Displaying reports 56761-56780 of 85073.Go to page Start 2835 2836 2837 2838 2839 2840 2841 2842 2843 End
Reports until 12:17, Monday 15 August 2016
LHO VE
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:17, Monday 15 August 2016 - last comment - 14:38, Monday 15 August 2016(29103)
Pressure bump at YEND correlated with ISI activity

 

Kyle reported on Aug 12 that he thought there was a correlation between his RGA signal and locking attempts.

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=29079

 

On July 19 there was a programming change to the FPGAs;

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28535

During this process there was a pressure burst in PT410 at the YEND. Dave  believes that as the system was brought back, dacs railed while connected to the ISI. This caused all actuators in the chamber to go to their maximum output. We believe this caused some heating which resulted in the pressure bump.

Perhaps Kyle saw pressure changes related to ISI activity?

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 14:38, Monday 15 August 2016 (29106)

ISI spike on the 12th - don't think the time matches though.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI (SUS)
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:40, Monday 15 August 2016 (29102)
OPLEV 7 day trends

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:48, Monday 15 August 2016 (29100)
Morning Meeting Minutes

Dont forget to get work permits in today for work tomorrow. Let's try to make tomorrow a short maintenance day so comissioners can get to work early.

SEI - HAM6 will trip with often the shutter now. HAM6 now runs in Damped for the beginning of locking then then switched later but is a WIP. SDF will be red.

    CS HEPI pump maintenance tomorrow.

SUS - HAM6 sus look good.

CDS - ISS outer loop work, FRS work.

    New version of GDS code (DTT updates).

PSL - PSL seems good. TCS has CO2 laser swap planned (Alastair on his way). BS OpLev investigation.

Vac - Fire up pump to bake out RGA at vertex, Yend worked well. A couple of days of pumping for HAM6

Facilites - LED lights along walkway need to be coiled up (broken?)

 

Ran through work permits.

H1 AOS (DetChar)
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:24, Sunday 14 August 2016 (29096)
LEMI magnetometers buried, readout comes next

Julia Kruck and I buried the high-sensitivity LEMI magnetometers this week near the vault.  This is at the approximate location for which trial spectra were taken (https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=12525), and determined to be good enough to study subtraction of the effects of globally correlated fields due to, for example, Schumann resonances.

We buried them directly in the soil at a depth of about 18 inches. We used a bubble level to ensure that they were not tilted in Z, and aligned them with beam tube X and Y using lines constructed and measured on Google satellite images. We think that this alignment technique was more accurate than could be made with the simple compass that we had, though we made sure that the compass agreed with our alignment.  The connector to the X-axis magnetometer is 17m in the -X-direction from the  +Y corner of the electronics vault, and the magnetometer extends in the -X direction beyond the connector (see photos). The Y-axis magnetometer has its connector 1.22 meters +X and 1.22 m -Y of the connector for the X-axis magnetometer, so the closest parts of the magnetometers, the connectors, are 1.72 m apart. The connector  is on the +X or +Y end of the magnetometers so that the signals will have the proper phase relationship. 1.22 meters of cable is buried directly in the ground before the point where the cables come together to enter the conduit (yet to be installed) in order to damp any cable vibrations. The LEMIs lie between the lines of orange stakes that parallel them to either side (see photos). The electronics had not arrived so they have not yet been tested.

Absolute location: X-axis magnetometer  is 1020 m +X,  188 m +Y of the vertex

Robert Schofield, Julia Kruck

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:20, Sunday 14 August 2016 - last comment - 18:23, Sunday 14 August 2016(29097)
locking today

Evan, Sheila

This morning we had truoble with DRMI ASC.  THere are a few things that seem to have helped (in addition to intal alingment and some by hand alignment), and how the guardain is reliably getting to analog CARM. 

Currently we are in a similiar situation as the last two nights, we can lock the interferometer but loose lock within a few minutes.  We have lost lock even while sitting on analog carm, we have been able to switch PRCL and MICH to POP sensors but suddenly lost lock about a minute latter. 

Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 18:23, Sunday 14 August 2016 (29098)

The sudden locklosses seem to happen only after switching the CARM sensor to REFL9 (the digital or analog version). We can set at 5 pm CARM offset seemingly indefinitely, but any full-resonance lock (after the sensor is switched to REFL9) is a few minutes or less.

The LSC OLTFs (including the digital CARM) all look fine on resonance --- no evidence of loop instability. Debugging REFL9 seems like the next logical step.

