Displaying reports 781-800 of 84555.Go to page Start 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 End
Reports until 09:06, Thursday 07 August 2025
H1 CAL
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:06, Thursday 07 August 2025 - last comment - 09:23, Thursday 07 August 2025(86237)
Calibration Sweep 1530 UTC

Ran our usual calibration measurements this morning following the wiki instructions. We plan to make some bias changes and then run this again. I'll comment to this log with that info.

Simulines start:

PDT: 2025-08-07 08:36:03.467961 PDT
UTC: 2025-08-07 15:36:03.467961 UTC
GPS: 1438616181.467961

Simulines end:

PDT: 2025-08-07 08:59:22.221768 PDT
UTC: 2025-08-07 15:59:22.221768 UTC
GPS: 1438617580.221768

Files:

2025-08-07 15:59:22,060 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_
20250807T153604Z.hdf5
2025-08-07 15:59:22,068 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DA
RM_SS_20250807T153604Z.hdf5
2025-08-07 15:59:22,072 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_
L1_SS_20250807T153604Z.hdf5
2025-08-07 15:59:22,077 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_
L2_SS_20250807T153604Z.hdf5
2025-08-07 15:59:22,081 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_
L3_SS_20250807T153604Z.hdf5
 

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Thursday 07 August 2025 (86238)

After Sheila made some changes, the broad band started at 1605UTC.

Simulines start:

PDT: 2025-08-07 09:10:24.159048 PDT
UTC: 2025-08-07 16:10:24.159048 UTC
GPS: 1438618242.159048

Simulines end:

LOCK LOSS 1615UTC

 

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:49, Thursday 07 August 2025 (86236)
Lock loss 0831UTC (6 hours ago)

1438590708

The lock loss that we had over night was unfortunately an ETMX glitch. We hadn't seen one since changing the ETMX bias July 28th so we were hopeful that it was the fix. Sad.

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:33, Thursday 07 August 2025 (86235)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 08/07 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 144Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 1mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked for almost 4 hours. Had a GRB (E587865) short come through at 1046UTC just a few minutes after we got to observing. Plan for today is commissioning and calibration from 1530-1900UTC.

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:59, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86234)
OPS Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 08/07 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING since Aug 5 22:22 UTC (30 hr 40 min lock!)

Nothing to add other than well done everyone (particularly comissioners) for contributing to such a stable IFO state - this is definitely the O4c record so far.

LOG:

None

H1 SUS (SEI, SUS)
ivey.zhong@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:26, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86233)
Corrected OSEM estimator fits for SR3 Yaw

Ivey,

I finished the yaw-to-yaw transfer functions for the OSEM estimator using the corrected measurements that Oli took for SR3 yesterday [see LHO: 86202].

The fits were added to the Sus SVN and live inside '~/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HLTS/Common/FilterDesign/Estimator/fits_H1SR3_2025-08-05.mat'. They are already calibrated to work on the filter banks for the estimator and can be installed using 'make_SR3_yaw_model.m', which is in the same folder.

Attached below are two images of the fits for the estimator.

The first attachment shows the Suspoint Y to M1 DAMP Y fit. The zpk for this fit is

'zpk([0,0,-0.027+20.489i,-0.064+11.458i,-0.027-20.489i,-0.064-11.458i],[-0.072+6.395i,-0.072-6.395i,-0.096+14.454i,-0.096-14.454i,-0.062+21.267i,-0.062-21.267i],-0.001)'

The first attachment shows the Suspoint Y to M1 DAMP Y fit. The zpk for this fit is

'zpk([-0.002+19.224i,-0.007+8.31i,-0.002-19.224i,-0.007-8.31i],[-0.06+6.398i,-0.06-6.398i,-0.091+14.439i,-0.091-14.439i,-0.074+21.29i,-0.074-21.29i],12.184)'

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:31, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86232)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 08/06 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 147Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY: Very quiet day with H1 observing throughout except for just a few minutes this morning. H1 has now been locked for over 25 hours.
LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
19:33 SAF Laser HAZARD LVEA YES LVEA is Laser HAZARD Ongoing
15:43 CAL Rick PCal Lab Local SPI BS measurements 17:11
15:43 FAC Kim Optics Lab N Technical cleaning 16:14
16:19 CAL Dripta PCal Lab Local SPI BS measurements 17:11
17:52 FAC Randy MY N Looking for materials 18:22
18:34 SPI Jeff Optics Lab N SPI measurements 19:56
19:57 VAC Travis MX N Leak checking 20:30
20:53 CDS Marc MY N Looking for parts 21:31
21:14 VAC Travis, Janos MX N Pump checks 21:20
21:20 ISC Camilla Optics Lab N Sorting totes 22:38
21:44 SPI Jeff Optics Lab Local SPI measurements 23:11
21:54 ISC Jennie Optics Lab Local ISS array work 22:50
22:21 CAL Dripta PCal Lab Local SPI BS measurements 22:38
23:07 ISC Jennie Optics Lab - Checking code 23:14
LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86229)
OPS Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 08/06 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 19mph Gusts, 14mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.07 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.11 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 22:22 UTC (24hr 45 minute lock)!

