Displaying reports 68681-68700 of 85743.Go to page Start 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 End
Reports until 10:51, Friday 27 March 2015
H1 CAL (CAL)
richard.savage@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:51, Friday 27 March 2015 (17525)
Xend Pcal commissioning and calibration

SudarshanK, RickS

Yesterday, we adjusted the transmitter module optical layout to address the s-pol light downstream of the AOM (see notes appended below).

We then calibrated the system using Working Standard WS1.  The details are in LIGO-T1500129.

The calibration of the TxPD output (H1:CAL-PCALX_TX_PD) is  8.517e-13 *1/f^2 (m/V).

The calibration of the RxPD output (H1:CAL-PCALX_RX_PD) is  6.799e-13 *1/f^2 (m/V).

 

Notes:

LHO Xend calibration

As found:
With servo output railed at ~1.5V
 
Total power downstream of AOM 1.37 mW
Diffracted power 1.09 W
80% Diffraction efficiency
OFS PD 1.32 mW; -9.0 V with NE01A-B filter
TxPD  6.64 mW; 2.72 V without filter
 
Beam seemed to be slightly clipping the transducer in the AOM
Moved the beam away from the transducer approx 1/2 turn on 4 axis mount
 
Now (without the polarizer)
Total power 1.55 W
diffracted poer 1.14W
75% efficiency
 
Moved wedge about one inch farther downstream to decrease incidence angle
 
Found that wedge roll angle was not well set.  OFS PD too high.
Used IRIS set right in front of wedge, then adjusted vertically so iris is centered on input beam.
Then, used iris in Tx and OFS beams to adjust roll angle of wedge such that both beams are level.  Note that one needs to adjust the pitch angle of the wedge for the Tx beam after making a roll angle adjustment.
 
After centering beams on PDs, then installing lens in OFS PD path and recentering.
Installed NE06A-B on OFS PD.  6.12 mW on OFS PD.Output was -14 V.  With an additional NE01A-B we have -10.8V
Tx PD (without any filters) 12.3 mW on Tx PD. 5.1 V
 
Installed PBS downstream of AOM and rotated in yaw to minimize reflected light with AOM drive switched off.  ~4 mW
With AOM drive on at max level 23 mW.
 
Measured OLTF (see attached photo).  UGF 100 kHz with gain set to 37 dB.  Phase margin 61 deg.
Images attached to this report
H1 ISC (DetChar, ISC)
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:46, Friday 27 March 2015 (17524)
Coherences

Every time commissioners improve the sensitivity, I have to run again my brute force coherence. Luckily, it's fast enough now. Here is the sumamry page:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_1111482016/

MICH is dominant between 20 and 150 Hz (first plot). PSL periscope peaks are prominent (third plot). Intensity noise is a factor of few below DARM at frequencies above 100 Hz (fourth plot). There are many lines coherent with suspension or environmental signals, too many to list all of them here.

SRCL and PRCL show a broad band coherence basically everywhere (second plot), giving a noise projection a level of few below the DARM signal. This is the usual thing we already saw, and I believe is due to the IMC locking offset, somehow converting frequency noise into intensity noise. Still to be proven though.

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI (CDS, GRD)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:32, Friday 27 March 2015 (17523)
LHO SEI SDFs all Clear (Grey)

Updated all the BSC ISI snaps to reflect Jim's current Blends.  Elliptical blends have been added to and turned on to all the St2 for the 4 DOFs we are isolating.  I also had to edit unchanged filter banks due to the FE/SDF mapping of SW2 down onto SW1.  This was an issue just at the ETMs and seems related to the blend switching for the winds (45 vs 90mhz, what's up with that?)  Safe.snaps committed to svn.

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:11, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 10:27, Friday 27 March 2015(17521)
HAM Blends: Same trick, different dog

Similar to my mods at ETMX in alog 17488, I thought I would try add some low pass filters to one of the HAM's CPS blend filters. So far I've gotten mixed results. HAM6 shows a pretty clear improvement, HAM5 is about 50/50 good and bad. First plot shows HAM6, second is HAM5, solid is before, dashed is after, black is ground, blue is CPS, red is GS13. HAM6 shows improvement between  1 hz and 10, but HAM5 is better up to 3 or 4 hz, then worse. At least the HAM 5 data shows nothing worse below a HZ, the HAM6 data was taken really quick so I didn't get the low frequency part.

Not really sure what is going on. Maybe insufficient loop gain or something?

