Displaying reports 64821-64840 of 77211.Go to page Start 3238 3239 3240 3241 3242 3243 3244 3245 3246 End
Reports until 10:45, Tuesday 15 July 2014
LHO General (PEM)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:45, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12753)
EX Newer Dust Monitors and New Code

NOTE to Operators (and others)

With the EX Chamber work, there have been a pair of new Dust Monitors installed (along with new code, alog12738).  Unfortunately, the Dust Monitor signals aren't connected to alarms, and do not come up on the main EX Dust Monitor Screens.  You can find out counts on these Dust Monitors by bringing up their Expert Screens.  So, we will want to look at these screens every  now and then. 

The Dust Monitors work locally, so those doing in-chamber work should be mindful of any audible alarms (if any) the Dust Monitors may give.

H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:33, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12752)
ITMy CP-AR FirstContact removed

Travis, Betsy

In prep for the PSL alignment check off of ITMy, we pulled the First Contact sheet from the CP-AR surface.

H1 AOS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:32, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12751)
BSC1-BSC2 dam removed

Since IAS finished taking this morning's alignment measurements, Travis and I went into BSC1 and dropped the dam that was standing between BSC1 and BSC2.  It is currently laying under the ITMy QUAD in the chamber in the event we need it again soon.

H1 AOS (INS, SUS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:07, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12750)
WBSC1 ITMy Alignment
IAS: D. Cook, J. Oberling
SUS: B. Weaver, T. Sadecki
 
After yesterday's alignment work, we did one final check on the ITMy this morning before the hand off for the output arm work.  The ITMy alignment errors are currently:

It should be noted that the pitch is without the 352 µrad correction for the First Contact currently on the HR face of the ITMy; this will have to be corrected for after the output arm work, in addition to the yaw and the X axis position.  Also, I applied a +40 yaw bias to the ITMy.  This zeros the yaw in our alignment equipment (the current slider calibration is a little off).

H1 CDS (SEI, SUS, SYS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:33, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12749)
ETMY safe.snaps captured before RCG 2.9 upgrade
J. Kissel

In prep for the RCG 2.9 upgrade of EY, I've captured all relevant safe.snaps:
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/models/h1susetmy_safe.snap
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/models/h1sustmsy_safe.snap
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/models/h1isietmy_safe.snap
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/models/h1hpietmy_safe.snap

and committed them to the userapps repository. 

All components listed above have been left in their offline state.
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:51, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12748)
Morning Installation Meeting Minutes
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:58, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12746)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Monday 14th July 2014

no restarts reported.

H1 AOS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:56, Monday 14 July 2014 (12745)
H1 SUS OFI Resonance Characterization -- Medium to Low Success
J. Kissel, D. Hoak, A. Pele, G. Merano

Spearheaded by my blind hopes of obtaining measurements of all 6 resonant modes of the suspended bench of the H1 SUS OFI -- an otherwise abandoned suspension, to confirm / refine the recently developed OFIS model -- Arnaud, Dan and Gerardo helped me construct various configurations of a (clean) laser pointer (literally a laser pointer) and an old QPD as a crude shadow sensor / optical lever. The normalized amplitude spectral densities are attached. I was able to confirm the two of the three modes already measured (Long and Vert -- see LHO aLOG 12588), but the only new mode I could get (without hours more pain, and MUCH better equipment / hardware) was the Yaw mode (which did at least roughly agree with the 1.1 [Hz] yaw mode from the model as it currently stands). Unfortunately, as we've learned from every other suspension, the Pitch and Roll modes are those which constrain the model the best. I did not reconfirm the mode's Qs. 

Ah well. Details and pictures below.

The lack of mode frequency and Q should not hold up close-out of this chamber, but as a last ditch effort, we should at least try to get this information from 3IFO's OFI.

-----------
Details:
Measured Resonances:
L* - 0.6306 or 0.6263 [Hz] (15 [mHz] or 7 [mHz] bin width, Configuration 2 & 1, respectively)
V  - ~1.05 [Hz]  (7.5 [mHz] b.w., Config. 3, noisy and low-Q)  
Y  - 1.058 or 1.084 [Hz]  (15 [mHz]  b.w., and Config 2 or 3, respectively) 
* the L and T mode are virtually degenerate and given the spew of light and iffy spot on the QPD, this could be either.

See attached images for configuration descriptions. I was pretty limited given the clean hardware and table space I had as to how and where I could reflect or shadow light. Very few of the surfaces at the beam / QPD heights I had were reflective, and there were only a few bolt-holts that allowed for a good beam-to-QPD path. Not to mention the quality of the beam coming out of the laser pointer was garbage, the QPD only read out one DOF (the X channel was reported twice out of the preamp #facepalm), and ambient motion was just barely enough to get the first three modes above the noise floor of the QPD at its maximum gain setting (used in config 2 and 3). If this ever needs measuring again (say if the 25 [Hz] modes appear in DARM from some second-order dirt effect) we should really think about the measurement technique.
 
