_transitions(GRD_LOCKING_NODE, t0, t1):
  File "/ligo/apps/linux-x86_64/guardian-1.0.3/lib/python2.7/site-packages/guardutil/nds.py", line 32, in find_transitions
    for buf in conn.iterate(t0, t1, [channel]):
RuntimeError: Requested data were not found.
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 02:19, Tuesday 18 October 2016 (30615)

After noticing LLO alog 28710 I tried to svn up the lockloss script (we're at rev 14462 now), but I still get the same error when I try to use select

jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 17:11, Tuesday 18 October 2016 (30643)

The problem at LLO is totally different and unrelated.

The exception you're seeing is from an NDS access failure.  The daq NDS1 server is saying that it can't find the data that is being requested.  This can happen if you request data too recent in the past.  It also used to happen because of gaps in the NDS1 lookback buffer, but those should have been mostly fixed.

Right now the lockloss tool is looking for all lock loss events from 36 hours ago to 1 second ago.  The 1 second ago part could be the problem, if that's too soon for the NDS1 server to handle.  But my testing has indicated that 1 second in the past should be sufficient for the data to be available.  In other words I've not been able to recreate the problem.

In any event, I changed the look-back to go up to only two seconds in the past.  Hopefully that fixes the issue.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:40, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30437)
Ops Evening Summary
Trouble locking DRMI improved after turning TCSY back on. Handing over to Ed and Sheila.

23:15 UTC Cheryl started initial alignment. Taking over.
23:35 UTC Initial alignment done.
00:13 UTC Changed phase to damp PI mode 26
00:15 UTC NLN, RF looks good
00:17 UTC Sheila running A2L, Kiwamu to LVEA to turn on TCSY laser
00:23 UTC Kiwamu back
00:45 UTC Lock loss. TCSY laser turned off. Kiwamu to LVEA to turn it back on.
01:01 UTC Kiwamu back
01:26 UTC NLN
01:46 UTC Jeff K. starting calibration measurements
02:24 UTC Jeff K. done measurements
03:40 UTC Sheila to LVEA to check ISC racks
03:43 UTC Sheila back
03:45 UTC Sheila starting frequency noise coupling measurement
06:08 UTC Lock loss (Sheila)
07:17 UTC Sheila and Ed to mezzanine to check TCS chiller. TCSY laser has been off since around the beginning of the last lock.
07:28 UTC Sheila and Ed back. TCSY laser back on.
H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:35, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30438)
Difficulty locking PRMI/TCSY Laser turned off

Ed, Sheila and Patrick

The "Gate" indicator LED was off on the TCSY LASER controller. This condition was reset by Sheila by pushing the red button on the front panel of the controller. I added 250ml of water to the Y-chiller to bring the level back to the top mark. This was most likely the reason that PRMI wouldn't stay locked.

H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:09, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30436)
Shift Summary - Owl Transition
 
 
TITLE: 10/12 Owl Shift: 07:00-15:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Patrick
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.20 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:
Shiela and Patrick currently trying to re-align PRMI. 
H1 CAL (CAL)
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:17, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 12:13, Monday 24 October 2016(30435)
Calibration line status (additional PUM and UIM lines)

J. Kissel, D. Tuyenbayev,

We turned on two calibration lines using ETMY coil drivers on stages L1 and L2. The SNRs of these lines are roughtly 1/3 of the regular calibration lines (regular cal. lines have SNR of ~100 with 10s FFT).

                              _FREQ (Hz)  _CLKGAIN (ct)
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_CAL_LINE          33.7             60.0     O2-scheme synched oscillator for kappa_U
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_CAL_LINE          34.7             27.0     O2-scheme synched oscillator for kappa_P

These lines will be used to better quantify calibration of the PUM and UIM actuators.