H1 AOS (ISC, PSL, SEI, SYS)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:12, Saturday 13 August 2016 - last comment - 09:54, Sunday 14 August 2016(29091)
More work on shutter testing, locking

There are a few things that still needed worktonight with the fast shutter, and will need more work:

A few other things:

The ISS diffracted power has been at around 4% since August 2nd (the first day of the vent). Before the vent it was around 16%, but DIAG_MAIN thinks the diffracted power should be between 1 and 6%.  I moved it up to about 14%, so DIAG main is complaining. 

There is a problem with switching DRMI to POP signals in full lock.  We can stay locked stably for ~10 minutes at ANALOG CARM, but lose it shortly after transitioning DRMI to POP signals each time. Before transitioning off the 3F signals, the MICH UGF is about 5 Hz.  I manually changed the digital gain from 1.4 to 3.6 to restore the loop to a 10 Hz ugf, although I don't know why the gain would be low.  The PRCL and SRCL UGFs were normal.  After adjusting the MICH UGF I was able to transition to POP, but did this in the middle of an earthquake.  I don't know if the lockloss about a minute latter was due to the DRMI problem or due to the earthquake. 

Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 07:19, Sunday 14 August 2016 (29092)

Regarding the ISS diffracted power, on August 2nd we re-calibrated the percentage diffracted power display; see the 4th paragraph of Peter's August 2nd alog here.  Previous to this the ISS diffracted power percentage was displayed incorrectly, so when the display said 16% in reality it was diffracting around 2-3%.  We want the ISS diffracted percentage to be around 3-4%, which results in ~6W diffracted by the AOM; at 14% the AOM is diffracting ~24W, which is much more than necessary.  This change was discussed in the 8:30am meeting on August 3rd and DIAG_MAIN must have been updated to reflect this new ISS diffracted % value (I'm assuming this is the case, as I can't find an alog detailing this change to DIAG_MAIN).  Please set it back to around 3-4% (I believe this is a reference signal value somewhere in the neighborhood of -1.70V).

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 09:54, Sunday 14 August 2016 (29093)

Thanks Jason.  I've reset the Ref Signal to -1.7 which gives a diffracted power of 3.2%

H1 AOS (AOS)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:22, Saturday 13 August 2016 - last comment - 16:55, Sunday 14 August 2016(29089)
BS oplev glitches

Our DRMI lock times have been a little long in the last 2 days, it seems like the beam splitter optical lever is glitching.  The attached screenshot shows a PRMI lock where the BS oplev damping is on for the first minute, you can glitches in both POP90 and POP18, when the oplev damping gain is ramped to 0 the glitches go away although there are some oscillations in the build up.  Turning the oplev back on brings back the glitches. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 16:55, Sunday 14 August 2016 (29095)

The BS oplev was getting worse and making locking worse, so we went to the floor and adjusted the knob a little but (about 1/10 th of a turn clockwise).  It seems to be better but is probably worth checking on tuesday.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:11, Saturday 13 August 2016 (29085)
Ops Evening Summary
Sheila, Stefan, and Koji worked on relocking.

23:37 UTC Kyle to LVEA to move two carts from high bay to near HAM5, connect pump cart to vertex RGA
23:44 UTC Kyle done moving carts, starting connecting pump cart to vertex RGA
00:49 Kyle out of LVEA for the night

The astronomy club has set up telescopes for public viewing.

I am leaving the ISC_LOCK guardian in down.
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:46, Friday 12 August 2016 - last comment - 23:58, Friday 12 August 2016(29082)
misalignment causes problems with carm offset reduction

Today we have had some difficulties with alignment in the process of recovering the IFO. 

This morning we moved ETMX by 20 urad in yaw, Patrick checked trends and the top mass osems roughly agree with the alingment sliders that we moved by about 20 urad, while the optical lever indicates that this was moving the test mass back to the position it was in last time we were locking, on August 1st. 

We also saw that even after doing initial alingment twice, the arms atill had a large relative misliagnment which caused a low recycling gain and therefore a lower cam offset than expected while CARM is locked  which cause random locklosses at different points.  Earlier tonight we we seeing a 5% drop in the refl power when the arm transmission was at 5 times the single arm power, while the same arm transmitted power level on August 1st coresponded to only a 1% drop in reflected power.  Koji and Stefan worked on solving this problem, so I will leave it to them to log their solution. 

Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 23:58, Friday 12 August 2016 (29084)

Koji, Stefan

We co-aligned the y-arm for IR and green by comanding the guardian in an y-arm IR lock, and simultaneously engaging the green arm alignment. Then we moved the ITM green camera set point around, and kept the IR maximized with the BS. THis resulted in a nice co-alignment.

WIth that setting we had much less truble during the CARM reduction sequence, but once we were on resonance, we kept loosing the lock in a fast transient. Our guess is that there is a problem with the CARM loop, but we didn't have the energy to check that.

At least the fast sutter is reliable triggering on every lock-loss.

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:32, Friday 12 August 2016 - last comment - 14:06, Wednesday 24 August 2016(29079)
Y-end RGA captures IFO locking effects on partial pressures
After decoupling the pumping components used during the recent bake out of the Y-end RGA, I exposed the RGA to the Y-end vacuum volume, energized the filament and let it come into equilibrium for an hour or more.  I then let the RGA scan continuously with the multiplier (SEM) on for an additional hour or so while I gathered up my mess(es).  I periodically checked the scanning as I walked past the screen.  At one point, I noticed that the spectrum was changing rapidly towards the "dirty".  I monitored the scanning and noted that after reaching a temporary maximum, the amus which had increased then returned to near their original values.  

After consulting with the Jeff B. (the operator on shift), I feel that the observed changes in partial pressures were likely the result of IFO locking attempts as they coincide closely in time.  Perhaps something gets hot when the IFO is locked or when mirrors are steered?  

See attached scans 
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
michael.zucker@LIGO.ORG - 04:46, Saturday 13 August 2016 (29086)

If true that could be kind of scary (!)  Can we set an RGA in MID (stripchart) mode and run time series following the main peaks through a locking attempt?

 I could imagine baking the adsorbed water off the ETM and perhaps nearby baffles. But this should not persist (or repeat) after the first good cavity buildup. 

 

 

 

joshua.smith@LIGO.ORG - 15:39, Saturday 13 August 2016 (29087)DetChar
It's not clear whether this effect could be seen on the overall vacuum pressure, but if it could be, we don't see it. Here is 8 hours (yesterday/today) ofthe y-end vacuum pressure together with the y-arm transmitted power. I don’t see anything in the vacuum pressure channels that relates to the locking attempts, though that may be my untrained eye. 
 
1. H1:ASC-Y_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ, raw,start: 2016-08-13 00:00:00 (1155081617) len: 8:20:00. 
https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=137580
 
2. H0:VAC-EY_Y3_PT410B_PRESS_TORR, raw,start: 2016-08-13 00:00:00 (1155081617) len: 8:20:00. 
https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=137573
 
3. H0:VAC-EY_Y2_PT424B_PRESS_TORR, raw,start: 2016-08-13 00:00:00 (1155081617) len: 8:20:00. 
https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=137576
 
...and here is 5 hours from the day we think the lock losses damaged the OMC (this includes the 5 lock losses reported in https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28684 ). 
 
4. H1:ASC-Y_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ, raw,start: 2016-07-27 03:40:00 (1153626017) len: 5:00:00.
https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=137591
 
5. H0:VAC-EY_Y2_PT424B_PRESS_TORR, raw,start: 2016-07-27 03:40:00 (1153626017) len: 5:00:00. 
https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=137590
 
6. H0:VAC-EY_Y3_PT410B_PRESS_TORR, raw,start: 2016-07-27 03:40:00 (1153626017) len: 5:00:00. 
https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=137589
 
I don’t see any obvious relationship between these high power locks and vacuum pressure in the Y-end. 
 
The last plot shows the first set of data with the vacuum channels highpassed 3rd order at 1Hz. Nothing visible. 
 
Let me know if you’d like to chase this another way. 
Images attached to this comment
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 20:36, Saturday 13 August 2016 (29090)
Mike - 
Chandra's stated goal is to eventually continuously trend 7 AMUs (max allowed by software) at each building.  The observance cited in this aLOG obviously would have been missed while in Faraday.  Too bad that the RGAs don't live long with their SEMs on 24/7.  As we install/commission the RGAs and as she works out the issues with the CDS and/or GC folks this trending will eventually be happening.  


