SudarshanK, RickS
Yesterday, we adjusted the transmitter module optical layout to address the s-pol light downstream of the AOM (see notes appended below).
We then calibrated the system using Working Standard WS1. The details are in LIGO-T1500129.
The calibration of the TxPD output (H1:CAL-PCALX_TX_PD) is 8.517e-13 *1/f^2 (m/V).
The calibration of the RxPD output (H1:CAL-PCALX_RX_PD) is 6.799e-13 *1/f^2 (m/V).
Notes:
LHO Xend calibration
Every time commissioners improve the sensitivity, I have to run again my brute force coherence. Luckily, it's fast enough now. Here is the sumamry page:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1111482016/
MICH is dominant between 20 and 150 Hz (first plot). PSL periscope peaks are prominent (third plot). Intensity noise is a factor of few below DARM at frequencies above 100 Hz (fourth plot). There are many lines coherent with suspension or environmental signals, too many to list all of them here.
SRCL and PRCL show a broad band coherence basically everywhere (second plot), giving a noise projection a level of few below the DARM signal. This is the usual thing we already saw, and I believe is due to the IMC locking offset, somehow converting frequency noise into intensity noise. Still to be proven though.
Updated all the BSC ISI snaps to reflect Jim's current Blends. Elliptical blends have been added to and turned on to all the St2 for the 4 DOFs we are isolating. I also had to edit unchanged filter banks due to the FE/SDF mapping of SW2 down onto SW1. This was an issue just at the ETMs and seems related to the blend switching for the winds (45 vs 90mhz, what's up with that?) Safe.snaps committed to svn.
Similar to my mods at ETMX in alog 17488, I thought I would try add some low pass filters to one of the HAM's CPS blend filters. So far I've gotten mixed results. HAM6 shows a pretty clear improvement, HAM5 is about 50/50 good and bad. First plot shows HAM6, second is HAM5, solid is before, dashed is after, black is ground, blue is CPS, red is GS13. HAM6 shows improvement between 1 hz and 10, but HAM5 is better up to 3 or 4 hz, then worse. At least the HAM 5 data shows nothing worse below a HZ, the HAM6 data was taken really quick so I didn't get the low frequency part.
Not really sure what is going on. Maybe insufficient loop gain or something?
Previously posted as comment to 17504.
Note that ISI Stage2 was a State3 trip meaning that the Damping Loops were still functional. It would be nice to know when/why the stage tripped. But I'd guess that the Guardian was set to fully isolated before the ~0700utc short lock and was untripped during the short lock, likely triggering during acquisition and then triggering again at the trip. That is what I first thought.
See attached--It looks like the stage2 when isolated survived the IFO lock loss but not the MICH reacquisition. This means, we can use the Guardian to transition the ISI between Isolated Damped and Fully Isolated with tripping nor requiring operator intervention.
This is a 50 minute stretch so the IFO lock Loss is only a couple minutes before the St2 WD trigger but there may be enough time to deisolate stage2. Looking at a zoomed in full data, looks like a full 70+ seconds after lock loss based on this CAL_DELTAL channel. The second lock loss had even more time so I don't think it is tied to the lock loss but more to the reacquisition.
Of course, we also need to show that turning Stage2 Isolation loops on is a positive thing.
When I look at the MASTER_(local-drive)DRIVE_DQ, there isn't actually a data point(full data) that exceeds the trigger threshold. These are the channels the watchdog plotting scripts display. However, when I look at the OUTF_SATURATION totalizers, I see that indeed H1 had 2 saturations (I've set this counter threshold to 31000cts.) All the other drives had no saturations at the lock loss. I wonder if there is a way we could ride this out? Of course if we hadn't shut off the Isolation, we probably would have a lot more.