A related report: LHO alog 29291.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - 10:00, Thursday 13 October 2016 (30494)CAL

κU, κP and κT using these additional lines at ~6am on Wed., Oct. 12 are:

κU = 0.9828 - 0.0637i

κP = 0.9499 - 0.0380i

κT = 0.9784 - 0.0440i

These are preliminary values calculated manually for transfer functions taken at a selected time (no trends or averaging except for 10avg. in DTT), and the DARM model for ER9 (H1params_2016-07-01.conf). We will use SLM tool data to look at the parameter trends.

darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - 12:13, Monday 24 October 2016 (30795)CAL

Greg M, Darkhan T,

We calculated kappa values using SLM data (10s FFTs) generated over 10 days between Oct 10 and Oct 21 with ER9 parameter file
'${CalSVN}/Runs/PreER9/H1/params/H1params_2016-07-01.conf'

The plots show raw (unaveraged) values. SNRs of the L1 and L2 lines (used for calculation of κU and κP respectively) were set to give approximately 1/3 SNR compared to the L3 line (with the ER9 noise floor).

The data was taken from an additional SLM tool instance which was setup by Greg to calculate 33.7 Hz, 34.7 Hz, 35.9 Hz and 36.7 Hz line FFTs.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL (DetChar)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:27, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30434)
PCALX Roaming Calibration Line Frequency Changed to 2501.3 Hz
J. Kissel for S. Karki

I've changed the > 1 kHz PCALX calibration line frequency, a.k.a. the "long duration sweep" line, to 2501.3 Hz. Recall this started moving again on Oct 6th (see LHO aLOG 30269) I report the progress towards completing the sweep below. 


Frequency    Planned Amplitude        Planned Duration      Actual Amplitude    Start Time                 Stop Time                    Achieved Duration
(Hz)         (ct)                     (hh:mm)                   (ct)               (UTC)                    (UTC)                         (hh:mm)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1001.3       35k                      02:00      
1501.3       35k                      02:00     
2001.3       35k                      02:00     
2501.3       35k                      05:00                   39322.0           Oct 12 2016 03:20:41 UTC
3001.3       35k                      05:00                   39322.0           Oct 06 2016 18:39:26 UTC    Oct 12 2016 03:20:41 UTC      days
3501.3       35k                      05:00                   39322.0           Jul 06 2016 18:56:13 UTC    Oct 06 2016 18:39:26 UTC      months
4001.3       40k                      10:00
4301.3       40k                      10:00       
4501.3       40k                      10:00
4801.3       40k                      10:00  
5001.3       40k                      10:00
Images attached to this report
H1 CAL
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:08, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 19:10, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30431)
Another DARM OLGTFs and PCAL2DARM TFs; Confirms CAL-DELTAL Inaccuracy is not Lock-Stretch/Alignment Dependent
J. Kissel, D. Tuyenbayev

We've grabbed another set of calibration measurements of the IFO's sensing function in order to build confidence in our newly commissioned front-end tracking of time dependent model parameters, and to confirm the discrepancy seen yesterday (LHO aLOG 30391) was not something funny about that lock stretch. Indeed the discrepancy remains.

We've found bugs in our code that compares our DARM model against these measurements, so we can't yet confirm exact numbers like optical gain, DARM coupled cavity pole frequency, or SRC detuning spring frequency to offer a proposed change to the CAL-CS front-end parameters to fix it. We'll hopefully have something by tomorrow.

Attached are screenshots of the measurements and the DARM loop parameters during the measurement. 

Timeline: (in UTC)
2016-10-12
01:30:00 -- IFO in stable Nominal Low Noise (PCALY calibration lines are ON); IFO undisturbed
01:46:00 -- IFO sufficiently thermalized to start measurements; PCALY lines turned OFF
01:47:48 -- PCAL2DARM measurement begins
02:05:48 -- DARM OLGTF measurement begins
02:24:00 -- measurements done; PCALY lines turned back ON; IFO undisturbed
02:40:00 -- Official Undisturbed period ends (but no one has done anything with the IFO since, up to 03:06 UTC)

Data files (which are exported and committed to the SVN):
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Measurements/
DARMOLGTFs/2016-10-12_H1_DARM_OLGTF_4to1200Hz.xml
PCAL/2016-10-12_H1_PCAL2DARMTF_4to1200Hz.xml
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - 20:35, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30432)CAL

J. Kissel, D. Tuyenbayev,

These are kappas calculated in the front-end after the TF measurements have been completed.

The optical gain is still ~15% lower w.r.t. the value in the DARM model parameters and the coupled-cavity pole frequency is ~ 340-350 Hz, which is higher compared to the yesterday's value (LHO alog 30391).

