Displaying reports 74901-74920 of 86123.Go to page Start 3742 3743 3744 3745 3746 3747 3748 3749 3750 End
Reports until 18:50, Thursday 24 April 2014
H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:50, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11555)
ETMY UIM modified coil drivers

Yesterday, the modified UIM coil drivers for ETMY and ETMX were tested in-situ. The transfer functions are showing an average drive increase of ~3.8 for ETMY and ~3.9 for ETMX comparing them before and after, which corresponds to the modification as described in T1400223.
A second test was carried out, using the monitor boards current channels. The test consisted in sending the equivalent of 1V to the coil drivers, to each of the UIM osem channels, and recording the current increase with channel ${QUAD}_L1_FASTIMON_${OSEM}. Jeff K helped me for the calibration of those channels.

The output voltage of the "fast current channel" of the monitor board as described in T1100378 is measured across the resistor Zout. The relation between the current and the ouput voltage is described in the last equation of Jeff's notes attached, with R1/R2 = 1/3 and Zout = 2010 ohms. In other words Current_readback_calibrated (A) = FASTIMON_Readback (cts)* 1/1638.4 (V/cts) * 3/2 * 1/2010 (ohms-1)

For ETMX I measured a transconductance of ~0.6 mA/V for each channel which matches pretty well with the design, but for ETMY it didn't quite match. First, only two channels (even though the mass was moving) were seeing a response, and secondly, the working channels were showing ~3mA increase for 1V drive. Since the transfer function shows that the driver is working as expected we certainly have something going on with the monitor board.

The non functioning channels are LL and UR osems. For UL and LR, when no voltage is sent to the coil driver, the readback sees ~4000 cts (as shown on the screenshot).
 

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:03, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11564)
~1515 hrs. local -> "Burped" unpumped volume seen by PT246B into adjacent RGA volume


			
			
H1 AOS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11556)
Ops DAY Summary

Days Activities

 

H1 SEI (SEI)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:15, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11561)
OPS: reset of HEPI L4C Accumulated WD Counters Thursday 24nd April 2014

Went through the Operator check of saturations with HEPI this afternoon.  The HEPI Saturation Counters which I had to reset were: 

HAM2, HAM4, ITMx(BSC3), ITMy(BSC1), ETMx(BSC9), ETMy(BSC10)

LHO VE (VE)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:12, Thursday 24 April 2014 - last comment - 13:56, Thursday 24 April 2014(11559)
MY Pressure Sensor Alarm Level Changed

A pressure sensor at MY had been MAJOR Alarming the last few days, but this is due to it being worked on.  It will be displaying values of a higher pressure for a month or so while it is valved out and being worked on.  To prevent getting alarms from this, we've bumped up the MAJOR alarm setting to 1x10^-6 (originally it would alarm at 5.11x10-8).

Since the Vacuum computer was really slow, Dave ssh-ed into the computer (still was slow) & did the following:

vacuum@control0:~$ caget HVE-MY:Y5_246BTORR.HIHI
HVE-MY:Y5_246BTORR.HIHI        5.11e-08
vacuum@control0:~$ caput HVE-MY:Y5_246BTORR.HIHI 1.00e-06
Old : HVE-MY:Y5_246BTORR.HIHI        5.11e-08
New : HVE-MY:Y5_246BTORR.HIHI        1e-06

We must revert the alarm setting when the VAC work is complete.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 13:56, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11562)VE

OK, 1e-6 wasn't good enough (Kyle started baking out RGA components today & this shot up the pressure on this sensor).  John said I could up the Alarm setting to 1e-05, and if it alarms here, then the VAC crew will just power OFF the sensor.

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:57, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11560)
~1130 hrs. local -> Began baking portable RGA currently mounted at Y-mid on the Y2-1 beamtube port
Baking will continue for as long as a few weeks
H1 SEI (SEI)
hugo.paris@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:55, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11557)
HEPI safe.snap corrected

HEPI safe.snap files had the wrong ..._L4C_THRESH_MAX values recorded, as pointed out by Dave yesterday. Those safe.snap files are now fixed. The new versions are committed under the SVN -r7796.

Details are attached.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI (INS)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:53, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11558)
WHAM6 SEI ISI Electronics Powered Down--for access to WHAM6 Bellows retraction Bolts

The Apollo crew was unable to get wrenches to the large clamp bolts which retract the bellows of the chamber's west side 60" flange.  We needed to remove the Feedtrhu protection shroud and the cabling attached to the feedthru.  So the WHAM6 isi interface electronics were powered down.