Thanks again to Gerardo, Dan, and Arnaud for their help!
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 AOS (DetChar, SEI)
jess.mciver@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:21, Monday 14 July 2014 - last comment - 21:32, Monday 14 July 2014(12743)
H1 SEI ETMY set to level 2 isolation

Hugh R, Jess M 

 

As of  00:53:00 UTC July 15, the ETMY chamber was in the following configuration: 

Please leave ETMY in level 2 isolation until 8am tomorrow (if it hasn't tripped by then)

 

Today Hugh and I spent the afternoon trying to get EMTY stably into level 2 isolation. For stage 1, Hugh brought up the DOFs one by one, and we discovered a giant peak in the actuator output signal (and the L4Cs) in all DOFs at 738Hz as the X DOF gain approached 1. (Giant = most of the actuator power spikes at that high frequency right before the ST1 actuators trips.) We're not sure what might cause this, but it's very reproducible and we plan to look into it later this week. 

We noticed a small peak in the open loop transfer function at about the same frequency, and the level 2 isolation filter gain is much higher than levels 1 or 3 in this very high frequency range.  (See attached.) 

As for stage 2, we had no trouble using the control script to bring it up to level 2 with the Start blend, but sometimes it would trip on the actuators shortly after and we couldn't switch the blend for any DOF without tripping (also on the actuators). 

 

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 21:32, Monday 14 July 2014 (12744)
I attach the .pdf of the loop design for reference. 

In doing so I noticed two things:
- Why are we allowing gain peaking of 4+? I thought we'd agreed never to design a loop with gain peaking of more than 2ish?
- The prediction of the minimum phase margin is busted. I was about to be saddened by a phase margin of 20.8 [deg] (again, I thought we'd agreed that no less than 35 to 40 [deg] phase margin is acceptable) BUT it turns out the phase margin is 41.9 [deg] at the upper unity gain frequency. So, at least the loop is still stable, but hopefully the designer didn't accept the phase margin of 21 [deg] as stable and move on...

Regarding the 738 [Hz] resonance -- what's our high-frequency roll-off policy? Seems like still having high-frequency features at a loop gain of 0.2 is treacherous, especially when the feature is close enough to the Nyquist frequency that the *measurement* amplitude (perhaps not the real amplitude) falls off deceivingly because of the DAQ's down sampling filter. Can we not just toss in pole at ~300 [Hz] where it would cost us little in phase margin, but alleviate the worries of this high-frequency non-sense? 

I think perhaps, now that the era of "OMG we need to get every platform commissioned yesterday!" is over, we should consider dropping these automated scripts and going back to looking at the loop design in detail, understanding the compromises we've made there, and making sure it all makes sense. 
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:53, Monday 14 July 2014 (12742)
WBSC10 ETMY HEPI Pump Station Stops with Overvoltage Error at VFD

On Sunday ~1957utc, the VFD on the HEPI Pump Controller at ETMY registered an overvoltage error (OV3) and shut down its output.  The servo was fine, the fluid level was fine.  This OV3 error has occurred before at various pump stations but not too frequently, a few times a year maybe.  No issues getting it back on using the documented procedure.

H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:40, Monday 14 July 2014 - last comment - 18:52, Tuesday 15 July 2014(12740)
ITMy Main Chain alignment in BSC1

Today, Travis and I worked on aligning the main chain of the ITMy QUAD to IAS tolerances.  We first tackled some coarse yaw, then used pushers to push the structure in the +x direction to fix a ~3mm error in the lateral position of the optic.  (Some of this error was due to misplacement the first time we set this QUAD on this ISI.)  We then continued on pitch and more yaw and have finished the day with the optic within tolerance in position and pointing.  We will start transfer functions to check for the suspension health, but will likely hand off to SR3 output alignment checks with the PSL beam before continuing on with this QUAD.  (We have not touched the reaction chain yet, other than to clamp it out of the way of the main chain.)

Comments related to this report
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 17:41, Monday 14 July 2014 (12741)
Undamped/damped transfer functions were started on opsws1 and will run overnight
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 18:52, Tuesday 15 July 2014 (12771)
The main chain of ITMy was free of rubbing as of this morning, cf attached results
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SUS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:21, Monday 14 July 2014 (12739)
HAM 2 SUS Ground Loop Checking
Checked the following cables for possible shorts. 


PRM TOP (Cable 10 air side) - Found short on Pin 13 to chamber ground. Andres inspected cabling and saw no obvious short. He removed aluminum foil cable tie on table and short disappeared. Could not reproduce short.

PRM RIGHT and SIDE (Cable 11 air side) - Did not find any short to chamber.

PRM Middle (Cable 31 air side) - Found short on Pin 13 to chamber ground. Traced in-vacuum cable to feedthru. Short appears when you move the cable going into the connector. Will need to repair or replace cable.

MC3 Middle  (Cable 25 air side) - Found short on Pin 13 to chamber ground. Andres inspected cabling and saw no obvious short. He removed aluminum foil cable tie on table and short disappeared. Could not reproduce short.

Filiberto C. / Andres R.
H1 PEM (CDS)
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:11, Monday 14 July 2014 (12738)
New dust monitor code running for EX
New preliminary dust monitor code is running to support Met One GT-521S dust monitors at EX. There are 2 monitors that are supported by the code, and it works better if they are not turned off or disconnected.  If they need to be moved, contact Jim Batch to make sure they get started and data continues to flow.

