Displaying reports 63801-63820 of 77231.Go to page Start 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 End
Reports until 14:26, Monday 08 September 2014
H1 PSL
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:26, Monday 08 September 2014 (13813)
PSL Status
PSL Status: 
SysStat: Green 
Output power: 33.7w  
Frontend Watch: Good
HPO Watch: Red  

PMC:
Locked: 5 days, 1 hours, 31 minutes
Reflected power:    2.1w
Power Transmitted: 23.2w 
Total Power:       25.4w 

FSS:
Locked: 0 days, 0 hours, 25 minutes
Trans PD: 1.802v

ISS:
Diffracted power: 8.779%
Last saturation event: 4 days, 18 hours, 43 minutes  

H1 CDS (DAQ, SYS)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:14, Monday 08 September 2014 (13812)
summary of recent beckhoff windows machines problems

here is a summary of the recent windows issues we had with the Beckhoff IOCs. At today's slow controls meeting we found that the alog record was incomplete.

Thursday 28th August, 03:15PDT. h1ecatx1 rebooted after auto update. h1ecatx1plc2 came back up with bogus EPICS values. System was rebooted. Details in alog.

Tuesday 2nd September, 07:05PDT. h1ecatx1 stopped running, all EPICS data frozen. A restart was made late morning which only ran for a few minutes. System was restarted again later in the afternoon and made statble.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:02, Monday 08 September 2014 (13810)
WHAM5 ISI TFs w/ HEPI Locked/At Air -vs- HEPI Isolating/Under Vacuum; and, compared to HAM4

Attached is a plot with the HAM5 CPS magnitudes from July 18 (at air HEPI locked) and from 6 Sept when we are under vacumm and the HEPI has closed position loops.  The things we believe are SUS resonances are cleaner now and the HEPI structure modes are lowered in frequency and Q. 

The feature just below 6hz is decidedly softer than the one seen on WHAM4--see comparison in the second attached plot.  All these 'HEPI' features are positioned/shaped differently between HAMs 4 & 5.  Maybe this is external mechanical and I should give everything a good hand-on look-see.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:49, Monday 08 September 2014 (13811)
HAM6 turbo crash
~0915 - 0930 hrs. local 

The HAM6 turbo and its scroll backing pump were accidentally de-energized this morning resulting in the maglev turbo "crashing" onto its emergency bearings -> Chris M. was cleaning the floor near where the pumps were plugged in and accidentally tugged/shifted the shared power cord causing it to lose electrical connection -> I was in the LVEA at the time and heard the "characteristic" sound of the non-levitated turbo spinning down from 48,000 rpm on its unlubricated bearings (not unlike a steel garbage can full of rocks rolling down a steep hill) -> I was able to isolate HAM6 while the rotor was still spinning -> Both of the in-series foreline safety valves worked as intended and the scroll pump was isolated upon the loss of AC -> I was able to restart the pumps without difficulty and was able to resume pumping after ~15 total down time -> HAM6's pressure was perturbed with the loss of pumping and saw a pressure rise from 1 x 10-6 torr to 6.5 x 10-6 torr while the pump was isolated  

This is the second "crash" of this turbo due to loss of power.  This first happened years ago and was also the result of a "wiggled" power cord.  Back then the power cord to the pump cart was removable via an unreliable 1/4-turn twist lock connector.  As a result of this first crash the twist lock connector was abandoned in favor of permanently terminating the cord internal to the cart's control box.  

Note to others:  

Are energized PZTs in HAM6 vulnerable to rough vacuum?  If so, are there protection systems?
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:21, Monday 08 September 2014 (13809)
WHAM5 ISI TF w/ & w/o SUS Damping

There are a few features in the ISI TFs around the resonances of HAM5 but not seen on HAM4.  Jeff suggested TFs with the SUS off.  Attached is the result.  The only thing that stands out without deeper study is a small feature at ~1.5hz on V1.

I reran the TFs completed Saturday but with only 1/4 the averages and just between 0.5 & 5hz.  And, Kiwamu turned the SUS damping back on for the last 15 minutes or so.  This should only affect the V3 results.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
nicolas.smith@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:20, Monday 08 September 2014 (13808)
Near term OMC plans

Nic, Dan

Here is a short checklist outlining the short term plan for the OMC. Many of these times require interferometer time so will need to be coordinated with other activities.

