Sheila, Patrick, Daniel, Alexa, Chris, Kiwamu, Evan
Before we started commissioning tonight, we had to recover from some maintenance day activities.
Alexa, Kiwamu,
In response to Keita's alog about the PR2 baffle, we took a peek at the PR2 baffle by opening some of the viewports on HAM3 and HAM2 spool.
Conclusions:
(PR2 baffle check out)
We opened up a viewport on the East side of HAM3 which the leftmost one with an illuminator attached on. This was the only available viewport to open up. We removed the illuminator and looked at the baffle through the viewport. We confirmed that there was no cross bar structure on the side of the baffle unit as shown in the DCC document (D1000328). We could not see the top part of the baffle where it supposed to have a cross bar structure. We took some pictures and I attach them to this entry.
(Peek at the aperture position)
Then we tried a different zooming in the PR2 digital camera in order to have a better view so that we can determine if the aperture hole is in the middle of the baffle unit or not. With a help of flash light illuminating the PR2 baffle from the HAM2 East side viewport, we could clearly see the edge on both right and left sides of the unit as well as the edge of the aperture. It looked like the hole is centered with respect to the right and left edges of the unit. We took several pictures of it via the digital camera so that one can evaluate the position later if necessary.
(MC2 scraper baffle check out)
Then we opened up another viewport on the West side of HAM3 in order to see both MC2 and PR2 baffles. Though, the MC2 baffle was completely occulting the PR2 baffle and therefore we could not see it. We could still confirm that the MC2 baffle has a cross bar structure on the side as shown in the design document (D1000327).
The baffle hole seems to be centered in the baffle frame within 3mm from the picture. Good.
The distance from the left baffle hole edge to the left inner edge of the baffle frame is about 52 pixels, it's 56 pixels for the right, i.e. about 2 pixels offset to the left, which corresponds to 2 or 3mm.
Keita
The hole diameter is also good (i.e. the ratio of baffle frame width to the hole diameter on the picture reasonably agrees with the spec).
Switch between the first attachment and the second to see if you agree with my assessment of the edges.
| Nominal | Image | |
| Baffle diameter | 2.756" | 53px |
| Baffle height | 8.34" | 160px |
| Baffle width | 8.74" | 165px |
| Diam/Width | 0.315 | 0.321 |
| Height/Width | 0.954 | 0.970 |
| Center offset | none | 2px to the left ~ 3mm |
Similar to what was rolled-out earlier today for the Suspensions (see LHO aLOG entry 14657), I've now svn'd up the latest HAM-ISI & HEPI MEDM Overview screens, which includes the embedded Guardian mini control-panel providing access to requestable states, as was developed at LLO (see LLO aLOG entry 15010). The following MEDM screens were updated:- /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/medm/hamisi/ U ISI_CUST_CHAMBER_OVERVIEW_LARGE.adl U ISI_CUST_CHAMBER_OVERVIEW.adl /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/hpi/common/medm/hepitemplate/ U HPI_CUST_CHAMBER_OVERVIEW.adl Screen-shots of the updated HAM-ISI & HEPI MEDM Overview screens are attached below.
added 802 channels removed 524 channels
I've scheduled a RH-X test to run from around 2:45AM for 5 hours.
We reported last week that the pitch RMS motions of the bottom masses was dominated by 0.5 Hz features on all BSC units. We are looking at the coherence between ISI, Suspension top mass and optical levers to find out how to reduce the bottom masses angular motion.
Plots:
The first figure attached shows coherence plots, the second figure shows transfer functions plots:
- in the top left, from "ISI longitudinal" to "SUS top mass longitudinal"
- in the top right, from "ISI longitudinal" to "SUS top mass pitch"
- in the bottom left, from "SUS top mass longitudinal" to "Optical Lever pitch"
- in the bottom right, from "SUS top mass pitch" to "Optical lever pitch"
Comments:
At 0.5 Hz,
- the coherence between ISI longitudinal and SUS top mass motion is not very high. We'll add more ISI channels to see how they contribute to the suspension point motion.
- the coherence betwen the suspension top mass and the optical levers is above 0.9 (above .99 in some instances). The BS longitudinal to pitch transfer functions show a Q around 20. The pitch to pitch transfer functions show similar Qs for all units. We can compare this to damping models.
Corrections:
- I used one hour of data starting on Monday Oct 27, 3 am PT.