There's still more noise in the calculated values of fC. The SNR of the 331.9 Hz line is affected by a slightly increased noise in the [0.2, 1.0] kHz band.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 19:10, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30478)
Doing the same thing as was done in LHO aLOG 30475,

I've grabbed similar undisturbed data from the times quoted in the original entry, and replotted them in matlab after doing some rudimentary math. The 15 minute (900 sec) average value (starting at Oct 12 2016 02:39:00 UTC) for all of the time dependent parameters just after the sweeps are:

Param            Units        Mean      Std
kappa_{C}        [ ]          0.868     pm 0.01
f_{cc}           [Hz]         325       pm 5.5
Re: kappa_{PU}   [ ]          1.01      pm 0.0089
Im: kappa_{PU}   [ ]          0.0007    pm 0.015
Re: kappa_{TST}  [ ]          0.998     pm 0.011
Im: kappa_{TST}  [ ]          -0.010    pm 0.0091

Input Power      [W]          51.8      pm 0.029

The script to generate these values lives in
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Scripts/CAL_EPICS/get_fe_tdep_params.m
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 CAL (ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:06, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 19:05, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30391)
New DARM OLGTFs and PCAL2DARM TFs; CAL-DELTAL_EXT is Wrong by 20% above 50 Hz
J. Kissel

I've used Kiwamu's templates (LHO aLOG 29860) to gather new DARM OLG and PCAL2DARM transfer functions, to help increase the number of data points for darm coupled cavity pole and SRC detuning spring frequencies. In doing so, I've found that PCAL suggests that CAL-DELTAL_EXTERNAL is wrong low by ~20% above 50 Hz, in a frequency dependent fashion (confirmed by the phase and ridiculously high coherence). 

We will analyze the data in-full, and report what the measured pole and spring frequencies are in the morning. We'll also show trends of calibration line heights, such that eventually we can confirm the frequencies over time.

This frequency dependent error in CAL-DELTAL_EXTERNAL may be because the DARM coupled cavity pole frequency programmed into the CAL CS fron end is 342 Hz, and that's just not correct for this lock stretch. We have to turn OFF the PCALY calibration lines during the measurement due to range issues, but the front end calculation of the DARM cavity pole, after the measurement, suggests anywhere for 315 Hz to 340 Hz. Unclear whether we can trust the online calculation just yet, so we're leaving the IFO alone for ~30 minutes after the measurement to be able to confirm offline later.

Recall that we're still not controlling the cavity waist angle/translation of the SRC entirely: the SRC1 loop (nominally controlling SRM alone) is OFF, but the SRC2 loop (controlling SRM and SR2) is ON.

Undisturbed time post-sweeps:
Start    Oct 11 2016 02:36:00 UTC   Oct 10 2016 19:36:00 PDT  1160188577
Stop     Oct 11 2016 03:07:00 UTC   Oct 10 2016 20:07:00 PDT  1160190437
 
The new measurements have not yet been exported, but have been committed to the CalSVN here:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Measurements/
DARMOLGTFs/2016-10-10_H1_DARM_OLGTF_4to1200Hz.xml
PCAL/2016-10-10_H1_PCAL2DARMTF_4to1200Hz.xml


EDIT: I've added two screenshots showing the digital settings relevant to the DARM loop parameters. Unfortunately, the production conlog is down for maintenance/upgrades, but thankfully Patrick setup a test bed a few nights ago (goto http://conlog-test-replica/), I was able to pull the list of channels I needed. FAlso for the record, some of those channels have changed since O1, so I quote the new list here for easier copy and paste in the future: 
H1:LSC-DARM1_SWSTAT
H1:LSC-DARM1_GAIN
H1:LSC-DARM2_SWSTAT
H1:LSC-DARM2_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_LOCK_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_LOCK_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_LOCK_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_LOCK_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ISCINF_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ISCINF_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_SWSTAT
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_DRIVEALIGN_L2L_GAIN
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_LOCK_INBIAS
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ESDOUTF_LIN_BYPASS_SW
H1:SUS-ETMY_L3_ESDOUTF_LIN_FORCE_COEFF
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_M0_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L1_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_UL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_LL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_UR_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L2_LR_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_UL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_UR_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_LL_STATEREQ
H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_LR_STATEREQ
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - 20:22, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30433)CAL

J. Kissel, D. Tuyenbayev,

Kappas calculated in the front-end suggest that an optical gain was lower compared to the reference time (optical gain in the DARM model) by ~15% and the coupled-cavity pole frequency was ~325 Hz at the TF measurement time.

