Displaying reports 72761-72780 of 83002.Go to page Start 3635 3636 3637 3638 3639 3640 3641 3642 3643 End
Reports until 13:30, Wednesday 05 March 2014
H1 SUS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:30, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 15:58, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10555)
Betsy to LVEA
Jeff and Betsy will swap the glass optic into the SR3 suspension when Jeff gets back from end Y.
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 15:50, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10558)
Betsy out of LVEA.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 15:58, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10560)
Work is done.
H1 PEM
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:27, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10553)
Jeff B. to end Y
Swapping cable on dust monitor.
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:50, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10548)
Karen to end Y


			
			
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:49, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10547)
Cris to end X, mopping VEA
about 20 min ago
H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:49, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10546)
Filiberto removing SUS watchdog chassis from H1 electronics room


			
			
H1 SEI
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:15, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10543)
H1 ISI ETMX Trips after several minutes, Unstable ST1-ST2 Sensor Correction
H1 ISI ETMX trips again on actuators.

Got up to:
Level 2 isolation on both stages,
TCrappy blends on both stages,
ST1-ST2 sensor correction on

Went back to what I was doing, then ~5 minutes later, both ST1 and ST2 actuators trip.

What is the difference between when visiting commissioners design all of these improvements vs. when they trip? Day time vs. night time? Weekends vs. During the week? There's something systematically wrong with our commissioning process.
Images attached to this report
H1 SEI (SUS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:50, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 12:12, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10539)
H1 ISIS ETMX Trips while using SWITCH ALL from
For the records. GPS time 1078083583. Tripped on Actuators. 

Level 2 isolation on both stages, no ST1-ST2 sensor correction on. Had been running on "Start" blends on both stages for quite some time, T240s were pleasantly green. Tried moving ST1 from "Start" to "TCrappy", tripped halfway through on actuators. First glitch in captured screen show is start of switching third spike killed it.

Since glitch appears much larger in horizontal, we'll try switching vertical first (Z, RX, RY), then horizontal (X, Y, RZ).
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 12:12, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10542)
Blending from "Start" to "TCrappys" on verticals  (Z, RX, and RY) then horizontals (X, Y, and RZ) worked much better. I've tried twice (thanks to another trip from unstable ST1 ST2 SC).

We should change the SWITCH ALL script to performed the blend switching as such. Note that it also might be the difference between starting the switch process at human-button-click speed vs. computer speed, so we might wanna consider staggering the start of the blend switching.
H1 AOS
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:36, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10538)
WBSC10 ETMy Alignment
IAS: D. Cook, J. Oberling
SEI: J. Warner, G. Grabeel, M. Robinson
 
Aligned the X, Y, and Z positions and Yaw of the ETMy this morning.  The errors are as follows:

All is within spec, we are ready to move forward with HEPI actuator attachment; IAS will take another look afterwards to ensure we are still within spec.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:31, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10537)
Jim, Greg and Mitchell back from end Y


			
			
H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:16, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 13:00, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10536)
Keita to end X lab for parts and then to end Y to help with TMS


			
			
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 12:04, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10541)
Back from end X.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 12:33, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10545)
going to end Y.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 13:00, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10550)
Done
LHO VE
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:50, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 11:50, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10532)
Ski to mid Y to check on instrument air alarm


			
			
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 11:50, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10540)
Done. It was a bad belt.
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:16, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 12:16, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10528)
Jodi at mid Y
Has been for about 20 min.
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 12:16, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10544)
Done
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:13, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 10:57, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10522)
Optics got dirty - EY

Sometime between leaving the cartridge test stand and yesterday inside of BSC10, the optics in the suspension got really dirty.  The barrels of the ETM test mass, ERM optic, and PUM have accumulated alot of particulate.  I wiped these clean just prior to welding in Jan and recall them looking much better than they do in the pictures below when they were hanging on the test stand.  So, between the last bit of cartridge work, the cartridge flight and the in-chamber work over the last week lots of particulate has swirled around the in-vac hardware (about a 2 week duration).  Here's the sequence of cleaning in case Calum wants to know:

On test stand, just prior to flight:

- I wiped and vacuumed SUS, bagged both SUS and TMS

- Hugh wiped all of the ISI above, then bagged ISI

Cartridge flight Feb 24th

~2 days after in-chamber I wiped entire floor and viewport surfaces of BSC10 chamber, I did NOT inspect optics

- cabling, TMS payloading, SEI float/balance

- yesterday, I see this gross particulate accumulation, some on the suspension structure too, harder to see since it's metal surfaces though

- I wipe the entire floor of chamber again

More cleaning to follow, obviously.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 10:57, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10533)

Note, the particle counter which was hanging around in the test stand area was worked on early last week and then parked under the tube in the chamber cleanroom.  This wasn't a particularly useful place to count particles so I moved the counter to in front of the door yesterday.  Long story short, no particle data is useful before yesterday.  Par.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:32, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 12:56, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10514)
ETMX ISI

We had a lot of trouble early in the evening isolating ETMX, we kept tripping the watchdog on stage 2.  We tried reseting the CPS offsets, and eventually were able to get it to isolate with Tcrappy and level 2 controllers, but the motion was rather large (~ten fringes per second).  We left stage 2 with damping only. 