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 10:27, Friday 27 March 2015 (17522)

Adding plots of the blend filter change. Red is stock, blue is the added filter, green is the product.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:43, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 09:59, Friday 27 March 2015(17519)
Looks like the BS Stage2 Isolation can survive the lock loss-- We need the guardian!

Previously posted as comment to 17504.

 

Note that ISI Stage2 was a State3 trip meaning that the Damping Loops were still functional.  It would be nice to know when/why the stage tripped.  But I'd guess that the Guardian was set to fully isolated before the ~0700utc short lock and was untripped during the short lock, likely triggering during acquisition and then triggering again at the trip.  That is what I first thought.

See attached--It looks like the stage2 when isolated survived the IFO lock loss but not the MICH reacquisition.  This means, we can use the Guardian to transition the ISI between Isolated Damped and Fully Isolated with tripping nor requiring operator intervention.

This is a 50 minute stretch so the IFO lock Loss is only a couple minutes before the St2 WD trigger but there may be enough time to deisolate stage2.  Looking at a zoomed in full data, looks like a full 70+ seconds after lock loss based on this CAL_DELTAL channel.  The second lock loss had even more time so I don't think it is tied to the lock loss but more to the reacquisition.

 

Of course, we also need to show that turning Stage2 Isolation loops on is a positive thing.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 09:59, Friday 27 March 2015 (17520)

When I look at the MASTER_(local-drive)DRIVE_DQ, there isn't actually a data point(full data) that exceeds the trigger threshold.  These are the channels the watchdog plotting scripts display.  However, when I look at the OUTF_SATURATION totalizers, I see that indeed H1 had 2 saturations (I've set this counter threshold to 31000cts.)  All the other drives had no saturations at the lock loss.  I wonder if there is a way we could ride this out?  Of course if we hadn't shut off the Isolation, we probably would have a lot more.

H1 ISC (CAL, CDS, DetChar, GRD, INS, IOO, ISC, SEI, SUS, SYS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:58, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 07:47, Saturday 28 March 2015(17515)
Great sensitivity all night long!
J. Kissel, J. Warner, J. Romie, H. Radkins, N. Kijbunchoo, K. Izumi, G. Moreno

SUMMARY: We just finished ~7 HOUR lock stretch at our best sensitivity ever, between 32 and 34 [Mpc]!

We've all been pleasantly surprised this morning to see that the lock stretch that Sheila Evan, Dan and Lisa started last night lasted the entire night. Unfortunately, as of ~10 minutes ago (~8:40a PDT, ~15:40 UTC), there are GIANT glitches and non-stationarity that keep popping up, spoiling the sensitivity. There's no one in the LVEA, so we're not at all sure what's caused the sudden change in behaviour. Wind seems fine at ~5 [mph], ground motion is still pretty low, the 1-3 [Hz] hasn't even come up yet.

Anxious to explore things, Jim installed some low-pass filters in the HAM5 and HAM6 ISIs at around 8:45 to try to reduce scattering / acoustic coupling to the ISI, and Kiwamu began exploring MICH coupling to DARM. 

But, as I write this log, we lost lock. However, for DetChar purposes, one can assume the detector was undisturbed from March 27 9:00 UTC to March 27 ~15:00 UTC.

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:17, Friday 27 March 2015 (17516)
K. Izumi, J. Kissel

For the record: Kiwamu drove down to the EY end station to check: *this* lock loss did *not* cause the EY ESD Driver to trip. Huh.
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 11:21, Friday 27 March 2015 (17526)DetChar, ISC

Looking at spectrograms of DARM during the first hour of lock (first plot) and the last hour (second plot), it seems to me that the noise is more or less stationary, but there are huge glitches. They are so big that you can even see them easily in time domain (third plot). A zoom in is visible in the fourth plot. They look like bursts of oscillations at about 5.5 kHz.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 13:44, Friday 27 March 2015 (17532)

We now believe that the glitches we had in the lock stretch from this morning was due to the ISS which repeatedly unlocked. This is a typical behavior of the ISS when the diffraction power is too low. Indeed the diffracted power had been 4% on average during the time when the interferometer was locked. There was clear correlation between arm cavities' power and the ISS diffracted power. See the attached trend of some relevant channels. Elli adjusted the diffracted power in this after noon so that the diffracted power is now at 8% with only the inner loop closed.