Also it seems that the SNR of 331.9 Hz line is not sufficient - higher statistical noise in the calculated κC and fC.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 19:05, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30475)
A little bit more quantitative assessment if the time dependent correction factors as computed by the front end (or "kappas"): 

I've grabbed similar undisturbed data from the times quoted in the original entry, and replotted them in matlab after doing some rudimentary math. The 15 minute (900 sec) average value (starting at Oct 11 2016 02:51:00 UTC) for all of the time dependent parameters just after the sweeps are:

Param            Units        Mean      Std
kappa_{C}        [ ]          0.866     pm 0.011
f_{cc}           [Hz]         323       pm 4.5
Re: kappa_{PU}   [ ]          1.01      pm 0.011
Im: kappa_{PU}   [ ]          -0.007    pm 0.012
Re: kappa_{TST}  [ ]          0.998     pm 0.0085
Im: kappa_{TST}  [ ]          0.0095    pm 0.0065

Input Power      [W]          50.5      pm 0.031

The script to generate these values lives in 
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Scripts/CAL_EPICS/get_fe_tdep_params.m

And for ease of copy and paste for someone in the future, I'm gathering the following channels (which correspond to the parameters in the same order as the table above)
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_C_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_F_C_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_PU_REAL_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_PU_IMAG_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_TST_REAL_OUTPUT
H1:CAL-CS_TDEP_KAPPA_TST_IMAG_OUTPUT
H1:IMC-PWR_IN_OUTPUT
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:56, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 09:14, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30429)
CDS maintenance summary, Tuesday 11th October 2016

WP6232 Upgrade frame writers

Jonathan, Jim B, Dave:

h1fw2 was running with close to the new code, it was upgraded to add the md5 filename change only. Quickly following h1fw0 and h1fw1 were upgraded to the latest code. I am updating the DAQ MEDM to show the new diagnostic md5 check sum data.

WP6217 ISI frontend code upgrade

Hugh, Jim B

All ISI models were restarted with new code

WP6227 HEPI frontend code upgrade

Hugh, Jim B

All HEPI models were restarted with new code.

WP6235 PSL-DBB jitter feed-forward to LSC

Daniel, Gabrielle, Dave:

New code on the h1psldbb exports the jitter signal as a 64kHz Dolphin channel. The h1lsc model uses this feed-forward data. Change added a 16kHz LSC DQ channel to the commissioning frame.

WP6242 Migration of virtual machines to proxmox

Carlos

Old vmware virtual hosts were migrated to the new Proxmox system.

WP6236 SUS ITMX.ETMX model changes for HWWD install

Fil, Richard, Jim B, Dave

sister wp to 6234. The ITMX and ETMX hardware watchdogs were install. The h1susitmx, h1susetmx models were modified to read the HWWD status via the binary input feed from these chassis. Since we are not controlling these units, I did not put in the binary output logic.

WP6229 h1tcscs model change for SIM parts

Kiwamu, Dave

A new h1tcscs model was installed. We verified that the TCS CO2 chillers behaved correctly on loss of temperature control voltage.

WP6231 GDS-DMT upgrade

team-GDS

Code was upgraded, no impact was seen from the control room

WP6239 PSL-ISS model change

Daniel, Dave

New h1psliss model was installed. This was done at the same time as the h1psldbb change.

WP6240 Beckhoff Slow Controls change

Daniel, Dave

Daniel installed new PLC code. I updated the DAQ INI files, the target autoBurt.req files and the Beckhoff SDF monitor files.

WP6238 CAL-CS model change

Darkhan, Jeff K, Dave

a new h1calcs model was installed.

DAQ restarts

Dave:

The DAQ was restarted several times today to support the above work.

(note we did not get to removing h1ldasgw2 WP#6237, will defer this to later in the week)

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 09:14, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30449)

Regarding the following:

WP6217 ISI frontend code upgrade

Hugh, Jim B

All ISI models were restarted with new code

Only the HAM ISIs models were updated.  I might have implied to DaveB that I was going to do something to the BSC ISIs but in the end I do no changes there.