IFO continues to be very well behaved. Nothing of note.

 

LHO VE (DetChar, VE)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:51, Wednesday 06 August 2025 - last comment - 08:30, Thursday 28 August 2025(86227)
BTRP adapter flange and GV installed at MX

Yesterday, we installed the BTRP (Beam Tube Roughing Pump) adapter flange on the 13.25" gate valve just to the -X side of GV13.  This included installing a 8" GV onto the roughing pump port of the adapter, moving the existing gauge tree onto the new adapter, and installing a 2.75" blank on an unused port.  All of the new CF joints were helium leak tested and no signal was seen above the ~9e-11 torrL/s background of the leak detector. 

The assembly is currently valved out of the BT vacuum volume via the 13.25" GV, and is being pumped down via small turbo and aux cart.  Therefore, the PT-343 gauge reading is only reporting on the BTRP assembly pressure, not the main BT pressure, so it can be ignored until further notice of it being vavled back in.  This system has been pumping via aux cart or leak detector since ~2pm yesterday, and will continue to be pumped until it is in the pressure range of the BT volume.  The aux cart is isolated by foam under the wheels, but some noise may be noticed by DetChar folks, hence the DetChar tag on this report.

Comments related to this report
janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - 16:08, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86230)
A before - after pair of photos.
As the conductance is very bad in this complex volume, we're aiming to pump it until next Tuesday. The estimated pressure rise of the main volume after valving in this small volume next Tuesday is less than E-12 Torr (after equalizing) - in other words, negligible.
Images attached to this comment
anna.iudintseva@LIGO.ORG - 16:20, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86231)
Some backstage snapshots of the great teamwork of Travis, Janos, and me on installing these: Pic. 1 - "before"; 2,3 - 90% complete.
Images attached to this comment
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 09:39, Wednesday 13 August 2025 (86338)

As of Tuesday, August 12, the pumps have been shut off and removed from this system, and the gauge tree valved back in to the main volume.  Noise/vibration and pressure monitoring at MX should be back to nominal.

janos.csizmazia@LIGO.ORG - 08:30, Thursday 28 August 2025 (86607)
LOTO was applied now both to the handlers of the hand angle valve and the hand Gate Valve.
Also, components have been added to the header, only 1 piece away from the booster pump.
Images attached to this comment
H1 AOS (DetChar)
riley.mcneil@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:48, Wednesday 06 August 2025 - last comment - 13:59, Monday 11 August 2025(86226)
DQ Shift July 28-August 3

DQ Shifters: Riley McNeil and Emil Lofquist-Fabris.

See the full report here: https://wiki.ligo.org/DetChar/DataQuality/DQShiftLHO20250728

Comments related to this report
samantha.callos@LIGO.ORG - 13:59, Monday 11 August 2025 (86304)

The spike in the YMAN accelerometer is caused by the daily dewar fill noise at the Y-manifold cryopump. The noise at 20 Hz (and the harmonic at 40 Hz) shown in your Friday Lock/Strain plot is likely from an AC unit housed inside the VPW (see alog 86257).

H1 SUS
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:06, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86224)
Violin mode settings

19:50 UTC

While I was trying to damp the highest modes, the pair around 1008 on ETMX (newish modes that were discovered in 2023 alog68650) which have been above 10^-16 on DARM I noticed that the other pair from ETMY (16 & 17) were not being monitored. I went into SUSPROC and unmonitored FM1, and the gain for the BL and RMSLP banks for EY 16 & 17, I turned on FM1 then ramped up the gains  starting with BL then RMSLP, then I accepted and remonitored them all.

H1 General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:01, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86223)
Ops Day Mid Shift Report

State of H1: Observing at 150Mpc

Quiet morning with H1 staying locked throughout; current lock stretch is almost up to 21 hours. There was one brief drop from observing at 15:34 UTC when the SQZ PMC unlocked, but everything recovered automatically and H1 resumed observing a few minutes later.

H1 SUS (SEI, SUS)
edgard.bonilla@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:01, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86222)
OSEM calibration of H1:SUS-PR3

Oli, Ivey, Edgard.

We used Oli's measurements from [LHO: 86204] to do an OSEM calibration for the PR3 M1 OSEMs. Here are the outputs of the calibration script.
_______________________________________

OSEM calibration of H1:SUS-PR3
Stage: M1
2025-08-05_1700 (UTC).