Images attached to this comment
thomas.massinger@LIGO.ORG - 18:24, Friday 27 March 2015 (17540)DetChar

Looking at glitch-to-glitch coupling between auxiliary channels and DARM shows a large number of glitches in the > 1kHz range that are coincident with glitches in CARM, REFL 9 PIT/YAW, and REFL 45 PIT. Interestingly, CARM is highly correlated with high frequency glitches until about 12:00:00 UTC, at which point REFL 45 PIT becomes the stronger veto.

It looks like REFL 45 Q PIT was offset by about 2500 counts during the lock, is it possible that intensity fluctuations on an uncentered WFS are showing up as alignment glitches? I've attached a time series covering 2 hours of the lock from 11 UTC to 13 UTC.

We're currently running code to see if the lower frequency (50-200 Hz) glitches are caused by zero-crossings in the 18-bit DACs.

I've attached an Omicron glitchgram for the whole day, it seems as if the higher frequency glitches and the glitches populating the 50-200 Hz region are the two dominant populations right now. There are also a few high SNR glitches scattered around in the 100-400 Hz region that we'll follow up individually.

Images attached to this comment
joshua.smith@LIGO.ORG - 07:47, Saturday 28 March 2015 (17555)DetChar

-2^16 Crossings in ETMY L3 ESD causing many of the glitches in this lock:

In addition to the arches reported in 17452 and 17506 we found DAC glitches in this lock when ETMY L3 ESD DAC outputs were crossing -2^16 counts. Attached is a PDF with a few examples that were lined up by hand. We will follow up more closely to see if other suspensions and penultimate stages also add glitches. Note: At Livingston, SUS MC2 M3 DACs were also a problem. 

If you'd like to see the primary culprits from this long lock, here is a tar file of omega scans (thanks to Joe Areeda) of the loudest 100 glitches between 30 and 200Hz. The vertical lines that repeat are DAC glitches, the crazy wandering features are the arches described in the pages linked above, those two mechanisms account for most of the glitches we see.   

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 AOS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:04, Friday 27 March 2015 (17510)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Thursday 26th March 2015

model restarts logged for Thu 26/Mar/2015
2015_03_26 00:32 h1fw1
2015_03_26 08:55 h1calcs
2015_03_26 08:57 h1omc

2015_03_26 09:03 h1broadcast0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1dc0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1fw0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1fw1
2015_03_26 09:03 h1nds0
2015_03_26 09:03 h1nds1

2015_03_26 14:44 h1fw0

two unexpected restarts. CAL and OMC model work, with associated DAQ restart.

LHO VE
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:54, Friday 27 March 2015 (17507)
Beam Tube Washing
Scott L. Ed P. Chris S.

My apologizes for this late report from yesterday. I had to leave early to get to town and pick up oil filters for the new generator, already time for P Ms.
The cleaning crew was able to clean 76 meters of tube yesterday towards X-1-7 double doors. Good day.
H1 DetChar
andrew.lundgren@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:34, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 02:08, Saturday 28 March 2015(17506)
Whistles in DARM in current lock
The whistles in DARM are still quite prominent in this lock. As briefly summarized in this alog, they happen whenever the PSL VCO frequency crosses 79.2 MHz. This points to the likely cause. This is a reliable enough indicator that we can get some statistics. In the first hour of the current lock (Mar 27 9 UTC to 10 UTC), the whistles happen at a rate of 4 per minute.

Below are four spectrograms. The first two show some whistles identified this way. A new feature is that there seems to be a second oscillator very close by, or maybe some harmonic of the beat note. The next two spectrograms show a minute with several whistles, and the next minute where none occurred. Even when none go through zero frequency, you can still see the beat note hovering up near Nyquist.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
andrew.lundgren@LIGO.ORG - 02:08, Saturday 28 March 2015 (17554)
The attached script will find all the crossings which indicate whistle / RF beat note glitches due to the 79.2 MHz crossing. Currently the PSL VCO readback only appears to be changing once a second, so the time accuracy of glitch finding is only one second.  For vetoing purposes, this could be improved by doing a linear fit of IMC-F to the PSL VCO readback, then using the much faster sampled IMC-F to measure the VCO frequency.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC (ISC)
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:12, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 12:17, Friday 27 March 2015(17504)
30 is the new 20!