  • Due to the new TT actuation matrix, we must recommission the dither alignment servos.
  • Do the tests/characterization described in Zach’s OMC manifesto elog.
    • Compile OLGs of all servos in their desired state.
    • OMC transmitted noise should be characterized, a good reference for the RIN incident on the OMC will be IFO-REFL (the ISS isn’t working right now).
    • OMC length noise has not been measured yet, this one seems like a high priority.
H1 AOS (ISC, SUS)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:43, Monday 08 September 2014 (13807)
BS oplev not great again

Sheila, Alexa, Kiwamu

Even though we swapped the oplev laser for BS recently. The BS optical level laser power started showing another power modulation, which resulted in kicks on BS through the damping loops.

For now, we recentered the beam on the QPD to reduce the intensity coupling.

The power modulation looks more like a step which randomly shows up as a function time as shown in the attached screenshot. The modulation depth is roughly 1%. This was actually big enough to cause BS angle agitation which was visible at the dark port digital camera. The coupling seemed bigger in the horizontal direction presumably due to a bigger off-centering in the horizontal direction on the QPD. After the re-center, the coupling seemed to have become lesser, but it is still kicking BS in its angle. This needs to be fixed.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:36, Monday 08 September 2014 (13806)
REFL WFS tuning; REFL_A_RF not good

Alexa, Kiwamu ( a report from this past Friday)

We started checking out the REFL WFSs again. The misssion of the day is to engage the DC centering servos and check out the demod phases.

(REFL WFS DC centering servos)

We applied some modifications on the DC centering servo so that the servo basis REFL_A and REFL_B QPD signals. This had been adjusted to be some other basis (alog 9966), but we wanted a simpler basis. The attached is a screenshot of the new centering servo configuration. The input matrices are simple diagonal matrices so that the servo basis is simply REFL_A and REFL_B. In order to actuate on those basis through RM1 and RM2, we did some algebra based on the number reported in the previous alog (alog 9966). After the adjustment, we tuned up the gains to have a few second impulse repose time scale in every servo loop. Also, the sign of the output matrix were chosen such that all the servo gain consistently has negative sign.

 

(REFL_A_RF9 looked not great)

While we could easily re-adjust the demodulation phases on REFL_B_RF9, we could not perfectly adjut the demod phase on segment 1 of REFL_A_RF9. In addition, segment 4 of REFL_A_RF9 showed no reliable signals. This looked as if a cable was unplugged or something. Indeed the noise floor of segment 4 was lower than everyone else. We need to check REFL_A_RF9 at some point.

We did not check RF45 because we ran out the commissioning time.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:27, Monday 08 September 2014 (13805)
08:15 Meeting Minutes
   With installation ramping down, Vern will be chairing the morning meeting for the Detector Group. Meetings will be on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, starting at 08:30.

OpLevs – Need laser safe to continue work on HAM5. 
               Ongoing alignment and problem resolution work at ITMX and ITMY. 
               Glitches with the BS OpLev laser are being looked into.

Seismic – Continuing work on ITMX control loops stability.
                Commissioning on the various HAM HEPIs.
 
Electrical – Pulling cables and power distribution configuration in the LVEA. 
                  Work on the Chiller 3 tripping problem. 
                  Reconnecting Staging Building fire system to the alarm distribution panel in the OSB 
		 
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:53, Monday 08 September 2014 (13804)
WHAM ISI TF running w/ SRM & SR3 Undamped ~ 4 hrs

Some features in TF we'd like to confirm are SUS peaks.  Will desist if needed.

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:04, Monday 08 September 2014 (13803)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Sunday 7th September 2014

model restarts logged for Sun 07/Sep/2014
2014_09_07 12:28 h1fw1

unexpected restart of h1fw1

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:42, Sunday 07 September 2014 (13802)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Saturday 6th September 2014

no restarts reported

H1 ISC
nicolas.smith@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:06, Saturday 06 September 2014 - last comment - 17:44, Saturday 06 September 2014(13799)
Installed new OMC alignment matrices

The matrices described in 13703 were installed. This caused a noticable improvement in the shape of the QPD alignment OLGs. They are now more clearly a clean 1/f shape.