J. Kissel, J. Warner, J. Romie, H. Radkins, N. Kijbunchoo, K. Izumi, G. Moreno SUMMARY: We just finished ~7 HOUR lock stretch at our best sensitivity ever, between 32 and 34 [Mpc]! We've all been pleasantly surprised this morning to see that the lock stretch that Sheila Evan, Dan and Lisa started last night lasted the entire night. Unfortunately, as of ~10 minutes ago (~8:40a PDT, ~15:40 UTC), there are GIANT glitches and non-stationarity that keep popping up, spoiling the sensitivity. There's no one in the LVEA, so we're not at all sure what's caused the sudden change in behaviour. Wind seems fine at ~5 [mph], ground motion is still pretty low, the 1-3 [Hz] hasn't even come up yet. Anxious to explore things, Jim installed some low-pass filters in the HAM5 and HAM6 ISIs at around 8:45 to try to reduce scattering / acoustic coupling to the ISI, and Kiwamu began exploring MICH coupling to DARM. But, as I write this log, we lost lock. However, for DetChar purposes, one can assume the detector was undisturbed from March 27 9:00 UTC to March 27 ~15:00 UTC.
K. Izumi, J. Kissel For the record: Kiwamu drove down to the EY end station to check: *this* lock loss did *not* cause the EY ESD Driver to trip. Huh.
Looking at spectrograms of DARM during the first hour of lock (first plot) and the last hour (second plot), it seems to me that the noise is more or less stationary, but there are huge glitches. They are so big that you can even see them easily in time domain (third plot). A zoom in is visible in the fourth plot. They look like bursts of oscillations at about 5.5 kHz.
We now believe that the glitches we had in the lock stretch from this morning was due to the ISS which repeatedly unlocked. This is a typical behavior of the ISS when the diffraction power is too low. Indeed the diffracted power had been 4% on average during the time when the interferometer was locked. There was clear correlation between arm cavities' power and the ISS diffracted power. See the attached trend of some relevant channels. Elli adjusted the diffracted power in this after noon so that the diffracted power is now at 8% with only the inner loop closed.
Looking at glitch-to-glitch coupling between auxiliary channels and DARM shows a large number of glitches in the > 1kHz range that are coincident with glitches in CARM, REFL 9 PIT/YAW, and REFL 45 PIT. Interestingly, CARM is highly correlated with high frequency glitches until about 12:00:00 UTC, at which point REFL 45 PIT becomes the stronger veto.
It looks like REFL 45 Q PIT was offset by about 2500 counts during the lock, is it possible that intensity fluctuations on an uncentered WFS are showing up as alignment glitches? I've attached a time series covering 2 hours of the lock from 11 UTC to 13 UTC.
We're currently running code to see if the lower frequency (50-200 Hz) glitches are caused by zero-crossings in the 18-bit DACs.
I've attached an Omicron glitchgram for the whole day, it seems as if the higher frequency glitches and the glitches populating the 50-200 Hz region are the two dominant populations right now. There are also a few high SNR glitches scattered around in the 100-400 Hz region that we'll follow up individually.
-2^16 Crossings in ETMY L3 ESD causing many of the glitches in this lock:
In addition to the arches reported in 17452 and 17506 we found DAC glitches in this lock when ETMY L3 ESD DAC outputs were crossing -2^16 counts. Attached is a PDF with a few examples that were lined up by hand. We will follow up more closely to see if other suspensions and penultimate stages also add glitches. Note: At Livingston, SUS MC2 M3 DACs were also a problem.
If you'd like to see the primary culprits from this long lock, here is a tar file of omega scans (thanks to Joe Areeda) of the loudest 100 glitches between 30 and 200Hz. The vertical lines that repeat are DAC glitches, the crazy wandering features are the arches described in the pages linked above, those two mechanisms account for most of the glitches we see.
model restarts logged for Thu 26/Mar/2015
2015_03_26 00:32 h1fw1
2015_03_26 08:55 h1calcs
2015_03_26 08:57 h1omc
2015_03_26 09:03 h1broadcast0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1dc0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1fw0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1fw1
2015_03_26 09:03 h1nds0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1nds1
2015_03_26 14:44 h1fw0
two unexpected restarts. CAL and OMC model work, with associated DAQ restart.
Scott L. Ed P. Chris S. My apologizes for this late report from yesterday. I had to leave early to get to town and pick up oil filters for the new generator, already time for P Ms. The cleaning crew was able to clean 76 meters of tube yesterday towards X-1-7 double doors. Good day.