Evan, Sheila, Dan, Lisa

We made it to 34 Mpc by managing to do at the same time all of the things we have tried before (low noise ESD on ETMY, low noise coil drivers for all the optics, POPAIR for vertex length DOF, more aggressive SRCL cut-off), plus some more ASC cut-offs. Implementing all of these things at the same time happened to be more challenging that expected because of a few problems that slowed us down today:

Some more details

Final IFO & Guardian state

We leave the interferometer locked at 34 Mpc, starting at March 27 9:00 UTC

Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 02:17, Friday 27 March 2015 (17505)

Spectrum attached.

Images attached to this comment
fred.raab@LIGO.ORG - 07:41, Friday 27 March 2015 (17509)
Great work! I will update our slides for the quarterly briefing.
albert.lazzarini@LIGO.ORG - 08:40, Friday 27 March 2015 (17511)
Excellent progress!
david.reitze@LIGO.ORG - 08:47, Friday 27 March 2015 (17514)
Nice work.  Great headline, too.
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 09:38, Friday 27 March 2015 (17518)

Note that ISI Stage2 was a State3 trip meaning that the Damping Loops were still functional.  It would be nice to know when/why the stage tripped.  But I'd guess that the Guardian was set to fully isolated before the ~0700utc short lock and was untripped during the short lock, likely triggering during acquisition and then triggering again at the trip.  That is what I first thought.

See attached--It looks like the stage2 when isolated survived the IFO lock loss but not the MICH reacquisition.  This means, we can use the Guardian to transition the ISI between Isolated Damped and Fully Isolated with tripping nor requiring operator intervention.

This is a 50 minute stretch so the IFO lock Loss is only a couple minutes before the St2 WD trigger but there may be enough time to deisolate stage2.  Looking at a zoomed in full data, looks like a full 70+ seconds after lock loss based on this CAL_DELTAL channel.  The second lock loss had even more time so I don't think it is tied to the lock loss but more to the reacquisition.

Images attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 12:17, Friday 27 March 2015 (17530)

Noise budget attached, with new the anticipated ETMY ESD noise. We have many other traces to add here: intensity coupling, frequency coupling, auxiliary dofs, etc.

I believe the 10 W quantum noise and the DAC→ESD noise alone limit us to no more than 60 Mpc, although based on the previous performance of the ETMX ESD, the ESD trace here may be an overestimate.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:25, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 08:46, Friday 27 March 2015(17502)
some new violin data

Evan & Sheila, Dan & Lisa

Tonight some new failure modes of the violin damping manifested themselves, and we found new ways to damp them.

On ITMY, the following modes and settings were identified:

Frequency (Hz) Filter (ITMY_L2_DAMP) Settings (phase, gain)
503.007 MODE3 +60deg, +200
503.119 MODE1 -60deg, -300
504.875 MODE4 0deg, +300

Note that in the earlier catalog the 504.875 line was mis-identified as an ETMX mode, and the 503.119 line was not paired with an optic.

Comments related to this report
david.reitze@LIGO.ORG - 08:46, Friday 27 March 2015 (17513)


		
		
H1 SUS
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:57, Friday 27 March 2015 - last comment - 11:33, Friday 27 March 2015(17501)
EX PUM watchdog

Earlier in the evening we tripped the RMS watchdog on ETMX, and had to drive out the end station to power cycle the coil driver.  

This wasn't obvious from the control room.  Three things that would help are to 

1) add this to the OPS overview screen

2) add it to the SYS_DIAG gaurdian

3) add it to the SUS guardians

Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 11:33, Friday 27 March 2015 (17527)

They are now in SYS_DIAG.

H1 SUS (CDS, ISC, SUS)
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:18, Thursday 26 March 2015 - last comment - 07:00, Friday 27 March 2015(17496)
ETMY ESD driver tripping repeatedly

Rich A., Lisa, Sheila, Jeff, Evan

The EY ESD driver has tripped twice today, apparently in the same failure mode as described previously. Each time we have had to drive down to the end station to reactivate it.

The supplies are set at ±430 V, each with a 75 mA current limit. When the driver is active, it draws 23 mA dc from the positive supply and 20 mA dc from the negative supply. When tripped, it draws 3 mA dc from each supply.

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 00:55, Friday 27 March 2015 (17500)

This seems to happen every time we loose lock if we have transitioned to ETMY.  We are getting plenty of excerise tonight going back and forth to the end station.  

If anyone has any ideas about how to make this easier to reset or to prevent it from happening, that would save us some fuel.  

kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 07:00, Friday 27 March 2015 (17508)

Why don't we set a digital limiter ? For example, see LLO alog:

https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=14472

Displaying reports 68681-68700 of 85743.Go to page Start 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 End