The suggested (calibrated) M1 OSEMINF gains are
(new T1) = 1.770 * (old T1) = 2.055
(new T2) = 1.547 * (old T2) = 1.544
(new T3) = 1.443 * (old T3) = 1.511
(new LF) = 1.590 * (old LF) = 1.862
(new RT) = 1.774 * (old RT) = 2.063
(new SD) = 1.543 * (old SD) = 1.639

To compensate for the OSEM gain changes, we estimate that the H1:SUS-PR3_M1_DAMP loops must be changed by factors of:
L gain = 0.596 * (old L gain)
T gain = 0.648 * (old T gain)
V gain = 0.617 * (old V gain)
R gain = 0.617 * (old R gain)
P gain = 0.670 * (old P gain)
Y gain = 0.596 * (old Y gain)

The calibration will change the apparent alignment of the suspension as seen by the at the M1 OSEMs
NOTE: The actual alignment of the suspension will NOT change as a result of the calibration process

The changes are computed as (osem2eul) * gain * inv(osem2eul).
Using the alignments from 2025-08-05_1700 (UTC) as a reference, the new apparent alingments are:

DOF        Previous value       New value            Apparent change
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
L          -57.1 um             -33.6 um               +23.5 um
T          -101.3 um            -65.6 um               +35.7 um
V           62.4 um              36.6 um               -25.8 um
R           433.5 urad           225.7 urad          -207.8 urad
P          -631.8 urad          -406.5 urad          +225.2 urad
Y          -166.7 urad          -76.1 urad           +90.5 urad

We have estimated a OSEM calibration of H1 PR3 M1 using HAM2 ST1 drives from 2025-05-21_0000 (UTC).
We fit the response M1_DAMP/HAM2_SUSPOINT between 5 and 15 Hz to get a calibration in [OSEM m]/[GS13 m]

This message was generated automatically by OSEM_calibration_SR3.py on 2025-08-06 01:07:57.985744+00:00 UTC

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%


EXTRA INFORMATION

The H1:SUS-PR3_M1_OSEMINF gains at the time of measurement were:
(old) T1: 1.161
(old) T2: 0.998
(old) T3: 1.047
(old) LF: 1.171
(old) RT: 1.163
(old) SD: 1.062

The matrix to convert from the old Euler dofs to the (calibrated) new Euler dofs is:

+0.596    -0.0    +0.0    -0.0    +0.0    -0.003
+0.0    +0.648    -0.0    +0.0    +0.0    -0.0
-0.0    +0.0    +0.617    -0.004    +0.001    +0.0
+0.0    +0.0    -0.748    +0.617    -0.007    -0.0
+0.0    +0.0    +0.517    -0.036    +0.67    -0.0
-0.407    +0.0    -0.0    +0.0    -0.0    +0.596

The matrix is used as (M) * (old EUL dof) = (new EUL dof)
The dof ordering is ('L', 'T', 'V', 'R', 'P', 'Y')

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:12, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86220)
PSL Cooling Water pH Test - Monthly

FAMIS 26579

pH of PSL chiller water was measured to be between 10.0 and 10.5 according to the color of the test strip.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:10, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86219)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Aug 06 10:06:40 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 6min 37secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:45, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86218)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 08/06 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.13 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked and observing for 16 hours with some slight variations in range overnight as a few earthquakes rolled through. Planning for a quiet day of observing.

LHO General
ibrahim.abouelfettouh@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:59, Tuesday 05 August 2025 (86217)
OPS Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 08/06 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 149Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY:

IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING since 22:22 UTC (6 hr 30 min lock!)

Extremely uneventful shift where we stayed locked the entire time. Range was somewhat low at the start of the lock but picked up and stabilized ~2 hours in.

Temps have effectively stabilized since the drill.

PSL dust was high but this seems to be wind driven and going down. Counts have been higher in last 3 days as well so likely not a cause for concern.


LOG:

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
21:32 SEI Tony, Rick PCal Lab Local SPI characterization 01:32
00:53 vAC Janos MX N Pump Check 01:06
Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:43, Tuesday 05 August 2025 - last comment - 16:27, Wednesday 06 August 2025(86210)
Revisiting the calibrated angle to length coupling of the hard loops

I posted LHO:81917 regarding the calibrated ASC coupling functions. At the time, my results seemed wildly large and I was certain I had made some calibration error somewhere, and indeed I had. Lee reached out last week since he is working on something similar for his optimal controls work, see LLO:77901. These are the calibration errors I made:

The full counts of drive to Nm of torque conversion factor is therefore: (20 / 2**20) * 0.268e-3 * 0.0309 * 70.7e-3 * 4 * 3.5355 * 4 = 6.317e-10 Nm/ct

Lee also pointed out instead of using the modeled free suspension plant, I should be using the radiation pressure modified plant. This is correct, however for the purposes of calibrating the coupling function the effect is mostly the same, since we know that the rad/Nm transfer function is the same at 10 Hz within a few percent for zero power and high power.

