State of H1: locked in Nominal Low Noise
Activities:
H1 locking: all changes / issues resolved or being worked on
In brief, no success. In details, here are some alignment tweaks trief over the last couple of days:
The decrease of range in the last lock was due to a misalignment of the SRM.
J. Kissel Though we turned off the 1083.7 Hz calibration line last night (LHO aLOG 30476) because we were worried about range in the PCAL systems Optical Follower Servo (OFS) after increasing other calibration line amplitudes. However, as a quick test, I turned it back on. With the increased amplitude of other CAL lines, and this 1083.7 Hz line ON, the OFS does not saturate, so it appears we have enough range to run it all. I've also made a quick check of the calibration line harmonics to be sure those are not huge, and still well below the DARM sensitivity, and they are. Nice! We want this line ON, so it serves as a clean reference for the optical gain while we perform the high frequency, long duration sweeps (i.e. LHO aLOG 30434). I've accepted the change in the SDF system.
issues getting here:
REFL WFS centering not coming on in Inital alignment for PRC and SRC, so in both cases those didn't complete until engaged by hand (guardian?)
POPA OFFSETS - Evan looks at these - not sure they're OK but in the end they seem to work
ASC - Evan toggled PRC1_P on and off (3 seconds each) to save the lock and also allow PRC1 P to converge
POPA sum got noisy in ENGAGE SOFT LOOPS until I engaged the CHARD offset of 0.1 by hand in Engage Soft Loops, then the signal improved
I set the ramp on CSOFT to 120 seconds, and at 120 seconds there's a kick that can be seen on CSOFT_P
PI mode 26 rang up and did a bouncing thing until I lowered the gain by half from -5000 to -2500, and then tuned the phase
Using the crystal chiller that is currently sitting in the mechanical room, the on/off flow rate was recorded as a function of time. The data is that reported via the RS-232 interface. When switched off, the flow rate drops to zero in 3.245 seconds. This seems a lot slower than the drop reported by EPICS, which seems to suggest the flow rate drops to zero in less than a second.
The difference in times might be a result of different flow impedance - ie -different plumbing and thermal loads connected to the two chillers.
I'd like to go from PRMI to Lock DRMI 1F.
Locking issues this morning.
Images attached show the filter banks that aren't being engaged, and where to find them on the ASC page (DC centering)
As expected, the jitter feed forward that was tuned yesterday evening was no more good. Using the same method described before, I retuned it and found comparable performances as yesterday.
The second plot shows how the coherence between DARM and DBB Q1Y changed over time. Initially there was no feed forward, then it was switched on at about t=1 hour. At t=8 hours I retuned it as explained above. Beware that the coherence color scale tops at 0.6 and not at 1. It looks like the subtraction was getting worse, but not too bad after all.
TITLE: 10/13 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
09:29:10 Intent Bit set to Observe
J. Kissel, D. Tuyenbayev,
We turned on two calibration lines using ETMY coil drivers on stages L1 and L2. The SNRs of these lines are roughtly 1/3 of the regular calibration lines (regular cal. lines have SNR of ~100 with 10s FFT).
_FREQ (Hz) _CLKGAIN (ct)H1:SUS-ETMY_L1_CAL_LINE 33.7 60.0 O2-scheme synched oscillator for kappa_U
H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_CAL_LINE 34.7 27.0 O2-scheme synched oscillator for kappa_P
These lines will be used to better quantify calibration of the PUM and UIM actuators.
A related report: LHO alog 29291.
κU, κP and κT using these additional lines at ~6am on Wed., Oct. 12 are:
κU = 0.9828 - 0.0637i
κP = 0.9499 - 0.0380i
κT = 0.9784 - 0.0440i
These are preliminary values calculated manually for transfer functions taken at a selected time (no trends or averaging except for 10avg. in DTT), and the DARM model for ER9 (H1params_2016-07-01.conf). We will use SLM tool data to look at the parameter trends.
Greg M, Darkhan T,
We calculated kappa values using SLM data (10s FFTs) generated over 10 days between Oct 10 and Oct 21 with ER9 parameter file
'${CalSVN}/Runs/PreER9/H1/params/H1params_2016-07-01.conf'
The plots show raw (unaveraged) values. SNRs of the L1 and L2 lines (used for calculation of κU and κP respectively) were set to give approximately 1/3 SNR compared to the L3 line (with the ER9 noise floor).
The data was taken from an additional SLM tool instance which was setup by Greg to calculate 33.7 Hz, 34.7 Hz, 35.9 Hz and 36.7 Hz line FFTs.
Evan, Daniel
17:12:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:
17:16:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:
17:18:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:
17:24:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:
17:32:00 UTC Oct 7 2016:
17:34:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:
18:06:30 UTC Oct 7 2016:
Spectra attached.
Coherence (modulation on)
Using 2600 V/W for the demod gain and transimpedance, and 29 mW of dc PD power, this implies the following AM depths:
| I | Q | |
| 9 MHz | 0.95×10−4 | 2.4×10−4 |
| 45 MHz | 1.9×10−4 | 8.2×10−4 |
Using 0.22 rad and 0.28 rad for the 9 MHz and 45 MHz modulation depths, this implies the following AM/PM ratios:
| I | Q | |
| 9 MHz | 0.43×10−3 | 1.1×10−3 |
| 45 MHz | 0.67×10−3 | 2.9×10−3 |
The attachment contains a budget of the expected CARM residual. The in-loop error point is taken from the CM board control signal, as was done previously. Here I used 2600 V/W for the transimpedance and demod gain.
The other measured traces are taken from the REFL9I readback (not from the CM board), so in principle there could be some extra dark noise at the error point from the summing node board or CM board. However, based on the O1 level this is of the same order as the shot noise (so we are not missing a huge amount of extra noise in this estimate).
Attaching earlier RAM plot, this time with informative labels
Here is a time series of REFL LF during the modulation depth reductions that happen during lock acquistion.
During the 9 MHz depth reduction (from 0.22 rad to 0.11 rad), the dc power changes from 4.83(3) mW to 4.27(3) mW. That means that after the modulation depth reduction, 4.08(4) mW of the dc light is from the carrier and 0.19(2) mW of the dc light is from the 9 MHz sideband (this assumes the 45 MHz contribution is negligible).
Note that the dc level is still settling to its final value of ~3.7 mW, so it's possible that these power ratios are evolving during the lock.
Can we roughly quantify this in m/rtHz/rad?
Moving SRM by ~20 urad reduces the noise by a factor ~2
A bit more like a factor 3 of noise reduction when moving IMC_DOF_1_P with an offset of 400, don't know the calibration