Displaying reports 69441-69460 of 85592.Go to page Start 3469 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 End
Reports until 14:03, Tuesday 10 February 2015
H1 SUS
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:03, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16604)
ETMX SUS

Jeff restarted ETMX SUS, but this didn't solve the decimation problem reported in alog 16511.

H1 CDS (CAL, PEM, SYS, TCS)
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:09, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16602)
Restarted models on h1oaf0
All models on h1oaf0 stopped running just before 1:00 PM PST with ADC timeout errors.  Had to kill the user models and restart the IOP model to recover timing, then the user models were restarted.
H1 SEI (CDS, SEI)
richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:36, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16599)
Current Oscillation on Ham 4,5 +-24V power supply
Richard, Filiberto

Late last week I noticed the current meter for the Ham4 and Ham5 +-24V ISI DC supplies that feed the coil drivers were oscillating at about 1Hz and 0.5amps.  Today we connected a meter to the output lines of the supply and systematically shut down the ISI system starting with the Ham4 moving to Ham5.  First step was using guardian to take the system to READY state.  We then shut off the outputs using the watchdogs.  The oscillation remained until we shut off the 2nd Ham5 coil driver.  The system was brought back up and the oscillation was gone.  Re-engaged the software had guardian take it back to isolation.  Still no oscillation present.  I will check the power on this system during the week to see if it goes back into oscillation.    There was no obvious problem with the HAM isolation during this time.  If the oscillation returns we will power the HAM 5 electronics down first to see if this corrects the problem.

H1 DAQ (CDS)
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:32, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16598)
h1nds1 reconfigured to allow file system maintenance
The h1nds1 NDS server has been reconfigured to serve past data from the same disk systems as h1nds0.  The /trend/minute_raw data has been renamed, and is being copied to /frames/trend/minute_raw because the /trend file system is nearly full.  The h1fw1 is still writing minute_raw files, so there will still be a redundant source for the files.
H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:26, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16597)
Updated conlog channel list
Added 26 channels. Removed 105 channels.
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:41, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16595)
EX HEPI Pump Servo Restarted--Now controlling remote differential pressure at BSC9

No Issues at restart, no impact on HEPI Platform.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:40, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16594)
WHAM3 ISI foton loaded, Sensor Correction Match Gains moved to FM1

SDF updated, foton file committed to svn.

H1 IOO
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:22, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16593)
Power readbacks after EOM

The PSL team has installed an ND filter in front of the IO photodiode measuring the power after the EOM. Now we have about 3V. I adjusted the calibration to give us 21W. Old alog at 16437. I added the power readbacks to the IMC overview screen as well.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:44, Tuesday 10 February 2015 - last comment - 12:13, Tuesday 10 February 2015(16591)
length offset in ETMX M0 and R0

Summary:

ETMX M0 stage was pushed towards the reaction chain so the F1 flag comes out of the BOSEM. It got slightly better, BOSEM reading changed from  7300 to 8300.

Reaction chain was pushed away from the test mass chain so that L1 and L2 stages don't get too close to the test mass chain.

We don't know yet if this made any change to the damping etc.

Details:

Due to a huge pit offset we need to align ETMX (it was large before the vent, but it got worse after), F1 flag is too much into the coil, and supposedly that is one of the reasons why the PIT damping is not that good. In the first attachment, you can see the BOSEM reading of F1 to be about 7300 (ideally this is 16000 or so).

I gave the top stage a length push such that the test mass chain is pushed away from the top face BOSEMs, and gained about 1000 counts in F1 BOSEM. With this offset the coil outputs should still have some headroom even if you misalign the ETMX to point to baffle PDs.

One drawback of this is that the test mass chain is pushed towards the reaction chain, which is fine under a normal circumstances, except that Sheila tells that misaligning the reaction chain of ETMX affected the actuation behavior of L1 and/or L2. I'm worried that something is close to touching, and pushing flags further into OSEMs doesn't sound like a good idea.

So I gave a length offset to the reaction chain, pulling it back from the test mass chain.

In the second screen shot you can see that I gave offsets to L2L, L2Y and L2P drivealign matrix rather than M0_LOCK_L because of a very small DC gain of the latter, and because it's somewhat more convenient than to give length offset to TEST_L and compensate the misalignment caused by that by using alignment sliders.

If this makes no negative impact on locking, the offset could be moved to TEST_L and sliders.

Reaction chain offset H1:SUS-ETMX_R0_TEST_L_OFFSET was set to -100k. I can go further easily, but I left some headroom so the reaction mass could be misaligned when fringe wrapping between the test mass and the reaction mass is observed.

After these, M0_OSEMINF_F1_INMON changed from 7300 to 8250, L1 LL from 6700 to 7000, L2 UL from 7100 to 7500.