- I fixed the axis labels and plots titles
SUS and LSC model changes. Jeff K
many sus models and LSC were changed. New IPC added between them. susaux models at end stations also changed.
HEPI Pump Controller. Hugh R
new EPICS databases started on EX and EY HEPI pump controllers. MEDM changed accordingly.
DAQ FW1 file system increase. Jim, Dave, Dan
h1ldasgw1 file system grown to use two raids.
Patch and Restart Workstations. Cyrus
All CDS workstations patched and restarted
Beckhoff changes. Patrick
Beckhoff systems for C1 (PLC1,3) X1 (PLC3) and Y1 (PLC3) modified.
DAQ reconfigured. Dave
DAQ reconfigured for Beckhoff and HEPI pump controller and susaux(ex,ey) changes. Restarted twice, needed start_streamers on various frontend after second restart.
Installing SUS DRIFTMON. Jim, Dave
Installing a test version of driftmon which doesn't require additional EPICS records. Testing NDS2 data collection parameters.
Beckhoff INI generator continues to write duplicate channels H1:PCL-ERROR_[CODE,FLAG] from both end stations. Would be nice if someone could fix this, I have to hand edit the ini files to prevent DAQ lockup on restart.
Aidan. Alastair
Following a successful install of the HWSY correction, we realigned the HWSX optical system to accomodate a change in the green leakage field from four weeks ago (probably due to changes in alignment of the BS and SR3). We coarsely matched the ALS and 800nm optical axes through the irises. We fine-tuned the centering of the probe beam to the ITM by observing the location of the center of the intensity relative to the center of the shadow from the BS and tweaking the alignment of the upper periscope mirror to get the intensity distribution concentric with the shadow.
We will run RH tests in the morning to try to ascertain the exact location of the centers of the ITMs in the HWS coordinates.
However: when I turned on the HWS-Y SLED, the HWS-X sensor started going haywire. By reviewing the camera stream from HWS-X itself, it became clear that some of the HWS-Y probe beam is making it into the HWS-X camera. We haven't yet figured out what this leakage path is. We can still run the sensors one at a time as diagnostics. Only HWS-X is currently running.
And: we're seeing glitches in the frames from HWS-X that have been seen before. They manifest as part of the image being transpose with another part of the image. This is clearly a digital issue (probably access of the framegrabber). It has really only been observed when we try to access both cameras from the framegrabber.
Images of the HWS-X camera stream, with and without the HWS-Y probe beam turned on, are attached.
WP 4916
Dan Moraru
The file system for writing frames on h1fw1 has been expanded by attaching a second SATABOY raid similar to h1fw0. This will provide a look back capability similar to h1fw0 as data is written over the coming weeks. The current look back capability of h1fw0 is:
| Data | Hours |
|---|---|
| Commisioning frames | 356 |
| Science Frames | 74 |
| Minute Trends | 106 |
| Second Trends | 851 |
8:15 Jodi and guest to LVEA
8:15 RichardM to LVEA to check ITMX HEPI L4C
9:00 Mitch to LVEA
9:15 Hugh to EX/EY hooking up HEPI Pressure sensors, back at 11:00
10:15 Betsy to LVEA
11:00 Karen to EY
13:30 Betsy back out to LVEA
14:30 JeffB and Andres to LVEA, moving 3IFO sus
15:00 Kyle to EY work wit Rai, back 16:00
I have tried to use the Guardian to isolate HAM2 ISI seven times today and it has never succeeded. Three times early ~8am, twice at 1250, and twice at 1500. Everytime I use the command script it succeeds. Another thing I've noticed the Guardian does differently from the old Command script: The Guardian loads the reference location at the intermediate points whereas the command script does all 6 dofs at the end.
Attached is the GS-13 Spectra after switching to the 100mHz Blends on X Y & Z. Again, it doesn't appear to be a better controller.
The ITMY RH is on at 4W for beam location of the HWS beam.
The default NDS server has been restored to h1nds1. This applies to all new logins, shells, or processes that use NDS, all currently running processes are unaffected and will continue to use h1nds0.
