FAMIS31407
Swapped the filters in the two chillers while they were running this morning. There was slight discoloration in both. The mesh diffusers/flow straighteners had some gunk buildup in them. I have some that should have arrived today that I will put in later.
[Tony, Erik]
We verified that the ETMX hardware watchdog started to count down when the connection from the satellite amps for ETMX was removed.
Bypass will expire:
Tue Sep 30 12:08:51 PM PDT 2025
For channel(s):
H0:FMC-CS_FIRE_PUMP_1
H0:FMC-CS_FIRE_PUMP_2
At the weekend, Ryan reduced the OPO Trans Setpoint form 80uW to 75uW. Today I used the SQZT0 SHG waveplates to maximize the power available to the Pump and then I minimized rejected HAM7 power. After doing these, with the OPO locked at 75uW, the OPO_ISS control mon is at 2.5V, it is unhappy normally when below 2.0V. I am able to lock the OPO with 80uW OPO trans setpoint, but the OPO ISS controlmon is at 1.4V so probably wouldn't last very long. Leaving with the 75uW setpoint.
NLG as per 76542:
| OPO Setpoint | Amplified Max | Amplified Min | UnAmp | Dark | NLG |
| 75 | 0.0103676 | 0.000175 | 0.0005591 | -1.1e-5 | 18.2 |
WP12814
Jim, Erik, Dave:
I have rev-locked built and installed Jim's new h1hpiham6 model. This is an internal ADC rewiring of 4 channels, no DAQ restart needed. We will restart the model later this morning when Jim completes his chamber side wiring work.
Jim put HEPI HAM6 into a safe state and we installed the new model at 08:40 PDT. No DAQ restart was required, I just had to clear the DAQ CRCs and DIAG_RESET the latched IPCs.
For a check, I was viewing the filter module MEDMs for WITNESS_P1 and 3DL4C_A_X. With the old code the witness was seeing around 700 counts and A_X zero, with the new code this was reversed, as expected.
TITLE: 09/30 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: EARTHQUAKE
Wind: 17mph Gusts, 14mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 1.28 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.57 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Lost lock just a bit ago due to a 6.9 earthquake in the Philippines. Maintenance starting a bit earlier because of this.
Looks like the SQZer unlocked at 1216 UTC this morning, relocking again and gettting back into Observing at 1220 UTC.
Reason for SQZ unlock was PMC PZT getting to the end of it's range at 100V.
H1 Manager just called to tell me that we've been out of Observing for a bit. I know we recently bumped up the times for the Tuesday morning measurements to run, and that's why we're out of Observing, so I'm ignoring H1 Manager's call for help.
Workstations were updated and rebooted. This was an OS packages updated. Conda packages were not updated.
TITLE: 09/29 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Quiet shift with only a brief (& easy) drop from Observing due to SQZ.
Otherwise, locked the entire shift for a lock going on 21.75hrs (so no opportunities to shutt of Annulus Ion Pumps for HAM5/6).
LOG:
At the top of the hour (within 15seconds), the Squeezer unlocked and took H1 down. Tony was in here and thought the timing was odd with it happening close to the top of the hour! (he saw that the PMC went down at 00:00:15).
The Log for the SQZ MANAGER also notes the PMC as the cause (w/ a message of "LO railing!").
I slowly got SQZ windows opened & got the wiki up and started recovery by Steps:
Reason for SQZ unlock was PMC PZT getting to the end of it's range at 0V.
The FC Trans level in the wiki was a red herring (has been corrected), we're unsure why it has dropped so much in the past few months, plot.
TITLE: 09/29 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: We stayed locked the whole shift, 16 hours.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16:48 | VAC | Pump | LVEA | N | AIP pumping on HAM6 | ongoing |
| 15:33 | PEM | Robert, Anamaria | LVEA | N | Set up PEM measurements | 16:26 |
| 16:04 | FAC | Randy | Xarm, before Mid | N | Inspections, power washing X1 midpoint | 21:29 |
| 16:16 | FAC | Nellie | MidY | N | Tech clean | 17:16 |
| 17:15 | CAL | Tony | PCAL lab | LOCAL | Turn on lights | 17:18 |
| 17:40 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | N | Change measurement | 17:55 |
| 17:56 | FAC | Chris | Optics lab | N | Look for bags | 18:04 |
| 21:15 | JAC | Corey | Vac prep lab | N | JAC table | 23:14 |
TITLE: 09/29 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 9mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.41 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Hand Off from RyanC with:
During facilities annual flow test and inspection of all site fire hydrants, it was noted that hydrant L9, which resides on the vertex interior nearest the FCE was not fully closing and bleeding a small amount of water. This issue was made worse when an outside group was invited to help troubleshoot the problem and overtightened the stem to the point that it was completely broken. Following this, I (with the assistance of locate) located the service valve and isolated supply of firewater to the hydrant. Given the age of the hydrant, repairing it was cost prohibitive, so a new hydrant was installed. It is probably worth mentioning here that the thrust block placed back in ~97' was sizeable. Almost too large for the mini excavator to remove. This came as a big surprise to all involved and should be considered in the future if any hydrant excavation takes place. Also, the as-built location of this hydrants service valve is incorrect. The drawing details the valve being southwest of the hydrant, when it is in fact to the northeast. E. Otterman R. McCarthy T. Guidry
Sheila, Camilla. Saved to camilla.compton/Documents/sqz/templates/dtt/Fringe_wrapping.xml
ZM2,5 Fridge Wrapping with No SQZ light
As Sheila suggested in 86836, the amount of backscatter we are seeing from SQZ should be due to light from the IFO being backscattered rather than any excess SQZ light. To confirm this I took SQZ DOWN, mis- aligned FC, blocked all three SQZ beams on SQZT0 and re-opened the beam-diverter so that the IFO light could get into HAM7 but there was no SQZ generated light. The ZM2 and ZM5 scatter shelves were the same in both this and the nominal SQZ configurations, confirming all backscattered light is coming from the IFO. Plot attached. This plot does show our ZM5 scatter has increased since 2024, ZM2 is the same.
