Displaying reports 61721-61740 of 83040.Go to page Start 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3090 3091 End
Reports until 07:51, Thursday 24 September 2015
H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:51, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21882)
H1 Lockloss @ 12:35: Unknown Cause

12:35 H1 Lockloss (nothing obvious:  seismic quiet, and all the H1 strip tools showed nothing obvious before lockloss)

During Lock Acquisition, during 2nd locking attempt, had issues with ALS XARM:

1) You can either misalign SRM using the SUS_SRM guardian, or use a new state in ALIGN_IFO called SET_SUS_FOR_PRMI_W_ALS. 

2) Request OFFLOAD_PRMI from the DRMI guardian.

3) Once PRMI locks adjust PRM and BS alignment until you get about 80 counts on POP90 and 50 counts on POP18.  

4)Realign SRM by undoing whatever change you made in step 1.

5) Request DRMI_1F_OFFFLOADED from the ISC_DRMI guardian.

Waited for DRMI to lock again.  Several times I had a Verbal Alarm which sounded like "Slip Mode"?  What do we do about this?  It looked ugly on AS-AIR video.  Had "Slip Mode" alarms a few times while waiting for DRMI, and then the Vancouver earthquake arrived!

After recovering ISIs and ETMy, took ISC_LOCK to LOCKING_ALS, but haven't made it there yet (the guardian log keeps saying "Waiting for arms to settle").  The 0.03-0.1Hz seismic band was ramping down, but flattened out at 0.3um/s (which is over an order of magnitude from normal quiet levels).  Perhaps we should wait for this to come down to normal levels.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:02, Thursday 24 September 2015 - last comment - 07:20, Thursday 24 September 2015(21883)
While Trying To Lock Up H1, Big EQ Approached

At 13:54 Verbal Alarm posted Earthquake.

Looks like Magnitude 5.5 from Vancouver Island at 13:49.  (Terramon did not alert us to this one.)  0.03-0.1hz seismic has increased 3 orders of magnitude (!) and 0.1-0.3Hz seismic has increased 2 orders of magnitude.

ETMy & all BSC ISIs have Watchdogs have tripped.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 07:20, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21884)
  • HAM6 ISI also tripped at some point.
  • 14:20 Everybody restored.
  • Forgot to hit Observatory Mode to Earthquake....selected it at 14:21 (while seismic is halfway back to normal).  Will leave here for a while (until seismic bands return to normal.
  • Terramon finally shows the Vancouver EQ.
H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:12, Thursday 24 September 2015 - last comment - 02:16, Thursday 24 September 2015(21879)
H1 46hr Lock Ended & Back Up

H1 had a ~46Hr lock that ended toward the end of Jim's shift.  He noted DRMI was looking pretty ugly.  I waited DRMI a little, but eventually gave Sheila's new PRMI procedure a try, but POP18 & POP90 remained at a flat zero and PRMI never locked.  So went through the Initial Alignment procedure (I went slow & took notes since this is something we do rarely.).  Alignment was and getting to NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE were straightforward.

Reason for Lockloss?

I saw nothing obvious from seismic signals when I walked in, everything quiet!  Jim mentioned ASAir/OMC video spots took an odd move prior to lockloss.  H1 was trending down over 6hrs before the lockloss, and Jim mentioned this could be the RF45 issue which has been coming up.

Initial Alignment Notes:

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 02:16, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21880)

Accidental Slip Out Of Observation Mode:  9:04:15 - 9:04:33

While making the entry above and updating the Initial Alignment wiki, I wanted to look at a pull-down of an ISC Guardian node.  Clicking on the ALS_YARM node pull-down dropped H1 out of Observation & into Commissioning.  (after cursing, I quickly checked things and took H1 back to Observation)

(I didn't bother touching the Observatory Mode button during this short slip.)

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:32, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21877)
Transition to OWL Shift Update

TITLE:  9/24 OWL Shift:  7:00-15:00UTC (00:00-8:00PDT), all times posted in UTC

STATE OF H1:   H1 in lock acquisition after ~45hr lock.