I also tuned the OMC LSC demod phase and set the gain for a 80Hz UGF. (This was done by opening the LSC loop and sitting on the side of a resonance and tuning the phase until the Q signal was 0)

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 17:44, Saturday 06 September 2014 (13800)

I suppose the matrices Nic used are the ones described in T1400585

There is some factor adjustment from the one in ALOG 13703 such that we now have the servo inputs calibrated in um and urad for POS and ANG.

H1 ISC (ISC)
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:27, Saturday 06 September 2014 - last comment - 14:42, Monday 08 September 2014(13797)
OMC scan - single bounce ITMY
Nic, Jamie, Lisa

With the QPD alignment engaged, we did a scan of the OMC in ITMY single bounce configuration. Data are being sent to Koji right now for a careful analysis, but our rough estimate is that indeed the matching to the OMC is around 90%, so slightly better than for ITMX, as expected. 

Scan data: Sep 9, 2014 21:10:08 - 21:12:00 UTC
Comments related to this report
nicolas.smith@LIGO.ORG - 14:34, Saturday 06 September 2014 (13798)

Screenshot of the scan data. Koji will post a more complete analysis (a la 13767)

Images attached to this comment
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 00:01, Sunday 07 September 2014 (13801)

I don't know if Lisa, Nic, and Jamie believe this or not, the mode matching was 0.82 for this scan, which was indeed worse than the result with ITMY.
Note that this mismatch still includes the effect of the misalignment. This scan involved more 1st order mode.

Should we just incorporate the 1st order into the 0th order, qualitatively to saying? In this assumption, both arms are not so different.

Carrier Mode X arm (mA) Yarm (mA)
0th 13.13 9.15
1st 0.088 0.28
2nd 1.65 1.25



1 - 2nd/(0th+1st) 0.88 0.87

Here are the result of the mode decomposition for the Y arm

Carrier  
Order mA
0 9.153
1 0.28
2 1.251
3 0.102
4 0.264
5 0.0192
6 0.04144
7 0.02544
8 0.0108
   
Upper sidebands (45MHz)
Order mA
0 0.319
1 0.005
2 0.0294
3 0.004
4 0.0065
   
Lower sidebands (45MHz)
Order mA
0 0.318
1 0.005
2 0.0297
3 0.004
4 0.0065
   
2nd order Upper sidebands (90MHz)
Order mA
0 0.0021
1 0.00002
2 0.00075
   
2nd order Lower sidebands (90MHz)
Order mA
0 0.0021
1 0.00002
2 0.00075
   
Upper sidebands (9MHz)
Order mA
0 0.13
1 0.0026
2 0.012
3 0.0012
4 0.0035
   
Lower sidebands (9MHz)
Order mA
0 0.13
1 0.0026
2 0.012
3 0.0012
4 0.0035
   
Sidebands of sidebands
(+/-9MHz+/-45MHz) mA
-54 0.002
-36 0.002
36 0.002
54 0.002
Carrier TEM00 9.15 mA
Carrier TEMnm 1.99 mA
Sideband   1.04 mA
       
Mode matching  0.821  

Here "mode matching" is defined by 1-(CR_TEMnm / CR_TEM00)

Non-image files attached to this comment
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 14:42, Monday 08 September 2014 (13814)ISC
Yes, that makes sense to me. Once the dither is working we can make more precise measurements. But I guess the point is that the mismatch is around 10%, and we don't see a significant asymmetry between X and Y as in L1. 
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:53, Saturday 06 September 2014 (13796)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Friday 5th September 2014

no restarts reported

H1 ISC (ISC)
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:14, Saturday 06 September 2014 (13795)
PRMI carrier success, but only in principle
Alexa, Sheila, Kiwamu, Nic, Jamie, Lisa

After some ITMX ISI work, PRY initial alignment work and more Guardian work, variable finesse technology has been used to bring the PRMI close to the dark fringe. This time the normalization of the error signals is done with POPAIR_A. The success is only in principle because once we arrived at the final step to transition to RF for MICH, an earthquake sadly hit us..the bad timing of this earthquake is unbelievable (#%$#&*&!). 
The positive news is that with this new alignment the recycling gain is somewhat higher than before. We don't have precise measurements because we haven't really locked stably on the dark fringe yet, but we think we had a recycling gain around 10 at some point during the MICH offset reduction sequence when the alignment was good.

Jim's ITMX ISI measurements are about to start, and they will last until tomorrow around lunch time.
Displaying reports 63801-63820 of 77231.Go to page Start 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 End