H1 PSL
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:05, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 11:36, Wednesday 12 October 2016(30425)
Saturday 10/9/2016 laser trip
LP_v_H4 shows the laser output power and the head 4 flow rate.  At this point in time the flow rate trip
0.2 lpm.  The drop in laser power seems to coincide with the increase in flow rate.

XC_v_H4 shows the output of the crystal chiller and the head 4 flow rate.  The chiller clearly switches
off after the spike in the head 4 flow rate.

InletP_v_H4 shows the inlet pressure versus head 4 flow rate.  The oscillations in pressure take place
after the spike in the flow rate.  The same is true for the outlet pressure.

    The sudden increase in the flow rate perhaps suggests that something in the flow sensor may have
been dislodged but I (PK) would expect that the flow rate would not drop to zero but to some other
non-zero value.  Unless there was a following object that promptly jammed things up.  But things started
up okay for the subsequent startup.

    The various filters in the system are clean from a visual inspection.




  Jason/Peter
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 11:36, Wednesday 12 October 2016 (30453)

The trip Peter discusses above took place at around 6:17am PDT on Sunday, 10/9/2016.

The laser did trip off on Saturday (first reported by Patrick here) at 21:06:02 PDT (04:06:02 UTC, Sunday 10/9/2016).  As noted by Kiwamu the reason for the trip was due to a trip of the Laser Head 1-4 Flow interlock.

PSL_Heads_Flow_2016-10-8.png shows the 4 laser head flow sensors around the time of the trip; head 4 is once again the most likely culprit.  As seen in the plots posted above by Peter for the early Sunday morning trip, head 4 sees a spike in flow rate before falling off to zero.  Interestingly, when compared to the actual interlock (PSL_Head4_v_HeadIL_2016-10-8.png) the interlock trips just prior to the spike in flow rate; from the plot it can be seen that the interlock starts to trip just before the spike in head 4 flow begins.  The trip threshold at this time was set to 0.2 lpm, which none of the flow sensors were below at the time the interlock tripped; I can't explain why the interlock tripped.

PSL_Head4_v_XChil_2016-10-8.png shows the crystal chiller turning off several seconds after the interlock trips (5 seconds after in this case).  I've noted this before (here).

PSL_Head4_v_InletP_2016-10-8.png shows the head 4 flow rate versus the inlet pressure in the PSL water manifold.  The oscillation in the pressure occurs after the interlock tripped and has been seen before (noted above by Peter and here).

Images attached to this comment
H1 General (OpsInfo)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:21, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 16:08, Tuesday 11 October 2016(30424)
Maintenance is done - locking resumes

details in alog 30410

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 16:08, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30428)

Update as of 23:05UTC (16:05PT)

State of H1:  in Initial Alignment

Activities:

  • IM1, IM2, and IM3 restored to alignments before HAM2 ISI trip
  • Jenne restored X arm optics to previous values to restore green locking
  • I tweaked Y arm, now at good power
  • Initial Alignment should continue, then lock full IFO
H1 PSL
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:23, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 15:49, Tuesday 11 October 2016(30415)
ISS PDA moved to a pick off after the EOM

Peter, Kiwamu,

We have taken out the PD A photodiode out of the ISS inner loop box and placed it at a location where the PWR_EOM photodiode was. We confirmed that we can close the loop with the moved PD A.

[New setup]

We opened up the inner loop box and removed the base plate on which the two photodiodes sat. Then we took out only PD A from the base plate while leaving PD B mounted on the base plate. We put the base plate back into the inner loop box. A black glass beam dump was placed at the location where PD A used to be. Careful: because we could not find a good screw hole, we could not clamp down the black glass beam dump which is currently just sitting on the base plate.

We placed PD A to the location where PWR EOM (Thoralbs PDA55) had been. We rerouted all the associated cables for PD A (a 5 pin lemo, 2 normal lemos) to the new location. We measured the beam power at this location to be 8 mW. Because this is too much for PD A (which we think typically runs with 1 mW), we installed an ND filter on the front panel of PD A (see the picture).

A few more pictures are available at ResourceSpace.

