Spare optic SRM07 arrived at LHO yesterday from LLO, after prisms were bonded to it's sides (see LLO alog 71969 for details). After inspecting the optic in bonding lab, I started preparing for bonding the magnet-standoff on the AR side. At first I prepared 8-10 magnet-standoff of both north and south polarity. The magnets were glued to the standoffs using Masterbond EP-30 - as per assembly drawing D0902432_V2.
The optic with AR side facing up (arrow at the top of the optic points towards the HR side) was placed on the gluing jig and aligned with the scribe lines. Once the edge of the optic was well aligned with the jig, metal plungers with the magnet-standoffs were inserted inside (the jig) - after applying the Masterbond EP-30 to the bottom tip of the standoffs using a pin (for reference see pic here). This set up was left for curing for 24hrs approximately, following which the jigs were removed. Given below are the details with pictures for reference,
- SRM07 arrived at LHO in pelican case - image01.
- optic inside the transport can - image02
- optic placed on the optical bench for inspection - image03
- Metal jig were placed on top of the AR side of the optic and aligned with the scribe lines and the optic edge (locked with stops having silica tip ends)- image04
- magnet-standoffs with plungers inserted into the jigs - image05
- magnet standoff prepared in lab - image06
- jigs removed and SRM07 with magnets glued to its AR side is visible - image07 and image08
- Optic with labels showing the four magnets and their polarity - image09 - see controls arrangement poster for reference.
Tagging for EPO.
Looks like there is visible damage on the KTP optic of the OFI.
TBC...
Betsy, Sheila, TJ, Mitchell, Camilla
On second inspection, after TJ and Mitch removed some of the OFI shroud 79227, you can clearly see two crater holes in the KTP wedge on the input (SRM) sideG2100316 OFI doc. The output (OMC) side of the KTP wedge looked smooth. Photo and photo.
There is splatter on the Fused Silica wedge optic, holder and surrounding beam dumps facing the KTP crater holes. Photo and photo. Maybe there was more splatters on the KTP holder too.
Photos of the SRM AR surface looked fine, but it was hard to see: photo
Zoomed out photos of the OFI with shroud removed to aid with planning: here and here.
Additional photos from everyone on googledrive here.
Attached is a view looking through the OFI from the SRM side back towards HAM6. As well as the two crater spots, you can see the black dots of splatter on the FS wedge.
Tagging for EPO.
WP 11989
With HAM6 and HAM7 vented, the Fast Shutter, OMC PZT, PSAM and HAM7 Piezo were powered on. Both high voltage interlock chassis are bypassed from the vacuum interlock system. Shortening plugs were installed to enable the power supplies to turn on. This will need to be removed before pump down. WP will be left open.
The fast shutter chassis in ISC-R3 is powered on but the enable HV switch needs to be toggled up. See attached picture.
Fil, Dave:
Fil tested the corner station ITMY, ITMX HWWDs by disconnecting one of the satellite amp input connectors for a few seconds on each. The HWWDs went into LED-low-current mode (8) as expected.
We performed this test because over the past week ITMY and ETMX HWWDs have been very quiet, whereas ITMX and ETMY remain noisy. I cannot find any correlation in the main mass top drives signals and these quiet times.
At Jims recommendation, I put the corner station ISIs into damped around 17:45 UTC. HAMs 2, 3, 4, and BSCs 1, 2, 3.
Fil, Camilla WP11987
Fil labeled and then we removed the AS Air and OMC Trans Cameras form HAM6 +X Door. They are being stored on the metal racks in the SQZ bay. Plastic guillotines were inserted before removal and yellow VP covers install.
I have investigated the gradual increase of the BNS range from ~140 Mpc just after relocking, to ~160 Mpc a few hours after the relock by comparing the coherence between the CAL_DELTAL_EXTERNAL_DQ channel and the SUS, ASC and LSC channels to look for repeating patterns.
I have found that the LSC_SRCL_OUT_DQ channel shows a systematic decrease in coherence in the 20-50 Hz band from just after the relock to when the range has stabilized at ~160 Mpc. This is mirrored by an increase of the BNS-range count in the OAF_RANGE_BAND_3 in the hours just after relocking.