OUTGOING OPERATOR:  Jim W. 

SUPPORT:  None

QUICK SUMMARY:  DRMI looked ugly.  Tried Sheila's new procedure for PRMI, but POP90 & POP18 were flat at zero.  Proceeding with an Intial Alignment.

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:17, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21876)
Shift Summary
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:46, Wednesday 23 September 2015 - last comment - 10:45, Tuesday 29 September 2015(21869)
bilinear coupling of TMS X motion to DARM

Durring yesterday's maintence window I made some excitations on both transmons to investigate the noise peaks around 75-85 Hz.  The main conculsions are that the coupling from TMS X L drive to DARM is bilinear while the coupling from TMSY is linear, and it seems likely that TMSX motion accounts for some significant part of the unexplained noise in the H1 noise budget (21162) even at frequencies where there is no coherence between DARM and the X QPDs. 

In the first attached screen shot you can see the DARM spectra durring some of my excitations in the upper panel and TMS QPD spectra in the lower panel.  In the QPD spectra, you can see that the X end QPDs have some excess noise compared to Y.  These spectra were from a time when I had a TMSX longitudnal injection at 75 Hz (this is the same time as the yellow DARM trace).  There is a narrow line in the X QPD spectra, but in the DARM spectrum the line that appears is about 1 Hz wide, indicating there is some bilinear coupling.  The excitation either did not show up or was very small in the QPD sums.

I also made a few injections into TMSY longitudnal which produced only narrow lines in DARM, both X and Y injections are shown at 100 Hz for comparison.  

We can attempt to make projections of this noise into DARM using the ratio or the injection line peaks or the rms of the injection peaks to estimte the coupling.  I drove longitudnally and the only good witness sensor we have is an angular sensor.  If the coupling mechanism is something like scatter off the QPDs that goes directly back into the arm, DARM would be mostly sensitive to the longitudnal TMS motion and if the QPDs are only seeing the unintentional length to angle coupling the projection from the normal level of the QPD spectra to the normal level of DARM could be an overestimate. This projection does show that this would be within a factor of 10 of DARM from about 100 Hz down to at least 75 Hz.

Perhaps when we get a chance we can try misaligning TMSX to see if we can reduce the noise in DARM this way. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 19:00, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21925)

AS Keita suggested, I checked if some of this noise (or at least the linear coupling seen for TMSY) could be simply that my drive on TMS moves the ISI and that motion propagates down the quad to the test mass.  This seems to be much too small to explain the observed coupling. 

Using the GS13s, and the calibration for them that Jim told me, the table motion caused by my 75 Hz drive to TMSX was 4.9 nm/rt Hz, while my 90 Hz drive to TMS Y caused the table to move 3.4 nm/rt Hz.  Using the quad model, The table motion is attenuated by 281 dB at 75 Hz and 294 dB at 90 Hz. The test mass motion induced due to my TMSX drive would be 4e-23 m/rt Hz at 75 Hz, and 6.724e-24 m/rt Hz for TMS Y. (too small to explain the lines in DARM).  

Of course it is possible that the coupling mechanism is through the motion of the ISI, not TMS.  

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:09, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21875)
Mid Shift

Everything quiet on site. Environment quiet. The current lock is approaching 40-some odd hours. 

H1 CDS
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:19, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21870)
ext_alert.py code updated at LHO

The code the brings up GraceDB alerts on our overviews was somewhat outdated, as it used an FAR of 1e-6 hz (~once every 12 days) instead of 3.8e-7 (~1 a month). Dave wrote up instructions for me to do the update when one of the IFOs dropped out of lock. Just before he left, the opportunity arose, so I updated the code. It's running now.