I took a very very quick top P2P TF of the test mass chain for before(blue)/after(red) comparison and I see no ill effect (but no difference means no change in the PIT sensing). This comparison was done without oplev damping.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
brett.shapiro@LIGO.ORG - 11:20, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16592)

Just a reminder for some history on the problematic pitch damping of ETMX: I investigated the effect of the alignment offsets on pitch damping last month. See 16107. I plot some pitch TF measurements from the morning of Jan 16 that suggest the pitch offset influences the OSEM sensitivity around the first two modes. However, a repeat measurement that afternoon was completely normal, i.e. no influence of the alignment offset at all.

Don't know what this means. It's possible the damping problem is not due to the alignment and what I saw was something else mysterious. Or maybe it comes and goes, which sounds worse to me.

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 12:13, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16596)

When I compare today's measurement with Brett's (alog 16107), the TFs today are somewhere between his good data (cyan) and  bad one (green), somewhat closer to the good than the bad.

Anyway I'll leave the reaction chain offsets on because of the claim about reaction chain misalignment VS the actuation of L1 and L2, and the test mass chain offsets on because of the same possibility as the L1 and L2 (that the flags are very close to hitting something, making them hit when driving hard).

Images attached to this comment
H1 TCS
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:06, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16590)
ETMx, ETMy Ring heater driver chassis turned on

ETMx and ETMy ring heater chassis have been turned on.  I have copied the ITM calibration settings (except for resistance values) over to the ETMs.  I breifly turned each heater on and off again, they are drawing the right ammount of power.  All of the ring heaters are requesting 0W (ie no heating) right now.

H1 ISC
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:42, Monday 09 February 2015 - last comment - 09:00, Tuesday 10 February 2015(16587)
Tidal Feedback

Looking at the tidal feedback signals during the 2 hour lock shows:

  1. The calibration of ALS-Y_REFL_SLOW is too small by a factor of 2. In Fig. 1 we see the green REFL_FAST signals running out of range near ~7.5µm. This is corresponds to the full VCO range of 1MHz and is correct. The same is true for X_REFL_SLOW, but the corresponding Y_REFL_SLOW shows a signal roughly half the size. The calibration is the same but the ALS common mode board have different gains in the input and VCO path. The X-arm board uses -7dB and 0dB, respectively, whereas the Y-arm board uses -13dB and +6dB. The Y-arm board should have the same gain as X.
  2. When the Y-arm tidal servo is switched to red lock, the HEPI feedback runs away slowly, see Fig 2. This is due to the fact that the integrator for the slow Y-arm feedback is holding at its last position, but no feedback is applied to either the ESD or the common tidal. Either the common tidal feedback needs to enabled or the integrator bled off.
  3. The calibration gains for the common tidal feedback was missing. The MC_F signal is calibrated in kHz and sent to the VCO. With a double passed AOM the gain factor becomes 0.5µm * 1/(2*37.5kHz) ~ 0.007 µm/kHz.
  4. Driving HEPI to a positive offset seems to lead to a negative MC_F. Meaning, one should be able to just copy the MC_F value into the COMM_ERR offset field.

Script:

#!/usr/bin/python
import ezca
Ezca=ezca.Ezca("H1:")
while True:
    val=Ezca['IMC-F_OUT16']
    Ezca['LSC-X_COMM_ERR_OFFSET']=val
    Ezca['LSC-Y_COMM_ERR_OFFSET']=val

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 09:00, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16589)

Changed the H1:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_IN1GAIN to -7dB (from -13dB) and H1:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_FASTGAIN to 0dB (from +6dB). Also turned on the frequency servo for the VCO on in EY.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:19, Monday 09 February 2015 (16588)
ETMY bounce mode damping revisited

Alexa Dan Evan Lisa Sheila

Today the ETMY bounce mode was ringing up during our many lock attempts.  We rediscovered Nic's work to damp this mode using DARM feedback to the pitch drive of ETMY L2.  We have been able to damp the mode while hanging out in ALS_DIFF, but progress is slow.  We suspect that the high noise floor of DARM when locked on ALS_DIFF is limiting our ability to damp the mode.  Transitioning to RF DARM may let us damp the mode more quickly, but this carries it's own inconvenience.

Anyways the way to damp the mode is to enable ETMY L2 DAMPDARM MODE1 --> PIT, with FM1-3 turned on.  (FM3 is a 206dB gain stage, I have never seen so many dB in one place before.)  With the bounce mode very high we had to reduce the overall filter gain to -0.04 to keep the SUS L2 drive from saturating.  (Nic recommends -1, probably this is good once the mode has damped a little.)