The attached plots show the coherence difference between a time at which the BNS range was at 140 Mpc, in red, and the time at which the BNS range has stabilized at 160 Mpc, in blue, for the four relocks on the 7th of July 2024. I also attached time series plots of the BLRMs for the same time period.
FAMIS 25999
This CPS Spectra was ran after the vent on 2024-07-18.
Thu Jul 18 08:04:50 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 4min 47secs
Jordan confirmed a good fill curbside.
TITLE: 07/18 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Corrective Maintenance
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.09 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is in MAINTENANCE for VENTING
Getting ready for an 8:30 meeting detailing plans for the vent this week and beyond.
Other:
*H1:PEM-CS_DUST_PSL102 WARNING: dust counts did not change, please investigate
Jason, Ibrahim, Dave:
We verified that the PSL102 dust monitor is not communicating with the EPICS IOC and most probably needs a power cycle of the dust monitor to restore it. Jason is scheduling an incursion into the PSL enclosure for this, and in the mean time we will continue to run without this dust monitor The last good reading from PSL102 was 9th July 2024.
Late entry from yesterday (7-16): The Kobelco (corner station purge air supply) was switched on at 4 pm. It needs to run at least 12 hrs before vent Today's activities: - The purge air dew point was measured: Right tower (11 am) -42.1 deg C; left tower (11 am) -43.4 deg C; the dew point at the purge port before venting (4:10 pm) -42.2 deg C - Particle counts of the purge air before venting (4 pm; 3 l/min flow rate): 0 pcs. of 5 um or larger particles - The following GVs were closed: GV1, GV2, RV-1, RV-2, FCV-1, FCV-2, FCV-3, FCV-4, and GV5 soft closed (see explanation below) - All the adjacent Ion pumps (IP1, IP2, IP3, IP4, IP14) were valved out - The OMC RGA was valved out, and now is being pumped by an aux cart - The Y-manifold Turbo was switched on and valved in, in order to hold the pressure between GV1 and GV5 - The vent started at 16:15, and lasted until 19:30. This means an overall ~3.9 Torr/min pressure rise, which is a nice slow vent. We hit some ~8 Torr overpressure, and then blew the volume down The reason behind the soft close of GV5: because CP1 is most likely saturated, or at least only has some reduced pumping performance, after closing GV1 and GV2, the pressure of the Y-arm started to rise (notice, that after the close of these 2 GVs, the X-arm CPs were not able to aid the Y-arm CPs). Therefore, the pressure in the Y-manifold started to drop, and the pressure at CP1 (PT-114, PT124) started to raise: this phenomenon would have gone until equilibrium. To avoid the pressure rise of the Y-arm, we soft-closed GV5, and valved in the Y-manifold turbo. This helped, as the pressures are stabilizing now at all areas. This also shows now undeniably, that the pumping performance of CP1 is seriously reduced, and definitely needs regeneration. And, this also explains the relatively high pressures at LHO's corner (notice, that before the vent it was in the low E-8s, while at LLO it is in the mid-low E-9s). Tomorrow, some graphs will be added as a comment in this topic. The pressures: - Corner: atmosphere - Y-manifold: 2.9E-8 Torr - CP1: 4E-9 Torr - CP2: 5.4E-9
TITLE: 07/17 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Corrective Maintenance
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: MAINTENANCE
Wind: 17mph Gusts, 13mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is DOWN and in CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE - VENTING
With maximum sarcasm, I report that it's been a slow day. Here's a rough rundown:
The vent plan can be found at E2400260
Other:
EY Intelli-site network down (Fil contacting contractors)
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14:58 | FAC | Kim, Nelly | LVEA | N | Technical Cleaning in prep for vent | 19:14 |