H1 CAL
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:03, Wednesday 23 September 2015 - last comment - 19:18, Thursday 24 September 2015(21868)
DARMOLGTF and PCALY to DARM Sweeps taken for Calibration Validation
J. Kissel

I've taken new DARM open loop gain and PCALY to DARM transfer functions to validate the current calibration. During the PCALY to DARM transfer function, I take the transfer function from PCALY's RX PD (calibrated into [m] of ETMY motion) and the CAL-CS front-end's DELTAL_EXTERNAL (calibrated into DARM [m], which -- since we're driving ETMY -- is identical to [m] of ETMY motion). These two different methods agree to within 4% and 3 [deg] over the 15 [Hz] to 1.2 [kHz] band. The calibration discrepancy expands to a whopping 9% and 4 [deg] if we look a frequencies between 5 and 15 [Hz] ;-).

I think we're in great shape, boys and girls.

Details
--------------
- CAL-CS does not correct for any slow time depedence (optical gain, test mass actuation strength, etc), so any agreement you see with the current interferometer is agreement with the reference model taken on Sep 10th 2015 (LHO aLOG 21385).

- In the previous measurement, Kiwamu had to fudge the phase by ~90 [us] to get the phase to agree. Now that we've updated the cycle delay between sensing and actuation to 7 [16 kHz clock cycles] to better approximate the high-frequency frequency response of AA, AI, and the OMC DCPD signal chain, we no longer have to fudge the phase -- AND the phase between the two metrics agree. NICE.

- I've made sure to turn OFF calibration lines *during both of these measurements, but there should be ample data just before and just after with calibration lines ON, such that we can compare our results against theirs to help refine our estimates of systematic error.

- The measurements live in
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Measurements/DARMOLGTFs/2015-09-23_H1_DARM_OLGTF_7to1200Hz.xml
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Measurements/PCAL$/2015-09-23_PCALY2DARMTF_7to1200Hz.xml
and have been committed to the CalSVN. We'll process these results shortly, and perform a similar analysis as Darkhan has done in yesterday's aLOG 21827.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
darkhan.tuyenbayev@LIGO.ORG - 14:41, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21898)

The parameter file for this measurement was committed to calibration SVN:

CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Scripts/DARMOLGTFs/H1DARMparams_1127083151.m

Attached plots show components of DARM loop TF and their residuals vs. DARM model for O1.

Non-image files attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 19:18, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21926)CAL

It looks better. Very nice.

By the way, I wanted to measure the open loop without the MICH or SRCL feedforward because I wanted to demonstrate that the unknown shape in the residual in magnitude is not due to these feedforward corrections. Though this may be a crazy thought. Anyway, it would be great if you can run an open-loop measurement without the feedforwards at some point, just once.

H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:10, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21865)
OPS Day Summary:

TITLE:  Sept 23 Day shift, 15:00-23:00UTC, 08:00-16:00PT

STATE Of H1:  Commissioning, Range = 78Mpc, lock is 30+ hours long!

SUPPORT: MikeL, Sheila, Chris Biwer, JeffK

SHIFT SUMMARY:  In Observe most of shift, currently in Commissioning.  Commissioning includes injections, filter change, and others in progress.

INCOMING OPERATOR: Jim

ACTIVITY LOG

15:58:43UTC - DMT glitch, Range = -1, no effect on IFO

16:00:43UTC - DMT glitch, Range = -1, no effect on IFO

20:16:27UTC - Commissioning, injections 

20:35UTC - Chris Biwer injections end

20:45:20UTC - cleared the ETMX timing error bit that was stuck

20:45:40UTC - GRB notice

20:47:16UTC - put IFO back into Observe

22:21:53UTC - Commissioning

22:22:06UTC - engaged Sheila's DHARD_Y filter

22:22:16UTC - put IFO back into Observe

22:22:18UTC - with the new filter, SDF kicked the IFO out of Observe

 

Currently JeffK has the IFO.

 
H1 INJ (DetChar, INJ)
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:53, Wednesday 23 September 2015 - last comment - 12:53, Friday 25 September 2015(21852)
single-IFO hardware injection tests at H1
L1 went out of lock. At H1 we turned off the intent bit and injected some hardware injections.