I did the same with the 30Hz injection too, saved to Fringe_wrapping_nosqz.xml, refs 0-8 are no sqz beams, refs 9-17 are nominal FDS. Plot attached, if anything, the shoulders of the 30Hz peak are larger with no sqz beams, so again, there is no difference.
ZM2,5 Fridge Wrapping with Different Alignments on OFI_PD_A
In FRS # 35457 and 87071, we theorized that the backscatter could be off the OFI_PD_A which we shows out beam is clipping, when we change the alignment to this PD using ZM4/5, we change the level of light on OFI_PD_A, showing we are clipping and not centered on the PD, but this also changes the level of SQZ so it's hard to compare. Unsure if there's a real difference, plot attached and ndscope. It's possible that with more light on PD_A (less clipping) there is a more scatter and a secondary ZM5 scatter shelf ~25-40Hz. Would want to repeat or misalign more to confirm.
| References on Fringe_wrapping.xml | No Injection | ZM5 Inj | ZM2 Inj |
| Nominal FDS (ZM5 Yaw -460urad, -4.6dB, OFI_PD_A = 0.031) |
0 | 1,2 | 3,4 |
| No SQZ light, BeamDiv Open to IFO | 5 | 6,7 | 8,9 |
| FDS, ZM5 Yaw -510urad, -3.4dB, OFI_PD_A = 0.024 | 10 | 11,12 | 13,14 |
| FDS, ZM5 Yaw -440urad, -3.4dB, OFI_PD_A = 0.033 | 15 | 16,17 | 18,19 |
Other ideas that haven't been done yet: change the temperature of SFI2 and repeat backscatter measurements, repeat above with increased alignment changes the OFI_PD_A changes.
Elenna realized while I was doing this that we should turn off the 13Hz Roll mode damping before injecting into ZM2/5 as this increased DARM noise might confusing the damping signals.
To turn off the roll mode damping: sitemap > SUS > Bounce Roll > DAMPING Filters. Then turn the gain of the one damping to zero (already should be a 10s Tramp).
As Ryan correctly identified, the issue to why the SQZ dropped was there was no enough green power to keep the OPO ISS locked. So he had to reduced the setpoint in sqzparams from 80uW to 75uW. It wouldn't surprise me if this happens again as we are still close to the botton of the ISS's range.
Tomorrow AM we'll check if we can get any more power with the SHG waveplate, otherwise we may need to realign through the AOM and into the fiber again as we last did in 86323 or move crystal spots.
Yesterday I went into the optics lab and re-measured the coupling between input beam motion and PD array. While taking measurements I noticed that the injection could not be seen on the AC readouts of the PDs (example) so I tuned the temperature of the laser via changing the resistance of the controller, I went from ~10kOhms up to 13 kOHms and down to 8kOhms and while I found places where the noise reduced see example of noisy trace here, I couldn't find anywhere with the controller where the trace renamed stably in the non-noisy state. I then decided to tune the pump current down from 130mA to ~100mA and eventually found a somewhat stable place. I still had to wait through some periods of noise to trigger the measurement of the PDs.
I alos increased the modulation ampltitude to 80 mVpp. The counts on the QPD LCD readout were 10672, see image.
When the laser is in its quiet state the AC PD traces should comfortably fit on the screen of the osclloscopes with a 5mV scale, with the laser noisy this is more like 100mV, I also use 100mV scale for the QPD, I didn't change it when I reduced the noise on the laser.
The noisy state for the QPD outputs is here, the quiet state is here.
For each measurement I used a capture range of 400ms on the time axis of the scope and 125 000 samples selected on the 'ACQUIRE' menu.
The final measurements are:
PD 1 - 4 measured at AC: T0012ALL.CSV
PD 5 - 8 measured at AC: T0014ALL.CSV
QPD X, Y and SUM channels measured at AC: T0013ALL.CSV
The two DC measurements are going to be averaged so I didn't wait for a quiet time to measure them.
PD 1 - 4 measured at DC: T0011ALL.CSV
PD 5 - 8 measured at DC: T0010ALL.CSV
To save you need to click on the menu button and change the resolution to be'Full', the format to be CSV and the channels captured to be 'ALL', the file number will roll over every time you save so you don't need to enter it manually.
The code to produce this plot is in my optics lab code repo.
The graph of the TF from horizontal dither on the input mirror to horizontal dither across the array, shows that we are not getting much coherent modulation of the light intensity on the PDs at 100Hz which is the dither frequency. Either my code is wrong or I need to increase the dither amplitude for the mirror.
The maths to work this out was
A time series = abs(dither in direction horizontal to bench on QPD in V)/ (motion horizontal to bench volts on QPD/mm moved horizontal to bench on QPD)
B time series = AC voltage on each PD / mean of DC voltage on each PD
TF = CSD (B, A) / PSD (A, A)
I used gwpy for the calculations this time.
The attached plot shows each PD in the array as a different colour with magnitude on the top and phase on the bottom.
We realised in the analysis that we should be using :
H_amp on QPD = Xcos theta + Y sin theta where theta is the angle between the X axis of the QPD and the horizontal scan direction of the beam worked out from our previous calibration measurments, 14 degrees.
This gives a different value for the couplings. All the PDs other than PD6 did not have coherences 0.9 or over so I only attach the final TF for PD6. We increased the dither amplitude after this to improve the measurement of the other PDs.