14:58 | FAC | Karen | Optics Lab, Vac Prep Lab | N | Technical Cleaning | 15:13 |
15:20 | FAC | Chris | LVEA | N | Tech cleaning tops of HAM 5,6,7 | 16:57 |
15:39 | FAC | Tyler, Erik | FCES, LVEA | N | Forklift from FCES to HAM5, 6 | 16:39 |
15:39 | FAC | Richard | LVEA | N | Checking on Vent Prep Work | 15:42 |
15:48 | EE | Fil | EY | N | Network Access Work | 16:48 |
17:35 | sus | corey | cr | - | ZM6.OM2 TFs | 21:24 |
18:33 | VAC | Travis, Jordan | LVEA | N | Gate Valves | 19:33 |
18:34 | VAC | Janos | LVEA | N | Gate Valves | 19:34 |
18:34 | OPS | TJ | LVEA | N | Parts check | 19:14 |
20:53 | EE | Fil | LVEA | N | Turning High Voltage Off | 21:26 |
20:54 | VAC | Travis, Jordan | LVEA | N | Viewport Checks | 20:54 |
21:02 | VAC | Janos, Travis, Jordan | LVEA | N | Closing Gate Valve 5 | 22:02 |
21:18 | EE | Fil | MY | N | Drop off part | 22:18 |
21:35 | FAC | Chris | Lvea | N | HAM7 | 21:35 |
22:55 | AOS | TJ | Optics Lab | N | Gathering AUX Optics | 23:55 |
As part of the TF A-Team, SR2 and SR3 TFs can be found here under today's date - 07-17-2024
SR2:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SR2/SAGM1/Data
SRM:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SRM/SAGM1/Data
PDFs to be posted, edited, commented in soon.
Find attached both the TF Model Comparisons and the ALL_TF Model and Previous Measurements Comparisons
allhsts comparisons: /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/Common/Data
SRM All_TFs: /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SRM/SAGM1/Results
SR2 ALL_TFs: /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SR2/SAGM1/Results
SUMMARY: Transfer Functions COMPLETED for ZM6, OM1, & OM2. Leaving in DAMPED guardian state for vent. Will post matlab plots in a comment to this alog later.
Joined team of others (Ibrahim, Jeff, Rahul, RyanC) in getting SUSpension transfer functions in preparation for upcoming vent. We split up the work amongst us. I took on ZM6, OM1 and OM2.
7/18/24 Update NOTE: OM3 measured by Ryan C, OMC measured by Rahul. Their results are posted in a comments below!
Instructions for this work is at: https://awiki.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/wiki/Suspensions/OpsManual/TFs/DTT
For TODAY, this is what I did:
Here are the locations of the files noted above:
Will leave all of these SUSpensions in their DAMPING guardian state (vs ALIGNED).
I ran the first analysis code for the OMs.
Attached are the Matlab-generated plots for ZM6 (with measurements I ran yesterday).
(Ryan already made the plots for OM1 & OM2 which I measured yesterday--Thanks!)
I should note this was my first time running through this procedure for taking SUS transfer functions. I had a few issues which came up (mainly svn-related), but got through some of this yesterday with Jeff's help, and Erik helped me this morning with other svn issues, but for these issues, I opted to not run an SVN update since there was a note for a "conflict". So I skipped the svn steps for plotting.
The Latest H1SUSZM6_M1_ALL_TFs.pdf is now availible
If you want to know where this lives on the CDS machines it can be found here:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HXDS/H1/ZM6/SAGM1/Results
I have taken the in-vacuum measurements for OMC (HAM6) and they look great - see screenshots attached below.
Travis requested that the cell phone alarms for BSC2 vacuum gauge be turned off for the duration of the vent. I have removed the PT120 pressure and error channels from the alarms system and restarted the systemd alarms.service on cdslogin.
Channels removed are:
H0:VAC-LY_Y1_PT120B_PRESS_TORR
H0:VAC-LY_Y1_PT120B_PRESS_TORR_ERROR
Ditto for HAM6
H0:VAC-LX_Y0_PT110_MOD1_PRESS_TORR
H0:VAC-LX_Y0_PT110_MOD1_PRESS_TORR_ERROR
The seismic state of HAM5 during this measurement was, ISI_DAMPED_HEPI_OFFLINE and the HEPI was locked yesterday. I put SR3 to DAMPED, made sure the damping outputs were off and the TEST outputs were on. Overall it looks fairly close to the model.