The hardware injections were the same waveform that was injected on September 21. For more information about those injections see aLog entry 21759

For information about the waveform see aLog entry 21774.

tinj was not used to do the injections.The commands to do the injections were:
awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 H1-HWINJ_CBC-1126257410-12.txt 0.5 -d -d >> log2.txt
awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 H1-HWINJ_CBC-1126257410-12.txt 1.0 -d -d >> log2.txt
ezcawrite H1:CAL-INJ_TINJ_TYPE 1
awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 H1-HWINJ_CBC-1126257410-12.txt 1.0 -d -d >> log2.txt
awgstream H1:CAL-INJ_TRANSIENT_EXC 16384 H1-HWINJ_CBC-1126257410-12.txt 1.0 -d -d >> log2.txt

To my chagrin the first two injections were labeled as burst injections.

Taken from the awgstream log the corresponding times are approximates of the injection time:

1127074640.002463000
1127074773.002417000
1127075235.002141000
1127075742.002100000

The expected SNR of the injection is ~18 without any scaling factor.

I've attached omegascans of the injections. There is no sign of the "pre-glitch" that was seen on September 21.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 13:57, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21855)DetChar, INJ
Attached stdout of command line.
Non-image files attached to this comment
david.shoemaker@LIGO.ORG - 14:04, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21857)
Neat! looks good.
john.veitch@LIGO.ORG - 01:37, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21878)
Hi Chris,
It looks like there is a 1s offset between the times you report and the rough coalescence time of the signal. Do you know if it is exactly 1s difference?
peter.shawhan@LIGO.ORG - 09:19, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21887)INJ
Yes, as John said, all of the end times of the waveforms are just about 1 second later that what's in the original post.

I ran a version my simple bandpass-filtered overlay script for these waveforms.  Filtering both the model (strain waveform injected into the system) and the data from 70-260 Hz, it overlays them, and also does a crude (non-optimal) matched filter to estimate the relative amplitude and time offset.  The four plots attached are for the four injected signals; note that the first one was injected with a scale factor of 0.5 and is not "reconstructed" by my code very accurately.  The others actually look rather good, with reasonably consistent amplitudes and time delays.  Note that the sign of the signal came out correctly!
Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 09:47, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21890)
I ran the daily BBH search with the injected template on the last two injections (1127075235 and 1127075742).

For 1127075235; the recovered end time was 1127075235.986, the SNR was 20.42, the chi-squared was 29.17, and the newSNR was 19.19.
For 1127075242; the recovered end time was 1127075242.986, the SNR was 20.04, the chi-squared was 35.07, and the newSNR was 19.19.
reed.essick@LIGO.ORG - 14:19, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21896)
KW sees all the injections with the +1 sec delay, some of them in multiple frequency bands.
From 
  /gds-h1/dmt/triggers/H-KW_RHOFT/H-KW_RHOFT-11270/H-KW_RHOFT-1127074624-64.trg
  /gds-h1/dmt/triggers/H-KW_RHOFT/H-KW_RHOFT-11270/H-KW_RHOFT-1127074752-64.trg
  /gds-h1/dmt/triggers/H-KW_RHOFT/H-KW_RHOFT-11270/H-KW_RHOFT-1127075200-64.trg
  /gds-h1/dmt/triggers/H-KW_RHOFT/H-KW_RHOFT-11270/H-KW_RHOFT-1127075712-64.trg

    tcent         fcent significance channel
1127074640.979948   146    26.34      H1_GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_32_2048
1127074774.015977   119    41.17      H1_GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_8_128
1127074773.978134   165   104.42      H1_GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_32_2048
1127075235.980545   199   136.82      H1_GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_32_2048
1127075743.018279   102    74.87      H1_GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_8_128
1127075742.982020   162   113.65      H1_GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_32_2048