J. Smith - 
The partial pressures that are changing are too small and not expected to show up on the total pressure gauges. From the graphic scans and knowing that the total pressure at the Y-end is 2 x 10-9 torr, we see that the partial pressures that changed are small (10-12 torr) - but still interesting because they are measurable and even more interesting if the changes can be shown to be tied to some IFO locking activity.  (Science interesting?  Who knew?)
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 09:17, Monday 15 August 2016 (29101)
Doh!!!  Here are the .txt versions of the ASCII data
Non-image files attached to this comment
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 14:06, Wednesday 24 August 2016 (29283)
The indicated currents for these scans are typical of the SEM @ 1300 volts (which is the factory default). I have noticed in the past that setting the SEM voltage value in the EDIT tab does not change the value displayed in the device status screen or vice versa - so, though I set this to 1500 volts in one of those two fields, it may not have taken effect.
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:03, Friday 12 August 2016 - last comment - 15:38, Saturday 13 August 2016(29078)
ASC-AS_C calibrated in W into HAM6

Using the calibration of alog 28133 (3.0554e+04 cts / Watt from SRM, or 3.273e-05Watt/ct) I added FM10 filters to the segments of ASC-AS_C to cast the output into Watt entering HAM6. I also updated H1:ASC-AS_C_SUM_OFFSET (which avoid astronomic PIT and YAW values).

SDF is updated.

Comments related to this report
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 23:47, Friday 12 August 2016 (29083)

[Stefan Koji]

LHO ALOG 28953 and LHO ALOG 28133 show descripancy of factor of two.

When we have 10W input this should give us 24mW

10W (P_in) * 0.9 (T_IMC) * 0.03 (T_PRM) * 1/2 (R_BS) * 0.985 (ITM) * 1/2 (T_BS) * 0.37 (T_SRM) * 0.97 (T_FI) = 24mW

This is closer to the measurement on LHO ALOG 28953. (We still don't know the origin of this difference of x2.)

We decided to use the number in this log (0.0162mW/cnt) to calibrate H1:ASC-AS_C_SUM_OUT to indicate incident power to HAM6.
Also the calibration factor for H1:LSC-ASAIR_B_LF_OUT was entered to match those two.

peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 15:38, Saturday 13 August 2016 (29088)

It looks like Stefan's earlier log (28133) missed a factor of 2 gain in the QPD transimpedance amplifier (D1001974) due to the balanced differential output of this amplifier (which feeds the Whitening/VGA). With that factor of 2, Stefan's estimate would be very close to the measured value of 0.0162 mW/count.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:15, Friday 12 August 2016 - last comment - 10:05, Sunday 14 August 2016(29075)
WHAM6 ISI Trips with Fast Shutter Closing

The attached is just one instance and is fairly representative of the trips.  Most of the time, the ACTuator is called to blame, but as I reported in 29056, I'm not sure the Last Trip is absolutely robust.

The 2 seconds of full data show the ISI in Full Isolation (GRD STATE) when Stefan throws the shutter (FASTSHUTTER A MODE.)  You can see a fraction of a second later, the Actuator MASTER DRIVEs going very large.  All the actuators are contributing to the saturation counting as the threshold is only 32760 counts.  The watch dog trips near the end of the two seconds (WD MON STATE.)  It was going to happen anyway but I can't be sure why the WD tripped because none of the counters (iii SAT COUNT) actually reached the trip threshold.  This is a mystery to me, still.  The SAFE COUNT is 8192, 4096, and 10 for the ACT, GS13, and CPS.  None of the counters reach the SAFE COUNT level....  Regardless, the Actuators where going to reach it so that is another problem to figure out.

Unless the shutter softens its blow on the ISI, the trips are going to happen almost everytime.  For now, we are running with HAM6 in the DAMPED state.  There the HAM6 sees a few saturations on the GS13s when the Shutter triggers but literally just a few.  The HAM6 will be transitioned to ISOLATED by the ISC after the FAST SHUTTER is tested.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 10:05, Sunday 14 August 2016 (29094)

We could have the HAM6 ISI in damped while we are testing the shutter, but we want it to beisolated when we are running the IFO, so when we loose lock and the shutter triggers we will stil be frequently tripping the ISI. 

H1 ISC (ISC, Lockloss)
richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:04, Friday 12 August 2016 - last comment - 08:17, Monday 15 August 2016(29059)
Modifications to ISC rack and Fast Shutter near Ham6
In an effort to eliminate the need to connect and disconnect shutter cables during vent we have moved the shutter logic controler to the rack from the table.  Also replaced the BNC cables with Yellow BNC cables so they can be easily identified.
See attachment.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 08:17, Monday 15 August 2016 (29099)

Drawings D1200196 and D1201500 updated.

Displaying reports 56761-56780 of 85073.Go to page Start 2835 2836 2837 2838 2839 2840 2841 2842 2843 End