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:54, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11554)
CDS model and DAQ restart report, Wednesday 23rd April 2014

model restarts logged for Wed 23/Apr/2014
2014_04_23 08:46 h1nds1
2014_04_23 08:53 h1fw1
2014_04_23 09:03 h1broadcast0

2014_04_23 10:02 h1asc
2014_04_23 11:06 h1susmc2
2014_04_23 11:29 h1susprm
2014_04_23 11:38 h1sussrm
2014_04_23 11:52 h1susmc1
2014_04_23 12:01 h1susmc3
2014_04_23 12:11 h1suspr2
2014_04_23 12:18 h1sussr2
2014_04_23 12:58 h1suspr3
2014_04_23 13:08 h1sussr3

2014_04_23 13:16 h1broadcast0
2014_04_23 13:16 h1dc0
2014_04_23 13:16 h1fw0
2014_04_23 13:16 h1fw1
2014_04_23 13:16 h1nds0
2014_04_23 13:16 h1nds1

no unexpected restarts.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:35, Thursday 24 April 2014 (11553)
Installation Meeting Minutes

815-828

mike, daniel, stefan, aiden, terry, bubba, margot, ski, matt h, jason, patrick, hugh, jeff, jodi, andres, corey, richard, pablo, david H, jimW, thomas, filiberto

H1 SYS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:33, Wednesday 23 April 2014 - last comment - 08:56, Friday 23 May 2014(11552)
Camera Housings Installed On ITMx Cryo Baffle Spool

While the Gate Valves were closed and we were Laser Safe, I installed a pair of aLIGO Camera Housings on the Spool where the ITMx cameras will be. 

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:56, Friday 23 May 2014 (12048)

Additional Notes: 

Lexan covers were already installed on these viewports.

Checked out unused viewports:  VP1 & VP4 (see attached map).  Line of sight looks good for both of these viewports.  I installed camera housings and kept them on both of these viewports. 

Currently VP5 has the sole ITM camera.

Pictures of this work are located here.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SYS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:16, Wednesday 23 April 2014 - last comment - 10:43, Friday 09 May 2014(11541)
Checking First Batch Of Camera Filters for ITM Spool Cameras Part II

Re-did measurements from yesterday.  Daniel brought up point about green light leaking into IR measurements and vice versa.  So addressed this.

IR Laser Light:  Look At filters to attenuate IR

Here we wanted to see which filter was best for viewing the GREEN light, so we wanted the filter which passed green & cut out IR.  With the Prometheus laser we used its IR light.  To make sure there was no Green light, we dropped in a Hoya R72 filter (to remove any Green light from laser).  Then we looked at the filters I bought .  So this is what we had:

The BP550 is OK, but Daniel says the OD of this filter may be low and we should look for a Schott glass filter (order of 4mm thick, similar to our old iLIGO glasses).  Either that or we can see what a couple of the BP 550s filters look like in series.

GREEN Laser Light:  Look At filters to attenuate Green

Here we want to see which filter is best for viewing IR light, so we want a filter which passes IR & attenuates Green.  With the Prometheus laser we had green light.  To make sure there is no IR light leaking in, we dropped an iLIGO goggle in the beam path as a filter.

LP 920 may be good...maybe have two in series?

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:43, Friday 09 May 2014 (11801)

So the plan is this.

For Green-viewing camera, we will actually use a 4mm thick KG5 Schott filter (these are on order from UQG Optics in the UK).

For the IR-viewing camera, we actually want to try the LP 550 from the entry above (the LP920 & Hoya R72 will show IR light, but we won't see much else).  Since we have one of the LP550s, we can test out this filter now.  Want to make sure we can easily install this on the Rainbow zoom lens (without disturbing alignment).  If we like it, we can order more of these guys.

H1 INS (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:25, Wednesday 23 April 2014 - last comment - 20:28, Wednesday 23 April 2014(11550)
ALS DIFF work
Alexa, Stefan

- With the y-arm o.k. (the remaining glitches were actually bleeding in from x-arm locking), we realigned the x-arm.
- Note: we need to switch back to a better camera view for the x-arm transmitted light. The current one does not provide a lot of information because a) it is completely saturated and b) it is in a guoy phase that is not very sensitive to TMS alignment.
- Once we had both arms aligned and locking fairly reliable, we looked at the DIFF electronics:
- First we found 3 switches on the VCO and FDD that were left off.
- Next we noticed that the DIFF beat note was only -32dBm - we verified the EPICS read-back with the scope.
- So we hooked up the scope on ISCT1, but right then an earthquake struck and knocked out every ISI on site. Thus we went home.
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 20:28, Wednesday 23 April 2014 (11551)
The earthquake was reported as a 6.7 94km S of Port Hardy, Canada (Vancouver Island), at 2014-04-23 20:10:13 UTC-07:00
H1 ISC
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:39, Wednesday 23 April 2014 - last comment - 19:40, Wednesday 23 April 2014(11546)
EY measurements

Today we were able to lock the y arm for a significant period of time. Here are some settings:

PDH REFL Servo Board:

I took a few measurements:

  1. Power at REFL A PD: 6.5mW
  2. PDH error signal peak to peak: 780mV
  3. PDH loop suppressed error signal (EY_PDH_NoiseSpecV.txt)
  4. OLTF: again the UGF was around 3kHz with a phase margin of 68deg (mag --> 125.txt, phase --> 126.txt)
  5. With ITMX misaligned, I measured the shot noise of REFL A (EY_PDH_ShotNoiseSpecV.txt) -- this noise is partially limited by the SR785 noise; this is not "pure shot noise"
  6. While blocking the PD, I measured the dark noise of REFL A (EY_PDH_DarkNoiseSpecV.txt) -- this noise is limited by the SR785 noise
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
alexan.staley@LIGO.ORG - 19:40, Wednesday 23 April 2014 (11549)

Note: Stefan has since changed the input gain to -13dB and the fast gain to 6dB. The overall UGF and loop shape is the same. See alog 11547

H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:14, Wednesday 23 April 2014 (11548)
Control State Definition for Y-end (H1ISCEY and H1ECATY1PLC2)
I created a script, createCSD in sys/common/scripts, that sets up all required files and code for implementing a new instance of the control state definition. I also improved the makeMEDMfromOUTXML.py somewhat when dealing with sub-states.

createCSD takes the following three inputs:
  createCSD SYSTEM systemhome snapfile
   SYSTEM     has to be the capital version of the system name, i.e H1ISCEX or H1ECATX1PLC2
   systemhome is the system subdirectory name in userapps, i.e. something like als, isc, isi, lsc, omc, pem, psl
   snapfile   is the initial snapshot setting that will be enforced. If not specified, the default safe.snap will be used

It uses a burt snap file to create a very simple xml file with no states. Running this xml file will simply continously enforce that snapshot file. Any further modifications can then be done manually in the xml file.

Using this I stood up CSD-Guardians for H1ISCEY and H1ECATY1PLC2. I also manually created the same states for H1ISCEY as we have for H1ISCEX, so H1ISCEY is ready to be used.

I haven't done the manual edits for H1ECATY1PLC2.

I left H1ISCEX, H1ECATY1PLC2 and H1ISCEY running in OP. H1ECATY1PLC2 was left with the Guardian paused.
H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:03, Wednesday 23 April 2014 (11547)
EY PDH VCO swapped
Alexa, Pablo, Keita, Stefan

We noticed that H1:ALS-Y_VCO_TUNEMON and H1:ALS-Y_VCO_FREQUENCY were only reacting to half the range of the drive from the common mode board (H1:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_FASTMON). We thus swapped the EX VCO ( D0900605 , S1200562 ) with a H2 spare ( S1200566 ). This fixed the issue.

Next we noticed that the PDH signal doesn't bring the arm power to a maximum.
With a H1:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_IN1GAIN of -13dB, and an H1:ALS-Y_REFL_SERVO_COMOFS of -4.75V we get the maximum build-up, about 1750 counts of H1:ALS-C_DIFF_A_LF_OUT_DQ. With a misaligned ITM Keita and Alexa verified that it is not an RFAM effect.

We still see transients in the arm build-up.


H1 CDS (DAQ, SEI)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:59, Wednesday 23 April 2014 (11545)
DAQ problems with HPI ETMY (and BS)

Jim and I have been investigating DAQ issues with HEPI ETMY which started over the weekend. Brian noticed that HPI ETMY's L4C Sat Counter started looking like the WD threshold, and was also counting down from 89k to 30k which it should no longer need to do.

We are unsure about the details, but it appears that when Jeff restarted h1hpietmy at 15:02PDT Saturday afternoon , the old INI file was archived but the newer file was used. It would appear that the INI Checksum the FE sends to the DAQ was calculated from the archived file, so DAQ did not show a 0x2000 error for this model. At a later time of 18:50PDT Saturday Jeff restarted the DAQ, at which point the FE DAQ status went to 0x2000 and the data in the DAQ was mixed up (resulting in a WD threshold being named the Sat Count). When I pressed the "DAQ RELOAD" button for HPI ETMY monday morning at 10:24PDT the FE and DAQ synced up and the DAQ data became good again.

When the model was restarted on Sauturday it read the safe.snap file which set the WD threshold level high, hence the ramping back down to 30,000. The safe.snap is being corrected by Brian and Hugo.

I had to "DAQ RELOAD" h1hpibs on monday as well, so it could have the same issues over the weekend.

We suspect the fact that the make-install and model restart occured very close to each other may be a possible cause of the INI file mismatch, but this is pure speculation.

If commissioners suspect any DAQ issues with h1hpietmy and h1hpibs we should restart the models.

Displaying reports 74901-74920 of 86123.Go to page Start 3742 3743 3744 3745 3746 3747 3748 3749 3750 End