Omicron also sees them with the same delay
From :
  /home/reed.essick/Omicron/test/triggers/H-11270/H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN/H1-GDS_CALIB_STRAIN_Omicron-1127074621-30.xml
  /home/reed.essick/Omicron/test/triggers/H-11270/H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN/H1-GDS_CALIB_STRAIN_Omicron-1127074771-30.xml
  /home/reed.essick/Omicron/test/triggers/H-11270/H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN/H1-GDS_CALIB_STRAIN_Omicron-1127075221-30.xml
  /home/reed.essick/Omicron/test/triggers/H-11270/H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN/H1-GDS_CALIB_STRAIN_Omicron-1127075731-30.xml

    peak time          fcent      snr
1127074640.977539062  88.77163  6.3716
1127074773.983397960 648.78342 11.41002  <- surprisingly high fcent, could be due to clustering
1127075235.981445074 181.39816 13.09279
1127075742.983397960 181.39816 12.39437

LIB single-IFO jobs also found all the events. Post-proc pages can be found here:

 https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~reed.essick/O1/2015_09_23-HWINJ/1127074640.98-0/H1L1/H1/posplots.html
 https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~reed.essick/O1/2015_09_23-HWINJ/1127074773.98-1/H1L1/H1/posplots.html
 https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~reed.essick/O1/2015_09_23-HWINJ/1127075235.98-2/H1L1/H1/posplots.html
 https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~reed.essick/O1/2015_09_23-HWINJ/1127075742.98-3/H1L1/H1/posplots.html

all runs appear to have reasonable posteriors.
florent.robinet@LIGO.ORG - 23:17, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21935)DetChar
Here is how Omicron detects these injections:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~frobinet/scans/hd/1127074641/
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~frobinet/scans/hd/1127074774/
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~frobinet/scans/hd/1127075236/
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~frobinet/scans/hd/1127075743/

Here are the parameters measured by Omicron (loudest tile):
1127074640: t=1127074640.981, f=119.9 Hz, SNR=6.7
1127074773: t=1127074773.981, f=135.3 Hz, SNR=11.8
1127075235: t=1127075235.981, f=114.9 Hz, SNR=12.8
1127075742: t=1127075742.981, f=135.3 Hz, SNR=12.4
joey.key@LIGO.ORG - 12:53, Friday 25 September 2015 (21947)
The BayesWave single IFO (glitch only) analysis recovers these injections with the following SNRs:
4640: 8.65535
4773: 19.2185
5253: 20.5258
5742: 20.1666
The results are posted here:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~meg.millhouse/O1/CBC_hwinj/
Images attached to this comment
H1 CDS (CDS)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:46, Wednesday 23 September 2015 - last comment - 19:18, Wednesday 23 September 2015(21853)
ETMX Diag Reset at 20:45:20UTC
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 15:53, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21862)

General Question:  Does this knock us out of Observation Mode?  Could I have reset this this morning?

cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 16:05, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21863)

IFO was in Commissioniing.

jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 16:42, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21867)

No, the DIAG_MAIN guardian node is NOT under the OBSERVATION READY check.  It can be changed/reset/etc. without affecting OBSERVATION MODE.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 19:18, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21873)

I think Cheryl was talking about the diag reset button on the GDS overview screen for the front end, not the DIAG_MAIN guardian.

H1 INJ (DetChar, INJ)
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:01, Wednesday 23 September 2015 - last comment - 21:35, Thursday 24 September 2015(21838)
new approved coherent CBC waveform
I've uploaded new and approved coherent waveforms for hardware injection testing. SVN is at revision number 5097.

There is a H1L1 coherent version of the September 21 test injection that was done at LHO. It can be found here:
  * H1 waveform
  * L1 waveform
  * XML parameter file

There is a H1L1 coherent version of the September 21 test injection that was done at LHO and the waveform begins at 15Hz. This waveform should be tested after the previous waveform has been tested. It can be found here:
  * H1 waveform
  * L1 waveform
  * XML parameter file
Comments related to this report
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 16:26, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21845)DetChar, INJ
I've attached time series of the four waveforms. Y-axis is h(t) in strain.

EDIT: Re-uploaded image files with title and proper y and x labels.
Images attached to this comment
bruce.allen@LIGO.ORG - 20:51, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21933)
Chris, I think the links to the XML parameter files are broken, could you please add corrected ones?   Error message:

The requested URL /svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/coherenttest1_1126257410.xml.gz was not found on this server.