The whistles in DARM are still quite prominent in this lock. As briefly summarized in this alog, they happen whenever the PSL VCO frequency crosses 79.2 MHz. This points to the likely cause. This is a reliable enough indicator that we can get some statistics. In the first hour of the current lock (Mar 27 9 UTC to 10 UTC), the whistles happen at a rate of 4 per minute. Below are four spectrograms. The first two show some whistles identified this way. A new feature is that there seems to be a second oscillator very close by, or maybe some harmonic of the beat note. The next two spectrograms show a minute with several whistles, and the next minute where none occurred. Even when none go through zero frequency, you can still see the beat note hovering up near Nyquist.
The attached script will find all the crossings which indicate whistle / RF beat note glitches due to the 79.2 MHz crossing. Currently the PSL VCO readback only appears to be changing once a second, so the time accuracy of glitch finding is only one second. For vetoing purposes, this could be improved by doing a linear fit of IMC-F to the PSL VCO readback, then using the much faster sampled IMC-F to measure the VCO frequency.
We made it to 34 Mpc by managing to do at the same time all of the things we have tried before (low noise ESD on ETMY, low noise coil drivers for all the optics, POPAIR for vertex length DOF, more aggressive SRCL cut-off), plus some more ASC cut-offs. Implementing all of these things at the same time happened to be more challenging that expected because of a few problems that slowed us down today:
Some more details
Final IFO & Guardian state
Spectrum attached.
Great work! I will update our slides for the quarterly briefing.
Excellent progress!
Nice work. Great headline, too.
Note that ISI Stage2 was a State3 trip meaning that the Damping Loops were still functional. It would be nice to know when/why the stage tripped. But I'd guess that the Guardian was set to fully isolated before the ~0700utc short lock and was untripped during the short lock, likely triggering during acquisition and then triggering again at the trip. That is what I first thought.
See attached--It looks like the stage2 when isolated survived the IFO lock loss but not the MICH reacquisition. This means, we can use the Guardian to transition the ISI between Isolated Damped and Fully Isolated with tripping nor requiring operator intervention.
This is a 50 minute stretch so the IFO lock Loss is only a couple minutes before the St2 WD trigger but there may be enough time to deisolate stage2. Looking at a zoomed in full data, looks like a full 70+ seconds after lock loss based on this CAL_DELTAL channel. The second lock loss had even more time so I don't think it is tied to the lock loss but more to the reacquisition.
Noise budget attached, with new the anticipated ETMY ESD noise. We have many other traces to add here: intensity coupling, frequency coupling, auxiliary dofs, etc.
I believe the 10 W quantum noise and the DAC→ESD noise alone limit us to no more than 60 Mpc, although based on the previous performance of the ETMX ESD, the ESD trace here may be an overestimate.
Evan & Sheila, Dan & Lisa
Tonight some new failure modes of the violin damping manifested themselves, and we found new ways to damp them.
On ITMY, the following modes and settings were identified:
| Frequency (Hz) | Filter (ITMY_L2_DAMP) | Settings (phase, gain) |
| 503.007 | MODE3 | +60deg, +200 |
| 503.119 | MODE1 | -60deg, -300 |
| 504.875 | MODE4 | 0deg, +300 |
Note that in the earlier catalog the 504.875 line was mis-identified as an ETMX mode, and the 503.119 line was not paired with an optic.
Earlier in the evening we tripped the RMS watchdog on ETMX, and had to drive out the end station to power cycle the coil driver.
This wasn't obvious from the control room. Three things that would help are to
1) add this to the OPS overview screen
2) add it to the SYS_DIAG gaurdian
3) add it to the SUS guardians
They are now in SYS_DIAG.
Rich A., Lisa, Sheila, Jeff, Evan
The EY ESD driver has tripped twice today, apparently in the same failure mode as described previously. Each time we have had to drive down to the end station to reactivate it.
The supplies are set at ±430 V, each with a 75 mA current limit. When the driver is active, it draws 23 mA dc from the positive supply and 20 mA dc from the negative supply. When tripped, it draws 3 mA dc from each supply.
This seems to happen every time we loose lock if we have transitioned to ETMY. We are getting plenty of excerise tonight going back and forth to the end station.
If anyone has any ideas about how to make this easier to reset or to prevent it from happening, that would save us some fuel.
Why don't we set a digital limiter ? For example, see LLO alog:
https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=14472