The following EPICS channels are available for monitor 1:
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_300NM_PCF
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_500NM_PCF
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_300NM_RAW
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_500NM_RAW
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_ACTSAMPLETIME
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_DATESTR
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_TIMESTR
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_UNIXTIME
H0:PEM-EX_DUST_VEA1_STATESTR

Monitor 2 has the same channels with VEA2.

Note that the sample time is programmed into the dust monitor at 20 seconds, with a hold time of 300 seconds.  These values are not changeable from the control room with the present software.  Also, these are two channel devices, and only count 300nm and 500nm particles.  
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Monday 14 July 2014 (12729)
Ops DAY Summary

 

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:58, Monday 14 July 2014 (12737)
Kyle, Gerardo -> Hard Closed GV20 -> slow venting X-end


			
			
H1 SUS (AOS, COC, INS, IOO, SYS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:30, Monday 14 July 2014 (12735)
Beam Go Through OFI Hole (Again)
A. Pele, K. Izumi, J. Kissel

After unlocking ITMX and pulling the first contact from SRM, we wanted to re-check our report of finding the IFO beam going through the HAM5 OFI. I outline the process below, but in summary, we have found an alignment that again gets the beam through the OFI, but with the beam mis-centered in YAW at SRM with +200 [urad] YAW offset on SR2 ~16 [m] away. Below are the alignment deltas from what we had in DRMI, i.e. pre-vent. We can be comforted in that the alignment change of the input chains are all ~0.5 [mrad] in P and Y, and within the range of the alignment sliders. This gives us confidence that IAS values for the new ITMX are quite good, and we should have only to do a similar amount of effort to get the Y-ARM beam also to go through the OFI hole.

Attached are pictures from the morning's activity, as well as a cartoon drawing of how the alignment into the OFI changes between an SR2 Y offset of -800 [urad] (clipping on input) vs. -600 [urad] (centered). The coordinate system drawn to the left the cartoon is global IFO coordinates. Finally, a screenshot of the alignments for all SUS.

Alignment Deltas:

     Pre-vent [urad]             Now [urad]          Diff [urad]
        P       Y              P         Y         P         Y
MC1   +1254   -2366.0     +1254.0    -2366.0    (none)    (none)
MC3   -550.0  -2467.0      -550.0    -2557.0    (none)      -90.0
IM1      0.0  +1469.0         0.0    +3786.1    (none)    +2317.1
IM2  +4600.0  +2000.0    +35849.3    +5154.7   +31249.3   +3154.7
IM3  -1397.9  +1060.8    +14057.0    +5464.0   +15454.9   +4403.2
IM4  -2350.0  -3607.0    -30000.0    -9337.0   -27650.0   -5730.0
PR2   +434.7   -355.7         0.0    +1350.0     -434.7   +1705.7
PR3   -245.5   -250.9         0.0     +250.0      245.5    +500.9
BS    +180.6   -266.4      +750.0     -600.0      569.4    -333.6
ITMX   +38.7    -48.9         0.0        0.0      -38.7      48.9
While we've changed the IMs quite a bit in both pitch and yaw (presumably to account for the bypass beam), but downstream all optics (PR2, PR3, BS) have not changed more than 0.5 [urad] in pitch, and PR2 is the worst offender with ~2 [mrad] in yaw, with the rest also below 0.5 [mrad]. These changes (at least of the large optics) are well within the range of the core optics. The largest offsets on the IMs are taking up ~80% of the DAC range.

Alignment process this morning (again, after release of ITMX and removal of SRM First Contact): 

- Check beam at SR3. Looks like clipping
- Check beam at AS port, AR side, output side of BS, see clipping.
- Check beam centering on ITMX -- is mis-centered. Tweak alignment of PR3 to center on ITMX.
- Check beam at AS port, AR side, output side of BS -- clipping alleviated.
- Check beam through HAM4 between HWS baffles, no clipping.
- Check beam at SR3 -- clipping alleviated.
- Re-center beam on SR3 using BS.
- Re-center beam on SR2 using SR3, making sure of no clipping on SR2 scrapper baffle.
- Re-center beam on SRM using SR2, still no clipping.
- Confirm that beam no-longer goes through input of OFI with SRM centering, using SR2 offset of Y = -800 [urad] (P as shown in IFO Align screen).
- Move SR2 to Y = -600 [urad], find that beam goes through OFI hole, but is now miscentered on SRM. Should be walk-able / recoverable, but we'll wait for beam from Y ARM before we move anything.
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:11, Monday 14 July 2014 (12736)
Weekly PSL Check

 

Laser

PMC

FSS

ISS

H1 PEM
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:11, Monday 14 July 2014 (12734)
Restart weather station epics IOC for EX
Restarted End-X weather station epics ioc. It died about 12:09 PDT today for reasons only slightly related to dust monitor work, when the Comtrol web page was accessed.
Displaying reports 64821-64840 of 77211.Go to page Start 3238 3239 3240 3241 3242 3243 3244 3245 3246 End