However, for completeness, and because it matters for other calibrations, I did this instead:

The end result is much more sensible, resulting in a coupling function around 30 Hz that is about 1 mm/rad for both pitch and yaw. This is still "high" in the sense that Matt and Lisa assumed a coupling on the order of 0.1 mm/rad in T0900511.

I went a step further to check the linearity of the coupling. I measured the transfer function of ASC to DARM during the noise budget injection times. However, the noise budget is usually calculated with an excess power projection, so we have both quiet and injection times taken. Using the same calibration method, I compare the excess power coupling function with the linear transfer function coupling function. They appear to be nearly the same, showing that the ASC coupling is dominated by linear behavior.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 16:27, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86225)

Back in March 2024, Gabriele, Louis, and I did several tests of the DHARD Y coupling while adjusting the ITMY Y2L gain (centering of the beam on ITMY in yaw) and the AS A yaw WFS offset (centering of the beam on the DHARD Y sensor). I used the method above to calibrate the measured couplings so we can better understand the effect of each.

First, I used data where Gabriele and I adjusted the ITMY Y2L gain and measured the DHARD Y coupling. I calculated the linear coupling function at each Y2L gain, so we could observe the effect of the phase of the coupling as the Y2L gain is changed. Using the a2l_lookup matlab function in /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/common/scripts/decoup/BeamPosition, I calibrated the A2L gains into spot position in mm from the center.

While adjusting the beam position reduced the DHARD Y coupling above 25 Hz reduced as the beam moved from about 6.4 mm to 4.4 mm from center, the low frequency steep coupling appears to increase.

The flat coupling was overall higher at this time (at best reaching about 5 mm/rad), possibly because the other test mass A2L gains were not completely optimized.

Next, Gabriele and Louis varied the AS A WFS yaw offset between -0.2 and -0.1 and measured the same coupling. I again calculated the linear coupling function for each step. It appears that both the magnitude and the frequency dependence of the steep coupling varies with the offset. At an offset of -0.2, the coupling is more like 1/f^2, but at an offset of -0.1 it is more like 1/f^4.

We are currently operating with zero WFS yaw offset.

Non-image files attached to this comment
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:46, Tuesday 05 August 2025 - last comment - 10:37, Wednesday 06 August 2025(86191)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 08/05 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan C
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 12mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.09 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for 17 hours, but looks like there were three brief drops from observing between 11:33 and 11:40 UTC (I'm assuming SQZ-related, but will look into it). Magnetic injections are running and in-lock charge measurements will happen right after before maintenance begins at 15:00 UTC.

Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 09:36, Tuesday 05 August 2025 (86196)

Lockloss happened during in-lock charge measurements, specifically during the 12Hz injection to ETMX. The lockloss tool tags IMC for this one, and it certainly looks like the IMC lost lock first, but I can't say for sure why.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 14:18, Tuesday 05 August 2025 (86209)TCS

The three drops from Observing that Ryan points out were actually from the CO2 lasers loosing lock, first CO2Y and then CO2X lost lock twice, all between 11:33 and 11:40UTC ~4:30amPT. Both PZTs and laser temperatures started changing ~5minutes before CO2Y last lock. Unsure what would make this happen, LVEA temperature and chiller flowrates as recorded in LVEA were stable, see attached.

Unsure of the reason for this, especially as they both changed at the same time but are for the most part independent systems (apart from shared RF source). We should watch to see if this happens again.

Images attached to this comment
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 10:37, Wednesday 06 August 2025 (86221)TCS

My initial thought was RF, but the two channels we have to monitor that both looked okay around that time. About 4 minutes before the PZTs start to move away there is maybe a slight change in the behavior of the H1:ISC-RF_C_AMP10M_OUTPUTMON channel (attachment 1), but I found a few other times it has similar output and the laser has been okay, plus 4 minutes seems like too long for a reaction like this. The pzts do show some type of glitching behavior 1-2 minutes before they start to drive away that I haven't found at other times (attachment 2). This glitch timing is identical in both laser's pzts.

I trended almost every CO2 channel that seemed worthwhile, I looked at magnetometers, LVEA microphones, seismometers, mainsmon, and I didn't find anything suspicious. The few people on site weren't in the OSB. Not sure what else to look for at this point. I'm wondering if maybe this is some type of power supply or grounding issue, but I'd expect to see it other places as well then. Perhaps places I just haven't found yet.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 781-800 of 84555.Go to page Start 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 End