Cheers, Bruce
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 21:35, Thursday 24 September 2015 (21934)
Hi sorry forgot the h1l1 at the beginning. https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/h1l1coherenttest1_1126257410.xml.gz

and https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/h1l1coherenttest1from15hz_1126257410.xml.gz
H1 General
peter.shawhan@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:42, Tuesday 22 September 2015 - last comment - 16:27, Wednesday 23 September 2015(21824)
GWIstat fixed
Cheryl and Jeff brought to my attention that GWIstat was reporting incorrect information today.  It turns out that the ~gstlalcbc home directory at Caltech was moved to a new filesystem today; GWIstat gets its information from a process running under that account, and apparently got into a funny state.  I have now restarted it.  For the rest of the current observing segment it will report the duration only from the time I restarted it, about 3:32 UTC.  I apologize for the problem!
Comments related to this report
peter.shawhan@LIGO.ORG - 06:15, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21836)
I see this morning that GWIstat is not showing the correct duration for the current observing segment.  The log file on ldas-grid.ligo.caltech.edu, where it is now running, shows that it was restarted twice during the night for no obvious reason, and it is reporting the duration only since it was restarted.  I'll ask the Caltech computing folks to look into this.  New hardware for ldas-grid was put into use yesterday, and maybe they were still shaking it down last night.
peter.shawhan@LIGO.ORG - 16:27, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21866)
Stuart Anderson told me this is a known problem that seems to have arisen from a condor configuration change.  They know how to fix it but will need to restart condor.  Until they do that, gwistat should indicate status correctly (except for momentary outages) but may sometimes display the wrong duration for the current state.
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:40, Tuesday 22 September 2015 - last comment - 19:26, Wednesday 23 September 2015(21818)
request for operators

Durring the maintence window we left the DHARD yaw boost on (21768 and 21708). There was no evidence that it caused any problems, but I was putting excitations onto transmon at the time and there were other maintence activities going on.  We'd like to check that it doesn't impact the glitch rate, so if LLO drops out of lock or if you see an earthquake on the way ( 0.1um/sec or larger predicted by terramon), it would be great if you can turn it on.  You can find it under ASC overview> ASC arm cavities, DHARD YAW FM3 (labled boost). (screenshot) 

It would be good to get more than an hour of data, so if you see that LLO has dropped it would be awesome if you could turn this on util they are back up.  

This is just a temporary request, only for tonight or the next few days.  

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 01:08, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21831)

This is actually FM2.

I was texting with Mike to see if taking H1 out of Observation Mode (when L1 is down) for this test was OK by him, and he concurred.  This work is referenced by Work Permit #5505.  In the work permit, I see a time of 9/21-25 for Period of Activity.  So Operators can allow this activity during this time since Mike has signed off on the work permit.  (perhaps in the future, we can reference the work permit in alog entries so Operators will know this is an acceptable activity.)

I'm not totally sure about when to make the decision to preemptively turn ON this filter if we get a warning of an impending EQ.  It's not totally clear to know which types of EQ will knock us out and which won't.  I guess I can look to see if (1) Terramon gives us a RED warning, and also (2) watch 0.03-0.1um/s seismic signal for an order of magnitude increase.  Perhaps in that case I could then end Observation Mode and turn ON the filter and stay out of Observation Mode until L1 comes back.  (sorry, just trying to come up with a plan of attack in case L1 drops out)

As it stands, L1 has been locked for 10hrs, so we'll keep an eye on them.  I asked William to contact me if they drop out (but I'll also watch the FOM & GWI.stat.

edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - 10:23, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21843)

I believe that by switching this, while in 'Undisturbed', it will show as an SDF diff thereby automatically taking us to 'Commissioning' mode until the diff is accepted, the ODC Intent ready bit is Green(again) and we can once again click the intent bit to 'Undisturbed'. I asked this at the JRPC meeting yesterday.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 19:26, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21874)

Apologies for the wrong FM number, and in the future I'll try to rememver to put the WP number in the alog.   Operators can probably stop toggling this filter for now.  We will put this on the list of minor changes that we will make on maintence day, so that next tuesday it can be added to the guardian and the observe.snap, along with some HSTS bounce and roll notches. 