 

 - Dan as Sheila

H1 ISC
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:55, Monday 09 February 2015 (16586)
Transition to POP complete

Evan, Lisa, Sheila, Dan, Alexa, Kiwamu

Summary

With DARM on ASAIR_RF45_Q and CARM on analog REFLAIR_RF9_I at zero CARM offset, we were able to transition the DRMI 3f signals from REFLAIR_B to the 1f POPAIR_B signals. 

The locking sequence is scripted in the guardian up until this point.

Details

By exciting PRM, we adjusted the demod phase of POPAIR_B_RF9 and POPAIR_B_RF45. In both cases we maximized the I signals, and found 66.6º and -30º for RF9 and RF45 respectively. Then, we excited PRM, SRM, and BS at 137 Hz, 137 Hz, and 53 Hz respectively.  The folder /ligo/home/alexan.staley/Public/Spectra_3F2POP contains the DTT files, which have the power spectra for all the POPAIR_B signals, as well as transfer functions to the respective REFLAIR_B signals. The input matrix is as follows:

  POPAIR_B_RF9_I POPAIR_B_RF45_1 POPAIR_B_RF45_Q
PRCL 0.27 0 0
MICH 0 0 0.54
SRCL 0.041 0.74 0

When locked with the POP signals, we measured all three loops and found that they were all at the appropriate UGFs with good phase.

H1 IOO
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:21, Monday 09 February 2015 (16585)
IMC had difficluty relocking, removed the offsets

This morning, the IMC had a difficulty in relocking it.

It turned out that most of the IMCASC DOFs had accumulated some large offsets which had pushed the alignment so bad that it was not able to catch a 00-mode. This was due to the fact that we had turned on both the offsets (e.g. IMC-DOF_1_P_OFFSET) and the integrators, which off course simply accumulated the offset in the up front even when the IMC was unlocked. I disabled all the offsets as they are not necessary for now.

H1 SEI
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:21, Monday 09 February 2015 (16583)
windy times seismic twidle

Over the last few days, we have been occasionally been locking the ISI to the position sensors below 90mHz along the beam direction when the wind is high.

The general idea is that wind causes the ground to tilt, at low frequencies this shows up as a huge translational signal in the interial sensors, so we are better off controlling the ISI with position sensors to higher frequencies when the wind is high.  This means that we give up some isolation at the microseism, so it might not be a good idea to do this when the microseism is high.  The last few days the 0.1-0.3 Hz BLRM has been hovering around 0.4 um/sec, in this situation blending high along the beam direction when the wind is steadily above 20 mph seems to help us. 

I've attached a screen shot of the configuration that I've just switched the Y end to, this only takes two button clicks, switch the Y blend from 45 mHZ to 90 mHz, and turn off the output of the sensor correction in the Y direction. 

At X end we have been doing the same blend switching along the beam direction, but here we have the BRS, which can be used to subtract the wind induced tilt from the ground seismometers so that sensor correction can give us some benefits even durring windy times.  So the X end procedure is three clicks:  raise the X blend to 90 mHz, turn off the unocrrected X sensor correction by typing zero in the ISI_CUST_CHAMBER_STS2CART screen at the X X2 position, then turn on the corrected sensor correction by typing a 1 in the X X3 position.  Before and after screen shots attached. 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:22, Monday 09 February 2015 (16584)
Daily Ops Summary
7:00 Jodi to LVEA West Bay 
7:30 Mitchell joined Jodi 
8:15 Aiden to LVEA
8:45 Bubba to LVEA (checking on 3IFO containers)
8:45 Karen to End Y 
8:45 Thomas and Sudarshan to End Y (PCal)
9:15 Corey to Mid-Y
9:37 Jodi and Mitchell back
9:40 Karen left End Y
9:47 Bubba back from LVEA
9:49 Corey back from Mid-Y
9:53 Rick to LVEA (for a few minutes)
10:01 Thomas and Sudarshan back
10:10 Aiden to High bay
~12:30 DRMI locked, commissioning started
A fire truck came in and went to Mid Y at one point in the afternoon (forgot to write down the time, my bad). Nothing was on fire.
~ 4pm, another lock (Hooray!)
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:48, Friday 06 February 2015 - last comment - 12:54, Tuesday 10 February 2015(16536)
ETMY HEPI Pump Servo Channel Smoothing removed

On Nov 7 I added smoothing to the terribly noisy channels generating the differential pressure.  I revert these back to no smoothing.

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 16:54, Friday 06 February 2015 (16537)

The smoothing factor was 0.75 and is now 0; see the attached for how that affects the channels.

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 12:54, Tuesday 10 February 2015 (16600)
Smoothing (SMOO) parameters for the Supply and Return pressure channels of EY were restored to 0.75 Friday evening, 2014-02-06, late-ish in the evening. The EPICs subrecords are not recorded in the frames, so I can't give you an exact time.
Displaying reports 69441-69460 of 85592.Go to page Start 3469 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 End