Work under permit 4919 and possible missed stuff from 4917: corner station quit IOC C:/SlowControls: svn update H1ECATC1: PLC3: 'Update from source' C:/SlowControls/Target/H1ECATC1/H1ECATC1.tsm: PLC1 rescan project, PLC3 rescan project; Actions -> Generate mappings, Check configuration; Save Copy C:/SlowControls/Target/H1ECATC1/H1ECATC1.tsm to C:/SlowControls/Scripts/Configuration/H1ECATC1/SYS/H1ECatC1.tsm. svn commit C:/SlowControls/Target/H1ECATC1/PLC3/PLC3.pro: rebuild all, save Copy C:/SlowControls/Target/H1ECATC1/PLC3/PLC3.pro to C:/SlowControls/TwinCAT/Source/Interferometer/Corner/Plc3.pro C:/SlowControls/TwinCAT/Source/Current/Interferometer/Corner/Plc3.pro: Export EXP. svn commit Plc3.pro and Plc3.exp. C:/SlowControls/Target/H1ECATC1/H1ECATC1.tsm: PLC3 rescan project; Actions -> Generate mappings, Check configuration; Save. Copy C:/SlowControls/Target/H1ECATC1/H1ECATC1.tsm to C:/SlowControls/Scripts/Configuration/H1ECATC1/SYS/H1ECatC1.tsm. svn commit H1ECATC1: SYS, PLC1, PLC3: 'Stop', 'Update from source', 'Compile': Compile failed. C:/SlowControls: svn update H1ECATC1: SYS, PLC1, PLC3: 'Stop', 'Update from source', 'Compile', 'Activate and run': TwinCAT PLC Control has stopped working Restart computer quit IOC H1ECATC1: SYS, PLC1. PLC3: 'Stop', 'Update from source', 'Compile': TwinCAT PLC Control has stopped working H1ECATC1: SYS, PLC1. PLC2. PLC3: 'Stop', 'Update from source', 'Compile': TwinCAT PLC Control has stopped working, 'Activate and run': TwinCAT PLC Control has stopped working At this point I don't know what is going on. Going into deeper investigation...
I got the corner station back, now end X is down...'mystery errors' in IOC.
All appear to be back. Burtrestores done to 6:10 am for all PLCs for the corner station, end X and end Y.
I'm currently injecting a 50mHz, 2 micro-radian ampltiude sinusoid into ITMY YAW (via the top stage). HWSY is now within a few mm of the conjugate plane of ITMY. The HWS code is running and will measure the apparent tilt at the HWS from the injection oscillation. I will use this to calibrate the magnificiation of the HWSY optical system.
Injection stopped.
I upgraded the guardian core and cdsutils (python ezca) installs:
I restarted most of the nodes, except for the following:
jameson.rollins@opsws2:~/src/cdsutils/trunk 0$ guardctrl list | grep -v 1095
node s k m vers state message
---- - - - ---- ----- -------
ALS_COMM o - - - - -
H1ECATC1PLC2 * E 1076 INIT
H1ECATX1PLC2 * E 1076 INIT
H1ECATY1PLC2 * E 1076 INIT
H1ISCEX * E 1076 INIT
H1ISCEY * E 1076 INIT
H1LSC * E 1076 INIT
H1LSCAUX * E 1076 INIT
HPI_HAM2 * * M 1083 ROBUST_ISOLATED
IAS_INPUT o - - - - -
IAS_MICH o - - - - -
IAS_PRC o - - - - -
IAS_SRC o - - - - -
IAS_TEST o - - - - -
IAS_XARM o - - - - -
IAS_YARM o - - - - -
IFO_ALIGN o - - - - -
ISC_LOCK o - - - - -
ISI_HAM2 * P 1083 WATCHDOG_TRIPPED_FULL_SHUTDOWN WATCHDOG TRIP: FULL_SHUTDOWN (4)
LSC * E 1076 INIT
LSC_PRMI_VAR_FINESSE * E 1083 DOWN MISALIGN PRM
LSC_PRX * P 1083 FAULT check LSC input matrix, ITMY not MISALIGNED
LSC_PRY * P 1080 FAULT PRM not ALIGNED, ITMX not MISALIGNED
SEI_HAM2 * P 1083 ISOLATED
SUS_MC1 * * E 1080 ALIGNED
SUS_MC3 * * E 1080 ALIGNED
SUS_PR3 * * E 1080 ALIGNED
SUS_PRM * * M 1083 ALIGNED
The non-running nodes (s='o') had various errors on restart, so I shut them down until they can be fixed. I shut down all the IAS nodes since I was told they're not in use. The HAM2 nodes were not restarted because Hugh was in the middle of doing some SEI work on HAM2. The nodes starting with "H1" are the "CSDEF" nodes (not sure what the status of those is). I'll restart these nodes when I'm sure it's ok.