H1 CAL (AOS, CAL)
sudarshan.karki@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:19, Tuesday 22 September 2015 - last comment - 18:35, Wednesday 23 September 2015(21817)
Time Varying Calibration Parameters- Updates

SudarshanK, DarkhanT

We were using 137 degree of correction factor on kappa_tst on our time varying parameters calculation. (alog 21594). Darkhan found a negative sign that was placed at a wrong position in the DARM model which gave us back 180 degrees of phase. Additionally, Shivaraj found that  we were not accounting for DAQ downsampling filter used in ESD Calibration line. These two factors gave us back almost all the phase we were missing. There was also an analog antialiasing filter missing in the actuation TF that was applied in the new model. After these corrections, Darkhan created the new upated epics variable. These epics variable are committed at:

CalSVN/Runs/O1/Scripts/CAL_EPICS

Using these new epics  variable, kaapas were recalculated for LHO. For, LLO these epics variable doesnot exist yet. The new plot is attached below. The imaginary parts of all the kappa's are now close to their nominal values of 0 and real part are few percent (2-3%) from their nominal values of 1, which is within the uncertainity of the model. Cavity pole is still off from its nominal value of 341 Hz but has stayed constant over time.

The script to calculate these time varying factors is committed to SVN:

LHO: CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/ER8/H1/Scripts/CAL_PARAM/

LLO: CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/ER8/L1/Scripts/CAL_PARAM/

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 18:44, Tuesday 22 September 2015 (21821)DetChar, ISC
Recall that Stefan made changes to the OMC Power Scaling on Sunday 13 September 2015 (in the late evening PDT, which means Sept 14th UTC). One can see the difference in character (i.e. the subsequent consistency) of kappa_C after this change on Sudarshan's attached plot. 

Once can also see that, for a given lock stretch, that the change in optical gain is now more that ~2-3%. That means that ~5 [Mpc] trends we see on our 75 [Mpc] the in-spiral range, which we've seen evolve over long, 6+ hour long lock stretches, cannot be entirely attributed to optical gain fluctuations as we've been flippantly sure of, and claiming.

However, now that we've started calculating these values in the GDS pipeline (LHO aLOGs 21795 and 21812), it will be straight-forward to make comparative plots between the calculated time dependent parameters and every other IFO metric we have. And we will! You can too! Stay tuned!
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 18:35, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21871)

Just to drive the point home, I took 15 hours' worth of range and optical gain data from our ongoing 41+ hour lock. The optical gain fluctuates by a few percent, but the range fluctuates by more like 10 %.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 DCS (CAL, DCS)
gregory.mendell@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:35, Tuesday 22 September 2015 - last comment - 18:43, Wednesday 23 September 2015(21812)
Channels in the DMT (GDS) hoft frames with the strain channel and calibration factors

These are the channels in the DMT (GDS) hoft frames, which include the calibrated strain channel (H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN) and the calibration factors (the kappas):

H1:GDS-CALIB_STATE_VECTOR 16
H1:ODC-MASTER_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ 16384
H1:GDS-CALIB_STRAIN 16384
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_A_REAL 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_A_IMAGINARY 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_TST_REAL 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_TST_IMAGINARY 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_PU_REAL 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_PU_IMAGINARY 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_KAPPA_C 16
H1:GDS-CALIB_F_CC 16

These channels should be available using NDS2.

(For LLO the channels are the same with: H1-> L1.)

Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 18:43, Wednesday 23 September 2015 (21872)

I strongly suggest we add EPICS mirrors of these channels (similar to what was done for the sensemon range). This will ensure that (1) they are available in dataviewer, and (2) we have trend data of these channels. We want to be able to look at long-term (week- or month-long) fluctuations of these parameters during O1.

Displaying reports 61721-61740 of 83040.Go to page Start 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3090 3091 End