On Roll I saw an extra peak around ~1.04 Hz, and Verticle around ~1.5 Hz (cross coupling from yaw?).
The templates are saved at /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HLTS/H1/SR3/SAGM1/Data
Daniel, Sheila
We turned off the 9 Mhz, 45 MHz, and 117 MHz sidebands in order to do an OMC loss measurement. We used a single bounce beam off of ITMX, with 10W input from the PSL. We spent some time trying to improve the alignment before making OMC scans.
locked: 1370711576 (OMC REFL avg 3.51mW, OMC DCPD sum 15.23mA)
unlocked: 1370711782 (OMC REFL avg 24.73 mW, OMC DCPD sum 0.078 mA)
OMC scan start: 1370712036 duration 100 seconds (2nd order modes are roughly 8% of the 00 mode).
shutter blocked: 1370712337 (OMC REFL avg -0.030 DCPD SUM 8e-4 mA).
Jennie Wright plans to analyze this data to estimate OMC losses.
Here are the plots of ASC-AS_C_NSUM, OMC-QPD_A_NSUM, OMC-QPD_B_NSUM and OMC-REFL_A_LF, during these measurements. ASC-AS_C_NSUM shows between 22.8 and 32.1mW, OMC-QPD_A_NSUM 23.4mW, OMC-QPD_B_NSUM 23.0mW, and OMC-REFL_A_LF 24.8mW. According to Keita OMC-REFL_A_DC has an incorrect calibration and shows 25.2mW. The average of the 2 QPDs would be 23.2mW, which is about 6.5% lower than 24.8mW.
Second screen shots shows a time when the IMC was unlocked. The DC offsets are in the 10s of uW at most.
Using data from the scan I adapted labutils/OMCscan class to plot the fitted scan and adapted labutils/fit_two_peaks.py to fit a sum of two lorentzians functions for distinguishing carrier 20/02 modes.
The first graph is the OMC scan plot, the second is the curvefit for the second order carrier modes.
We expect the HOM spacing to be 0.588 MHz as per this entry and DCC T1500060 Table 25.
The spacing for the modes measured is 0.592 MHz.
From the heights of the two peaks this suggests mode-mismatch of the OMC to be C02+C20/C00 = (0.83+1.158)/(15.32+0.83+1.158) = 11.0% mode mis-match.
From the locked/unlocked powers on the OMC REFL PD the visibility on resonance is 1-(3.51+0.03/24.73+0.03) = 85.7% visibility.
If the total loss is 14.3%, this implies that the other non mode-matching losses are roughly 1.3%.
To run the OMC scan code go to
/ligo/gitcommon/labutils/omc_scan/
and run
python OMCscan_nosidebands.py 1370712036 100 "Sidebands off, 10W input" "single bounce" --verbose --make_plot -o 2
in the labutils conda environment and on git branch dev.
To do the double peak fitting run:
python fit_two_peaks_no_sidebands.py
in the labutils conda environment and on git branch dev.
These scans were done with OM2 cold.
For comparison with new OMC measurements I used Sheila's code to process the visibility, but updated dit to use nds2utils instead of gwpy as I was having trouble using it to get data.
The code is attached and should be run in the nds2utils conda environment on the CDS workstations.
Power on refl diode when cavity is off resonance: 24.757 mW
Incident power on OMC breadboard (before QPD pickoff): 25.239 mW
Power on refl diode on resonance: 3.525 mW
Measured effiency (DCPD current/responsivity if QE=1)/ incident power on OMC breadboard: 70.4 %
assumed QE: 100 %
power in transmission (for this QE) 17.760 mW
HOM content infered: 13.472 %
Cavity transmission infered: 82.111 %
predicted efficiency () (R_inputBS * mode_matching * cavity_transmission * QE): 70.367 %
omc efficency for 00 mode (including pick off BS, cavity transmission, and QE): 81.323 %
round trip loss: 1605 (ppm)
Finesse: 371.769