[ISS loop closed with PD A]

Here shows a screenshot of the setup for closing the inner loop with PD A. The gain slider needed to be a 12 dB higher (which still smells like a factor of two calibration error...) than the usual. The ref signal for PD A needed to be -0.46.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 15:49, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30426)

Here are some plots of the open loop transfer function with PD A used as the in-loop sensor. A gain of more than 20-30 dB in the gain slider actually does not do the job -- needs more investigation. The ugf is about 46 kHz with the gain slider set to 30 dB. Note that when PD B was in use, the ugf had been 54 kHz (29942).

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:54, Tuesday 11 October 2016 - last comment - 15:55, Tuesday 11 October 2016(30373)
WHAM ISIs & all HEPI Model Updates

ECR E1600042 WP 6217; ECR E1500325 WP 6227

To Remove DACKILL elements from HAM ISIs and HEPIs:

HAM ISI

.) Removed DACKILL Widgets on WD Block--Attachment 1.

.) Removed DACKILL link from WD Block to the ERRMON Block--Attachment 2.

.) Routed WD_STATE from WD Block to ERRMON--Attachment 2.

.) Added WD_STATE Logic in ERRMON Block for Rogue Excitation Evaluation--Attachment 3.

HEPI

.) Removed DACKILL elements from HEPI (Top) Level--Attachment 4.

.) Removed DACKILL parts  on WD Block--like ISI Attachment 1.

To update HEPIs to Bleedoff-Accumulated-Saturations feature running on ISIs for months:

.) Add WINDOWTIME inputs on HEPI WD Block--Attachment 5.

.) Removed Test Point pickoffs WD Flag channels--also on Attachment 5.

.) Replace model saturation counter on WD/IPS, L4C & ACT Blocks with WD_SATCOUNT_vb.c counter & bleedoff Function--Attachment 6 becomes Attachment 7, e.g.

JimB restarted all these models after the build and install.  Reisolation was not a problem.  HAM2 did have one trip on CPS during 1st isolation attempt but it worked fine on the 2nd...

SVN COMMITS:

/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/models/

hugh.radkins@opsws1:models 0$ svn commit -m "Removed DACKILL remenants & wired WD_STATE to ERRMON"
Sending        models/isihammaster.mdl
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 14424.


/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/hpi/common/models

hugh.radkins@opsws1:models 0$ svn commit -m "Added sensor/actuator WD Saturation Bleedoff ala ISI & removed Test Point WD Flag channels"
Sending        models/hepitemplate.mdl
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 14425.
 

Still have some medm and SDF cleanup to do.  In progress.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 15:55, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30427)

Yes I do know how to spell remnants!

I've edited the HEPI and ISI Watchdog medms getting rid of the DACKILL widgets that do not connect to anything now.  Also added the IOP DACKILL to the HEPI screen which were absent.  Also removed is the RESET ALL button as all it did was push the DACKILL and the RSET buttons.  Only 1 WD reset button remains, RESET WD.  CLEAR SATURATIONS ONLY button is on the ISIs, pretty self explanitory there.  On the HEPIs, I elected to not add the Clear Saturations Only infrastructure as the RESET WD button will do the trick anyway and won't harm the platform if it is not tripped.  The RESETs for the IOPDACKILL and the Rogue Exc WD on the ISIs still need to be done in addition to the RESET WD, if, the medms suggest (red) they need it.  There is no Rogue Excitation Watchdog on the HEPIs.

I will commit these medms to the SVN when I confirm that LLO does not need the RESET ALL button.

H1 TCS
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:58, Monday 10 October 2016 - last comment - 18:38, Tuesday 11 October 2016(30384)
TCS corner station model change, ready for installation tomorrow

WP 6229,

I have updated the TCS corner station model (h1tcscs.mdl). I confirmed that the model comiples without an error. The model is ready for installation tomorrow. The model change includes the followings.

The first item is described in T1600451 in detail. The second point is something we newly implemented today in order to get rid of two paricular ezcaread blocks which had been referencing channels that are in the same front end model. To improve this self-referencing situation, we modified TCS_MASTER.mdl so that the TCS block returns the CO2 power as an output. See the attached screenshot for how we routing the CO2 powers to the SIM block.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 18:38, Tuesday 11 October 2016 (30430)

This is now installed. See 30429. The filters for the new channels were set by running the code attached to T1600451-v2. The SDF is also updated.

Displaying reports 53641-53660 of 83254.Go to page Start 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 2686 2687 End