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:02, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10518)SEI
Were you sending any particularly large locking transients to the ETM, to the top mass in particular? What did the input motion look like? Did it trip on actuators, or some sensor? 
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 12:56, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10549)

We haven't been using feedback to HEPI, and turned off the feedback to the top mass when we started having trouble.  there were acutator trips, GS13 trips, and T240 trips (I frogot to disable the T240 watchdog once).  

Also, at one point last night I turned on the sensor correction with the blend filters still on Start, this was obviously bad although nothing tripped.  Maybe this is only intended to be used with T240s, or only with Tcrappy blends. 

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:29, Wednesday 05 March 2014 - last comment - 13:38, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10511)
measurement of IR noise with COMM locked

Alexa, Daniel, Sheila

We normalized the refl PDH error signal, and saw that we can stay in the linear range of this signal with only ALS COMM locked. 

We first normalized LSC-X_TR_A_LF by adding a gain of 0.000154 so that the tranmission peak is at roughly 1.  We set LSC-REFLBIAS to  REFL_A_RF9_I over the transmitted power (LSC-X_TR_A_LF).  The first screen shot is the PDH, the transmitted power, and the normalized error signal as we move the COMM VCO set frequency.  In the red trace we moved the frequency by 2kHz; meanwhile, in the blue trace we moved half as fast over 1kHz.  We used Alexa's equation from alog 7054  to roughly calibrate the signal: 80Hz cavity pole/150 counts pp of the PDH signal=0.533Hz/count.

We put this gain into the REFL_BIAS filter, we will do a more carefull calculation in the morning. With this calibrated error signal we were able to measure an out of loop spectrum of the noise between the arm cavity and the PSL.  Attached are some of the spectra that we took. In the top panel the green trace is a reference with the cleanroom over HAM1 on, in the red trace we turned the cleanroom off and Alexa tried to tune up the arm cavity alignment by maximizing the green transmitted power.  This realingment clearly helped at low frequecies, and reduced the coherence with the ETMX PIT oplev. 

The RMS we measured is completely dominated by low frequency noise that changed, probably because the alignment was drifting.  The RMS down to 0.1 Hz varied from 30Hz-70Hz, we also measured an RMS of 58Hz down to 0.01 Hz.

We saw coherence with the end station PDH reflected signal above 1kHz,  coherence with the PIT oplevs (mostly ETMX, which currently has level 2 controlers on Stage 1 and damping only on stage 2) around the PIT resonances (0.4-0.5 Hz), and coherence with YAW OpLevs from 0.04-0.5 Hz.  We also looked for coherence with some of Robert's PEM sensors, we have coherence from the periscope on ISCT1 from about 50-100Hz, as we kind of expected.

Tonight the noise is much worse than it was on saturday, the transmitted power was not stable at all over time.  This might be because we don't have as good of an alignment, or be because the arm cavity motion is larger because of the problems with ETMX ISI.  We also measured the spectrum with higher and lower gains in the COMM board, higher gain did not seem to help, which is different from the situation on saturday alog 10439

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.fritschel@LIGO.ORG - 06:44, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10516)

Did you have the ALS WFS servos running for these measurements?

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:07, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10520)
Note, this same measurement at LLO looks strikingly similar: see LLO aLOG 11265!
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 13:15, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10551)

No WFS, dither alignment, or longitudnal feedback to the test mass was on for any of these measurements. 

daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 13:38, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10554)

When comparing this spectrum to the LLO one has to undo the red cavity pole in the above spectra. It is a little bit more complicated, since we are dividing by the red transmitted power which itself can carry noise. With this correction both spectra are referenced to the input laser frequency and look more or less identical.

When comparing this spectrum to the HIFO-Y spectrum in T1300688, the story at mid frequencies is more or less the same:

  • There is large periscope peak around 70Hz with no evidence that the crossfire beam propagation solution helped at all.
  • Between 100Hz and 1kHz we are limited by acoustic noise from the corner.
  • At frequencies of a 1kHz and above we see the laser noise from the end station. Due to the much lower green finesse, it shows up an order of magnitude stronger.
  • At frequencies below 10Hz we now see a strong angular coupling, again due to the lower green finesse. The wavefront sensors were not engaged during the above measurement, and the excess is about two orders of magnitude over the HIFO-Y baseline.
H1 SUS
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:50, Monday 03 March 2014 - last comment - 11:04, Wednesday 05 March 2014(10475)
ETMY TF

Started ETMY TF at gps 1077929299 on opsws0 for M0 and R0 in undamped and damped config. The measurement will be running for ~15 hours. This is to assess for rubbing after installation in chamber, and before tomorrow's alignment check.

Comments related to this report
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 11:04, Wednesday 05 March 2014 (10534)

The measurement returned 0 for all excitations data. I tried again yesterday night with SR2 as a guinea pig and it did the same thing. I suspected some awgstream issues, so I tried running the awgstream command we use in get_sch_TF_M0_v9DQ_sma.m from the terminal, and it returned some error, cf below. Jim is curently taking a look at it

awgSetChannel : failed awgnewchannel_1(chntype = 1,arg1 = 0,awg_clnt[41][0] =o) H1:SUS-SR2_M1_TEST_L_EXC
Error code from awgSetChannel : -5
Error while opening SIStream: Error setting up an awg slot for the channel

Displaying reports 72761-72780 of 83002.Go to page Start 3635 3636 3637 3638 3639 3640 3641 3642 3643 End