I noticed that there are a couple of "hidden" nodes, that are not listed in the Guardian overview screen:
H1ECATC1PLC2 * E 1076 INIT
H1ECATX1PLC2 * E 1076 INIT
H1ECATY1PLC2 * E 1076 INIT
H1ISCEX * E 1076 INIT
H1ISCEY * E 1076 INIT
H1LSC * E 1076 INIT
H1LSCAUX * E 1076 INIT LSC * E 1076 INIT
LSC_PRMI_VAR_FINESSE * E 1083 DOWN MISALIGN PRM
LSC_PRX * P 1083 FAULT check LSC input matrix, ITMY not MISALIGNED
LSC_PRY * P 1080 FAULT PRM not ALIGNED, ITMX not MISALIGNED
We should be very careful about these. If they're being used, they should be on the overview. If they're not being used, they should be shut down. Do not leave running nodes off of the overview screen
I should note that a bug was fixed in the cdsutils avg function. The standard deviation calculations were bogus, off by some unknown but large factor. This new version fixes that issue so that the standard deviation calculations returned with the "stdev" option are now correct.
We have reverted the cdsutils to cdsutils-329 (the version installed here since september), we did this by changing the link in /ligo/apps/linux-x86_64
The guardians were failing when they called the new avg function, we tried using the new cds utils function from the command line but it doesn't seem to be working.
Alexa, Sheila, Rana, Evan, Dan, Kiwamu
Today we worked on getting DRMI locked on 3F. It took us a while to get through the inital alingment sequence for various reasons, but once we did, and sorted out the WFS DC centering (Evan and Rana made some improvements to the AS A centering loop, Dan pointed out that the output matrix was mixed up), we were able to use the ASC to bring the DRMI to a reasonable build up (POP18 at 200 cnts).
We then looked at the demod phase of our 3F sensors. We tuned both 135 and 27 to miniminize the Q signal, first exciting PRM then SRM.
The best demod phases in degrees:
| PRM | SRM | |
| 27 | 85.5 | 101.8 |
| 135 | -25 |
65 |
We left 27 at 85.8 (we started at 84.8) and 135 at 65 (we started at 63). We thendouble checked the relative gain between 3F and 1F signals, they are the same as previously, and we were able to transition to 3F. (durring all of this DRMI was nice and stable, locking for up to an hour before we knocked it out with an excitation of some sort).
Since this we have made a few attempts to bring the arms in, we redid our entire inital alingment process, and after that realingned the DIFF and COMM beat notes (they haven't been realingned since the pico motor in HAM3 was moved last week). We got about 3dBm in both beatnotes.
Once we had the arms (off resonance by 1 kHz in green), we were able to lock DRMI quickly, but the build up was low. When the ASC came on, it did improve the build up but as the build up got better, we started to mode hop. This was repeated a few times. By offsetting SRCL by -800 counts, we were able to avoid this mode hopping.
We have now rung up the roll mode at 13 Hz on ETMY.
some additional info for the roll mode:
(Developing the roll mode)
In a first half an hour or so, the roll mode was not excited and therefore we could close the ALS DIFF loop relatively easily. However at some point, we saw the roll mode slowly developing on a time scale of roughly 5 or 10 minutes which eventually killed the DIFF loop supposedly due to saturation in ETM DACs. After this incident, we were never able to stably lock the DIFF loop. The loop did not stay locked for a minute. I then waited for an hour while leaving ETMY untouched with a hope that the mode settles down in the meantime. But it did not. I still had a difficulty closing the loop.
(ETMY ESD is bad)
Before we started working on the DIFF loop, we briefly checked whether the ESDs are functional or not by injecting a line in pitch at 2.13 Hz. The ETMX ESD looked fine, but the ETMY ESD was pretty bad. Even though I shook the mirror vertically in pitch, oplev showed the motion which was mostly dominated by a yaw motion. The yaw motion was bigger than the pitch one by more than a factor of 5. Apparently the situation is different from how we used to be a couple of weeks ago (see alog 14415). I did not try exciting it in the yaw direction this time. I believe that the ESD is the cause for ringing up the roll mode.
(Some efforts did not help)
I tried two things in order to mitigate the issue. But neither worked.